Who is at the top? Corbett Report Video
(podcasts.apple.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Is the "sign in" required to watch this? Seems really fishy...
There is no sign in required to listen to an Apple podcast at the link but you can find the same video on YouTube or Birchute or the guy’s website.
Well, this is what I'm getting by clicking the link - https://www.pasteboard.co/y4kS7HmgUYPo.png
Oh, thank you! Found it - https://corbettreport.com/whos-at-the-top/
I am 3 min in now, and he doesn't seem to be very clear, which doesn't look good...
OP, who do you think is at the top?
My theory is that the Bible is correct, since it is written in Revelations that there will come a mark of the beast, and no one will be able to buy or sell, unless they have the mark. For me, that's the most interesting revelation from any prophecy book, which is coming true, while in the time it was written, nobody could understand it... For example, the neuralink, or the covid vaccines containing graphene, or the digital currency, or the swedish rice chips, etc. All points to a unified currency and a mark required to use it. So, if the Bible is correct, at the top is the devil.
I would like to hear your thoughts, if you want to have a discussion on the topic. If not, that's ok too. Again, thank you for the comment, I am watching the video right now!
EDIT: Just watched it. Corbett is 100% a gatekeeper, that's why he is avoiding an honest answer, and he is defensive about being a gate keeper. Notice also that at the end he's trying to deflect with "that's not the important question (who is at the top), but what do we do about it"... Also, his whole point is "if we find out who is at the top and remove them, a million more will try to climb the ladder and we have achieved nothing", well, that's not how any judicial system is seeing this thing. So, basically a lot of incorrect points from this Corbett, which either points to him being extremely ignorant (more than a teen), or a gate keeper, and we know he is not ignorant.
Thanks for letting me view the full video. I naively thought I would learn something, but I only learnt that this Corbett is only sharing misinformation. I think another comment here exposed him also as a gate keeper. I definitely, after reviewing the video, can conclude that this Corbett is 100% a shill.
Corbett is controlled opposition as are Broze and Robinson, although I don't know if that's exactly what you would call it.
All of them have egos too needy and too in control to slow down and consider whether they are off-target. All "They" need do is support and encourage them as they run farther off the track. Assuredly, none of them have the wit nor desire to figure out they're being manipulated.
Corbett has clearly asserted many times previously that no one is at the top. Frankly, he says it as his signal that he has exceeded nearly all conspiracy theorist peasantry. This is the capstone bullshit of his entire career.
If I was at the top, I would absolutely and unequivocally desire that everyone believes there is no one at the top, and to feel themselves superior for holding such a belief. What a laugh that would be.
At this point literally anyone could be controlled op. I do listen to Corbett from time to time, but do not take anything he (or anyone else, for that matter) says without some critical evaluation. I like that his takes often go into some surprising and unexpected directions. Also, he does not fall into stupid left/right paradigm and he's one of the few who says elections are a farce and a theater (which they are). Seriously, there are too many alternatives who still have their heads up in political ass so deep that they simply can't see anything outside their tiny constructed political bubble. Trump this, Trump that. Biden this, Biden that. Democrats, Republicans... It's all bullshit for the masses. We have to realize that. Until then nothing will change.
I consider Corbett being something like a bridge between normie world and conspiracy sphere. Let's be honest, you can't show average normie, for example, Alex Jones (who's definitely controlled op) and expect said normie to actually seriously listen and evaluate that. You can, however, do that with Corbett.
The way I came to think of Corbett was as a conspiracy "stenographer", I know that's not the correct word but I like it anyway.
Really, it's more akin to a high school student assigned to write an essay on, say, "Rockefeller medicine" or "the CFR". He gathers up a few conspiracy articles, construct an outline, and summarizes and rewrites what is already in those articles.
You'll never get anything novel out of such a process, no shocking revelations, no insight. It's literally all been said before. That's why it is--by definition--not a threat and never will be.
I mean, this is important material if you have no knowledge of the subject whatsoever. The problem--the fault which "They" are exploiting--is that Corbett presents himself as a careful scholar and the reader believes this is the ultimate extent of the research. It is, of course, merely a beginning, and perhaps corrupted and misleading in and of itself.
