Here's a spicy nugget about the guy. I have not personally validated it, but I trust no one reading this is taken by surprise at the nature of the claim:
As EIR first documented in its 1977 report, "The Buckley Family: Wall Street Fabians in the Conservative Movement," at the founding of National Review in 1954, former deep-cover CIA officer Bill Buckley brought together both the extreme right-wing and converted left-wing backers of McCarthyism, to launch a fascist conservative movement in the United States.
American intelligence sources reported then, for example, that Buckley had launched former Naval Intelligence officer George Lincoln Rockwell in the founding of the American Nazi Party, for gang-countergang warfare with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The gangster-linked ADL profited from Rockwell (until his assassination) by using the ANP to terrorize and blackmail Jews into large contributions.
Well you know, I consider dealing with disinfo agents like picking up gold nuggets in a minefield. It can be very safe and quite profitable as long as you stay alert, and 80% of success is just being aware you're in a minefield.
Here's a perfect example: take a look at these papers by a researcher named Miles Mathis:
Incredibly eye-opening, but here's the thing: Mathis is a disinfo agent (which is too long a story to go into).
On the flip side, here's his paper on JFK (one of his earliest): THE HIDDEN KING(S) (87-page PDF).
He ends up concluding that the assassination was faked. Tons of solid info in it, but that conclusion is wrong. How would I know?
I studied the thesis that Jackie did it and concluded that was correct. Then when I was reading Mathis' paper, I was able to examine it very closely and see where he was subtly steering the reader away from Jackie. I thought he was simply mistaken.
Later when I figured out that Mathis was disinfo, I thought back to the JFK paper and said to myself, "Well, now it makes sense that an extremely astute researcher didn't just happen to make a big mistake."
Here's a spicy nugget about the guy. I have not personally validated it, but I trust no one reading this is taken by surprise at the nature of the claim:
Fascist William Buckley Put Joe Lieberman in the Senate
Damn!! That is interesting, not sure what to think, I've been pro Rockwell for a while but could be possible.
Well you know, I consider dealing with disinfo agents like picking up gold nuggets in a minefield. It can be very safe and quite profitable as long as you stay alert, and 80% of success is just being aware you're in a minefield.
Here's a perfect example: take a look at these papers by a researcher named Miles Mathis:
Martin Luther King (21-page PDF)
The ASSASSINATION of MALCOLM X WAS STAGED (12-page PDF)
Incredibly eye-opening, but here's the thing: Mathis is a disinfo agent (which is too long a story to go into).
On the flip side, here's his paper on JFK (one of his earliest): THE HIDDEN KING(S) (87-page PDF).
He ends up concluding that the assassination was faked. Tons of solid info in it, but that conclusion is wrong. How would I know?
I studied the thesis that Jackie did it and concluded that was correct. Then when I was reading Mathis' paper, I was able to examine it very closely and see where he was subtly steering the reader away from Jackie. I thought he was simply mistaken.
Later when I figured out that Mathis was disinfo, I thought back to the JFK paper and said to myself, "Well, now it makes sense that an extremely astute researcher didn't just happen to make a big mistake."