As outlandish as it sounds, even around these parts, these pictures were purposely published to convince us that Anthony Fauci is still alive.
The very controversial Real Raw News reported a couple of weeks ago that Fauci was hanged at Gitmo. There's no real way to verify that so I just filed it away.
Then along come these pics supposedly "exposing" Fauci. That's what everyone is thinking about: what a hypocrite he is. And that's the point: you have to be alive to be a hypocrite.
There are numerous flaws in the fakes which you can find yourself once you're open to the idea that they may be fake. I'll just point out a few. In the first, take a look below Lemon's left cheek at that white strip. WTF? It's egregious. Someone just made a huge mistake cutting him out.
In the second, look again at what is supposedly Fauci's hand on Lemon's shoulder. Does he have the hands of The Hulk? Wait--maybe his head shrank and went into his hands. Yeah, that seems right.
In the third, try to determine which side the brighter lighting is coming from. Good luck. Also, why does Fauci somehow seem more out of focus than objects in the background?
Of course, everyone is free to believe as they wish. We all do it anyway.
I've often wondered, philosophically, whether it would it still be right to do the right thing, even if everyone else thought we were the villain? And how many of us could actually bring ourselves to do it?
Calm down, shills, I never said Putin wasn't the villain.
There's also the possibility that the process can be manipulated or induced artificially, serving as the theoretical basis for the fabled "earthquake machine".
And c'mon, does anyone think they haven't already checked? And if it worked, that they haven't already weaponized?
I would add the note that while it took some time to pacify Mariupol, that's because it was the home of the Azov Battalion, and those fanatics used human shields and dug in to the basement of Azovstal. Scott Ritter noted that they also began with strength much higher than commonly realized, up to 20,000 (two divisions!)
The point is, I suspect resistance in cities such as Mykolaiv, Odessa, and others on the way to Transnistria will be quite substantially lower for a variety of reasons, not least of which is the lack of Azov's "espirit de corps".
I agree with Stone's thesis, but would speculate on a different implementation. The key phrase is "no matter how preposterous". That is, we are far beyond any examination of evidence by the target audience. Emotion created by narrative is the sole measure.
The military situation is hopeless, on which I need not elaborate, and far past the time when a "Hail Mary" false flag would be enough to turn the tide. That should should not be interpreted as evidence that they won't, but rather that they can't. I think "They" have no access to a tactical nuke and delivery platform.
But they don't need to go to all that trouble, do they? I would place my money on a scenario like this: a fairly large conventional explosive placed well-within Ukrainian-controlled territory (Lviv?) in a gathering place of foreign mercenaries, near hospital facilities and a civilian concentration if possible. Malcolm Nance can then describe to us all the excruciating symptoms of radiation poisoning he's suffering.
Quite a lengthy analysis of the complex situation here:
Ukraine, Romania, Moldova ... vs. Transnistria: A WW III Scenario
The Lost History Of The Flat Earth (Ep 1 - 7) by Ewaranon
It's almost all mudflood/stolen history/antiquitech content with very little about Flat Earth, so you can fast-foward or tune out of that content based on your level of delusion.
Also, look up anything by Sylvie Ivanova.
The first real oddity from Elon that caught my attention was this:
Elon Musk says he is selling 'all physical possessions' during wild Twitter rant (5/1/2020)
I note the date was Beltane, so was that divestiture announcement some sort of slam against the materialism of the Satanists? And maybe that's when they subbed in the double, huh? I feel comfortable speculating so wildly in a safe space like this forum.
Looks funny, but I get the impression that the building was poorly constructed and kinda just fell away when some part of it was hit by whatever. I can't see an inch of rebar or seismic reinforcement anywhere.
So there's your silver lining, Ukrainians: a bunch of poorly constructed cities are going to be rebuilt from the ground up. It remains to be determined whether it will be courtesy the US taxpayer or the Russian one. That said, I think we can all agree it would have been better had it not come to this.
The first time I noticed this was back maybe as far as the 90's. The mainstream started referring to female actresses simply as "actors". It struck me, "Why would language evolve to be less precise?" I had no idea anyone was engineering it. Well, engineering us.
You can see They still haven't broken cover on this particular point: the ulti-woke Oscars still refers to "Best Actress". What's wrong with "Best Unit Identifying as Female/Non-Binary"? The Academy must still be run by Republicans.
Is this framing more comparable to the false dichotomy of "hot vs cold" or "wet vs dry"? I suspect we may be about to probe some new Orwellian heights (or depths, as you may like).
And I know it's inappropriate to judge someone by their looks, but man, doe she ever look like a maniac.
UN dismisses Russian claim of Ukraine-US biological weapons programme
Moscow had called a meeting of the Security Council to reassert without proof that Washington and Kyiv were seeking to use bats to spread viral pathogens The US says it’s ‘deeply concerned’ that Russia sought the session as part of a ‘false flag effort’ for using chemical weapons of its own in Ukraine
which is the response they got after
All supposed original documents introduced by Russia to UN 3.10.22
Must I continue to make up for your ignorance? I'm starting to think there's a possibility it's willful. But that can't be, can it?
What is it precisely that you demand to happen that Russia has failed to produce to your satisfaction? Cover story in WaPo?
I think it's pretty clear that Russia is less interested in narratives than in creating facts on the ground in Ukraine. Narratives are the stock in trade of the NWO and maybe they're not on board with that anymore.
And I'm not quite certain that Russia let Ukraine "get away with keeping all those Nazi bioweapon labs". You may have missed this discussion: “Confirmed and re-confirmed. - 9 underground US bioweapon labs in Ukraine were DESTROYED by Iskander missiles. - No confirmation on the status of other 4 labs. - Russia asked the Americans diplomatically - for years. - Now talk to Mr. Iskander.”
Or perhaps you would be so kind as to link us to an approved source to verify their continued operation.
Since it was mentioned in the text, quick note to beware of the "fire in a moviehouse" argument.
Years ago (it may have been on the Freakonomics podcast), someone actually researched cases of fires breaking out in theaters. He found that in virtually every instance, there was remarkable order and cooperation. There was something like only one or two injuries ever recorded due to the evacuations themselves.
Yelling "movie" in a crowded firehouse is another issue.
It really makes you wonder why he would say something so unpopular in the mainstream like that. Except that no one wonders, they just like to agree or disagree.