What I find enlightening is when you listen closely to people rejecting the "no planes" idea. I'm talking about non-shill conspiracy theorists who already think "911 was an inside job", etc.
You hear all the same type of thinking that normies use, but it's just going on at a different level. There's a lesson there about being "awake". And I always think, "I wonder how much of that flawed reasoning I'm doing right now and have no idea I'm doing it?"
I feel it's actually unproductive when people say that everyone should stop arguing about whether there were planes or not. I mean, how much truth are we going to be able to get at if we can't decide among ourselves whether there were giant planes that hit giant buildings?
Well, the first part of the post sounds reasonable enough, in the sense that I cannot easily demonstrate that it is not true, but there's a big problem in the second part.
The Roswell Incident was a hoax (by the government) and a phony coverup (also by the government) to get some people to believe a saucer actually crashed. IDK if any have, but certainly not there. Therefore, there's no "Roswell UFO technology".
And don't think I'm pouring cold water on the whole 4chan post, because I 100% believe there is indeed a Quiet War going on between the Alliance and Cabal (or whatever they call themselves).
Well, the answer is nothing. But the real answer is SuperFascism.
That is, we live under a system a couple of levels worse than anything the Nazis or blackshirts were working with. With them, it was just the merger of corporate and governmental power. With SuperFascism, all concentrations of power are coordinated to advance the agenda of TPTB.
How do They manage to keep it secret? They neglect to announce it publicly like the Nazis and blackshirts.
I've often noticed that shills get short-circuited by what I say. They have no clue know how to counter, they get frustrated, and end up spewing only anger and non-sequitur. I find it entertaining to force that reaction.
The shills will be along presently, so I thought I'd save them the effort:
"Of course, that's how the Cabal throws you off. This confirms that Trump is controlled op!"
Wait--I can do better. Let me generalize:
"All counter-evidence is more proof that oRaNgE mAn BaD! If you interpret any evidence as refuting that, uR dUm!"
Am I doing it right?
Some insight into Faith Goldy from Farber: The Jewish white supremacist vote (The Canadian Jewish News 1/11/2019):
... three of the 10 neighbourhoods in which Goldy received the most support were in areas of North York with significant Jewish populations.... All of these percentages were well above the average of 3.25 per cent that she received throughout the city as a whole.
During the campaign, Goldy established a close association with, and was supported by, ultra-right, anti-Muslim and extremist figures in the Jewish community, such as Laura Loomer and the Jewish Defence League (JDL).
Her claim to be a strong supporter of Israel may also have earned her some Jewish votes.
“I’m on record in favour of the one state solution. I ♥ Israel — their Wall, DNA tests for FSU Jews & how they pay illegals to leave. Your party supports anti-Semitic BDS policies … The rise of anti-semitism by the radical Left must be called out!”
... Goldy traveled with the Rebel to Israel, where she participated in a YouTube video calling for a modern-day crusade to “reclaim Bethlehem.”
Oy vey!
Here's a plot twist:
Opinion | Germany is closing its last nuclear plants. What a mistake. (1/1/2022)
What's bizarre is that it's from the Editorial Board of The Washington Post.and is from two months before the SMO in Ukraine, and they specifically mention an increased dependence on Russian natural gas.
Who knew you could actually still get information from The Washington Post?
I still have hope for Germany. Russia got royally screwed over for decades--albeit in a different way--but they finally got up off their knees and look at them now. Germany can do the same, but I don't see any Germanic Putin on the horizon and they may flip their wigs if a strong nationalist leader showed up (you know what I mean). But who knows?
I'm hoping, though, that German normies may start seeing stuff like this and thinking, "Hey, something is just not adding up here":
Germany Reopens Coal Plants Because Of Reduced Russian Energy
A few years ago, I would have laughed at this as pure nonsense and just a historical oddity. I even shrugged off Benedict XVI's resignation as notable solely because it has been 600 years since another pope had done it. But now with a good long look at Francis, I believe I'm with a lot of other people in thinking that if he isn't the Anti-Pope, we don't need to wait around for someone worse.
