Working on a new software project with a Jewish guy. I've had bad experiences with some before, but this guy actually seems pretty cool. Hopefully he doesn't try to hack me on behalf of Mossad.
For all I know he could already be a born again Christian, so I'm not going to judge.
Arrogant/arrogare - "to claim for oneself"...a lot of people contradicts that which one claims for oneself. The suggestions of others tempting ones consent to make a claim implies the casting of lots, and suggesting few collectivizing the consent of many together becomes "a lot of people".
Within such a collective the singular becomes arrogant of self and contemptuous towards one another, which is what few utilize to steer collectives against one another.
If agreement could be definite (affixed); then why does disagreement exits? What if it's ones will that is being tricked to hold onto either side, which keeps both sides in perpetual conflict against one another?