Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

12
American protestant /Scofield prosperity megachurches conspired to promote JPeterson and denounce Massie. But Jordan isn't even a Christian, an atheist supporter of Israel, while Massie is a Greek Orthodox (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 206 days ago by defenderOfMontrocity 206 days ago by defenderOfMontrocity +12 / -0
26 comments download share
26 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 204 days ago +1 / -0

stick to the facts

Aka holding onto fiction (suggested information) within action (perceivable inspiration).

False dichotomy. This implies that you have to stick to word games to be smart.

True vs false + smart vs dumb...are sticking together, hence turning against one another. Breaking words apart clears ones mind within sound. Dichotomy implies "cutting in two", which ignores oneness (whole) cutting into one (partial).

Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Papa-roach-last-resort-lyrics (cut my life into pieces...this is my last resort).

How is rebutting claims and using logic to prove things right or wrong "circular logic"?

Christianity allegedly gave you 2025 years of right vs wrong reasoning...how many Christians took a turn within that circle of mutual self destruction? How does reason dissolves right vs wrong conflicts? Can you tell me the difference between reasoning gentiles and the use of talmudic reasoning by a jew? Notice that right vs wrong reasoning somehow doesn't seem to apply to a jew...if many operate within a circle, while few operate within a line, then could that be exploitable?

This implies that it will keep going forever.

WILL + KEEP imply temporal reactions within the ever forwarding action. Using ones free will of choice to keep holding onto suggested tempts one to ignore/deny perceivable.

At some point it will stop.

Stop implies "cessation of motion"...being implies matter (life) within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion, hence being sentenced towards point of death. Few suggest STOP signs everywhere to tempt many to ignore that perception cannot stop perceivable...only hold onto suggested within the temporal bliss of ignorance.

Matter also doesn't stop, but dissolves back into motion. Basic alchemical transformation...flow to form (inception) > form within flow (life) > form to flow (death).

When you have made a counter, a REBUTAL to an argument, the loop stops! You GROW!

True VERSUS false...both sides arguing only supply themselves to the loop aka to the ring that binds aka to circular logic turning into conflicts of reason. 2025 years of supplying true and false arguments and yet the conflict is as destructive to life as it ever was. The ring is being set up to tempt the contestants to ignore what happens outside, while they're fighting each other within. Logic prevents ones mind to step out of the ring...it doesn't matter which contestant uses logic to attack or defend.

You say you want to "think straight" but yet claim that something "turning in your mind" is a bad thing??

Straight implies motion; turning implies matter shaped within motion. One cannot hold onto motion; holding onto matter tempts one to ignore motion. Good vs bad implies matter vs matter, while ignoring motion by claiming a side.

Breaking this apart sustains ones free will of choice...what others are doing with that is on each ones free will of choice. Anything dualistic aka a duel of reason among choices contradicts ones singular free will of choice.

That's like saying that lifting weights makes you weaker and exercise makes you less fit!!

Weaker and less fitter than? The words you use imply not ones growth through exercise, but drawing comparisons between one another, which establishes a conflict of reason aka mutual loss for anyone joining in.

As one within all one can only be weaker and less fitter than all...being isn't about drawing comparisons, but about resisting the temptation of being (life) drawn back in (inception towards death) while living out ones life.

tl;dr: Thanks for the inspiration.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy