How would the thief know what day and time to check your mailbox? I'm not saying it's fake, but as an operation it has some difficulties.
As I used to fly to Denver frequently for business I have done some research on Blucifer. Apparently it is a statue of a mustang and now resides on Broncos stadium. I think the ongoing remodel of Denver airport was an opportunity to get rid of all the creepy artwork.
Did you get out of there?
To be fair, there are a lot of lame robot-like claims on this board. If your argument sucks I'm going to offer my counter-opinion for my entertainment.
Thought provoking post! I also think the cycle is longer than 80 years, perhaps hundreds of years. When was the last calendar reset? Now every day is a "National _____" day.
I don't think this is a conspiracy. Technology can be lost to time just like any information we have. The theory that the universe is slowly moving from order to chaos (entropy) supports the idea.
The other thought I have on this is the people who crafted these blocks probably spent a lot of time crafting each piece that we just wouldn't find acceptable after the industrial revolution. Since every block had to be cut and crafted by hand anyway, they had the time to make them fit perfectly, but buildings and temples took decades to build instead of months. That kind of construction just isn't done anymore - it's not acceptable to anyone to commission a building and wait 40 years for its completion.
Clickbait headline. The airport websites may have been targeted, not airport operations.
I jumped ship a couple years ago when they started freezing the accounts of their political enemies.
I think he quit the Western NWO and is fashioning his own version. Still an enemy of the common man. We're watching giants fight while trying not to get stepped on.
Original author may be onto something, except he got it wrong about who the slave class are and who the masters are.
Axo, why do you still go there?
So Blinken admitted the pipelines were attacked?
You're a very confused person. Every time I make a point you change the argument to fit your warped perception of reality.
If you want to convince me, draw a vector diagram and show me how you're adding them up. I want to see where the acceleration is that you're talking about.
There is no acceleration and deceleration due to earth's rotation. You can't add two unrelated vectors and claim that there is an acceleration present. You don't understand basic physics!
If I throw a ball in an arc, tell me how its path of travel is affected by its spin, or how its spin affects its path of travel. They are completely separate motions and so you deal with them separately. You don't add the two together and say the ball is both speeding up and slowing down.
The Newton's first law explains that we remain in motion in earth's rotation and orbiting the sun until acted on by an external force. You don't feel a change in velocity with respect to the sun because there is no force acting on you as you're trying to claim.
You could have someone drive you on the freeway at 60 mph while you spin a ball on your fingertip at 10 revolutions per second. As long as the car is moving at a constant speed it does not affect the ball. Just because the combined forward velocity of the car and the leading surface of the ball are greater, with respect to the building ahead, doesn't mean the ball is speeding up or slowing down or experiencing any acceleration. You're just confusing your reference frame by including the orbital speed in your calculation when it's a completely separate system.
Let's take your "change in velocity" example. This is explained by Newton's first law of motion. Do you accept it as generally correct?
You can make an observation and misinterpret what you observed, which is what you're consistently doing. Any time someone points out your errors you don't acknowledge it, you just pivot to something else. Flat earth is a belief system of the worst kind, it's a perversion of the truth that sounds reasonable to the uneducated.
Didn't there used to be an option to hide comment history? I don't see it in the settings now.
I don't disagree with what you just said, but I think you're complicating the question by bringing up fractional reserve banking. Supposing we had a sound money system, would capitalism require constant growth?
I watched the whole thing last time it was posted. It made me feel dirty, like I had intentionally cluttered my mind with garbage. The feeling lingered for hours. Flat Earth is a mind virus.
I give the narrator an A for dramatic presentation, though.
Seems to be moving too slow to be a missile. Security footage tends to have a slower framerate than normal video but we still have 3 frames with the object in sight.
I lack special knowledge on this next point, but why would a missile fly that close to the ground and hit the side of the building? Seems like a missile would have to fly higher and strike at a steeper angle to avoid obstacles since it's a guided missile it can't "see" what is in front of it.
Believe it or not skin sags when you age, especially in that area.
This is simply a bad take. No evidence, only assertions.
I haven't taken it all in yet myself, but the part about perspective affecting observed slope makes sense to me. It's only difficult to accept because you can't see a physical line connecting the sun and moon. The part about following the perceived slope of the line where a wall meets a ceiling is a perfect example.
Dude... muzzle discipline!