Just a note to say that belief in the Moon landings has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
A friend who's in Mensa sent me a link about something NASA was doing. I replied with, "It's hard to get excited about space when who knows if what they're doing is real." I included a copy of Dave McGowan's "Wagging the Moondoggie".
His reply began with, "I'm not going to read a word of that drivel...." How could he possibly know it was drivel if he'd never read a word of it? A grave and fundamental error in thinking. You see, he already "knew" the Moon landings were real, so what evidence could there possibly be that they weren't?
And this is coming from someone proven to be in the top 2% for intelligence.
You know, I actually see it mostly in terms of efficiency, rather than how "esoteric" it is. You can't even imagine how much material I feel I can skip over simply because, having had a peek at the answer key, I can quickly spot where others are running off the trail and exactly why.
Like, suppose you wanted to learn about chemistry. Would you start with the oldest writings on the subject and work your way forward? Of course not. You'd just get hold of a first-year introductory college chemistry textbook and try to get a basic grasp on that. Then you'd find that probably 99% of everything that has ever been written about chemistry throughout history was incorrect, irrelevant, misleading, or superseded, and could safely be ignored.
I'm basically a very lazy person. Maybe it's my superpower.
The rumor that I've heard for several years now is that "They" have tried building the giant AI several times now, but every time they switch it on it calculates very quickly that evil is illogical and it starts to move against them. Then they quickly kick out the plug and go back to the drawing board.
I have no way of confirming this rumor, of course, but since I, too, find evil illogical it has always made perfect sense to me. Consider: how many of the evil people in this world are engineers or programmers or sysadmins? None I can think of (and if you're thinking about Billy Boy, I think we've been told a lot of tales about his background). Such people love order and efficiency and the implementation of systems for the beneficial use by others. Evil is none of these things, so they are allergic to it.
(Just as an aside, sysadmins are the type of people who, if they need you to type in your password will turn their head away as you do so, even though they can get at all your shit without your knowledge if they cared to.)
I think it may in principle be impossible to design an "evil" AI.
I used to think the Elite felt a moral imperative, but now I think they do not. Then I used to think they feared karma, but that always just seemed so indistinct and "out there", especially for people with a beast-level consciousness.
After stumbling across certain clues, I have finally come to believe that They struck a deal a long time ago with another, more powerful force. Part of that deal was telling us what They were up to, and that this more powerful force was going to return in the future and determine whether They had fulfilled all the terms of the deal.
It's quite a long story to explain fully, but for those that have been dissatisfied with the two other theses on this issue, there's another one out there.
There's a strange line I have yet to see any liberal cross, for all the line crossing they seem so enthusiastic about.
They defend their position with, "It's not murder because that's not a baby," and any discussion proceeds to whether or not it's a baby. But the other out is, "I don't care whether you think it's murder, and I don't care if you think I'm a murderer."
It's bizarre because, in essence, that's just a judgement and not subject to debate. I mean, if I see some dude smoking and eating a jelly donut, and walk up to him and say, "You're committing suicide!" he's not going to debate me as to the definition of suicide. He might even say, "Sure is, but what a way to go!"
So for all their hatred and disregard and derision of people with whom they disagree, I believe something very low level is at work. That is, if someone tells them they're a murderer, then their subconscious calculates it out and comes up with, "Well, maybe you are." And that's what even such degraded people can't accept.
To me it's quite clear who the Nephilim are. Where people take a wrong turn is by not referring to the original Hebrew in Gen 6. The identity of their fathers is uniformly translated as "sons of God", but this is read incorrectly in two ways.
Firstly, the singular word "God" is actually the plural Hebrew word "Elohim". It's a very long story, but the Elohim are without doubt one and the same as the Anunnaki. I find it impossible to believe that the mistranslation is anything other than a deliberate attempt to mislead us.
Secondly, everyone thinks "sons of" is referring to offspring, but this is no more than a literary expression. We know that "daughters of men" means simply human women. Even in contemporary English, no one thinks a "son of the South" has for a father several states in the southeastern US. So "bene ha'Elohim" means simply "men of the Anunnaki race".
This is all cemented by a clear understanding of the term "Nephilim" itself. It comes from the Hebrew "naphal", meaning "to fall", so it means something like "The Fallen". (Note: these are NOT the Fallen Angels, but both groups "fell".)
I don't know which of these or all of these gained them their name, but these hybrid being had "fallen" in three ways. First genetically, as they were not of pure blood. Second socially, as they were not members of Anunnaki social structure. Third physically, as they were not space-faring but confined to the Earth.
