Ah, blocking works! I am spared the Flat Earth Fucking Morons' (FEFMs') moron gibberish.
you are a retard. At least you are getting paid.
weeeell, hmm, ok.
That video is just some messy guy complaining about his youtube channel being blocked, nothing about what you were talking about.
The real deep state which is always connected to Chabad Lubavitch.
is that hand waving, I mean, what makes you say that? Can you paste a couple of links or support or something?
All USA institutions are shit.
It's YCombinator, which is a16z, Andreeson Howitiz (or whatever the fuck they are called) . a start-up nursery , funders, part-owners. They did all kinds of shit, like AirBnB, Uber, I think reddit, lots of the big ones.
what the fuck are you talking about? That is Hacker News front page. Did you mean to link to a particular post?
following [ahem] standard procedure at the time
now that is something true (!) actually coming from NASA. What next?!
Is that is?
A vague illusion in a ghost-written book from 2,000 years ago is NOT a reason to adopt some socially-convenient mental illness of "worshiping" some man dying nailed to some wood.
yeah, it's just information . the drones themselves have no physical existence, it's only information.
well, you've listed most possibilities so it is probably what you say only because you listed virtually every possibility.
"he knows the Earth is round because he went around it."
Intelligent
doubt of "he knows the Earth is round because he went around it."
retarded.
Flat earth is:
- stupidity, by morons, for morons.
- corrupt,
- the jism of the Synagogue of Satan.
What was the point of your comment exactly?
To express mild surprise at your/the world's lack of understanding about (what is to me quotidian) programming and computer .. stuff. "tHeY'Re jUSt aN aLGoRitHM".
You have no reason to believe this, and it is true:
- This GPT "AI" product/revolution will inform the next 400 years. Think Jethro Tull and the steel-tipped plough , and add it the thousands of additonal magical components now (2024) available.
- It won't be centralized, as todays run-on-your-own-GPU are as powerful as the corporate GPTs/LLMs from 12 months earlier.....
- ... but complete tracking, interpretation ... all understanding is now available to whoever has the information input.
- Even if they, the GPTs LLMs did not advance any more, all improvement stopped, they are still everything. They are writing poetry better liked (by non-experts) than proper poets, they write code better than I will ever be able to, are almost free (fractions of a single cent), they bet the best human Go player by only practicing against themself(es) .... millions of times
You will be happy to know that as soon as I get to it, to the task, I will:
- RSS / webpage scraping / API ...
- ... to read voat, conspiracies.win. poal rt.com unz.com
- use an LLM to extract the information from the articles (I get little, if anything, from the comments)
- and just read the summaries
in a few years, there will be millions. (well, RSS readers are already a bit like this)
So it's either an algo or a free will agent,
No. Not even close to being close. Ha! Jesus fucking christ
I guess I just take it for granted that "people" have a clue about what is going on with programming and GPTs. You do not.
You are just lying. No major.
You're looking at photos with no timestamps
No, moron, you are just lying. The eyebrow photo is an arrest photo (later); the security images are pre-(probably faked)-shooting photos (earlier). Are you the ONLY person in the western world who doesn't know this.
You're looking at the first photos that are very low resolution
No, moron, you are just lying. Bad bot. (First is "first in time") The absence of a mono-brow is clear. Only a completely dishonest piece of shit would lie otherwise - you.
You're looking at the first photos from a different angle barely showing the face
No, moron. You are just lying. The lack of a mono-brow is clear.
Are you a badly programmed GPT that should be replaced. Your "here are some retarded attempts" have a very gpt-feel to them.
The unibrow ain't even that thick
No, moron. The difference is clear. You are just lying. That is your job I suppose.
You're looking at a photos that have no chain of custody that's verifiable.
No, lying. One is from the McDonald's security footage; the other is an arrest photo (of a different person pretending to be the earlier, other person)
Like photos are never altered
You - moron - no are trying out "the photos were altered". Definiately a poor GPT. No human would try anything so retarded.
if this is a trial of a GPT then it has failed. Only a fag-traitor FBI fag could be fooled by what you have written.
you are a moron, or a poorly programmed GPT that should be terminated. Outside of a computer, there is this thing the humans call "time":
-
FIRST person A did NOT have a uni-brow
-
LATER person B DID have a uni-brow
the humans are talking about the ADDITION of a uni-brow, not about the removal "pluck"-ing of a uni-brow.
It still determined and uses an algorithm to do so.
If you still think that computer programs are 'algorithms' , then you know virtually nothing about programming over the last 30 or more years. Start with event driven code and go from there.
no respectable person should believe anything written in politico, and no person in their right mind will believe anything written in politico.
if there is a more reliable source then, maybe, it can be evaluated on its merits - this story. if it's only in politico then it is fake.
two things:
- that guy is as gay as a summer picnic.
- a covid epidemic faked in 2020-2019 was used to cover up a bird flu, probably faked, epidemic in 2022-2023.
what complete bullshit. Even by today's standards of top shelf bullshit, that is really, really extreme bullshit.
one of the funny things about this is that OP actually thought that someone would believe this bullshit.
OP is another fucking moron
You've noticed nothing.
No
I have four sons and have used wifi since its inception. I also sleep near my phone and keep it in my back pocket when walking.
Yes (if your are to be believed)
All of this is a fear-mongering device to keep people dumber and controlled,
No
All of this is ... same as things like flat-earth and Sumerian Aliens.
Idiocy. At least you took your boosters because the tele-screen told you to.
I am using my penis.
Buy an EMF detector (like I did) and test your various devices, including bluetooth airbuds (nada).
I never - well, maybe once for a few minutes each month, but practically - never ever put my "laptop" on my lap. I dont' think anyone else should either (on their lap(s), I mean).
With my laptops, there is only a few nT away from the devices, but the whole devices are +V elevated when charging, and I get that elevated static voltage increase when I touch them (that is not radiated via EM, that's touch).
My fridge, fucking hell.
But yeah, long term exposure. The official limits (something insane like 200nT for 8 hours or st) should be ignored, like nearly every government announcement.
The only positive is that intensity falls off as the third power close (1m ) to the router and (separate mechanism) the second power any reasonable distance away from the transmitter.
- Keep your wifi router physically away - a couple of metres, or more.... I reckon.
- a wooden wall absorbs 50-75% of the signal. This (other than the fridge in my case) will be the strongest source around, so having a wall between you and the router is a good for minimisation.
Your wifi network card is sensitive, will handle a weak signal (until it does not). That would be a good minimum-intensity point , just where your signal is about to start dropping/re-sending packets due to weak signal.
The world waits for:
- Iran
- Hezbollah
- Russia
- Hamas
to save the west from the Israel's and their americans, once again.
Am a big fan of your posts, and this is amazing.
According to Wikipedia, 120 "Parker"s for every 100,000 people. So a probability of 0.0012 for each "Parker". Even giving one free-bee, still leaves say four (4) Parkers invading the space like space invaders:
unlikely by only chance. I think we all - most of us - can agree that 2 in a trillion could be called "unlikely".
Even if there are 30 opportunities for "random" surnames here ...
Of course, your whole point is that this is not by chance. I get that.