Talmud was given
Talmud (instruction) from lamadh (he learned)...self discernment implies learning to teach self about being a structure (struct) within (in) action (ion).
Consenting to a suggested book called "talmud" (or any other) contradicts self discernment.
talmudic Law was transmitted by God orally
Oral/oris/os - "opening; beginning; origin"...hence transmission implying origin of being aka transfer (inception towards death) of release (life).
In short...each being represents the mitt within trans of natural law, which instructs one to learn (talmud).
Oral Law was implanted in their minds (and not written)
Being implies in-stru-ment (mind structured within) sound aka a formed instrument within flowing sound. Words are shaped within sound and tempt minds to hold onto definitions aka DEAF PHONETICIANS...implying one deaf to sound.
was preserved without being written down
Writing down implies as suggested words held within mind, which in return tempts one to ignore perceivable sound moving through.
Nature cannot be preserved...it falls apart into each being, which allows being to live (growth) within process of dying (loss).
exceeding in length that of the bible
Nature doesn't have a length...it moves each being from inception towards death; which in return gives each being the free will of choice to resist (need) the temptation (want) of dying.
Length implies measurement aka mind taking measure of matter, while ignoring motion.
The length of a book is measured by how long a reader holds onto it...physically and mentally. Hence writers utilizing books to bind the "free" will of choice among readers in-between covers, with spell-craft within.
The Talmud contains...
...each reader if one willingly chooses to let oneself bound to another.
entitled to abrogate the words
Aka shaping fiction (word) within reality (sound) for those who ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested).
It is a duty to follow the scholars
A duty implies a suggested call...nature implies the perceivable sound of silence.
One who does not...
...consented to suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing), which tempts one to de-nial perceivable.
voluntarily derive laws
Being implies free will of choice within the balance of natural law aka de-rive...division (life) of stream (inception towards death).
Kill the best of the Christians
Best implies versus worst aka two sides against each other...christian/christ - "anointed one" implies the separation of each being from one another, when coming into being through the birth-channel.
Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies holding onto a side (agree or disagree), which in return establishes a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) aka suicidal logic within self turning into genocidal reason against others.
A Christian who observes the Sabbath
Within nature there's no rest (sabbath) for the wicked (departed) aka no cessation of motion (inception towards death) for the divided matter (life) within.
It's a mishmash parody of stupid things from pop culture
a) Mishmash aka mixing is based on tikkun olam (repairing the world by mixing together) aka an inversion of nature separating each unique being from one another.
b) Culturalism (culture); populism (pop) and trivialism (parody) are all jewish tools of ideological subversion amongst gentiles.
Nature neither cultivates (it moves); populates (it departs); nor trivializes (it imports significance).
c) As for stupid things...those represent the gentiles watching jewish mishmash parodies of pop culture...willingly that is.
Bonus: what's the opposite of sons of simps? Sages... https://h-o-m-e.org/what-is-a-hebrew-sage/
identify as
Identify/identic/idem - "the same"...one cannot be the same as another, since coming into being implies a separation from one another, hence the birth of each off-spring.
ask if
If implies then aka an implication based on a moving origin. Asking implies towards a suggested outcome (answer) by another, while ignoring perceivable origin.
infowars
Information warfare is based on...
a) The transfer-agreement between ones consent and the suggested information by another, hence others asking one to willingly give a consensual answer.
b) Turning consent given to a suggested -ism (identiarianism) into a conflict of reason against others aka into wars like...straight vs gay; trans vs cis; ordinary vs queer; hetero vs homo.
This turning outwards against others (reason) is done by turning inwards against self (logic), which represents an inversion aka being within (in) turning (verto).
gay
Here's something funny... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/gay.html
Why would wordhippo use "a happy or cheerful disposition" as the definition for "gay"? As if... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/gay
You are looking at Tokyo; Japan through the lens of Mike Krieger and Kevin Systrom, who suggest an instant telegram (insta-gram) which isn't instant, but distorted by jewish algorithms promoting tikkun olam (repairing the world by mixing together).
the first victim
Daniel (God is my judge) from Dan (he who judges)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Daniel
"Judge not, that ye be not judged"...hence judgement (a judging mind) representing the first victim of a judgemental being.
cause of death...stab wounds.
From a box-cutter?
According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Lewin was stabbed...flight attendants reported that Lewin's throat was slashed
Commission report overrules flight attendant...