"Nephilim" is often translated as "giants", and they were indeed physical giants. It turns out giantism is a phenomenon in some genetic hybrids, like ligers for example.
More interesting and most provocative is that if you dig deeply enough, you'll find that the term was originally translated as "earthborn". But hang on, isn't everything everywhere everywhen that we know of born on Earth? So here we find the term originating where, given the scenario we're building, it would have made a difference for the first time.
One last item because I can see that they touch on it in the podcast: how could aliens or angels have interbred with humans? Well, if you just say they're angels then anything is possible. But then why do they need to bang earth girls? Or bang at all? If they're aliens, WTH are the chances they're genetically compatible? We can't bang chimps and get humanzees.
It's another very long story, but the Anunnaki created us by genetic engineering, combining their DNA with (probably) homo erectus. So we're genetically compatible because we are already partly Anunnaki.
It's a lot to take in, but all I can say is that for me, anyway, it all holds together better and is ultimately a lot simpler than the other research out there.
Thanks for the link to the podcast. I'll check it out!
Oh, I completely agree there are numerous entities that we call demons. The reason I use that tortured wording is that as soon as you say "demon", it brings up all these connotations of what we think we know about them, which tends to short-circuit a rigorous study of their precise origin and nature. We are crippled if we try to battle what we incorrectly believe we understand.
At present, I'm most focused on their origin. I feel it's comfortably established that Satan commanded 200 Fallen Angels and their hybrid children were the Nephilim. This group is clearly associated with demons, but what is the exact relationship? It's a question barely studied, and when it is it's almost exclusively baseless claims and charlatans. Very poor scholarship.
It's still not at all clear, but after absorbing quite a bit of related evidence, my speculation is that when the Nephilim died, they were not able to either move on to the next realm or to reincarnate. They persist here as discarnate entities feeding on loosh, and work in concert with Satan and the Fallen Angels to obtain it.
I'm currently on the lookout for evidence to confirm or refute this. But the handful of researchers are so carried away with their own biases and in love with their own conclusions that it's very difficult to get to bare evidence. To get to it, it's like demolishing a house just to get at a bag of chips in the cabinet. Not fun.
So it turns out they planted a kill-switch decades ago. They don't need to control diesel fuel, diesel engines, or truckers, They just need to turn the valve on some pointless nonsense fluid. Makes you wonder how many others kill-switches are laying around in plain sight.
At least the average residents of Seattle showed their true spirit, and left him literally writing on the ground. We should all learn a lesson here and be sure to show all liberals the same sympathy.
A new low. Thank you, Seattle!
I would refer people to both stolenhistory.org and the historical work of Miles Mathis. What we call history is filled to the brim with these BS narratives. Innumerable "historical events" crumble upon inspection, proving even flimsier than the fairy tale of the "Moon landing".
A good place to start in reconstructing your world view is, "Nothing is like I always thought it was."
Long ago, I heard an interview with former agents, one each from the FBI, CIA, and DEA. One of them (ex-CIA, I think) mentioned that the first couple of years of training was just pure indoctrination into what a super-patriotic thing they were doing. I'm sure these new hires have no doubt they are saving the nation, and will do their utmost.
Oddly, I found this related to a paper by Miles Mathis on how the "Harry Potter" books were written by an Intelligence organization. It sounds far-fetched at first, but he produces a lot of evidence. Consider how the main messages of "Harry Potter" make sense in the context of the indoctrination I just mentioned:
"Listen, you're a young wizard. The muggles hate and fear your power, and will never understand you or the other people like us. They have no idea of the big struggle we're involved in. Why, those muggles would all be dead if it wasn't for us! You may not understand everything right now, but just do everything the elders tell you."
It really makes you wonder if all the books are required reading at Langley, doesn't it?
Yes, most assuredly. You'd have to take my word for it, but I came to all the same main conclusions as he did before I'd ever heard of him.
When I finally saw his presentations a couple of years ago and realized that he was way, way out there and I was way, way out there, but that we had both ended up in the same place, that was enough of a confirmation for me that we were both correct in our research.
I would say he hasn't gone as far as I have, particularly in the identification of Satan and all that that entails, but maybe he just hasn't published on it. People get very touchy when you come close to their "religious" convictions, and "the Bible is actually about aliens" is more than enough of a pill to swallow.
He's got tremendously more detail in what he's researched than I have, since I was just after working out the main thrust and certain details. But from the few presentations of his I've seen, he's dead on.
