This is going to be disastrous for the republicans in states that are a close call and people are distracted from the real horror that is the complete collapse of the economy.
I wonder what they will use when people are getting angry about there no longer being any food on the shelves
The most obnoxious statement and you must know how you sound when you say it, right? Have you not LIVED your life? Gotten drunk and done stupid shit? Or gotten angry or emotional and behaved irrationally? You seriously think it's fair to slap the responsibility on the woman like this??? She has to deal with all the consequences and dudes are free to bang away all day without a 2nd thought? Comn man.
I don't believe a dude should be free to be running around banging random women. A real man should be considering to start a family with a woman and bang her exclusively.
Oh, a woman should be banging her man exclusively too.
Are you super invested in embryos? Would you shut down IVFs in your perfect, controlled world? Not trying to personally attack. Trying to understand your POV further.
Not only the next stroke poke, but other stuff too. What happens when they declare climate change a “public health” crisis and tell you you can’t buy meat then hand you your ration of bugs? Or if they say posting on anonymous message boards causes mental illness and you get sent in for reeducation? It seems to me that they can now do anything to you in the name of public health.
But if the abortion issue were decided with public health in mind they would allow it 100% due to the increased rate of violent crime which results from banning it.
“Public Health” is definitely not the reason they decided like they did but that’s what the state is going to use this decision for. I’ll bet dollars to Krispy Kremes on that one! Kavenaugh makes a point of saying specifically in his opinion that “we are not banning abortion”. And that they don’t really have the power to anyway. But they all bring up the 14th and 5th which to me says this is about due process for 14th amendment citizens. And if you use an ssn that means you! In other words, all those so called substantive rights you think you have you really don’t and from now on when we tell you to jump you better say how high massa.
Did anyone actually read the decision or understand the argument at the core?
The argument is that 'medical privacy' does not exclude legal action for illegal medical procedures or intervention.
A non-abortion example: When pill-mills in Florida were writing huge OxyContin prescriptions for people who wanted to sell or abuse opiates, this was a "medical decision" made between patient and doctor. The ruling says that 'medical privacy' does not protect the doctor from legal actions for overprescribing controlled drugs.
The Roe vs. Wade ruling could be used in the same way that it protected abortions, to protect pill-mills.
The Supreme Court ruled that this was not a valid application of the principle of 'medical privacy'.
Nothing about the ruling can force anyone to take a vaccine or accept medical treatments that they do not want. It simply removes a "shield" from doctors who do things that violate state law.
There is a HUGE difference between a law saying you CANNOT do something and a law saying you MUST do something.
I have seen it as well, on one side people make this claim, on the left people try to compare vaccine refusal to abortion in an attempt to claim it is hypocritical to oppose mandatory vaccines and abortion.
I hope my post can enlighten people to what the ruling actually means.
I haven't seen the leaker mentioned at all since before last week. I wonder how that was supposed to unfold since people weren't supposed to know about the ruling. If the decision had just hit cold out of nowhere on an unsuspecting country I feel like the reaction would be closer to the summer of 2020, riots and fires everywhere. A true, proper distraction from whatever slimy move we should be watching.
Precisely. A woman spoke at the Global Governance Summitt and said the current financial system must be destroyed first to usher in the new financial system. Zoltan Polzar posits a multipolar system is coming he deems Breton Wood Iii. The BRICS are moving swiftly in creating a new system. A currencey system based on a basket of commodities. Argentina is now asking to join BRICS. The west will be left behind, a ghost of what it once was. The script has been flipped.
I'm wondering which side Serbia will be on, as all of our other neighbors and even Orbán is cucked to the core. Vojvodina (Vajdaság) has a massive Hungarian minority anyway, a good springboard if SHTF...
I submit a suggested framework for interested persons to use as they observe developments in this situation going forward.
You see, the West could very simply say, "Well, you have your sphere and we have ours, and we'll live more or less separately. It wasn't ideal, but that's just what we already did for many decades during the Cold War. And this time, no threats or violence need take place."
You can see that already forming with BRICS+ and various other multi-polar organizations, already with well over half the world's population, and they seem satisfied with that direction. The Western system is hegemony, of course. Okay then, we'll just see a US hegemon of a smaller Western sphere, right?
I say we will not, and the West will keep pressing for a global hegemony at all costs. Now, could any rational global imperialists possibly believe that this is the best way to dominance over well-armed, alerted, and increasingly more organized and cooperative prospective provinces? No way. So what impels this irrational drive for a universal hegemony?
I suggest that this seeming irrationality is proof that the New World Order is quite literally and physically Satanic, and Satan demands to rule the world, not just parts of it. All powers centers in the West and subverted one elsewhere ultimately serve him.
We see proof of this over and over in the current Ukraine situation. Western leaders act against the interests of their nations and the will of their people, even destroying them. Do they wish to rule over smoking wreckage?
You can make a tortured case about how those leaders would ultimately benefit, but it seems to me far simpler just to conclude that the pyramid is in place as it always was, and the Big Guy at the top is calling the shots.
I have argued for the past 20 years that it is pure insanity that the US never solidified relations with South America... they would rather keep it impoverished and use it as a Banana Republic of a sweat shop continent.
Now, China has already moved in and undercut us with South America just like they did in Africa.
Canada has essentially been sold out to China.
The current regime is clearly selling the US out to China.
I have also long understood that the actual reason that the upper level politico's called Trump "dangerous and stupid and so on" was genuine but not how they publicly portrayed it... the political "elite" had already taken it as a given that China would take power, they gave up without even a fight, and the danger was that Trump's attempts to change the balance would leave the US with worse terms of surrender.
The absolute MOST fucked up thing is that the USA literally has ALL the resources it needs to sustain itself and still export. (Ok, less so for some rare earth metals, but all the essentials of life and civilization).
Excess water, oil, food production capacity, raw materials etc.
This should illustrate the corruption and absurdity of global banking and finance.
If I had to guess I would say Russia is already working out a way to launder new gold into old gold supplies and find a way to sell it anyways.
Or sell it on the black market at a discount to other people who will launder it into their legitimate supplies.
For example… if you happened to run a gold mine in Haiti, a country where it’s easy to bribe cops and elected officials… it would be easy to smuggle gold and mix it into your “legitimate” supply.
A lot of people think this is what the Clintons did in Haiti with Gaddafis gold (her brother—who died mysteriously—owned a goldmine there).
Roe being overturned wasn't planned as a distraction, it just happened to happen that way.
No, it was planned and permitted.
This is going to be disastrous for the republicans in states that are a close call and people are distracted from the real horror that is the complete collapse of the economy.
I wonder what they will use when people are getting angry about there no longer being any food on the shelves
no, this is a lot worse for you guys. RvW was the only thing standing between citizens and state mandated scamarona (((vaccinations)))
Damn.... That's NOT the epiphany I wanted to have but damn if that doesn't fit....
Damn
We'll be able to get out of this one. Just say you believe in my body my choice but why did you have sex if you weren't prepared for the consequences?
The most obnoxious statement and you must know how you sound when you say it, right? Have you not LIVED your life? Gotten drunk and done stupid shit? Or gotten angry or emotional and behaved irrationally? You seriously think it's fair to slap the responsibility on the woman like this??? She has to deal with all the consequences and dudes are free to bang away all day without a 2nd thought? Comn man.
I don't believe a dude should be free to be running around banging random women. A real man should be considering to start a family with a woman and bang her exclusively.
Oh, a woman should be banging her man exclusively too.
Are you super invested in embryos? Would you shut down IVFs in your perfect, controlled world? Not trying to personally attack. Trying to understand your POV further.
Not only the next stroke poke, but other stuff too. What happens when they declare climate change a “public health” crisis and tell you you can’t buy meat then hand you your ration of bugs? Or if they say posting on anonymous message boards causes mental illness and you get sent in for reeducation? It seems to me that they can now do anything to you in the name of public health.
Thaaaaank you.
But if the abortion issue were decided with public health in mind they would allow it 100% due to the increased rate of violent crime which results from banning it.
“Public Health” is definitely not the reason they decided like they did but that’s what the state is going to use this decision for. I’ll bet dollars to Krispy Kremes on that one! Kavenaugh makes a point of saying specifically in his opinion that “we are not banning abortion”. And that they don’t really have the power to anyway. But they all bring up the 14th and 5th which to me says this is about due process for 14th amendment citizens. And if you use an ssn that means you! In other words, all those so called substantive rights you think you have you really don’t and from now on when we tell you to jump you better say how high massa.
It really is not.
Did anyone actually read the decision or understand the argument at the core?
The argument is that 'medical privacy' does not exclude legal action for illegal medical procedures or intervention.
A non-abortion example: When pill-mills in Florida were writing huge OxyContin prescriptions for people who wanted to sell or abuse opiates, this was a "medical decision" made between patient and doctor. The ruling says that 'medical privacy' does not protect the doctor from legal actions for overprescribing controlled drugs.
The Roe vs. Wade ruling could be used in the same way that it protected abortions, to protect pill-mills.
The Supreme Court ruled that this was not a valid application of the principle of 'medical privacy'.
