Open mockery
Nature implies an open solution; mocking implies a delusion.
If one ignores natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion); then one deludes self during solution, which opens one up for mockery by another.
Also...mock/mucus/mold. A delusion within a solution can be molded.
search engine
Engine implies being within (en) generation (gine). Others suggest search engines to tempt one to ignore self discernment.
If one ignores to discern self as within generation, then regeneration becomes an issue...
top secret
Secret/seco - "to divide" implies the division of whole into partials...not top vs bottom. Only partials within whole can further divide each other into top vs bottom conflicts of reason.
Few suggest "top secret" to tempt many to choose a side within a conflict (top vs bottom), while ignoring to be a divided partial within whole.
Nature divides internally, hence moving through each being, hence as above/so below.
Ones consent to suggested information positions ones choice at the bottom, and the chosen ones suggestion at the top, which in return permits a chosen one to keep a secret (division) from ones choice.
If you currently have a potential
Being implies potential (life) within current (inception towards death)...a potential cannot have (posses) current (procession).
dark web
Only the users of a web are kept in the dark...not the crawler. Using the web from any position enlightens the crawler to ones position.
Sites aren't .com.. they're these .onion
COM implies "together", hence amassing together under a com domain (dominance) by few. This amassing requires consent (to buy) to a suggestion (to sell), hence a com-mercial contract.
Amassing together under few implies a pyramid scheme, hence layers upon layers like an onion, and those who lay others together are called "masons".
Furthermore: layer/liue - "binding"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/layer What does a MASON bind? FREE will of choice.
Did I mention that onion/union/uni implies "one"...hence apart from one another, and not together (com)? https://www.etymonline.com/word/onion
666 secret society
a) SIX and SEC originate from seco - "to divide".
b) SOC (together) contradicts SEC (divided)...if one joins.
c) Nature reveals; artifice conceals.
OUR weapon
There's only one weapon...ones free will of choice, which cannot be shared with others without disarming itself.
ZLOBALISTS greatest weapon against us
Aka each chosen one. A jew suggests -isms to tempt consenting gentiles against each other. Selecting a suggestion shirks ones choice onto a chosen one, hence disarming self by arming others.
the means to delivery
Delivery/deliberare aka de (division) liber (free) implies balance (inception/death) delivering choice (life)...not the suggested meaning by others tempting ones consent to hold onto it.
bread, circus, propaganda and tokenization
Suggested wants tempting one to ignore perceivable need...hunger; linear progression instead of circular, resisting the temptation of propagation, and breaking apart instead of holding tokens together.
in war...
Two sides mutually consent to loosing, while permitting a third party outside the war to declare those who lose less as the winner.
War implies a conflict of reason, and reasoning implies choosing a side within a losing argument in hopes to win.
sever enemy lines
a) Ones lifeline (inception towards death) cannot be severed, it separates those living within from one another, while continuing the whole process.
b) Enemy implies "within me"...hence if one chooses to claim self as "me; myself; or I", then every other one becomes a "you" (phonetic jew). That's the origin of the me vs you conflict of reason, and the enemy within me. That's where the international jew operates from...internal, while tricking gentiles to fight external wars against each other.
communication
- ATION aka action implies the nature that separates reactions within from one another.
- UNI implies ones reaction within all action of nature.
- COM implies the artificial suggestion to put together what nature sets apart.
A jew controls communication by tricking UNI to ignore ATION, while COM-ing together. Action implies the line that cannot be severed aka the moving substance of nature separating each essence within.
Nature moves all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...communication with one another (suggestion) tempts one to ignore natural for artificial.
It breeds community
Which is what a jew does...suggesting community aka ones (unity) together (com) to breed gentiles into livestock aka life stocked; stored for supply; product placement.
darwins gluttons.
If ones perception is being given access to all perceivable, then choosing to take ANY suggestion from one another implies excess aka gluttony.
A jew masquerades as Darwin/deorwine - "dear friend" to suggest Darwin-ism towards gentiles. Consenting to an -ism invites the jewish suggestion into self, hence establishing an enemy (within me).
sabotage the electric
Consenting to a suggestion sabotages the ELECT (ones choice) by s-ELECT-ing another (chosen one). Suggestion implies a magnetic temptation for ones electric choice of resistance.