After listening to all his published audio since inception (a decade?), this realization came to me only after I heard his take on the Ukraine war in 2022. It sounded like he had ripped it right from the headlines of the NYT and WaPo. FFS, how could anyone freely agree with either of them without having some extreme reservations that they had taken a wrong turn somewhere along the line?
I suppose from my own experience that I came to the feel I should have some grace for anyone who doesn't see it this way. But you gotta call 'em as you see 'em.
Well, kinda, but that's exactly why he can be considered a sort of "normie friendly" conspiracy theorist. Again, no normie will never ever listen to what the likes of Alex Jones has to say, but some normies might listen to what Corbett says. (As an aside note: I suspect that this is exactly why the character of Alex Jones exist. To invalidate any talking point in normie minds that TPTB deem unwelcome to be discussed. It goes like this: Normie listens to a snippet of AJ talking and normie will never again take that point seriously, even if it's true.)
I agree with first statement, but not quite with the second one. Yes, Corbett does not make shocking revelations, but do we actually need them? The whole point he reiterates repeatedly is that all the information you need is already available openly. It's not about shocking revelations of lizard people, aliens, or elite eating babies... It's about connecting the dots and understanding how the system works. How it takes and how it maintains power. Also, about how to resist it.
As for insights... Well, not in every video, but he does actually provide insights and new ways to think about things from time to time.
I can somewhat agree with this one. Yes, he has certain boundaries outside which he won't go. Then again, it's up to each one individually to find information form various sources and glue it all together. There is not one truthsayer out there who will give you everything on a plate.
Hmm, I got completely opposite impression. While he doesn't venture to some further out there theories (like the ones saying war doesn't exist or that it's fake etc), his analysis on basic facts is usually spot on. From the very start he has stated that this war is a building block for the NWO, that Multipolar World Order is the same NWO just in a different package and that basically the whole endeavour is totally engineered and planned. Also, that this is basically a war of governments on their own populations much more than a war against some outside enemy... Well, I don't know, but seems to me this is very different from what NYT and WaPo are saying...
All in all, it might sound like I'm totally defending him and agree with him on everything... That's not quite true either. The value of Corbett is his "down to earth" takes and interesting viewpoints to consider. Even if he is a controlled op, the likes of already mentioned AJ and all the other politically partisan pundits are much, much more harmful than Corbett will ever be.
As I have discovered it from personal research, the true (or at least far truer) state of affairs is quite shocking, so much so that few would have the capacity to even entertain the concepts.
The fatal problem is that it exists in a different paradigm than that discussed by Corbett or Jones or any other conspiracy researcher, whether authentic or disinfo. They will all just keep everyone running from pillar to post around the "mainstream conspiracy" paradigm while those "at the top" continue their work undiscovered and unstudied, and thus unmolested and unimpeded.
The reason I say the paradigm is different is because there is no accumulation or refinement of the sum of mainstream conspiracy research that will get you anywhere near the truth. They can even metaphorically stand right next it--in plain sight--yet never notice the crucial importance of it.
Virtually all of the evidence I draw on comes right from the normie mainstream. I just collect it up and arrange it artfully. I've often wondered why none of these other researchers--who seem to have dedicated their lives to it for far longer than me--have never noticed the same things I have.
I have come to no conclusion on that point. Certainly they could be paid and directed to notice and discuss other things, that's a simple enough explanation. But all of them? I'm left to speculate that it is not a matter of perception or analysis, but rather what level of truth one is willing to contemplate and accept.
See any of my numerous Salem Witch posts. Far more than what has already been documented is on the way. Find any connection to the work Corbett or Jones or any of the others has done. The work of Miles Mathis is connected, but I never miss an opportunity to highlight and specify how full of disinformation it really is.
Is the work all of them do harmful? I would let everyone judge for themselves but as I see it, one could spend a lifetime ingesting all their work product and die just as ignorant of the true state of affairs as at the beginning. Frankly, I believe that to be the point.
Well, of course if you get all your information from a single source and do not explore anything else outside it, you won't get anywhere far. I think multiple sources and critical thinking is the key here. Also, not believe in anything outright. You don't have to have an opinion or some definite belief about everything. There's a lot of stuff about which I simply do not have any strong opinion whatsoever.