Knowledge Reigns Supreme Over Nearly Everyone
If being implies as supreme within the reign of knowledge, then that goes OVER nearly everyone who chooses to seek UNDER-standing from one another.
Only the one who discerns self as supreme (matter) within the reign (momentum) of knowledge (motion) exists in-between aka "as above/so below".
If I would use the name "KRS ONE", then I would add another ONE to oneself, hence binding ones free will of choice to another one. KRS implies each one...any additional "one" tempts one to ignore that.
KRS - KRIS -CHRIST - "anointed one" implies separation of one from one another by unction (within oil), hence each off-spring coming through the birth-channel aka from oil/all into one.
Any words used to describe, are distracting from how sound moves. Words represent an artificial inscription within the mind/memory of those who ignore that nature moves sound through each in-stru-mental being.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2062996/ aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
Edit: RHYME; noun - "agreement in terminal sounds of words or metrical lines"...sound doesn't rhyme; beings within sound agreeing about words rhyme. Rhyming implies mirroring aka a miracle for the eye of the beholder aka a looking glass for the spectator.
If you had the choice...
Asking AI a question implies by ones choice, which in return permits others to utilize artifice to shape choices. Realizing this makes it irrelevant what "gronk" says in response.
In this example...ones choice asking about vaccination implies ones willing consent to suggested vaccination. Consent implies both agreement and disagreement, because the resulting conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) holds both sides together.
Since consent in nature was already given; AI can then be used to artificially supply more choices to those who ignore natural choice.
conscious
Con (together) scious (to perceive)...being able to perceive implies a separation of each ones perception (form) within all perceivable (flow).
The trick...others suggest CON to distract from self discernment. Breathing implies each formed partials adaptation to whole flowing through one...add a CON and it becomes a con-spiracy, from spirit/spiro - "to breathe".
KRS ONE
Aka KRS/KRIS/CHRIST...the anointed one, hence Knowledge (motion) Reigns (momentum) Supreme (matter).
Bonus: "sound of the police; sound of the beast"...sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" + and police/polis - "ones city; center", which implies be (being) ast (astute) aka being able to discern self.
"You can't stand where I stand, you can't walk where I walk"...because all separates each one from one another.
it must be restricted
Nature frees; artifice restricts. Attempting to further restrict artifice binds one into artificial restrictions.
unable to reach
Reaching implies towards outcome, while ignoring that origin enables being.
created purpose
Pur (forth) pose (position) implies ones position as matter (life) put forwards within motion (inception towards death)....not a creation out of nothing, but a transformation within everything.
rising up based on history
History implies a suggested story by a jew aimed at storage by consenting gentiles...the more one stores, the less one can rise up against another. Why? Self imposed burden.
Memory isn't there for storage, but for processing of moving input.
They call themselves...but they cannot and will not change their very core.
Answering a suggested call tempts one to ignore perceivable change. Being implies core (life) of change (inception towards death). Holding onto a suggested call hardens the core (hard-core) inwards, while making it malleable (soft-core) outwards.
For example...a call for an uprising tempts those who answer to follow a leader towards outcome. In nature one can only rise (life) by resisting origin (inception towards death). The less one resists, the easier for others to tempt one.
what other force can condition human beings to accept
Balance (inception/death) forces choice (life) through each being. A jew suggests constitutionalism to tempt consenting gentiles into a conflict of reason (accept vs deny) aka into imbalance of choice.
Force/fortia aka FORwards (inception towards death) potenTIA (life)... "may the force be with(in) you"
- SEM - "one together with"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=sem
All (perceivable) separates each one (perception) from one another...each jew tempts gentiles together, hence establishing the "sum of all things" aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).
Anyone resisting being as-SEM-bled represents an anti-SEM-ite.
Or as John D. Rockefeller said it: "Competition is a sin" (for a chosen one)...
script
A script implies a suggested "outline, being implies ones perception within perceivable line, hence ones life being moved from inception towards death...a life-line.
question
A quest-ion implies towards suggested outcome, hence tempting one to seek an answer. Being implies ones perception reacting to perceivable origin aka ion (action).
A suggested QUEST tempts one to ignore perceivable ION...no one else can supply an answer to revert ones own ignorance.
person
Aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies each in-stru-mental reaction by and within sound...not to words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality).
who
Who implies "what person". If person implies by sound (per sonos), then what else could one come into being by?
AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)
a) America/amerigo/amalrich - "work ruler" implies the rule (momentum) of work (motion) for each worker (matter) within.
b) Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with god" implies each worker (life) resisting the rule (inception towards death) of work aka ones struggle to sustain self by needing to resist wanted temptation.
c) Public (plural) implies the inversion of person (singular) aka few tempting many together to distract each from being a part within whole.
d) Affair/adfacere - "towards making" implies the inversion of being (life) forwarded (inception towards death). Suggested make/macian/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit" aka magic is utilized by few to knead many together.
c) Committee/committere - "thrown together" implies the inversion of being (life) thrown (inception towards death) apart from one another.
Here's a sleight of hand by Magic Affair (jewish btw)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgAKnsO6N-s + https://genius.com/Magic-affair-omen-iii-lyrics
doesn't look as much like...kinda though
Looking implies locking onto what others are suggesting...doing that flips ones different perception into an "alike; kinda" view of the world.
when i flip
a) Others already flipped your perception with their suggestion. A brand leaves a mark, right?
b) What happens when you flip carbon (6 Protons, 6 Neutrons, 6 Electrons)? Could forwarded (proto) choice (elect) be neutralized (neutro)?
the camera man
His name was Tyrone... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiqD45gp1hY
a) https://img.gvid.tv/i/2vjHvJVa.jpg
b) Nature doesn't pause...refreshment requires ones adaptation to being moved.
Gold; a symbol of malleability aka being (life) shaped or stretched by pressure (inception towards death)...holding onto suggested symbol-ism makes one malleable by others.
I don't have it anymore...
You took the suggested symbol-ism by giving consent...a net loss. Why? Because perceivable current moves suggested currency out of ones hands...always.
Remember your gold-chains? Think about the implication of the symbolism...setting oneself free by taking possession of gold; in the shape of binding chains.
That's what a jew jerks off to...gentiles showing off gold-chains aka contradictions in terms aka naked ignorance.
Replace direct (perceivable) nosis (perception) with dogma (suggestion)
Only ones consent to suggested dogma can distort ones place as perceiving nosis within the direction of perceivable.
Disrupt natural balance
By tempting choice to hold onto a suggested side.
Introduce the illusion of time
By suggesting past and future to distract ones "presence" from perceivable now.
Trap them in linear thinking instead of cyclical awareness
Linear sets ones perception free within all perceivable, while circular logic conceals ones mind inwards, while turning outwards thoughts into conflicts of reason against others.
turn them against themselves
Aka circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against each other.
prisoners without walls
Ignorance of perceivable becomes the wall of ignorance within oneself, hence a prison within mind aka im-prison-ment.
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Serj-tankian-empty-walls-lyrics
- Your empty walls
- Pretentious attention
- Dismissive apprehension
- From the confines of our mind
weaponize fear
Aka tempting ones weapon of choice to choose suggested outcome (fear) over perceivable origin (courage/cor/heart)...fear is the mind-killer.
create artificial
Suggested creationism (out of nothing) distracts one from perceivable transformation (within everything). Ones consent to suggested -isms establishes artificial within ones mind, while one ignore natural.
so that they never see who's really in charge
Being implies within (life) charge (inception towards death)...which when adapted to allows each being to re-charge.
make them police each other
Aka "I'm just following orders"...a suggested inversion of being resistance (life) within natural order (inception towards death). A followers always attempts to put others into "line", hence into the life-line aka the process of dying within which each life resists the bla;bla;bla of each other...
Temporal shapes (life) within ongoing line (inception towards death)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6t8g6ka4W0
enforcing their own oppression
While being within (perception) force (perceivable)...consenting to hold onto suggestions oppresses ones expressions, while permitting others to suppress one.
harvest their energy
Energy; noun - "force of expression" aka expressed (life) force (inception towards death)...given freely by consent to suggesting harvesters.
totally disconnected
Connecting to suggested tempts each ones dis-connected perception to ignore the totality of all perceivable.
keep the suffering cycle going
Aka feeding suggested information to ones consenting "circular logic", which continues to turn into conflicts of reason against others.
Suffer; verb - "allow to occur or continue, refrain from hindering, fail to prevent" aka giving consent to suggested temptations. Thy suffer/supper is served...
vibrate in terror
Fear (terror) of outcome implies apprehension aka taking hold of and thereby compressing within self, which within an ongoing process shapes vibration, which reduces form to flow quicker. Vibra/weip - "to turn"...hence the cycle of self imposed suffering.
distracted from their own power
Consenting to a suggestion makes ones potential perception remotely controlled by another.
The more suggested one takes on, the more ones lack of power makes it feel like as if: "It's getting, it's getting, it's getting kinda heavy"... https://genius.com/Snap-the-power-lyrics And of course only ones own power can SNAP one out of it.
destroy all alternatives, and make them afraid of freedom
DOM (inception towards death) alternates FREE (life)...suggested liberty tempts the consenting ones free will of choice to self subjugate alternation.
Anything suggested tempts ones consenting mind towards outcome aka towards death of life aka towards fear.
it's not about chains...it's about consent
Consent binds ones free will of choice to the suggested chains of others. Nature doesn't require consent...it forces adaptation by free will of choice.
Consent implies "send together"...being implies send (inception towards death) apart (life) from one another.
they give you choices...
...which are given consent to by ones FREE will of choice, which after given consent becomes bound to a chosen ones suggestion.
tl;dr: It's said to never judge a book by its cover, but..."that dude looks like a lady"...
how could you fix that
Motion (inception towards death) opens matter (life)...few trick many to "fix" matter, while ignoring that motion cannot be fixed. Few call this "tikkun olam" aka repairing the world by bringing together.
bulldoze shit over
a) Which conceals the issue under, while ignoring that nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception).
b) One can put the bull to doze for a while, but nature utilizes Aries to spring Taurus back to life...
salt around
Coming into being through the birth-channel implies anointment aka a salty seed passing through oily soil...a straight passage.
how it's not a "closed" circle
A circle implies a shape. Only within motion can matter be shaped, which implies a beginning (inception) and end (death) for each shape (life) in-between.
As long as there's a shape (matter) so long are begging and end open (motion), thereby enabling shaping.
Sleight of hand for the open circle...ouroboros eating its own tail. As long as one eats; one is open to consumption.
Another example...perceivable moves straight through ones perception, hence opening up free thought. Consenting to a suggestion establishes circular reasoning, hence closing off ones thoughts aka eating oneself.
in essence
Aka within (in) being (esse). Ones consent to a suggestion implies a "symbolic opening", which in return represents a GATE, closing ones perception from the WAY of perceivable.
invoking and contacting entities
Aka to invoke (suggested) by contact (consent)...a contract among entities.
Leading researchers join
A lead sets itself apart...followers join together.
AI is pushing
If AI pushes, then why does it require input? What if only nature pushes (inception towards death) to shove (life)?
big ideas
Ones consent to suggested ideal-ism positions one under another, hence into a smaller position than those "big" ideas.
participants + moderator
Only within whole can there be participants, and being a part within whole implies a separation from one another.
Moderate/moderatus - "within bounds" implies a moderator binding the free will of choice of participants...if consent is given.
Read our Minds
a) Others wrote the words ones mind/memory holds onto, which in return permits others to also read from without what can be shaped within.
b) Words represent a controlled en-viro-ment aka mind (ment) within (in) circle (viro/viron) aka circular logic.
c) Ask yourself about the nature of reading and writing without words suggested by others...
Read implies "put in order"; write implies "set forth as an author"...so what if nature puts authors (life) into order (inception towards death)? Could there be such a process without words to describe it?
if you believe this...
a) Believing implies ones consent holding onto the suggestion of another aka ones willing submission to "stand-under" another aka understanding (Latin intelligo).
b) If implies then...the foundation of implication. To believe implies holding onto a side, while reasoning against the other. Reason contradicts implication.
you should be asking yourself
Ask and ye shall receive...yet, where does the answer come from? Ones consent makes one the recipient of suggested answers by others, for which one ignores being the responding incipient (perception) within origin (perceivable).
it is not genetics
Gen implies generation...nothing implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of being (life) generated (inception towards death).
Tracing ones "genetics" implies as the generated reactor (perception) within the generator (perceivable) of nature, yet ones consent to suggested "genetic-ism" by another; positions the other in-between ones perception and all perceivable.
Few suggest organ-ism and heredit-ism to tempt many to give consent to artificial -ism, while ignoring natural origin.
If one gives consent to a suggested word, then one denies perceivable sound. Sound generates in-stru-ments, words permit others to play them, hence becoming conductors (jew) of orchestras (gentiles).
A tale implies a statement aka a fiction shaped within ones mind to tempt others to ignore reality.
Nature doesn't tell/tale/del - "to count", hence setting each one within free from one another instead of holding accountable to one another.