Human sexual behavior is Natural, but some sexual behaviors are not necessarily Normal.
The definition of Natural is:
Being in accordance with or determined by nature. Example: Natural impulses.
Definitions:
Normal is the common pattern of behavior found among the majority.
Abnormal is the common pattern of behavior found among the minority.
The U.S. population is approximately 92.9% heterosexual and 7.1% lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or something other than straight or heterosexual, reference below.
Heterosexuality is normal
Homosexuality, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or something other than straight or heterosexual is abnormal
Before you get your panties in a twist, consider the same sociologically speaking analysis of pet ownership, dogs vs cats.
The U.S. pet ownership is approximately 60% Dogs and 40% Cats
Dog ownership is normal.
Cat ownership is abnormal.
REFERENCE: WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Gallup finds 7.1% of U.S. adults identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or something other than straight or heterosexual. The percentage has steadily increased since Gallup first measured LGBT identification in 2012.
NOTE: There are approximately 70M (60%) dog owners and 45M (40%) cat owners in the U.S.
All: I Hope you enjoyed this ad-hoc lesson in Philosophy 101 (Logic) and Sociology 101 (Human Behavior) as much as I did
The pet analysis extended to the whole population makes it even more enlightening.
U.S. Population is ~332.7M
65.5% own neither dog or cat
21% are dog owners
13.5% are cat owners
Non Dog/Cat ownership is normal.
Dog ownership is abnormal.
Cat ownership is abnormal.
Extended to the global population, it gets even more interesting:
Eating a dog is more normal than only one as a pet
Niggers are abnormal, got it.
what?
Is that a real example of lessons from Philosophy 101 and Sociology 101 courses?
Indeed heterosexuality is normal. However it is important to differentiate between normal and good/best. If someone wants to fuck butts or grow artificial tits as opposed to having children, it's neither here nor there.
The bad and evil comes from the recent push to make everyone believe being lbgtqwtfbbq is normal. While being so is fine, it is objectively abnormal. In a world where being a sexual deviant is even praised by almost every powerful organization, these people do not have the strength of character to own their abnormality, and instead must bend the world around them and groom people into being weird like them in order to feel safe.
Owning your own weirdness is part of being a functioning adult. If you cannot do that, then stop being abnormal. Don't force your shit on innocent kids and people who don't want it.
It is a shame that we have to discuss that in first place.
When the Left wants to deride something most everyone would consider normal, it's too obvious to call it that so they use the word "normative". It's a big tell for what they're up to.
Normal and abnormal do not relate with nature on a 100% correlation, and do not extend beyond averages.
If in 2080 all humans are gay then being gay will be completely normal, but still not natural.
Therefore You draw a faulty correlation.
Also simplyfying the data: If its 60% dogs and 40% cats, but 100% of the cats owners have a similar life condition, then having a cat in that condition is "normal" nest within nests.
Normality is a retarded abstraction useful to only establish trends.
Nature is a reality.
Do not use words easily swayed by mass impulse such as "normal". What if tomorrow is 55% cats 45% dogs? etc.
You missed the point.
Human sexual behavior is Natural, but some sexual behaviors are not necessarily Normal.
Nah, you missed mine.
You made an example made out of statisics to explain "normal"
Which has nothing to do with nature.
Therefore "normal" (a sociologic term) and "nature" (a biologic) have nothing to do with each other except a natural correlation that can be hacked socially.
By your logic if tomorrow 100% people possess only cats and are fully homosexual that will be normality, and therefore natural.
By mine naturalness has nothing to do with what is deemed "normal" in any context except strictly natural and any time.
Our world has humans that engage in all kinds of sexual behavior, some normal some abnormal. The behavior is based on what they want and that is a natural instinct = Natural. Normal vs Abnormal is a measure of how many want one thing versus the other and it stays very consecutive over time.
So it is normal to you 10-20% of youth is lgbt according to your theory?
I agree it is idiotic and they are gaslighted.
The 20% are the abnormal to the 80%
I think we are not in sync.
Remember:
Normal is the common pattern of behavior found among the majority.
Abnormal is the common pattern of behavior found among the minority.
By this projection of lgbt growth, by 2050 they will be majority.
Assume an hypotethic scenario.
Would that reconcile with your idea of relationship between nature and normalcy?
Isn't that relation subjective to context?
In that context lgbt identity is normal, but still not natural.
Because normalcy is dictated by social statistics, nature by... Nature.
There's gayness all over the animal kingdom.
Maybe it's time you stopped obsessing and finally found out what cock tastes like.
The people like you who make posts like this are closet homosexuals 9 times out of 10.
Lol maybe this shit worked in the 90's, schlomo
Everything which can occur is inherently natural.
Stop confusing yourself with words.
Do dogs and cats prefer anal sex?
their dream???:
child: Dadma, where do babies cum from? famother: They come out my ass.