How are words reality if they have to be fictitiously shaped within real sound?
Difference between conspiracy and reality
a) Real implies ones REsponse to ALL...a differentiation.
b) Con (together) spire (to breathe) implies a contradiction between likeness and difference aka SPIRE (an analytical process) and CON (a synthetic process).
they call you
a) That implies a suggestion tempting ones consent to take the call.
b) Call implies to SEE (c) ALL...not ones response to the summoning of others.
actually believe
Actual moves and cannot be held onto...to believe implies holding onto fictional, while ignoring actual.
nonsense
Nothing cannot be sensed...suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempts ones senses to deny everything perceivable.
normies
a) Few suggest norms aka "standard, patterns, or models" to tempt many to restrict "free" will of choice by consenting to norms.
b) Norm; from Greek gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm
Freemasonry utilizes suggested norms as square and resulting circular logic as compass to manipulate the free will of choice among others.
General consensus is...but is that really so?
Reality doesn't generate consensus...it separates choice from one another. Others suggest fiction to tempt ones choice to give consent, which permits few to amass many into consensus aka hivemind.
know it's a lie
To know implies each ones perception within all perceivable...true vs lie reasoning implies ones consent to a suggestion, while ignoring perceivable.
Nature doesn't generate truth or lies...only change.
choose to go along with the narrative
a) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow along...others influence by information to tempt following.
b) Nature doesn't narrate...it moves sound, which internally separates instruments from one another. Narration implies the articulation of natural sound.
I'm not sure it's the majority
Being within nature implies as one (partial) within oneness (whole)...others suggest collectivization, which when consented to, establishes a minority vs majority conflict of reason.
They didn't admit it out loud
"I'm just following orders" ~anyone consenting to the suggestion of another. Admission vs denial reasoning represents the artificial distraction thereof.
As for loud...nature implies the sound of silence; beings articulating words to one another implies noise. If one resists the noise, then one can sense the silence. That's the tranquillity; serenity; equanimity etc. only oneself can find.
their actions
Nature acts, which allows being to re-act aka respond to being enacted upon.
Few suggest actors under directors within movies to distract many from action directing (inception towards death) reaction (life) through motion.
One cannot act...only react, hence being given a choice how to react.
dark thought
Discernment implies light thought; ignorance implies dark thought. Perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception allows self discernment, while choosing to hold onto suggested information tempts ignorance.
most of the people are happy to accept a lie
- Some of them want to use you
- Some of them want to get used by you
- Some of them want to abuse you
- Some of them want to be abused
- Sweet dreams are made of this
- Who am I to disagree?
https://genius.com/Eurythmics-sweet-dreams-are-made-of-this-lyrics
Who invented Communism?
a) COM (together) UNI (one apart from one another)...a suggested -ism tempts ones consent together into consensus with others.
b) IN (within) VENT (to come) ION (action) aka each ones reaction coming into being within all action...consenting to any -ism tempts one to ignore that.
Origins of Mystery
There can be only one origin for each one within...ignoring origin (perceivable) for one another (suggested) conceals everything revealed in mystery.
Suggestion casts myst/mist over ones perception...if consented to.
Independent from the status quo and the world
a) Status (state) + quo (within which) aka status (ones perception) quo (all perceivable)...once again implying a separation from one another, while dependence implies attaching self (consent) to another (suggested).
b) World/worold - "human secular existence" from secular/saecularis/sai - "to bind; tie"...the word "world" is being suggested to distract from the status (perception) quo (perceivable).
being able to think universally
a) Being able implies being (life) enabled (inception towards death)...linear progression.
b) Uni (one) vers (to turn) implies turning against one another...circular thinking.
c) VERS tempts UNI to ignore ALL...it's a crafted spell. Only one within all can see this; while others are blind to it by turning against each other.
in absolute terms
a) Absolute (free from limitation) contradicts term (boundary)
b) Being implies free (choice) within limitation (balance), hence not bound, but set free (living) during limitation (dying).
c) The trick...terminology aka suggested terms tempting ones consent into circular logic, hence binding self to another aka ones choice to a chosen one.
circumstance
Aka ones stance within a circle...as opposed to ones stance (life) within linear progression (inception towards death).
