Jesus is the reason for the season.
Jesus is the reason for the season.
The Chinese know how to monkey copy, and building a DNA database isn't all that difficult.
https://mindmatters.ai/2021/07/china-is-building-the-worlds-largest-global-dna-database/
Indeed. For most people hooked on opioids, their first dealer was a doctor.
Probably not for cloning, but building a DNA database for "crime solving" and generalized population control. In China, it's for a database for organ harvesting.
Movie made in Hollywood has Jews involved. In other news, water is wet and dog bites man.
They have to prop the market up until at least February, so they can blame it on him.
What's interesting is all the "revisions" by various government agencies showing the economic data for the past two year have been full of lies. Zerohedge has some good articles on this.
Wouldn't we know via radiation readings if it was a tactical nuke?
First Epistle of Peter - [1:13–25] These verses are concerned with the call of God’s people to holiness and to mutual love by reason of their redemption through the blood of Christ (1 Pt 1:18–21).
"17 Now if you invoke as Father him who judges impartially according to each one’s works, conduct yourselves with reverence during the time of your sojourning, 18 realizing that you were ransomed from your futile conduct, handed on by your ancestors, not with perishable things like silver or gold 19 but with the precious blood of Christ as of a spotless unblemished lamb. 20 He was known before the foundation of the world but revealed in the final time for you, 21 who through him believe in God who raised him from the dead and gave him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God.
As for Paul, it's all over the place again and again. Now I get that Paul wasn't an apostle, but Peter, who was the leader of the apostles makes it clear that Christ's blood, shed on the cross, was our ransom. Sure, you can quibble about the exact meaning of these verses, but Christ's death up on the cross is the starting point. Your behavior, and his grace, after that is what matters.
Sorry to cast doubt here, but the Book of Enoch was lost from antiquity until the mid 1800s, when a translation was found in Ethiopia. Did they even have a copy at the council that decided what books to include in the canon of the Bible?
I'd prefer to get a cheap grill and put it in the garage after I use it, and through the long winters. They last damn near ten years or more.
Your point is well made, but I'd rather give people the freedom to choose the Chevy or the Cadillac, with the caveat that we don't allow dumping of cheap offshored crap.
First Epistle of Peter - [1:13–25] These verses are concerned with the call of God’s people to holiness and to mutual love by reason of their redemption through the blood of Christ (1 Pt 1:18–21).
"17 Now if you invoke as Father him who judges impartially according to each one’s works, conduct yourselves with reverence during the time of your sojourning, 18 realizing that you were ransomed from your futile conduct, handed on by your ancestors, not with perishable things like silver or gold 19 but with the precious blood of Christ as of a spotless unblemished lamb. 20 He was known before the foundation of the world but revealed in the final time for you, 21 who through him believe in God who raised him from the dead and gave him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God.
As for Paul, it's all over the place again and again. Now I get that Paul wasn't an apostle, but Peter, who was the leader of the apostles makes it clear that Christ's blood, shed on the cross, was our ransom. Sure, you can quibble about the exact meaning of these verses, but Christ's death up on the cross is the starting point. Your behavior, and his grace, after that is what matters.
Was Paul, or even Peter, part of this death cult? Because even these fellows, one of the 12 apostles even, makes it clear that the sacrifice on the cross had redemptive value.
Make no mistake, the sacrifice on the cross is only the starting point of seeking salvation, but it is THE starting point.
Where we agree: Ads directed towards children in America are only somewhat banned, for certain products. It should be across the board, Russia has it right on this.
Where we disagree: quality and reliability are things you must be willing to pay for. I want a backyard grill, for instance, but I don't cook out much. I could get a quality one that will cost a lot, or since I grill 2-3 times a year, it's my money, and I chose to purchase an inferior grill.
The real issue here is either planned obsolescence (which deserves prison imo), or the flooding of cheap products by countries with low labor prices in order to ruin a market (I'm talking to you China shills) in which case tarriffs are the answer and fuck the peasants in the hinterlands of China (electronics), or Vietnam (clothing) or Pakistan (cotton products) etc. etc.
If this cycle as you describe were inevitable, then there would be no quality items in production anywhere, which is not the case.
What OP seeks could be far easier done by laws removing the installment plan, or capping usurious credit card interest at 10%, which will result in lower credit limits. Maybe making bankruptcy easier.
That means that the average person isn't going to buy shit they can't afford because they get suckered into it.
Sounds Marxist. There is nothing immoral or wrong about a fair profit on a product.
Advertising that doesn't lie should be allowed. What if I develop a new product that I want to tell the world about? My new product does X and makes Y easier. I should have the right to earn a fair profit by letting people know about it, as long as the ad does not lie that it solves erectile dysfunction, or male pattern baldness, when it doesn't. This will be far, far easier to parse than the intent of showing a car I made with good brakes zooming through a winding road as somehow subliminal messaging.
All advertising to children should be prohibited though. Their minds are still forming.
There is a lot of data out there on bad batches, sent to certain locations filled with undesirable populations (from the NWO perspective). I'm not quite convinced on it though.
A trial allows him to grandstand even further than a guilty plea, especially if he takes the stand himself.
And you'll keep waiting, I've made my point, and you have yours.
Nothing new under the sun. Same as it always was.
People replaced reality with false expectations all through the 1920s in the "New Era" of endless prosperity and increasing wealth. Then it call came cashing down.
Possible, Elizabeth Smart was spotted at a fast food joint. Cops swooped in and saved the day.
More likely they were tracking him somehow. What's weird is that he didn't ditch the "ghost" gun and 3d printed suppressor (what a combo) and happened to have his manifesto on him.
Insert "always has been" meme.
No matter how many times this particular silliness is proved wrong, it rises again like a comic book zombie.
Did you know that the original Christmas festival was a holiday celebrated together with Christ’s baptism on January 6? No Sol Invictus (Roman pagan feast of the Invincible Sun) there, I’m afraid, so that can’t be the origin of Christmas. (Armenian Christians still celebrate this single feast on January 6, though because the calendar some of them use is out of sync with the one many of us use, it will fall on our January 19.)
And even when Christmas did get moved to December 25 (getting separated out from the baptism feast), it was not about Sol Invictus, which actually post-dates (you read that right!) the association of Christ’s birth with December 25, being introduced by the emperor Aurelian only in AD 274. Meanwhile, St. Hippolytus said in his commentary on Daniel (written ca. AD 202-211) that Jesus’ birthdate is December 25. (Maybe the pagans stole it from the Christians!)
Rather, December 25 was arrived at because it was exactly nine months after March 25, when the Annunciation was being celebrated, which is the feast of Christ’s conception in the womb of the Virgin Mary.
Christmas on December 25 isn’t a claim that Jesus was born on that day or even an attempt to claim a pagan holiday and make it Christian. It’s about a feast that was set to be nine months before.
https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/asd/2018/12/05/no-christmas-is-not-pagan-just-stop/