Hmm, but you have to have at least some entrypoint... You can't simply dump a lot of info on a normie and expect them to believe it. Even if it's true and correct. You see, it's a dead end. The more out there the actual truth is the harder is to get someone to even contemplate it.
I'll check them out. Do you have some definite post to recommend or maybe something like tldr intro?
Mathis is a strange one. He has opened my eyes on some things, but he's also sometimes very obviously full of shit. He calls literally anyone a disinfo agent, but he also might be one himself. Hmm.
I've not yet written a TL/DR for the Salem Witch thesis. The posts on them have evolved into basically a series of research notes just to get a bit of data organized and out there as I complete it.
I'm shooting for it, but the day will probably never come when I get around to collecting it all back up and organizing the material more formally. I've already written up probably 350 pages and that is--at a guess--just 5% of the evidence I've gathered and need to formally document.
The basic thesis, however, is simple: a small number of generational Satanist families have been manipulating history and dominating society for centuries. The evidence I have available begins with Europeans landing in North America. It involves primarily US history but tendrils lead farther afield.
How could one possibly demonstrate such a thing? Surprisingly, through genealogy. They "keep it in the family" so the same families pop up over and over and over. It turns out that a lot of those families--though there are some others that have turned up--participated in the artificially-manufactured and fake Salem Witch Trials. That provides a reliable touchstone.
One of my favorite posts which demonstrates the basic strategy of proof is:
Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)
One could consider that One Big Coincidence, but I've written up (I never count) maybe 60 other such Big Coincidences in numerous area of history and to the present day.
Roswell is just one nugget of gold among many that are lying around in the field, but I always liked it because so so so many disinfo agents and dupes run around basing their theses on it being real in some sense or another.
Because the analysis directly contradicts this and holds that both the "crash" and the "coverup" at Roswell were totally manufactured, you can instantly dispense with all that other material. You can even begin trying to figure out who was a dupe and who is deliberately lying.
And if you go back over that other Roswell material, there is zero way whatsoever you could get to the Salem Witches from it. That's why I consider it a new paradigm, and why "They" have been able to hide so successfully for so long.
Read that post. Yeah, that's some nice research. Somewhat similar to what Mathis does.
Well, yes, of course it's entirely possible that few spook families have been controlling the world for a while now. What I'm mostly interested is "how" and "why". How do they manipulate public perception and what exactly is the mechanism of power behind the scenes. Also, why do they do that, to which most simple answer is power and control... Of course, there may be other answers as well.
One other theory I'm currently interested in is the one about recurrent resets. In short: Our history might not even exist and our civilization could be deliberately reset at regular intervals of about 200-300 years. If it's true, then we are currently on the verge of next reset. Most likely reason is that TPTB can't hold control forever. Sooner or later masses do eventually wake up to how heavily they are being fucked by the system, so in order to keep their power and control, rulers orchestrate a reset after which everything starts anew. New lies, new control schemes and all the rest shitshow... However, their biggest mistake is assuming that this can keep going on forever. It can't. There will come a time when they no longer will be able to hold their power no matter what. Reset or no reset...
There are variations of that, of course. The intervals might be longer, our history might be only a partial lie and said resets might be of a softer kind. For example, WW1 and WW2 were most likely orchestrated deliberately. Maybe those can be considered sort of resets as well...
Do all the vegan activists eat children in the secret of the night, ofcourse not, sure. They believe.
Yet how do they end up taking up the mission of those who hate them?
You make them watch hundred of cartoons where the carnivore is the bad stupid guy who ends badly, while the herbivore (bipbip, bugsbunny, etc) is smart cute and winner. After creating this emotional pattern within them, you then release research results that validate that emotion and those people, while believing themselves very smart and good, will be your cultural minions until the end, without even seeing what happened.
That's pretty much it in all fields, i just took one i know well as example.
I've come to understand this as key. It holds true for virtually everyone, from CNN anchors to the Rothschilds to Redditors typing out walls of text. They absolutely believe they are on a crusade for "good". All who disagree with them must be wrong and bad, of course.
Nor will they ever question it because it is an assumption with which they begin. Damn few have the level of consciousness to ever wonder whether they've been the dummy and the dupe and wrong all along.