A kike/kikel - "circle" erects at center while circumcising circumference...
immediate environment
Im (within) mediate (middle) + en (within) viron (circle) ment (mind)...ones consent to any suggestion permits another to mediate information into ones mind, where one holds into during circular thinking (logic), which outwardly turns into conflicts of reason against others.
IM + EN implies "within" one...not the suggested "immediate environment" outside of one. Only oneself can see through this deception, because anything another suggests comes from outside self.
And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
KNOW (perceivable) sets FREE (perception)...truth/treowð - "faith; pledge, covenant" binds one to one another.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/truth
Notice also...truth/deru - "be firm, solid". Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Truth tempts form to pledge to other form (Jesus Christ), while ignoring flow (God).
That pledge of faith implies religion aka RE (to respond) LIGO (to bind)...
Jesus said to him, “I am...
Je suis (I am)...why would I AM say I AM? Because...
- I am what I am
- I am my own special creation
- So come take a look
- Give me the hook or the ovation
- It's my world that I want to have a little pride in
- My world, and it's not a place I have to hide in
- Life's not worth a damn till you can say
- "I am what I am"
https://genius.com/Gloria-gaynor-i-am-what-i-am-lyrics ...produced by... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Diamond
Openness (of heart) is necessary for one to see the truth...
...and yet the mind holds onto the truth, while blinding ones outward sight inwardly.
Also...necessity was before heart comes into being. It's inception opening and death closing necessity for each ones life within.
Openness is not lack of distinction
Using IS implies a synthesis between suggestion and consent, which when consented to...makes distinction unrecognizable.
Nature WAS perceivable before a being within can suggest what it IS to one another.
is not lack of
Is implies vs isn't...there's the "lack of". One cannot suggest what anything is without implying what it isn't. It's suggestion which conjures consent into a lack of aka into nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing).
is...doesn't imply relativism
Relate/relatus - "to carry back" hence carrying suggested information back from perceivable inspiration, while tempting the consent of another to burden self with it.
It's the -ism which shapes a suggestion out of perceivable re-lat-ion aka action carrying back (inception towards death) reaction (life).
open society
Society/sekw - "to follow"...life can only follow opening (inception) towards closing (death), which life needs to resist the wanted temptation of.
Follow aka to fall low...how about: "Rising High Rising High let your will fly high".... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imR_Sbkjq84
Thanks for the inspiration.
it kept bringing up Cognitive dissonance.
- CO - "together"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/co-
- DIS - "apart"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/dis-
Now ask AI why it would bring up a contradiction...
Its not like we, or I don't suffer from it either.
Nothing (not) vs everything; like vs dislike; plural (we) vs singular (I); do vs don't...that's the cognitive dissonance aka contra (against) diction (to speak) within your mind.
Only letting go of both sides relieves ones self imposed suffering...
Sometimes its hard to let go of...
Every time it's easier to hold onto, because that's the path of least resistance during motion.
what separates conspiracy
CON (together) + SPIRO (to breathe)...others CON one into ignoring that breathing implies separation.
We try to not let these ideas conflict with us
We vs they; everything vs nothing (not); us vs them...three conflicts within half a sentence about trying to avoid conflicts.
closed their minds off
Circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason) closes ones mind off from implication (if/then) aka linear progression.
kids and young people are usually the most open and receptive
Because young memory hasn't received much old information yet. Holding onto information within memory ages it faster, while spoiling memory with the rotting fruit of forbidden (suggested) knowledge (perceivable).
Forbid aka for (forwards) + bid (to ask) implies being forwarded within perceivable inspiration, while asking for suggested information.