She describes being within fluid. The trick...the suggestion of her being under the influence.
everyone...of the equator
One implies differentiated from one another...not made equal by an equator. There cannot be an equator in this world, because there's an ongoing differentiation between inside and outside of this so called world, and between every and each.
same direction
Direction implies "directed by action" aka same action directing different reactions.
fixed central point
a) Center implies an ongoing differentiation within surrounding.
b) Point (end of sentence) implies an ongoing differentiation between beginning and end of temporal sentence.
c) Fixed implies affixed during detachment, hence temporary mind detached from each other within ongoing motion.
Sleight of hand: "the fix is in"...
all looking in different directions
All cannot look; only each one within all can look at one another, while being differentiated from one another within directing action.
Furthermore...to look implies to lock onto, while ignoring that all moves each one apart from one another.
Why does everyone...get the same
Because all implies the same for each differentiated one within. The issue...trying to get a hold of what is given in motion corrupts ones perspective.
Come to think of it, was...part of...
Coming towards thinking implies all perceivable coming towards each ones thinking perception...making oneself a part of the suggestions by another tempts one to ignore that.
Surviving records show
a) Suggested survivalism tempts one (life) to ignore perceivable pass over (inception towards death), hence each life being sentenced towards point of death at inception.
b) How could records survive, while the "show must go on"?
c) Record implies ones responding (re) heart (cordis)...not mentally recording suggested information from one another by holding onto it.
begin at the dawn of civilization
One can only civilize what wasn't civilized before. As in...one can't be domesticated without set being free beforehand.
In other words...ATION (action) directs the beginning and end of reactions, which choose to ignore this by trying to CIVILIZE each other.
year round
Ones consent to suggested dates shapes ones thinking into circular logic. All nature gives isn't dated as data for each one within to hold onto, but passing through in linear progression.
the law of perspective states
Perspective aka per (by) spec (partial)...natural law isn't by partial, but by whole moving each partial apart from one another. Ones consent to suggested laws stated by others tempts one to corrupt ones perspective.
Why does...not change...than we’re told?
Because holding onto a tale tempts one to ignore being within change.
geometry
Geomancy aka "art of divination by means of signs derived from the earth"...idolatry. It's ones consent to suggested geometry/geomancy which establishes geology aka "circular" logic within self; turning into conflicts of reason against others.
If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep...
To believe any -ism implies following it towards outcome, hence "giving" up ones position within origin, while burdening self with whatever one keeps in possession...a death march.
If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax
A picture implies a "captured moment"...being alive implies within a momentum (inception towards death) that cannot be captured since it moves.
Photo (light) graph (to write)...one can only write in motion, yet ones writing can manipulate the speed of light within the minds of others who choose to capture moments in pictures.
A property of mass...
Mass (amassed together) contradicts proper (particular aka set apart).
if “pole” is the whole circumference
Pole implies center of circumference for each partial within whole. Suggested directions tempt one off-center and into circumference.
Now reconsider Poalei Tziyon and erecting at center while circumcising circumference...
Wouldn’t creating...cost
A jew suggests creation-ism towards each gentiles FREE will of choice...giving consent implies the cost of selling self out by buying into creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing).
Natural cost implies CAUSE generating CAUSTIC effects, hence each ones free will of choice effectively burning out within whole cause aka holocaust.
The idea of...existed
Consenting to suggested idealism tempts one to hold onto idols, which only exist within ones mind. A jew also suggests the-ism; ideal-ism and existential-ism as occupying forces within each consenting gentiles mind.
What financial motives
Finance/fin - "end"...nature moves; few suggest finance to tempt many into financial settle-ments aka settle their minds into the state of ignorance/denial of being moved.
Holding onto currency tempts one to that current moves and cannot be held onto.
How could the sun be a spotlight
Because each one looking at "the sun" represents a spot within all light aka a distinguishing mark, hence distinguished from one another by light generating a spectrum for each ray within.
If one casts a shadow, then one represents a spot within light.
why does...go to the horizon
Horizein - "bound, limit, divide, separate"...being implies center of horizon, hence being moved towards horizon.
Why do constellations appear to be different
Because appearances can be deceiving if the differentiated being chooses to hold onto constellation aka holding together (con) what action (ation) sends forth (stellare; to shine).
That which shines appears to those within...a jew crafts the spell "CONstellation" to deceive the appearance of CONsenting gentiles, hence being CONned by a CON artist.