For those who wish to control and manipulate society, they need not crush opposition under a bootheel. They just get them pointed in a slightly wrong direction then tell them what a great job they're doing. Their ego then makes those people run away from the truth under their own power.
Very good take, honestly. If this corbet was right, he'd been off'd like Bill Cooper. Not once has he talked about Christianity, like Bill. Yet, he continues to make videos of semi-serious topics, while this time he wants me to sign up for his video... Most peculiar...
The link is literally to podcasts.apple.com lmao. If you have not been kicked off of providers like Apple, you are not saying anything too controversial. Thus far, the only semi-normie company that seems to be somewhat permissive is Rumble. Other than that, you need to go to the darker corners of the net for anything interesting.
The fact that he is even asking this question explains why he is still on Apple. The answer is "jews." Anyone still unironically asking this question in late 2026, let alone not even answering it and appealing to "nonhuman entities" and "multi headed hydra" can just be assumed to be controlled oppo attempting to mislead.
Chuckles in Chinese
Then who do you think is at the top?
They all three have one thing right, that is if you replace one group another will take its place. “He who says organization says oligarchy.”
That said my problem with Corbett is from hinterlands of the safe ethnostate of Japan he goes on and advocates for retarded libertarian anarchism, policies that would 100% destroy the features he enjoys the most of in Japan. Policies that will never be implemented in Japan he wants put into place in the rest of the West.
It turns out be Satan, but there are a few advisories I would have to add as quickly as humanly possible:
(1) There is no one who realizes who actually Satan is, or was based on. Every conception is incomplete and distorted.
(2) Satan himself exists in a larger org chart, and understanding that context is a crucial part of the explanation for what's going on right now. So not technically "at the top".
(3) No one needs to have any knowledge of Satan or his plans to be in service to them. All that is necessary is for arrangements to be made so they have the proper incentives to advance the state of affairs. Those servants and any observers may fully and freely believe they are "at the top". That actually aids in the obfuscation.
This is why all the power centers anyone may point to come and go and are replaceable. Off goes one puppet and on goes another but the hand remains. How effective is that when jackasses are running around asserting there is no such thing as a puppeteer?
If you were wondering and so as not to be mysterious, Satan was one of the Anunnaki. That's a helluva long story, as you may imagine.
Satan as prince of this world is my best answer too.
It seems your opinion, i may be wrong, that satan is a title of Enki? Because Enki is usually the crossway between the religious 'satan' and a more historical one.
Or another case?
Not Enki, but his son Marduk.
The best and most explicit place to start is Isaiah 14:12. Everyone starts with this "son of the morning star" stuff in English and jumps off from there. You have to go to the original Hebrew and properly decode "helel ben shahar".
Long story short, you have to research who Shahar was in the Ugaritic pantheon. Then you can compare his immediate family to that of Enki and you come up with Marduk. If that verse isn't referring to Marduk, then it is all one hell of a coincidence.
Once you have "Marduk = Satan" as the thesis, a ton more evidence can finally be properly interpreted and will fall right into place. All of that evidence has to be unspun and descrustified because dumbass has had their shot at bending the evidence towards their desired conclusions over the last few centuries.
For example, Marduk was the tutelary deity of Babylon. Now you can clearly understand why Babylon was talked about so much in the Bible as being a not very good place at all.
Couple points i'd be curious about your thesis:
Why would you identify it as marduk, even within the context of looking for shahar's equivalent in the pantheon - i see he has a twin brother of dusk, a theme you could more easily match up with enki/enlil as marduk didnt have any relevant twin brother or so i read. There seems to be some minor lost versions though.
I would then assume the most probable case is for its rebellion against the rest of pantheon.
But again there is the thing where shahar is the son of el, which again would to point to anu and then enki/enlil as most probable.
While i may not find that as compelling a way to read it, may be missing something also, there is one detail i found that if not for the marduk argument does this shahar sounds quite prototypical in modern day satanic imagery:
https://oldworldgods.com/canaanite/shahar-god/
'A unique aspect of Shahar’s identity is their association with El, the main Canaanite god, as both his son and daughter. To understand Shahar’s gender identity, we must look beyond the conventional gender binaries.
This fluidity expands our understanding of ancient gender constructs and challenges traditional notions of masculinity and femininity in mythology.'