Fruit/frui - "to use"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fruit not misusing by holding onto it.
requires independent thought
Within dependence to what? To depend implies "attached to cause", which contradicts cause generating effects by separating each from one another.
different possibilities (openness)...and most important of all - love of truth above all.
a) How can there be anything above ALL?
b) Love vs hate and truth vs lies implies different sides turning against one another, hence not openness, but closeness.
analyzing information
Nature doesn't generate information, but inspiration. Information is shaped within nature by ones consent to the suggestion of another aka a synthesis...not an analysis.
critical thinking
Critic/krinein - "to separate"...holding onto "love of truth" implies attachment, while ignoring separation.
Sleight of hand: "everyone's a critic", because ONE implies separation from one another.
Amazing how well they have dominated most people
Free-dom implies each beings choice within natures balance...your wife operates within imbalance, hence wanting reddit drama or sitcoms on TV vs not wanting to think about what's really going on.
Only balance dominates...imbalance implies subservience by free will of choice.
occupy her mind
Occupy implies "taking possession of"...mind implies potential (perception) during procession (perceivable).
Few suggest information to tempt many to occupy their minds with it, while ignoring that one cannot take possession of perceivable inspiration moving through ones mind.
Information warfare is based upon few tempting many to take possession of information, while ignoring inspiration...which occupies the mind with artifice, while making the being vacant within nature.
Sleight of hand: "It's deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread...they want nothing but nothingness; nothingness without end" ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
That nothingness represents the vacant state of a gentile mind possessed by suggested information. A gentile possessed seeks to fill the emptiness inside with endless more information aka "reddit drama or sitcoms on TV"...
a relationship with a.i.
a) Consenting to any suggested word implies an artificial relation.
b) Relate aka re (to respond) lātus (to carry)...natural relation implies being (perception) carried (perceivable). Artificial relation implies carrying what another suggests.
400000 people
Natural implies each person. Artificial implies suggested collectivism (4); denialism (0), and pluralism (people)...if consented to.
some way
Some/sem - "one together with"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/some
Way (inception towards death) separates being (life) from one another.
mirrors gnostic
Gnostic/nosis/gno - "to know" implies each ones perception within all perceivable origin. It's the suggestions by another which have to mirror the moving origin, while one holds onto them.
Example...artificial CURRENCY mirroring natural CURRENT. Ones response to artifice represents a reflection.
recycle
Consenting to a suggestion tempts one to respond to a cycle, hence establishing circular logic within oneself, while turning outwards against one another within conflicts of reason.
reincarnation
Aka responding (re) within (in) flesh (carno) of action (ation) representing the embodiment of each being aka all (motion) giving mind (momentum) to each one (matter).
From the christian perspective...the embodiment of God in the person of each Christ. Rub your fingers together to notice the oily film...that implies being an anointed one aka smeared with oil.
hellscape
Heaven/heven/hebban - "to lift; raise; exalt"...hence hell (inception towards death) raising heaven (life).
Scape implies ones scenic view of either perceivable reality or suggested fiction...the former inspires one to rise (heaven), the latter tempts one to fall under the burden of information (hell).
Example...being implies heaven; carrying a name implies hell. Notice how hard it is for a being to outgrown its name...that's because the being was tricked to hold onto the name, while struggling to grow "in the name of" a corporation (corpus oration aka voice of the death) aka deadnaming.
It seems the natural direction of life to evolve
Evolve aka ex (out) volvere (to roll)...a circular movement. Natural direction implies linear progression (inception towards death) of being (life).
Seem aka hit semeth (it seems) implies an impersonal apparition suggested by another to distort ones perception into circular thinking (logic).
