They are vile creatures. Yet we see them every day in the form of humans. On television. On social media. They are cultured, they are rich, they are intelligent. They are politicians, musicians, actors, directors, bankers. They are loved, celebrated. They create children's charities. Take pictures of how they help children. They say they are humanists, righteous people. But when the sun goes down they put on their black robes. Meet in a cave. Take out their accursed idol. And slaughter children. They are cannibals, pedophiles, blood eaters. They are just like their father King Solomon. They say they are enlightened but only darkness is within them. They say they trust in God but worship Moloch. They will experience a tremendous fall.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
A singular cannot be free within a plural.
THE aka suggested the-ism implies masonry (magic) applied to ones free will of choice.
a) Vile is in the eye of the beholder aka the being who chooses to hold onto a value. Others suggest values to tempts one free will of choice to hold onto them, which represents masonry.
b) Creature implies suggested creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing)...an inversion of nature, which transforms each (partial) within every (whole).
a) Human aka the hue (color) of man implies the separation of flow (light) into form (ray), which establishes a visible spectrum of light in-between.
b) WE aka suggested pluralism deceives ONE aka singular perception into joining others....a distortion of light with shadows.
c) Human can only exist within animal aka the visual spectrum of light (hu-man) can only exist within animation (animal)...it's the suggested words "human" and "animal" which deceives ones perception to hold onto a definition.
The suggestion of another towards ones consent implies tell-a-vision.
Many together implies social; each one apart from one another implies partial at the middle (media) of whole.
Resisting (life) temptation (inception towards death) cultivates resistance. Consenting to suggested multiculturalism cultivates temptation, which destroys resistance.
Being implies evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable)...ignoring this for suggested values establishes a conflict of reason (rich vs poor).
Intelligence/inteligo - "to understand" implies the consent of many "standing under" the suggestions of few. As above mentioned...intelligence is utilized as a suggested value, hence tempting ones evaluation to ignore that perceivable value moves and cannot be held onto.
a) Will implies rise (life) during fall (inception towards death).
b) Only during fall can will experience rise.
c) Tremendous implies fearful aka a being full of fear towards suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin.
Choosing outcome over origin implies choosing fiction over reality, hence few utilizing fear of outcome as the "mind killer" to tempt many into ignorance.