It's a twisted, inverted, Satanic joke worthy of Kafka+Orwell.
Suppose I supported and desired all those things "of or befitting free persons". The word "liberal" has already been taken! They stole the F-ing adjective for my philosophy!
Remember back in 2019 when all the Leftys flipped out because Trump Jr. and Eric shot the last lion in Africa? So I guess they'd be interested in this story too but she's not in Africa and prostitutes are not endangered.
Some Leftists loudly deny this while others openly and plainly admit it. What is surreal is that no Leftists demand any reconciliation between the literally contradictory positions. I think this should be considered as an identifying characteristic of Leftists.
Somehow I feel that they will publish few, if any, actual accounts. Leftists tend to have disorganized thinking and will not present very well-stated accounts. (Nor do they demand them, amirite?)
Also, they are very loathe to expose anyone to any kind of information that might make sense. Does anyone remember when one of the social media companies (FB?) kept losing a lot of content moderators because they were reading "conspiracies" all day and thought, "Hang on a sec, I think there might be something to this."
Dammit, I knew it! This MAGA currently poisoning America has seeped into even our most trusted bankers.
Trump Signs New Executive Order On Prescription Drug Prices
Of course, Trump did this before we had Weimar-style inflation, but he and Putin are still clearly to blame. In any case, I denounce Yellen as an insurrectionist.
Has anyone produced a map of the school where this door is? I ask because you can see on Google Street View that this school is of the "outdoor mall" type.
IDK if this type of campus has a technical name, but there are few if any interior hallways (perhaps just in the Administration area). All the classrooms have doors that open to the exterior with only covered walkways between them. I don't believe there is even a single covered walkway you could move along without being seen from outside the school grounds.
That is, there is literally no "school building" (there are a number) and thus there is not any door by which you "enter the school". Everyone seems to talk as if one exists.
They never taught me anything about the Second Amendment in school--which I think we can agree was probably by design--and I hardly ever thought about it. But then again, I never thought about it because it was a time when it was simply unquestioned that you could acquire and possess any number and type of firearm you wanted.
Before you say it, yes I know that even way back when there were many restrictions on types of firearms you could own but no one talked about it because it wasn't a big issue in the public consciousness. And yes, I strongly hold that the NFA, GCA, parts of FOPA and any other such should be repealed an blatantly unconstitutional. And double yes, I think that anyone advocating such restrictions should be warned against and scrutinized for treason.
I wouldn't jinx it by saying that this is the beginning of the end for globalism (and the NWO behind that and Satan behind that), but I think we should recognize this as part of the Order of Battle for both sides coming into the open.
It's pretty obvious she's just making up a statement. The key quote is:
“It was the government’s job to prove it and they succeeded in some ways and not in others,” she continued. “We broke it down and it did not pan out in the government’s favor.”
As stated in the article, their job is only to determine the fact of a lie and it's materiality (was it not simply trivial or an ordinary mistake). There are no underlying elements to each, so no way to "break it down", and therefore no possibility of "some ways and not in others". Can you imagine someone saying, "I bought a can of coke from the machine and it was already open in some ways and not in others."?
Also, facts are facts no matter to whose they play, but she reveals that "favor" was primary in her mind. Again with the coke, "This already opened (in some ways) can of coke is half-empty, so it did not pan out in my favor." What?
I believe that's because Trump is aware that Assange has been dead (or in some deep black site) since October 2016. No sense wasting precious political capital demanding the release of a deceased person. And even less sense announcing it as his reason for declining such request when very few possess the capacity to believe it.
As I recall, my analysis added up to this being cover for a White Hat tactical strike on a facility located on the island. I could look up the details but somehow I doubt anyone is interested in such research at this point. Far less effort to just get outraged at something some politician said.
For those who are into "crazy conspiracy theory" and are monitoring the slow advance of an irresistable force towards an immovable object, you may be interested in this kooky little sitrep:
Look up the work of Dimitri Khalezov and of Heinz Pommer for very full explanations of the nuclear demolitions.
DEWs may be real, IDK, but they were not used on 9/11. Wood is definitely a disinformation agent, and she has explicitly lied about excess heat at the 9/11 site. She exists to steer unwary conspiracy theorists away from nukes.
Yes, exactly. It's a variant on the worst kind of short-hand reasoning we all use every day: "Well, I'm sure somebody would have said something if...." It's got about as much support as Wile E. Coyote in the middle of the canyon.
The article focuses on dirty bombs, but I do not think that is correct. Such bombs are useful only in terrorist acts, not as strategic or tactical weapons. This is not to say the Ukrainian leadership and their Western masters are above terrorism, but that it is not a useful tool against the Russian military.
I would argue that they were in the process of constructing actual nuclear fission weapons at Chernobyl. That is, they did it there not because there were mildly radioactive materials for a dirty bomb laying around, but rather that the elevated background radiation masked the signature of fissile materials. These are remotely detectable, and they most assuredly would have been detected by the Russian GRU just across the border. The Russians found out anyway.
I think the article was off-target again in it's discussion of the nuclear football. I agree that the current Residency does not have control of it, but that system is used for issuing launch orders through the normal military chain of command. Obviously, this would do nothing more than initiate a nuclear WW3, while what they are looking for is advantage against the Russians.
What would be useful in this scenario are tactical nuclear devices. We can deduce that the Neo-Imperialists are either unwilling or unable (and I would guess the latter) to provide the Ukrainian military with finished nuclear weapons. We should note that Israel has such devices but is evidently unwilling to part with any of them at this time.
It seems clear to me that as jammed up as they are in Ukraine right now, they would have already used one in a false flag attack if they had even a single one available.
Does anyone else think the BidenHarris Administration is going to come back with, "Hey, the UK is a sovereign country and this guy should just mind his own damn business. Totally inappropriate to interfere in another country's affairs!"
Ha, no, they'll ignore it. In fact, they've already wished it away in their own minds because that's how reality works for them.
Thank you!