Nothing about the ruling can force anyone to take a vaccine or accept medical treatments that they do not want. It simply removes a "shield" from doctors who do things that violate state law.
There is a HUGE difference between a law saying you CANNOT do something and a law saying you MUST do something.
I'm not American, but this is frequently popping up in different conspiracy realist circles (even on REEEEEEEEEddit).
I have seen it as well, on one side people make this claim, on the left people try to compare vaccine refusal to abortion in an attempt to claim it is hypocritical to oppose mandatory vaccines and abortion.
I hope my post can enlighten people to what the ruling actually means.
I haven't seen the leaker mentioned at all since before last week. I wonder how that was supposed to unfold since people weren't supposed to know about the ruling. If the decision had just hit cold out of nowhere on an unsuspecting country I feel like the reaction would be closer to the summer of 2020, riots and fires everywhere. A true, proper distraction from whatever slimy move we should be watching.
Yeah, I am beginning to entertain the idea that the leak was intentional and sanctioned by the justices for this purpose.
Precisely. A woman spoke at the Global Governance Summitt and said the current financial system must be destroyed first to usher in the new financial system. Zoltan Polzar posits a multipolar system is coming he deems Breton Wood Iii. The BRICS are moving swiftly in creating a new system. A currencey system based on a basket of commodities. Argentina is now asking to join BRICS. The west will be left behind, a ghost of what it once was. The script has been flipped.
I'm wondering which side Serbia will be on, as all of our other neighbors and even Orbán is cucked to the core. Vojvodina (Vajdaság) has a massive Hungarian minority anyway, a good springboard if SHTF...
Gold vs paper. Lets get ready to rumble.
I submit a suggested framework for interested persons to use as they observe developments in this situation going forward.
You see, the West could very simply say, "Well, you have your sphere and we have ours, and we'll live more or less separately. It wasn't ideal, but that's just what we already did for many decades during the Cold War. And this time, no threats or violence need take place."
You can see that already forming with BRICS+ and various other multi-polar organizations, already with well over half the world's population, and they seem satisfied with that direction. The Western system is hegemony, of course. Okay then, we'll just see a US hegemon of a smaller Western sphere, right?
I say we will not, and the West will keep pressing for a global hegemony at all costs. Now, could any rational global imperialists possibly believe that this is the best way to dominance over well-armed, alerted, and increasingly more organized and cooperative prospective provinces? No way. So what impels this irrational drive for a universal hegemony?
I suggest that this seeming irrationality is proof that the New World Order is quite literally and physically Satanic, and Satan demands to rule the world, not just parts of it. All powers centers in the West and subverted one elsewhere ultimately serve him.
We see proof of this over and over in the current Ukraine situation. Western leaders act against the interests of their nations and the will of their people, even destroying them. Do they wish to rule over smoking wreckage?
You can make a tortured case about how those leaders would ultimately benefit, but it seems to me far simpler just to conclude that the pyramid is in place as it always was, and the Big Guy at the top is calling the shots.
I have argued for the past 20 years that it is pure insanity that the US never solidified relations with South America... they would rather keep it impoverished and use it as a Banana Republic of a sweat shop continent.
Now, China has already moved in and undercut us with South America just like they did in Africa.
Canada has essentially been sold out to China.
The current regime is clearly selling the US out to China.
I have also long understood that the actual reason that the upper level politico's called Trump "dangerous and stupid and so on" was genuine but not how they publicly portrayed it... the political "elite" had already taken it as a given that China would take power, they gave up without even a fight, and the danger was that Trump's attempts to change the balance would leave the US with worse terms of surrender.
The absolute MOST fucked up thing is that the USA literally has ALL the resources it needs to sustain itself and still export. (Ok, less so for some rare earth metals, but all the essentials of life and civilization).
Excess water, oil, food production capacity, raw materials etc.
This should illustrate the corruption and absurdity of global banking and finance.
Drums are beating
prepare for a global collapse
If I had to guess I would say Russia is already working out a way to launder new gold into old gold supplies and find a way to sell it anyways.
Or sell it on the black market at a discount to other people who will launder it into their legitimate supplies.
For example… if you happened to run a gold mine in Haiti, a country where it’s easy to bribe cops and elected officials… it would be easy to smuggle gold and mix it into your “legitimate” supply.
A lot of people think this is what the Clintons did in Haiti with Gaddafis gold (her brother—who died mysteriously—owned a goldmine there).
Got any links/articles concerning this?
How much sleep does anyone lose knowing Africa and India are picking sides?
What are you going to do, aggressively starve at me?