If the circumferential...is preventing
Circumference generates center; inspires center to grow; sets center free to choose etc.
Prevention implies by ones free will of choice at center...not from circumference.
pour off the edge
Being implies within know-ledge. Choice within balance implies living on the edge.
Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
Because helium cannot reach helios (sun)...it can only move in-between, hence the visible spectrum of light allowing each different being visibility.
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
Body implies curve (life) within flat line (inception towards death) breathing (atmos/atmen). A sphere can only be shaped within a line.
Why are other...bodies spheres
Body implies center of sourROUNDing aka within CIRCUMference aka a physical structure one carries aROUND during animation....it's ignoring linear animation, which tempts one to think circular.
Try drawing a line from your perspective towards any constellation in the sky...pine-cone aka pineal gland.
the matrix
Matrix/materia/mater/mother isn't the issue...neo/new was. Casting broad a new(s) message tempts one to ignore the original matrix aka mother nature.
news benders
Nature bends choice from one another; artifice binds choice to one another...N(orth) E(ast) W(est) S(outh) implies a separation from one another.
Bending implies a curve; binding implies a circle...hence binding beginning and end of a curve together to establish the ouroboros aka circular logic.
Do you know your God?
Your implies possessive; God implies generous...possession contradicts the generation of potential.
Who are the warriors
A collective waging war against each other, while ignoring the generosity of given singular being aka each peace/piece.
alliance
All doesn't ligare (to bind)...it separates each one as free will of choice from one another. It's the one who ignores all who binds oneself to others by free will of choice.
evil will try everything to keep...
Everything (whole) gives each thing (partial) the free will of choice to be. Choosing evil or good keeps ones choice in bondage within a conflict called "reason".
It's holding onto good which keeps one bound to evil and vice versa. Furthermore...spreading the gospel (good spell) keeps one spell-bound to the crafted spells by others, which inverts being a-live/evil.
passing out
Being implies within (life) passing (inception towards death)...
passing out more easily
It's hard (inception towards death) to remain within (life)...yet easy to pass out.
different boxing
a) Different sides consenting alike to the same conflict aka differences mutually destroying each other.
b) A sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...BOX within a RING aka circling the square aka tempting cubic being into circular logic, which turns into conflicts of reason against each other.
So what's up...
Joining a ring aka ouroboros (a snake eating its own tail/tale) keeps those within down...it just takes a while to consume itself.
I know the Covid...
To know implies ones perception; "covid" implies a suggestion by another tempting one to ignore perception.
Reasoning against others about "covid" puts a ring (circular logic) around ones box (cubic perception).
Why is perception cubic? Because one perceives from within left/right + up/down + front/back...others suggest "covid" to shape it by ones consent within ones box, which draws a circle within (logic) and around (reason) self.
easier to be
To implies towards (inception towards death) which tempts being (life) to take the easy way out. Choosing to resist temptation makes it harder for way to tempt being.
Mike Tyson
Compare Mike Tyson and Logan Paul in their prime to notice that the boxing ring weakens the fighters. The Mike Tyson vs Logan Paul fight represents a make-believe distraction from that to tempt more fighters into the ring... "One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.”
tl;dr: The ring draws the power from those boxing each other within.
cause harm
In (life) harms way (inception towards death)...only during harm can one BE-nefit. The transformation of motion breaking into matter implies harm, hence generating living matter within the process of dying motion.
Cause (loss) harms so that effect (growth) benefits...
removed all black...
MOVE implies motion aka all light; RE implies response from each one within all light; BLACK implies absence of light aka ones sense abstaining from light aka ignorance.
Only within white (pure light) can there be black (absence of light).
fallout
Using Fallout to distract those within (life) fall (inception towards death) to choose a side (white or black) establishes a "falling out" in-between light vs dark.
this is the equivalent of that
There cannot be equals within nature, for nature implies the equal (motion) which differentiates (momentum) each being (matter) from one another.
This/that/the implies a suggested the-ism...a-the-ism, hence tricking each singular (mono) being to consent to a collective (poly) suggestion. If mono consents to poly...it equalized its status as a differential.
download
a) Implies loading down from above, hence burdening self, while submitting self to another.
b) Notice torrent aka overwhelming flow (inception towards death) for each underwhelming form (life)...few uploaders/many downloaders aka leechers.
You made no argument.
An arguing mind cannot be free...it binds itself to a conflict.