I wonder if this is some modern day interpretional forced bs or there is something to it, considering we know antihuman parasite cults are pretty old
You may want to examine the "origin story" of Shahar more carefully, as it provides a fairly specific fingerprint. It goes something like this:
"The king of the gods encounters two women and one thing leads to another. Half-brothers are born, the elder named for the dawn, Shahar, and the younger for the dusk, Shalim."
Isaiah 14:12 then says Lucifier is "ben Shahar", who would be the son of the elder half-brother. This alone is quite odd, although no one comments on it: why does the Old Testament author who surely had knowledge of the pantheon of Ugarit assert that Lucifer has a father, a grandfather, an uncle who is only a half-sibling of his father, and that his father was the elder?
Well, that's because he were talking about a real entity who, like all the rest of us, is at the center of a unique genealogical fingerprint. In this case, we can match up that fingerprint.
In the Sumerian pantheon, Anu was the king of the gods. He had two sons by two different women. The elder was Enki and the younger was Enlil. Enki had two sons, Marduk and Ningishzidda.
Isaiah does not specify which son but upon further investigation it is clearly Marduk who is being referred to. For example, even within the Bible itself, a verse states that "Baal and Nabu" have bent the knee. Nabu is the son of Marduk.
Thus also, Marduk was Baal. "Baal" is a general title but in almost all cases historically refers to Marduk, given his enormous role in human affairs.
To extend a tiny bit further, we can determine that that Enki was the "god" of the Old Testament. His city--the city of his people--was Jerusalem. The name derives from "uru shalem", which can be translated as "the city of Shalim".
It is the conflict between Enki/Shalim and Marduk/Satan which has determined much of human history, a conflict which continues to the present day.
Mmmh, ok, i understand now, so you took the 'son of the morning' as genealogical. Not unprobable at all.
But in this case, who was yahweh? and who the snake in garden if not enki?
My understanding is that the genesis is much prior to rest of the jewish chronicles and yahweh is a small regional lietunant. But id be curious if you differ there.
On the enki thing i always assumed the bible was written from the point of the elohim leaders or their followers, therefore enlil PoV or sort of. So would make sense Enki's attempt to educate mankind would be unwelcome in the text.
Lastly, if you can muster it, i'd be curious about that enki/marduk antagonism you see.
Do you mean it as the actual beings still being around or factions having sprouted through the conflict?
Was it about Enki still in the end being a elohim leader who wanted to retain control for his own and marduk falling out of touch with the leadership? What was the point of the rebellion? And by chance, do you have any lead about Tiamat?
It's the first time that i hear your version and it's quite different in some points from what i'm used to so forgive if i'm that curious :D Ofcourse i understand it to be all speculation, it's just a super interesting topic to do so about.
Who's At the Top? - Questions For Corbett The Corbett Report - Videos
It's the most common question confronting any would-be researcher of conspiracy reality: Who's at the top of the pyramid? Join James for today's edition of Questions For Corbett where he talks to Charlie Robinson and Derrick Broze about how they answer that question, and James answers the question himself.
Listen on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-corbett-report-videos/id424412530?i=1000791018731
a) Only one who likes to get butt-hurt...
b) Pyra (fire) mid (middle) implies in-between aka as above/so below, which is why those trying to reach the top represent the bottom feeder of any pyramid scheme.
Aka each gentile falling for jewish theism (the); pluralism (most) and communism (common).
Spoiler alert…call them controlled opposition if you want but these guys (Corbett is OG too) say it is either nonhuman entities or it is a multi headed hydra (my term).
Only within the hu(e) of man can an entity come into being, and only within an entity can non aka nothing aka nihilism and denial be shaped.
Hydra/hydor (water)...there can be only one water; dividing internally into waters above/waters below (inception/death) for the head (life) of each ascending diver.
The idea of "multi headed hydra" is based on the futile attempt of solid (life) to cut the head of fluid (inception towards death)...it always grows back, because fluid represents the animator of solid growth.
The trick...oneself represents the head within the hydra, and attempting to cut it off represents being headless aka ignorant.
Bonus: notice that the archetype of the "headless horseman" represents ones ignorance within horse/hros/kers (to run) aka nature runs (fluid), which allows each native within (solid) to lose ones head when submerging.