He says it's not sustainable, but I don't agree. In fact, it's their most fundamental modus operandi: they tell more lies and do it longer than all others collectively can promulgate the truth.
If someone wants to know the truth about the world, they can almost certainly get it. We have to understand that the vast majority not only do not want it and actively reject it, they consider you a threat for seeking it.
DAE think we're beyond expecting anything like "journalism" from anyone that calls themselves a "journalist"? The first thing any actual journalist would report on is the state of what passes for "journalism".
Just ask Udo Ulfkotte. Oh wait--you can't! He talked about the pervasiveness of CIA subversion in the mainstream press then died.
The true sickness (be it mental illness or demonic possession or both) is that they are 100% convinced that indeed they are the good guys, irrefutably and unalterably. Everything they are flows from that. You might as well try to tell them that the sky is no longer upwards.
I propose a new class of people we should call "The Order of the Hidden Star". That is, everything said by certain groups of people seems to come with an asterisk at the end which only they are able to see. Satanists and Democrats appear to share this "quality". Coincidence?
Hey, doesn't everyone remember when the Satanic Temple came out strong against masking, vaxx mandates, and lockdowns citing the inviolability of the body? You don't? Come to think of it me neither.
It's almost like they're admitting they have no fixed principles at all, only those chosen for the convenience of a covert political and social agenda. Oh wait--it's exactly like that.
Let's do the math: Jesus despised hypocrites, Jesus rejected Satan, and Satanists demonstrate that they're ultimate hypocrites. Well, maybe it does all add up after all.
I think you may skipped over the essential fact that you have exposed: the vast majority of people do not think like you do. I don't mean that they disagree politically or hold different values, I mean that their entire mentality is not what you have assumed it to be. You're far from alone: look at all the other comments and no one else has noted this.
Certainly events will continue on their "natural" course and we can only stand back and watch as long as we remain in ignorance of this state of affairs.
Frankly, I see it as the greatest secret the Elite possess. Virtually no mention is made of it in scholarly research, but then again, you can see that virtually no one realizes it exists as a phenomenon.
At some point, everyone needs to accept and really internalize that these Leftists have no inherent sense of morality, only that which is installed and updated externally.
I keep looking for a counterexample, maybe something in the form of, "It's terribly politically disadvantageous, but here's something I just could not go along with ethically or morally...."
It's sometimes hard to grasp the level of inversion in the world in which most people live. Here we have "less censorship will damage free speech".
Some say that God spoke the Universe into existence, but look what the MSM can speak into existence. A power not to be underestimated.
This is actually the most correct thing I've read on this subject, although it gets many of the details and some major points incorrect. I came to the same main conclusions as Biglino before I'd ever heard of him (going by his presentations as I haven't read his books).
Since Biglino lives in the land of the Roman Catholic, I think he actually shies away from some of the "spicier" and "controversial" implications. (Well, maybe better to say he's prudent with public disclosure.) And if you're wondering, yes, it all ties back to the Elites and their doings.
Did you think that the word "EL"-ite was mere coincidence?
It's surreal now how they'll play every side of any issue, no matter how contradictory it may seem.
The out on this one is easy: "And historically government has served to protect and defend those rights, by establishing, defining and limiting them." Gotcha!
Good Lord, here's Lula saying this while his opposition is the Brazilian Trump who says things like everyone should buy guns The NWO is out of the frying pan and into the fire in the "Global South".
And it gets printed in Time Magazine? Chaos must be reigning over there! Or should we step back and more properly characterize it as a return to order?
As outlandish as it sounds, even around these parts, these pictures were purposely published to convince us that Anthony Fauci is still alive.
The very controversial Real Raw News reported a couple of weeks ago that Fauci was hanged at Gitmo. There's no real way to verify that so I just filed it away.
Then along come these pics supposedly "exposing" Fauci. That's what everyone is thinking about: what a hypocrite he is. And that's the point: you have to be alive to be a hypocrite.
There are numerous flaws in the fakes which you can find yourself once you're open to the idea that they may be fake. I'll just point out a few. In the first, take a look below Lemon's left cheek at that white strip. WTF? It's egregious. Someone just made a huge mistake cutting him out.
In the second, look again at what is supposedly Fauci's hand on Lemon's shoulder. Does he have the hands of The Hulk? Wait--maybe his head shrank and went into his hands. Yeah, that seems right.
In the third, try to determine which side the brighter lighting is coming from. Good luck. Also, why does Fauci somehow seem more out of focus than objects in the background?
Of course, everyone is free to believe as they wish. We all do it anyway.
I've often wondered, philosophically, whether it would it still be right to do the right thing, even if everyone else thought we were the villain? And how many of us could actually bring ourselves to do it?
Calm down, shills, I never said Putin wasn't the villain.
There's also the possibility that the process can be manipulated or induced artificially, serving as the theoretical basis for the fabled "earthquake machine".
And c'mon, does anyone think they haven't already checked? And if it worked, that they haven't already weaponized?
I would call her a monster, but of course that would be a bigoted name for this "unit identifying as a horrible beast".