Who is at the top? Corbett Report Video
(podcasts.apple.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Corbett is controlled opposition as are Broze and Robinson, although I don't know if that's exactly what you would call it.
All of them have egos too needy and too in control to slow down and consider whether they are off-target. All "They" need do is support and encourage them as they run farther off the track. Assuredly, none of them have the wit nor desire to figure out they're being manipulated.
Corbett has clearly asserted many times previously that no one is at the top. Frankly, he says it as his signal that he has exceeded nearly all conspiracy theorist peasantry. This is the capstone bullshit of his entire career.
If I was at the top, I would absolutely and unequivocally desire that everyone believes there is no one at the top, and to feel themselves superior for holding such a belief. What a laugh that would be.
Then who do you think is at the top?
They all three have one thing right, that is if you replace one group another will take its place. “He who says organization says oligarchy.”
That said my problem with Corbett is from hinterlands of the safe ethnostate of Japan he goes on and advocates for retarded libertarian anarchism, policies that would 100% destroy the features he enjoys the most of in Japan. Policies that will never be implemented in Japan he wants put into place in the rest of the West.
It turns out be Satan, but there are a few advisories I would have to add as quickly as humanly possible:
(1) There is no one who realizes who actually Satan is, or was based on. Every conception is incomplete and distorted.
(2) Satan himself exists in a larger org chart, and understanding that context is a crucial part of the explanation for what's going on right now. So not technically "at the top".
(3) No one needs to have any knowledge of Satan or his plans to be in service to them. All that is necessary is for arrangements to be made so they have the proper incentives to advance the state of affairs. Those servants and any observers may fully and freely believe they are "at the top". That actually aids in the obfuscation.
This is why all the power centers anyone may point to come and go and are replaceable. Off goes one puppet and on goes another but the hand remains. How effective is that when jackasses are running around asserting there is no such thing as a puppeteer?
If you were wondering and so as not to be mysterious, Satan was one of the Anunnaki. That's a helluva long story, as you may imagine.
It seems your opinion, i may be wrong, that satan is a title of Enki? Because Enki is usually the crossway between the religious 'satan' and a more historical one.
Or another case?
Not Enki, but his son Marduk.
The best and most explicit place to start is Isaiah 14:12. Everyone starts with this "son of the morning star" stuff in English and jumps off from there. You have to go to the original Hebrew and properly decode "helel ben shahar".
Long story short, you have to research who Shahar was in the Ugaritic pantheon. Then you can compare his immediate family to that of Enki and you come up with Marduk. If that verse isn't referring to Marduk, then it is all one hell of a coincidence.
Once you have "Marduk = Satan" as the thesis, a ton more evidence can finally be properly interpreted and will fall right into place. All of that evidence has to be unspun and descrustified because dumbass has had their shot at bending the evidence towards their desired conclusions over the last few centuries.
For example, Marduk was the tutelary deity of Babylon. Now you can clearly understand why Babylon was talked about so much in the Bible as being a not very good place at all.