1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have zero connection with McAfee, and guilible rubes keep spreading that without verifying any information.

Also why would John immediately start writing like a Q impersonator? So they can neatly tie in your desire for something to be true?

When this phony account failed to deliver the other day, I had hoped people would see the light.

Whatever.

No connection to John, zero connection to Mrs. McAfee, just a larp that fooled y’all feeble minded plan trusters for your lack of investigation.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

McAfee either changed everything about how he communicates, somehow lost the ability to tie anything directly back to pre-suicide John, and behaves completely differently. Or he might be dead and assassinated with a poor attempt at a cover up. I don’t know we’ll see.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Idk which type it was I got it many years ago. It fell out and I coughed it up when I took a shot to the dome at work and chipped two teeth.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m stop and call bullshit, what are you gonna get an encrypted file tonight? Go download Wikileaks insurance file while you’re at it too. There’s been a surge of people and people likely also feds creating stuff in memorial and as honeypots after John’s death.

I’d love to be proven wrong but it very much appears he was assassinated and had a shitty fake suicide note.

If you’ve got more evidence then something like, idk proof of life. He made videos on the run in a faraday room for years for Christ’s sake. Or him using a pgp signature owned by McAfee, or his wife verifying, let me know. Enlighten me.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I talked to my dentist recently. I’ve only had two cavities my whole life. We were discussing options for my current one. I said, “Doc, I am not in pain, and I do not want a mercury filling.”

She laughed and said, “you know there’s only an extremely tiny amount of mercury, right?”

I told her what happened to my other filling.

It fucking came out and I almost swallowed the whole fucking thing at once.

She’s now understanding of my concern, for the wrong reasons maybe, but hey progress.

5
MO-Carpenter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep. They banned me from the great awakening for merely being skeptical of this shit.

It’s absurd, the “i want to believe” is really intoxicating apparently.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Staying home was also fairly common during that time.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

hahaha now you’re saying it’s not real pedophilia when Micheal Jackson sleeps with prepubescent children. You should stop talking already. I keep giving you rope and you just keep hanging yourself with it.

You’re absolutely a pedophile now confirmed. I was suspicious but you’ve really come out of your shell there. I’m glad we finally reached this point where your full opinion on the matter has been exposed.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s a bunch of retarded Gnostic fanfiction. They spent a lot of time and effort exploring different ways to subvert Christianity.

Hell even in the Talmud (which came after Christ) they say Jesus was a pedophile incel who made a religion because he was so lonely.

There’s a million different quack versions they’ve used in an attempt to sway people,

But we have accounts from Roman politicians, and historians, seems to have to enough historical evidence he was real and caused quite a big stir. These accounts are important because they had every reason to trash on Jesus because they were actively trying to wipe them out at the time.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Mathematics is the language in which God has written the universe.”

Stop being so autistic and read the WORD instead of focusing on weird schizophrenic numerology.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

On September 13, 1959, during Elvis Presley's Army career, he met Priscilla at a party at his home in Bad Nauheim, Germany.[10] At the time, she was only 14 years old and he was 24. Wikipedia

If you think that’s okay you’re a pedophile, or a pedophile sympathizer.

You’ve spent so much time and effort burying your head in the sand. Normalizing Micheal sleeping with small children, normalizing 14 year olds dating 24 year old men. (In an interview once Priscilla let slip that they met when she was 13 but even if we give the benefit of the doubt and say 14, it’s still disgusting.

If those men’s behavior seems acceptable to you, then you’re enabling pedophilia. Age of consent laws exist because children who are unable to make sound judgements for themselves need protection. If the parents fail those children and give permission, that doesn’t make it morally right to fuck children. Legal=/=okay.

You’ve said enough in defense of child fuckers to last a lifetime.

4
MO-Carpenter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ingersol Lockhart is not affiliated with John McAfee. I got banned from GreatAwakening for even questioning its validity.

Why would he make this dumbass website they can restrict take down or otherwise erase when he could have broadcasted his message in a million ways with the blockchain that would prevent its complete erasure?

Why would he not tell his wife?

If it seems too good to be true, it is.

Keep some healthy skepticism out here people. The psyop boys want you hooked on hopium.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually looked up your marriage claim and it turns out that Priscilla Presley was born on May 24, 1945 and She got married on May 1, 1967 which would make her 13 days away from her 22nd birthday.

On September 13, 1959, during Elvis Presley's Army career, he met Priscilla at a party at his home in Bad Nauheim, Germany.[10] At the time, she was only 14 years old and he was 24. Wikipedia

I got the parental consent thing wrong, she was under the age of consent and therefore he was able to bang this underage girl because he had the parents blessing.

It’s pretty easy to make it about you when you’re totally cool with grown men having inappropriate relations with children. I rarely meet people so determined to defend pedophiles. I question your morals because you seem to be cool with behavior that you wouldn’t tolerate for yourself or your children. You wouldn’t tolerate it because you know it’s wrong to spend hundreds of nights with children in your bed. You wouldn’t tolerate a 24 year old being in a relationship with a 14 year old girl. You justify actions these men publicly admit to. I’m not even going down the rape path. I’m just presenting you with the evidence they admit to.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is a 40 year old man spending hundreds of nights sleeping in the same bed as minors that he has no relation to a witch hunt.

How is Elvis a witch hunt? Elvis began his relationship with his wife when she was 14. Her parents had to give him special permission to marry her, because she wasn’t old enough to consent.

Would you let a 24 year old take your 14 year old out on dates?

Would you let your small child spend the night in Micheals bed?

It’s not a witch hunt when they admit to the behavior in their own words. Just because someone didn’t get prosecuted doesn’t mean they didn’t commit a crime. And sometimes morally abhorrent things are legally allowed.

That doesn’t mean it’s just, that doesn’t mean it’s good. When a 40+ year old man spends the night in the same bed as small children that’s fucking weird. Its not the type of behavior we should accept in a society that seeks to NOT NORMALIZE inappropriate sexual contact between children and adults.

Hell would you let your wife spend the night in bed with another man? Why not? Is there something sexual about spending the night together in the same bed?

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I doubt it. Having a kid sleep in your bed. Not bedroom, bed. 100, 200, 300+ nights? If it walks like a pedo, sleeps with kids like a pedo, it might be a pedo. You can continue to justify adult men sleeping in the same bed with children for hundreds of nights, still won’t make it right.

You wouldn’t allow your children to sleep in his bed, yet you continue to rabidly excuse it. It shows a lot about you.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so it is important to your argument to invoke the image of a teenage slumber party. No sex then, am I right?

Let’s be clear they were younger than teenagers.

I’m not quoting anyone on slumber party but myself: the rest I’m quoting is Michaels own words himself. He allowed children, not teens, to sleep in his bed. He said that. Not any news publication. Micheal Jackson’s own words. I trust his account more than I trust your theory.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you lol

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or realizing that the locking mechanism for most things is obsolete is a smart understanding of security. Yes their initial priority probably won’t be btc but we’ve heard rumors governments had quantum computers now we get to see them finally wagging it around. Knowing security weaknesses across the board is important in the growing better options department.

Knowledge is power, the story is significant regardless if you think the conclusion is wrong.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +3 / -1

Sounds like a globalist spook. Why so many name brands and corporate interests. Is this about freedom or about mining and proctor and gamble? Shows this posters priorities. Bet it’s fake.

view more: Next ›