The question dodger dodges the question with another question, and ironically accuses me of dodging. Rather, don't dodge a topic. I set the terms here.
By the way, that question, my brother in Christ (which you are) is a leading question. It's akin to asking me "when did I stop beating my wife?" The purpose, a clear as saran wrap, is to try to invalidate the whole by invalidating a part.
You're going to say X or Y is evil (based on what standards, why your own of course) then conclude the rest of Catholicism is evil.
Don't try to deny it. It's a classic prod technique. You guys are all think alike. So, try again. Maybe purgatory? Or the perpetual virginity of Mary?
He's in the way of aid to Israel, which is needed by them now more than ever.
Well, bravo for having the guts to go on record. Maybe something like this did happen. I'm still on the fence.
There was a movement some years ago called "ban the box" that succeeded in some states to ban the "check here if you've ever been convicted of a felony" box on job applications.
The result was the people just didn't hire blacks as often (and the change was huge), because, considering probability statistics, blacks are more likely to be criminals.
Jews have worked very hard on their propaganda to create an allyship with Christianity due to some common roots. Modernist theology has helped.
Typical prod. You define yourself by opposing what you think other people believe, rather than what you believe yourself. The key to understanding prod rebellion is that they never go after the Orthodox, or Chaldeans, or Coptics which have theology very, very close to Catholics.
They go after Catholics due to their rebellion against authority. Satan won a great victory with Luther.
Ha, of course, you want to wander all over the marketplace and criticize goods at random.
Choose a specific topic. You called me out for not debating you, I'm calling you out for not choosing a topic.
Hmm, maybe.
I'm leaning more towards the Orthodox ideas towards the Bishop of Rome, believe it or not. Papal supremacy, at least how the magisterium defines it today, doesn't go fully back to the time of Peter, more the time of Great Schism. Like most prods, you don't know what the Catholic church actually believes, but only what you think it believes.
For 500 years weak ass prod theology has been ripped to shreds by minds greater than my own. What makes you think a meaningless exchange here will change anything? Still, chose a topic. A SINGLE topic. Like most prods you're going want to walk about the place grabbing shit you don't like at random. I dare you to restrict yourself to one single theological topic of disagreement.
How about a classic, maybe "once saved always saved" or infant baptism?
Baaa says the sheep.
You are a sheep.
Am I debating a bot? I think I am debating a bot.
Thanks for proving my point, that you live in a society, that is hierarchical because we have government and private sector services, organized, to proved food and water in exchange for money.
And yes, I often hunt my own food.
TallestSkil, is that you?
The irony here, oh the irony. It's amusing to say the least. That whit, you not understanding what's right under your nose, that reality is hierarchical, not to mention the natural philosophy I water down to 7th grade level snippets for you, and you claiming that your speaking profundities that I can't understand.
No man is an island. You live in a society. Societies are hierarchical, because they have power over the individual.
Hierarchy flows from power. Power doesn't care about legitimacy.
And if you want a side debate about legitimate vs illegitimate governments, that's a whole other issue.
Do you breathe and eat? Yes. Then you live in nature.
I never said anything about Joe Rogan or any of the other stawman shit you're writing.
Illegitimate authority killed the Tsar and then started locking people up in the gulags...but that is just proof that reality is hierarchical.
You are so far away from your original point here, you're going to need a GPS to work your way back.
Now you're moving the goalposts. You're saying "legitimately" in charge.
Unfortunately for you, don't have the authority to decide that, and they are still in charge.
I understand the delusion, because frankly, I don't like many of them myself and they are quite horrible leaders on the whole.
House of Cards as predictive programming?
Damn.
That's where you're wrong, and I mean really, really, wrong. Painfully wrong.
There's always someone in charge. If for some reason there is breakdown of the established order, a new one supplants it in short order. Man is a political animal, it's in our nature to organize. If you had no society, in about 10 minutes 6 people will organize to be the strong to take from the weak, who didn't organize with anybody else.
And not just human nature, by that I mean not just animals, but "nature" or reality itself is hierarchical. Planets orbiting the sun and electrons orbiting the nucleus.
Define "nature" chump.
Wrong spot. Still works.
If you can't be serious, I am wondering why you seem to expect serious replies?
Hmmm, perhaps that masturbation fantasy joke was taken a little to personally.
If they are, it's a pysop by the right to divide the Democrat party before the election.
I personally think their organic, in that the multicultralism golem got out of Jew control.