So strangely, even though I think it's beyond bizarre that someone could have predicted this so many centuries ago, the prophecy gives me hope that the current situation will not persist.
Thanks for posting this nuanced take. I think we can see that such analysis is beyond the grasp of many, and that there are others who are primarily interested in promoting division. I believe that is both intentional and also a sad commentary on the state of development of human consciousness.
On the one hand, Germany has been among busily pouring gasoline on the fire, and on the other has been "slow-rolling" their assistance. This has been going on from the beginning and I suspect it indicates that their is a divide in the German ruling class. No one is reporting on or analyzing this.
I would guess that on either side of the divide are small numbers of true believers. One faction includes people like Scholz who are loyal solely to the globalists and know that their future lies with them. Another faction realizes the true situation that the battle is not Russia vs. Ukraine, but the hegemonic vs. multi-polar world, and that Germany is assisting in a future of global human slavery.
In the middle are many normally loyal global servitors, brainwashed and compromised. trading obedience for a high place in the order. Their sentiment is turning, however. We see it in many ways and I believe it will prove decisive for Germany. Members of this faction are now realizing that there is no value in lording it over the smoking ruins of a nation.
Ha, that "smoking" part a joke because Germany is going to run out of things to burn.
Yes, I agree and you've outlined compelling evidence of the difference.
A minor point: for whatever kabuki criticism of Bush they had, they never hated him because they never feared him, and they never feared him because he was never a threat. He is as of now, with never a hint of an apology or even recognition of responsibility, completely absolved in the eyes of the Establishment. Well, in their eyes he never sinned anyway, did he?
I may really be going out on a limb here, but it's possible--just possible--that the Russian leadership knows more about how to execute an international geopolitical and military confrontation than some dude typing into the Internet has been able to figure out for himself.
Interested persons may wish to refer to the more formally defined fallacy of Argument from incredulity.
Here's an extremely thorough analysis of the "Altgens6" photo showing LHO on the front steps of the TSBD as the motorcade passed by:
This is consistent with Oswald watching the "festivities" then going up to the 2nd Floor break room and calmly drinking a coke, where he was encountered by the policeman and office manager about 90 seconds after the shooting.
Of course, this also further cements (as if it was needed) that Oswald was not some innocent bystander. Gunfire rings out and the President is shot, and Oswald spins on his heel because it's time to get back to work? C'mon, man!
Here's a twist it seems no one has brought up: Page always been a dude.
Did you see "his" shirtless photo after "transitioning"? That's a guy's chest. Most soi bois of her age have bigger boobs because of all the estrogen they get from gestation to present. No surgical scars like anything was removed.
And an 8-pack? Yeah, most dudes would kill for that and would have to work incredibly hard. Because women have so much more subcutaneous fat it's almost impossible unless they're extremely disciplined amateur or professional bodybuilders. Closest I've seen on another celebrity is Pink, and it's really not even close.
So yet another double-reverse mind-F courtesy of the culture creators.
Just a hypothetical question: would Elon's public credibility rating go up or down if he said something like, "The Moon landings were fake, but I'm talking about actually going to Mars."
I personally have no idea how I would answer . Maybe I'm just highlighting what a very strange world we live in right now.
There's a missing angle to this survey, which is that I think virtually everyone is still under the impression that journalistic ethics exist which demand unbiased coverage, and that any potential source of bias should be disclosed. And everyone still lives under this strange illusion because no mainstream sources ever say otherwise. I'm sure ethics are still taught at journalism schools as if they still existed.
Just as a thought experiment, think how much would change about the role of media if even very tiny changes were made. Suppose MSNBC opened their coverage with, "Your leading source for progressive news!", or NYT changed it's masthead to, "The newspaper of liberalism". I suggest that much argumentation would be short-circuited and change in character dramatically.