Going for the green coat would have been a good one too. To his credit he mentioned the glasses. Mauve... 🤦‍♂️. Taking it up a level to the irrationality of advocating gender fluidity whilst advocating for color preference rigidity seems a shorter path to invoking the NPC short circuit routine.

They'll make "hate speech" exceptions and then just label your views as such

The first mistake he made was to attempt to ideas rational arguments. Marxists are fundamentally non rational worldview. Truth is whatever gives them power in the moment. Different moment, different truth. Instead, reject their truth and substitute your own- something like: "so what you're saying is women can only wear pink? Sounds pretty sexist to me."

I've seen hollowed out buildings from fires with the steel beams in place. At what temperature does steel loose tensile strength? Paper burns below diesel so clearly nothing here adds up

What temperature does diesel burn at? What temperature does steel melt at? This isn't hard...

The treaty of paris from 1783 describes King George's title as:

Prince George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of America

Does this imply he saw himself as "Prince of the USA" or "of the USA"?

Interesting

They love the equinoxes. I think it has something to do with equal day and night and the inversion. March was wild- remember when the banking system just collapsed

Likely mummified infants. Something nefarious most likely 🤢😡

No. Now I'm going to ignore you because you're rude to others

This was back in 2014- that's even before the 2016 election and all those red pills. How many have been awoken since then? Perhaps he's one of them.

Feature not a bug. Stage 2: rationing which requires Internet connected control switches

So you're in favor of theft then

Based upon your comment history I suspect that you already know what it is. If you're being genuine then define what you think it means and I'll respond.

By charging others a higher rate to carry their risk? 🤦‍♂️

His background is in fighting climate crimes. Can we differentiate this from climate change? Yes but understand in this video he doesn't. Climate change is Marxist BS. But, punishing companies and people who abuse the environment by, for instance dumping pollution into the ocean, is something we can accomplish without collapsing the economy.

They want to attack supply and demand while keeping the economy on life support. They are doing this so they can acquire ownership over the means of production at reduced cost.

I could see this. Look at what they're buying (farmland) to understand why they're doing what they're doing (attacking supply and demand).

Zh/https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/big-banks-corporations-getting-90-percent-bidens-green-energy-credits-congressional-study

Don't be misled by their narrative, focus on the power dynamics that the policies imply: https://mishtalk.com/economics/california-utilities-seeks-to-charge-people-based-on-income-not-energy-usage

Yes

Possibly but they probably don't block threaded connections due to persistence and resolving

The fake and gay drag queen empire is so screwed- they're ruled by literal idiots

Jet fuel can't melt steal

This is the same border i proposed would occur last February