Oh. I agree.
Doesn't change the jews are the gatekeepers for power, and you will have to tear its meatshield before you can reveal it.
Therefore as long the meatshield hold, it will be impossible to move further.
I once got this feeling, checked at a roundabout and ended up having an incident (small) because the car in front of me suddenly stopped because someone jumped on the walking stripes and those were just at the exit of a roundabout.
Noticing there was no real way for me to be safe there, i elected to stop using cars as much as i can lol. Cancer. Atleast in cities.
It's not 'synchronicity' in the sense you mean it imo.
Our animal senses are way more advanced than we would think and are always activated. They perceive much better than our conscious can and redirect it as needed.
Your animal senses for instance may have picked up some reflection, a slight change in windspeed typical of an object moving your direction.
Even without a physical tell i think we do have 'astral' receptors for dangers too if we are internally clean. But in most cases i think physical sense fully explain this sort of thing.
Our conscious perception is maybe a 10% of our subconscious if even.
This is a very important kind of show even if not anything deep.
It show you can talk, you can bark at them, and you will be going home to sleep again. Many people fear the consequences too much. One day it will be this or total forfeit anyway.
psy op in what way?
Sure, but they are subject to the same problem there as they will be in most EU countries anyway.
I guess they may be anticipating serious EU rebellions and want a proprietary base close to european soil so if nato falls and states recover the USA bases they still have a say in europe.
This and i think they actually learned to put their precious biolabs somewhere safe.
Greenland would be an amazing place for black budget projects.
Well, 'reportedly' leaves plausible deniability.
Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz is under consideration to serve as President Trump’s Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, people with familiar with matter told The Post.
(good english lol).
From the article, note also who is opposing him in the totally valid mainstream echochamber:
Nice, thanks
I would like to think that with my free will of choice I can choose to not act on chemically driven instincts alone, and can rise above the temptations of revenge, anger or fear.
Sure, you are still into and conditioned by the bundle so far if you write this.
You know if you try to go without breathing by will you are just going to run into incredible pain and death, or you can't raise your body temp consciously (or to a limited degree).
Why would I hunt and kill an animal when I have food a plenty?
Because that's the food you are naturally optimized to eat and thrive on while all the rest is mostly fillers with toxic payloads (for humans). Man is apex regulator of animal life and made for it. Your biology is, by reflex, not designed to reward you for doing much else in terms of nutrition.
Does the predator empathize with the pain of their prey? Does the prey empathize with the hunger of the predator?
Game of life and nature's call. Different morals. Nature wouldn't make carnivores if herbivores didn't need to become regulated.
To deter a bear from attacking all one needs is a spritz of bear spray, not a retaliation against the bear's cubs.
Different in nature, different if you are a natural bear hunter.
Comparing human behavior to animals is pointless. We were given the capacity of free will of choice, and the ability to invent with our superior brains. Thus we have the ability to empathize and feel what another being, either animal or human is feeling. (atleast many of us do)
Evolution theories aside (alien intervention etc) man evolved into a humanoid from monkey exactly becoming a skilled hunter. evolving brain to hunt also means evolving stomach.
A man is the only predator that tends to animal needs and safety and grants a painless death as it can be and i think that is fair enough for now and there are worse problem to think about than that overall and the good people are going to need the health and strength from said consumption.
Thanks!
Modernity is based on imitation of reality, and substitution of real with fake value. This is really the core concept.
Once rich people used to dress linen or silk, they are better for the skin -> real advantage. Now? Rich people buy overpriced branded cotton -> fake value.
Once generals used to eat meat and fruit, and slaves had potatoes and rice generating health problems (like scurvy on ships), real incentive to move up. Now? The poor eats better than the rich if he knows how. The rich is entangled often in a progressive ideology that won't let him eat naturally.
Once the rich used to invest their wealth into long lasting properties, like almost eternal furniture they could pass down 20 generations. Now they invest into fast-changing digital values that may crash and burn anyday, or in high tech that will be trash in some years.
That's a really bad translation and infact unheard of.
Mangioni translates to really nothing, 'mangiare' is to eat. Mansion translates to 'Mansione' in italian.
Seems like a GTranslate blooper, unless there is some ancient etimology stuff going on.
EDIT: if i check with google without translate,
'mangioni etimology', i get correctly
'Mangione is an Italian surname meaning someone who eats a lot, from the Italian verb mangiare. The name is common in Italy, primarily in Apulia and Sicily.'
You totally miss the point.
An animal that doesn't retaliate is soon dead.
Other animals will see it as a lack of strength and disrespect him until it shows strength or dies.
You may be the highest soul ever, but here among animal thinking you are just going to be taken as weak and profitted on.
Vengeance solve the need to show others you can't be taken advantage of, which is how in nature we create a deterrent to be attacked over and over.
There is a reason it is in our instinct.
If you care about forgiveness, you can forgive those who retaliated on you then. No problem.
We'll talk when you are done with that. Otherwise, just forgive. That's your ultimate solution right?
There are levels we are different, and levels it doesn't matter.
I wouldn't retaliate on a head to head basis if i was leading a country hit not by a head to head basis.
We are part of groups, individually we can choose our way, but then there are incentives to group us together with others in other people judgement that are rooted in nature.
'collectively'
I wasn't really referring to myself with that. No worries...
While i tend to agree on the matter,
those paid grifters are paid because they influence opinions, and you will sometimes meet their victims online looking to understand better, and your attitude won't be too useful for that.
The title is sort of clickbait. There's really little interview in there and is more of a doc.
But the comments were too funny not to post it.
Also, if whitewashed, some interesting details.
How so? I miss the connection.
He did tons of bs.
That's a reason, the other is he does a lot of bs and if he didn't do it for real then everyone is going to suspect he did thanks to him being a psycho dickhead.
And i think he might aswell have done it after what he did in the past.
Well i guess you have no hope then xd
Not in reality, but anything goes by appearance if it helps bring in that reality.
They love fake shows where they completely denature the meaning of something before using it as cover.
So i understand you may not like people blaming jews first and foremost, but you should understand this is a necessary process to get to the bottom of it.
People blaming jews help the fight for comprehension for many. While i understand it is not the end all be all, it is a necessary step in meta culture. Which is why i condone and support it.