You can make an observation and misinterpret what you observed, which is what you're consistently doing. Any time someone points out your errors you don't acknowledge it, you just pivot to something else. Flat earth is a belief system of the worst kind, it's a perversion of the truth that sounds reasonable to the uneducated.
I have pointed out numerous errors on your posts time and time again...you fail to do the math to show anything....you make stupid nonsequitors to avoid meaty deep dives....so what's the point...you ignored then.....that's bad faith on your part.
The Newton's first law explains that we remain in motion in earth's rotation and orbiting the sun until acted on by an external force. You don't feel a change in velocity with respect to the sun because there is no force acting on you as you're trying to claim.
You could have someone drive you on the freeway at 60 mph while you spin a ball on your fingertip at 10 revolutions per second. As long as the car is moving at a constant speed it does not affect the ball. Just because the combined forward velocity of the car and the leading surface of the ball are greater, with respect to the building ahead, doesn't mean the ball is speeding up or slowing down or experiencing any acceleration. You're just confusing your reference frame by including the orbital speed in your calculation when it's a completely separate system.
You can make an observation and misinterpret what you observed, which is what you're consistently doing. Any time someone points out your errors you don't acknowledge it, you just pivot to something else. Flat earth is a belief system of the worst kind, it's a perversion of the truth that sounds reasonable to the uneducated.
I have pointed out numerous errors on your posts time and time again...you fail to do the math to show anything....you make stupid nonsequitors to avoid meaty deep dives....so what's the point...you ignored then.....that's bad faith on your part.
You math was wrong....just sorry...but that's how the math calculation works.
You want to redefine math too to make it work???
You misunderstood change in velocity...as in what that even means.....you need a reference....so what is the reference???
--
You also don't realise that angular momentum and angular velocity are at play.... Which have different references to your 'observations'
Let's take your "change in velocity" example. This is explained by Newton's first law of motion. Do you accept it as generally correct?
The Newton's first law explains that we remain in motion in earth's rotation and orbiting the sun until acted on by an external force. You don't feel a change in velocity with respect to the sun because there is no force acting on you as you're trying to claim.
You could have someone drive you on the freeway at 60 mph while you spin a ball on your fingertip at 10 revolutions per second. As long as the car is moving at a constant speed it does not affect the ball. Just because the combined forward velocity of the car and the leading surface of the ball are greater, with respect to the building ahead, doesn't mean the ball is speeding up or slowing down or experiencing any acceleration. You're just confusing your reference frame by including the orbital speed in your calculation when it's a completely separate system.