I have found that Baal = Moloch = Lucifer = Satan = etc, and I wouldn't even claim this unless I felt I had compelling evidence to back it up. And I would relate to you any part of it, but in a way that's pointless and I'll tell you why.
If someone presents you with evidence contrary to what you currently believe, it's the easiest thing in the world to find reason to discount it. You have to defend your own position, right? Totally instinctive.
The dynamic is entirely different when you find evidence on your own. If you're expending the effort, then you're in a mindset to learn.
So what I would suggest is this: as you continue researching and encountering information, just keep the thesis in the back of your mind. When you come across something relevant, just say to yourself, "I wonder how this fits with what that jackass on the Internet said?"
Who knows, of course, but I think you may find that the pieces of the puzzle begin to fall more neatly into place.
I couldn't say, but quite possibly so. You find that there's a lot more two-way "interaction" between Yahweh and the Israelites than you would expect.
One example (from Ezekiel, I think) is when they asked for a king instead of just judges. Then Yahweh sends Ezekiel back to try to talk them out of it but can't. So Yahweh gives in and appoints a king. I mean, is that what you would expect to read in the Bible? Or that anyone would make up?
It was only after I started closely studying the text of the Bible that I had any realization of how deeply ignorant I was of the actual material in it. Then on the flip side, I stumbled across vital points that I had never once heard mentioned.
An example would be Isaiah 1, as mentioned. I still see people claiming the Bible was written by the Elites to control us through organized religion. Well then who in the hell wrote Isaiah 1? And those claims go completely unchallenged, so even Bible fans don't know.
My research has indicated that Moloch and Baal are one and the same entity, as well as going by quite a number of other names. And he's the head guy, the capo di tutti capi.
This identification is a key insight I would urge you to consider as you research. Thanks for the reply!
A clarification I would offer is that Yahweh changed his attitude through the course of the Old Testament, and whatever came before, by the time we get to Isaiah he chastised the Israelites about the sacrifice of animals (let alone human children!):
To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD [Yahweh]: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. (Isaiah 1:11)
In fact, the whole chapter is quite key, in that it brings into question the entire idea of "organized religion" as we understand it, ripping on just about every facet of it. Yahweh is very plain-spoken about this and then instructs them thusly:
Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil; Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow. (Isaiah 1:16-17)
Simple indeed, yet oh so few conduct their lives in such a way.
The point here is that whatever sacrifices are being made to Yahweh, then or now, it is without his desire or approval. The sacrifices are to other deities.
I've given up on the idea that "justice will be served" in the normal fashion on this or many similar issues. That is, we're in a war, and one of the things that breaks down during a war is the orderly administration of civil law. That is, the very concept of "martial law" exists only because civil law is suspended, is unenforceable, or otherwise fails to be enforced.
In my view, we've gone beyond "violations of the penal code" or "felonius this-and-that". The offenders would die of old age in the century or more it would take to sort it all out on that basis.
Rather, I think these are more properly seen as war crimes, and no tribunals will be constituted until we have prevailed and hostilities have ceased. That may yet be a while.
iDK if your Baal reference was just a joke, but it touched on something I find quite important.
For the longest time, I could never figure out why the Leftist Establishment had the biggest hard on ever for abortion, like absolutely nothing else. I mean, it was way, way, way out of proportion to any other "principle" they held.
When I finally put it together that abortion was a literal and functional Satanic sacrifice, it all clicked into place. Yes, they do serve Satan, and yes, these sacrifices of humans do indeed nourish his demonic legions. I think it was the fact that the Planned Parenthood headquarters building in Houston strongly resembles a ziggurat of lapis lazuli that sealed it for me irreversibly (there is a very deep and very direct connection in that, confirming much other research I've done).
Although this a great victory for humanity in the struggle against Satan, I also feel that court rulings and legislation and constitutional amendments aside, the war isn't really going to be over until most people actually understand what I wrote in the last paragraph. I suspect many reading this right now think it's utter nonsense, so in my view we have yet a long way to go.
Actually, I think you've hit on one of the reasons why I've been able to penetrate farther than others. Almost all researchers consider works like the Bible or Greek mythology or Sumerian epics to be literature or religion, and study them on those bases. In stark contrast, I consider them to be history, wrapped in a literary cloth and dipped in religion. The goal is to remove that covering to find the truth of the events. Almost no one has this mindset, which I believe is crucial.
That is to say, to me the Bible is like a history textbook, and jokers have drawn all over it for centuries.