That we are created and milked for our ‘feelings’ - which are then used as a food or energy source.
a) Energy implies source for anything within.
b) Energy implies motion generating matter by internal separation, which tempts matter with e-motion to one another.
c) Falling for the temptation of emotion implies ignoring to build resistance during motion...ones ignorance permits others to feed upon, hence inviting exploitation.
d) To create implies out of nothing...a suggested inversion of nature transforming all perceivable into each ones perception by internal separation.
loosh
Aka loose - "set free"...ignoring ones free will of choice by consenting to any suggestion by another permits others to harvest loosh aka gathering consensus, which in return binds ones free will of choice to a chosen ones suggestion.
dark
a) Light implies ones discernment; dark implies ones ignorance.
b) Light generates spectrum by internal separation of rays...rays cast shadows upon one another within the visible spectrum of light. That's what allows discernment and ignorance to be utilized by each ones free will of choice...choosing one over the other binds ones free will of choice, hence casting enlightenment into darkness.
a sort of creation narrative
Sorting implies putting together what nature sets apart. Creating implies out of nothing, and into nature for sorting by those within. Narrating implies those within nature tempting each other to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
Both sorting (collectivism) and creating (creationism) represent artificial narratives to narrow ones natural sight...if consented to.
first place
Place implies position; first implies ion...posited within action.
creator beings
Being implies within nature. A being cannot create what nature not already offers....yet, a being can be tempted to ignore natural transformation for artificial creation, which permits another being to "create" artificial narratives.
a particular substance
Being within nature implies as partial (perception) within whole (perceivable)...ones consent to any suggestion by another puts one into sub-stance aka under-standing.
to come up with a way
Only within way (inception towards death) can one come into being (life). There cannot be another way for coming into being.
pure loosh
Loose cannot be pure. It's the process of purification which sets loose impurity internally. Being implies impurity (living) during process of purification (dying).
all shapes and sizes
Only one within all can be shaped and sized by one another.
level of purity
Level implies balance for impure choice during pure motion. Measuring purity in levels makes choice impure.
When creating these zillions of lifeforms, the creator...
There can be only one. Each one life formed within all flow...not a creation out of nothing, but a transformation (transfer of form within action) within everything.
turning point
Point implies "end of sentence". Sentence implies sentience send from beginning (inception) towards end (death) of being (life).
One cannot turn the point...only the sentence/sentience aka by circular logic turning into conflicts of reason among sentient beings, who are reasoning against one another by trying to make a point.
divided all species into male and female.
All implies whole; species implies partial. Female implies fe(minine)male aka feminine effect within masculine cause, which implies an internal division.
Female can only come into being within male. Reaction can only come into being within action. Matter can only come into being within motion, hence as mote of ion etc.
to watch over the garden and to chase off any uninvited guests or thieves
Garden implies to guard...building defensive invites offensive.
Loosh is emitted
Only nature emits each transmitting being. A transmission coming into being (life) during emission (inception towards death) implies being set loose/loosh.
Consenting to any suggestion of another implies a-FIRM-ation, hence making firm what nature loosens.
Choice cannot give consent without binding self to another, hence corrupting natural analysis with artificial synthesis.
for your own understanding
How could it be for ones own if understanding implies standing-under another?
an immigrant in a foreign
Immigrate implies moving into, hence from foreign into native. The suggested rhetoric "immigrant in a foreign country" inverts each ones perception being native within all perceivable and foreign to one another.
As for this particular user, it really sounds like they’re
They're implies a plural, which contradicts singular "particular"...AI is being used here to domesticate consenting users to inversion.
Humans are indeed complex
The "hue of man" implies a separation of light into visible spectrum aka an analytical process...labeling it complex implies an artifical synthesis.
it’s almost as if the universe itself is giving us hints,
a) Almost represents a contradiction of terms...it's either "all" or most of each one within all.
b) Nature doesn't hint/hinþan "to seize"...it offers all (perceivable) through each one (perception) for free will of choice.
Others suggest HINT to HUNT consent...for it's ones consent which seizes suggested information by another.
the contrast between spiritual and materialistic
Contrast/contra - "against" contradicts being matter within spirit of motion, hence material reacting to being moved by spirit/spiro - "to breathe".