I made an argument.
You made your mind arguing.
I have accused you
Which implies cursing self by cussing at another. As choice one needs to adapt to cause...not accuse others, while cursing self by steering off course.
Why aren't you adhering...
a) ...because adhesive would put free will of choice into a sticky situation.
b) How could one attack a person if one didn't attack (or defend) any argument? What did I do to your arguing mind? Have I ever even downvoted you?
are you attempting
Temptation draws forwards...free will of choice adapts to perceivable origin, while resisting the temptation of suggested outcomes.
to add legitimacy
Only natural legit/legis/lex (law) can add (inception) and subtract (death)...the beings living within utilize macy (magic) to distract each other from that.
your subversive presence
"Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person."...is it me who continues to subvert the rules?
Choice can only re-use, and a poser can't be free...
a) Card implies essence, hence ordinal (inception towards death) generating cardinal (life) aka each one card within all natural order.
b) Deck implies a cover, an ornament; an arrangement etc. Nature doesn't cover...ordinal (all perceivable) reveals cardinal (ones perception). That's why one can't use someone else's deck (suggestion) without corrupting ones card (perception).
c) Tarot/taraha - "he rejected, put aside" implies one who rejects the decks of others, hence putting aside (suggestion), while remaining center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable).
d) Sacred (holy/whole) + rule/reg (to move in a straight line) implies each partial (life) being moved in a straight line (inception towards death) within whole.
e) Fortune implies "chance", the inversion of "choice"...ones free will of choice implies the card; while the tales of fortunes suggested by others implies the deck. The choice is yours...tarot or torat/torah.
a) Imagination implies a prison/prism; more specifically a trilateral prism...all perceivable, ones perception, and the suggested imagination shaped by another.
b) Abandonment implies mentally giving up ones grip on suggested imagination aka the artificial representation (information) of what nature presents (inspiration).
c) Ask Jon Levi if the wandering jew ever abandoned rome/roam. Notice furthermore that Jon Levi seeks isolation from others, while publicly providing for others his mental and physical travels.
a) Derail aka division (life) of rail (inception towards death)...others suggest the rhetoric "off the rail" to tempt one to ignore this.
b) Good post implies versus bad post...how could such a conflict of reason (good vs bad) ever be derailed from outside if those within can only switch from one side to the other?
How could circular logic be derailed?
c) To post implies setting upright...how could commenting under it derail the post?
more third parties like the UK
What does it matter how many parts there are, while being UNITED under the DOM-inance of a KING?
What if breaking further apart tempts each partial (choice) within whole (balance) to ignore being set FREE (life) within DOM-inance (inception towards death)?
If christ is king, and christ implies each anointed one, then...
- There's something deep inside of me
- There's someone I forgot to be
Dialectic of UFO
a) The U in UFO aka "unidentified" implies the dialectical rhetoric tempting one to choose in-between two (dia) sides...identified vs unidentified. Both represent a fiction distracting one from reality...which cannot be defined (affixed) since it moves.
b) Dia-lect aka two (dia) speak (legein) is based on ones ignorance of reality (perceivable sound) for fiction (suggested words); hence falling for spell-craft and getting spell-bound to one another aka ones choice consenting + a chosen ones suggestion bound together aka 1+1=2.
Nature separates each one from one another.
c) A flying object tempts one to ignore being subjected (life) to objection (inception towards death). Object/obicere aka ob (forwards) icere (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/object
Smithsonian's "sunburst" logo
A son of a (black) smith...bursting the sun/son/one within all...by logo (advertisement aka turning the mind against) aka logic (circular thinking) aka logos (suggested words turning ones mind from perceivable sound).
Smith/smi - "to cut"...a black (ignorance) smith cuts one off from light (discernment), hence tempting one to ignore self discernment.
Sleight of hand: "Disarm you with SMI-le and CUT you like you want me to"... https://genius.com/The-smashing-pumpkins-disarm-lyrics
But what has that to do with the sun? Well...https://genius.com/The-smashing-pumpkins-sun-lyrics
If you pay close attention, you can clearly see
a) Close contradicts clear. Clarity requires opening up while resisting the temptation of closing down.
b) To pay implies selling oneself out to another by "free" will of choice.
c) Attend implies being (life) subjected to (inception towards death)...paying attention to one another subjects one to another while selling self out.
d) The opposite of attention implies disregard...few tempt the attention of many with suggestion into disregarding perception.
letting their masks slip
A jew can slip in and out of any mask, since the cover isn't on his face, but within the minds of consenting gentiles who conceal perceivable reality by holding onto suggested fiction from a jew.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "SLIP inside the eye of your mind"... https://genius.com/Oasis-dont-look-back-in-anger-lyrics
What's an oasis? A fertile place in the midst (life) of a waste (inception towards death)...
a) Nova/novus - "new" + festival/festus - "feast"
b) NEW implies an artificial inversion of perceivable NOW, hence feast/fasno - "temple" implying the temporal cut of all perceivable into each ones perception. Why cut? Because temple/tem - "to cut"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/temple
a) Tribe of nova, form tribe (tripartite division) of new. That implies an old natural division, hence from all (perceivable) into each one (perception), and the addition of a new artificial division (suggestion).
b) Universo Paralello aka one (uni) turn (verso) besides (para) one another (ello), hence ones perception turning from perceivable towards suggested, while permitting the one suggesting to move parallel besides one, like a para-side/site.
c) World Tour aka world/werald (age of man) + tour/tourn (to turn). Man implies motion; age implies the lifetime of matter...using suggestion to distract from perception tempts matter (life) to turn away from motion (inception towards death), hence becoming a traitor/trader by trading reality for fiction, which is also called a turncoat aka "one who forsakes his party or principles".
Relativity is religious
a) IS implies a suggestion tempting ones consent into an artificial conflict (is vs isn't), while ignoring what WAS perceivable in nature.
Nature doesn't tell anyone within what it is...telling each other what something is implies the binding of free will of choice to one another, hence religion/religio - "to bind anew".
b) Relative/relate/relatus - "to carry back" implies motion (inception towards death) carrying back matter (life) aka all perceivable carrying forth and back each ones perception.
That's why it's all relative to each one within.
The issue...consenting to suggested relativism binds one to another, hence establishing an artificial relation in-between matter during the relation of matter within motion.
Matter holding onto matter ignores that motion separates matter from one another. Natural relation implies separation; artificial relation implies combination.
If relativists could admit
If/then implicates based on motion...admission and relativism reasons based on holding onto a side within a conflict (admit vs deny or relate vs conceal).
Implication implies natural; reason implies artificial.
admit that what they support is merely a stand in for reality rather than reality itself,
Admission aka consent given to suggestion implies ones fictitious stand within perceivable reality. Nature forces adaption from being...admission vs denial among beings only distracts from nature.
I would be OK with that
One cannot be OK (all right)...only one within the right of all. Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right
Suggested OK aka oll korrect implies all (oll) together (kor) moved in a straight line (rect)...hence tempting each consenting one into collectivization with others.
At that point
Inception sentences life towards point of death...suggesting points to one another tempts each other to ignore ones sentence/sentience.
a scientific discussion
Science/scio - "to know" implies the separation of all perceivable into each ones perception, while coming together to dis (apart) cuss (to shake) tempts each participant to ignore all perceivable for one another's suggestions.
to claim...
...implies ones choice to hold onto a suggestion by another, while ignoring ones perception being moved apart from one another within all perceivable.
provisional and not divinely inspired
Pro (torwards) vision (sight) implies a division/divine of all perceivable moving towards each ones perception. It's the suggestions from one another viewed by ones perception as "provisional", which tempts one to willingly ignore "divine" division.
Perceivable Inspiration implies divine provision; suggested information implies unholy provision...both are provided towards ones vision, hence forcing ones free will of choice to adapt.
light you see only appears to have a certain speed
Certainty implies ones choice to ascertain a measurement by holding onto a suggested measure aka matter holding onto matter/measure, while ignoring motion.
Speed/spoed - "haste" implies matter (life) within motion (inception towards death) hurrying towards outcome, while ignoring origin, which inspires resistance (living) during temptation (dying).
Sleight of hand: "there's a bomb on a bus; if it goes above or below a certain speed, it explodes"...
And yet... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/hate.html As if indifference is being suggested to distract from the relation between love + hate.
Indifference as a neutral stance implies each ones neutral/natural stance within (life) differentiation (inception towards death)...neither side of which one can hold onto.
Both inception and death imply the same motion for each differentiated matter living within...which is why matter cannot hold onto motion.