Material within spirit implies ones struggle to sustain self, not ones conflict against one another. Others suggest spiritual-ism and material-ism to tempt ones consent to attach itself to the suggested, which then establishes the conflict against one another aka reason.
Reason (vs) casts a contrast onto implication (if/then)...if one chooses a side.
Theater/theasthai "to behold" implies one being choosing to hold onto what another being predicts/praedicere - "foretell, advise, give notice".
Nature neither predicts, nor can any being within hold onto it. "the show must go on" refers to nature moving, which those who behold are ignoring.
Baron/baro - "free man" + Trump - "to deceive; cheat; impose upon"...
Etiology aka etio (to give) + logy (logic/reason)...cause giving effect implies linear progression; logic implies circular thinking turning into conflicts of reason against others, while ignoring linear causation.
both sides
a) SIDE (inception/death) cannot be held onto without distorting a beings SIGHT (life)...
b) Both implies one and one together (synthesis); being implies apart from one another (analysis).
c) Any synthetic side by another distorts ones analytical sight...if held to.
a) Reasoning implies a circular conflict. Ones will responds to linear progression. Stupidity refers to mental slowness when ignoring linear (perception) for circular (suggestion).
b) Saga/sagu - "a saying" implies the suggestion of another tempting one to consent to circular reasoning about words said, while ignoring the linear progression of sound.
I genuinely don't get it
Genuine/gignere/gene - "to beget; produce; give birth"...nature begets being. A being cannot get anything from one another which nature not already begot.
Whenever ones tries to get..."I can't get no satisfaction; cause I try and I try and I try and I try"
who owns the internet
Net/ned - "to bind"...binding internally implies by ones free will of choice to external suggestions by another.
Own/aik - "to possess"...consenting to a suggestion implies taking into possession, while ignoring that potential (life) was given by procession (inception towards death).
If form within flow takes given...one gives up self, while permitting others to take.
european union
Aka joining together (union) debtors held in servitude by a creditor (eu-r-o-peon)...
Any suggested information becomes a debt held within self, while serving others by giving credit/creed (faith; belief; consent) willingly.
an appeal to the global Christian community
Appeal/adpellere - "to drive forwards". That implies God driving forwards each christian...appealing to one another implies rejection of God.
global Christian community
Aka a christian allowing self to be abated by suggested globalism and communism, while ignoring to be anointed by God.
community
Com (together) contradicts unit (one apart from one another)...
jews
..."who claim to be jews though they are not, but are liars" ~Revelation 3:9
what if
Putting "what" before "if" puts origin in question. Implication (if/then) implicates origin generating outcome.
why many cops are so cold
Because following orders curtails heat; while resisting orders sustain heat. Notice also that cops are called "the heat"; while suggesting those within heat "to freeze", hence making arrests aka arresting development of heat by freezing ones will to resist.
reptile
Try ob-REPT-ion - "trying to obtain something by craft or deception"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/obreption
confess while mocking
- Howard aka Hoh-weard (high defender; chief guardian)
- Luttnik/luttrich aka liud (tribe) rik (rich)
Science/scio - "to know" aka each ones perception being (be) backed (hind) within all perceivable. Others suggest scientism to distract ones perception from all perceivable.
All implies one in energy. All energy sets each ones potential free during limitation. Device implies the divide of all energy into each ones potential.
It's suggested "un" which tempts one to ignore the aforementioned. Only within a limit (inception towards death) can one be free (life).
To implies "towards"; define implies "to affix"; gravity implies "weight"....consenting to a suggested definition tempts one to ignore being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death), while burdening one with suggested information, hence the weight.
...implies the essential being ignoring the substantial nature of being moved apart from one another, hence freed of burden. It's consenting to suggestions by another which establishes "gravity" aka the downward acceleration of ones submission to another.