Motion implies need; matter implies want...both in balance with one another, which gives matter choice. Choosing to ignore need for wanting from one another establishes an imbalance (want vs not want) for ones choice.
This imbalance is being exploited by others who rebrand it into for example...love vs hate; truth vs lie; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief; us vs them; me vs you; winning vs losing; democrat vs republican; soccer vs football; coke vs pepsi; mcdonalds vs burger king; he said vs she said; islam vs christianity; jew vs gentile; left vs right; up vs down; front vs back; capitalism vs communism etc. These conflicts are called "reason" and trick those reasoning to turn against each other.
tl; dr: Indifference doesn't oppose anything. Love opposes hate and vice versa...
Is using AI tapping into a frequency?
It lowers ones frequency to utilize artifice, because artifice tempts one to often repeat the same stuff frequently, hence asking AI for answers it already has.
Frequency in nature cannot be repeated aka the breath on takes isn't the breath one took before. Natural frequency implies the adaptation of each being within to an ever changing nature.
As for tapping...logging/locking onto to use AI contradicts lightly tapping. A tap also refers to a faucet through which liquid can be drawn aka a faucet (suggestion) for solids (perception) within liquid (perceivable).
Users aren't tapping; users are being tapped by abusers aka suggested information tempting ones consent to fall for a knock knock (tap tap) joke by giving invite aka by permitting the vampire access to ones house willingly.
Similar to discovering electricity?
a) Electric generates magnetic...an internal differentiation, which one ignores when reacting similar to one another.
b) Electricity doesn't divide (dis) cover...it sets magnetic reactions free from one another. Magnetic implies attraction to one another, hence tempting ones free will of choice to ignore electric divine/division for magnetic attraction, with ignorance representing the cover one puts over self.
Electric was always there for magnetic to come into being within. Ignoring perceivable (electric) for suggested (magnetic) covers self dis-cernment with ignorance.
Creepy answer from AI
What's creepy is questioning artifice for answers, while ignoring nature. Why? Because it permits those who suggest artifice to creep; verb - "to move secretly; to evade detection".
To know and love
To know implies being moved towards the known ledge...a linear procession. Love implies versus hate...a circular conflict in ignorance of linear procession.
God is to obey
a) God WAS perceivable before others can suggest one to obey what IS.
b) How does one obey? By FREE will of choice. What does God gives each being by separating each one from one another? Free will of choice. What does obedience to others contradict? Being free will of choice.
Obedient/obaudire (to hear; listen) from au (to perceive)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/obey
Do you keep...
Can one keep anything all gives (inception) and takes (death) from one (life)?
The fear of...
Fear implies outcome; God implies origin...choosing one turns one away from the other.
Change implies the cause for any effects within, hence sound implying the changing cause for each in-stru-mental (structured mind within) effect.
Music is being shaped by instruments within sound to affect effects into ignoring cause.
TO (towards) implies cause moving effects apart from one another...listening implies hearing what effects shape within cause.
One cannot hear cause, while being an effect within it.
Literal implies "according to letter" aka effects letting each other by going into agreement (accord) with one another".
Cause separates effects (discordance); effects tempt each other together (accordance) to gain control over discord among them.
A letter cannot cause...cause allows effects to let each other.
a) Aka moving to and fro (rock) + a resounding stroke (rap)
b) Effect operates at the center of cause...other effects affect center from the circumference, hence rocking to and fro to off-center effect.
c) Cause moves through effects...repetition (rap-etition) affects effects during linear progression with circular retrogression.
Cause doesn't repeat...it rhymes/rhein - "to flow". Natural law implies "legato"...ignoring it implies "staccato".
a) -ist (communist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (communism).
b) Consenting to a suggested -ism...joins one together (commun) with others.
c) A jew suggests communism, to tempt gentiles to become communists aka a collectivized consensus.
Sleight of hand: "real communism hasn't been tried"...because real implies the separation of ones REsponse within ALL, not a community of ones together.
Tried/try - "trial" implies trial (inception towards death) and error (life)...that's real aka ones test-a-ment (trial of mind).
The opposite of vibration implies stabilization aka balancing as choice. Turning implies against one another (choice vs choice), which implies imbalance.
The opposite of frequent implies intermittent, hence internal (life) mission (inception towards death).
a) Music aka muse (to reflect, ponder, meditate; to be absorbed in thought) aka a muzzle...
b) Music implies the combination of sound; being implies the separation of sound.