law of moses
Mosaic law implies "small pieces inlaid to form a pattern" aka many small laws to form a judicial system. That's the inversion of nature separating L(and) A(ir) W(ater).
From a different perspective...pattern/patron/pater - "father". Mosaic law tempts those who follow to form a father, while ignoring "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven."
Mosaic law implies a jewish game...a mosaic aka a puzzle aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).
Nature separates each being from one another...a jew tempts gentiles to artificially puzzle nature back together.
Kill homosexuals, kill rapists, kill them all
a) All cannot be killed by anyone within. One can only kill one another aka taking from one another, while ignoring all given.
b) If one kills homosexuals; rapists and all the other degenerates, then one's a killer. Who's gonna kill the killer?
c) Notice that killing (taken) sacrifices living (given)...what if only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life)? What if each being needs to adapt to given by resisting the wanted temptation of taking?
relies on
Rely aka re (to respond) + ligare/leig (to bind)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rely
Relying on anything binds ones free will of choice...
a dump on God
If God implies all, then one cannot dump anything onto everything without ignoring ALL.
Anthropromorphic
Only within pro (motion) can anthro (momentum) become morpic (matter). Putting the words anthro + pro + morphic together tempts morpic within anthro to ignore pro (God).
To assert (join together) ignores being set apart from one another...
All sets each one free (choice)...others tempt one to physically (idol) and mentally (ideal) hold onto. Holding onto distorts one within the process of being set free.
It ain't any of these material things...but ones choice to hold onto either.
Material implies ones matter (materi) within all (al) motion...a process of separation. Others shape matter to tempt one to hold onto the shape.
Godfather of A.I.
There can be only one father of anyone within; as in...only within nature can artifice be shaped.
we need
a) Need implies father; hence each child within struggling with want.
b) We implies artifice (plural) shaped within nature (singular).
To Become Our Mothers
Coming to be implies within (matter) mother (momentum) of father (motion)...both plurality (mothers) and possession (our) tempts one to ignore that.
It Will Murder Us
a) It's will implies each ones free will of choice using artificial intelligence.
b) To unite states (us) implies mutual destruction of each partial by friction, hence murder/mer - "to rub away"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/murder
c) What prevents rubbing away? Anointment by separation of mother and child. Therefore...coming into being implies as each anointed one (christ).
The artificial mother rhetoric is about destroying christ by rubbing off anointment, which ones consent to the suggestion of another does.
negative energies
a) Energy implies singularity.
b) Positive implies each ones position within all of energy; negative implies ones denial thereof when positioning self under another.
c) The suggested word "understanding" tempts those who consent to switch polarity...
attached themselves to us
US implies ones singular attachment to suggested pluralism.
possession and demons are real.
a) Real implies ones response (re) within all (al) aka potential within procession.
b) Demon aka dai (to divide) mon (to provide) implies all procession providing each ones potential division.
c) If dai (potential) ignores mon (procession) by taking (possession) from one another, then one becomes possessed by another.
We must always spiritually be on guard.
WE prevents one from guarding self. Notice guarding implies...many asleep; few awake aka gentiles asleep; jew awake.
Plural prevents singular from waking up aka throwing many seeds together makes it harder for each to grow, hence guarding/gardening aka garden/en garde...a defensive stance within fencing, like fencing a garden.
pilling is provably not a solution. Conquering ..is.
Con (together) quaerere (to seek)...few suggest pills to tempt many to seek solutions to problems together.
Doing that tempts one to ignore being a problem (life) within solution (inception towards death). A being moved cannot conquer motion...the mind of a moving being can be conquered with matter.
If one suggests a pill as the solution to problems, then ones consent to it implies ones permission for another to conquer. Neither the pill, the solution, nor the problem matter to the conqueror...only the consent of the conquered.
Ultima Thule implies the extreme limits (inception towards death) of travel (life). Travel implies to traverse (trav) all (el).
- Reich/rich/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rich
1st reich (inception towards death) generates 2nd reich (life) aka second/seco (to divide) aka a division of all (perceivable) into each one (perception).
3rd reich (suggested) tempts one to ignore that, because ones consent to a suggestion artificially unites (3rd) what nature (1st) divides (2nd).
Origins of the freemasonic
Origin (nature) sets free (being)...which frees one to masonic/magic/magh (to be able) aka to distract one another from origin.
Mason distracts free from origin...if consented to by free will of choice.
Our Entire Reality Is A Lie Manipulated By Actors
Real aka each ones response (re) to all (al)...reaction within action. It's watching others "act", which tempts a being to ignore re-acting to natural action.
Watching (truth) vs acting (lie) becomes the manipulation aka many watchers manipulated by few actors.
Whenever one watches; one chooses what to watch based on conflict (want vs not want)...this conflict represents internal (logic) and external (reason) manipulation.
entire reality
Entire (integer) implies particular (fraction), hence an internal separation of each one (re) within all (al).
Reality cannot be entire...being implies particular within entire nature. Therefore...particular/entire implies re/al.
A particular cannot discern self within entire (analysis)...by consenting to the suggestion of another particular (synthesis).
many people don't know the difference between something real and something created to deceive
Aka the difference (ones free will of choice) between re (ones perception) al (all perceivable) and a created (suggestion by another) deception (ones consent).
Another cannot create a deception without ones consent to it...consenting to another (suggestion) deceives self (perception).
according to
Artificial accordance (coming into agreement) distracts from natural accord aka ad (to) cordis (heart) aka nature moving towards (inception towards death) the heart (life) of matter...a process of internal separation.
Agreement implies external contract establishing internal strife (agree vs disagree).
commonly without any credibility
Ones consent to commonly (common-ism) aka singular consenting to suggested plural implies credibility aka creed (belief; faith; consent) given.
They* are propagandizing language
All implies sound; each one within implies instrument...propagation of words implies among instrument aka by consent to suggestion, which is how spell-craft works.
to condition us to adopt isolated info.
a) US (plural) implies ones (singular) consent to condition aka con (together) dicere (to speak)...US implies spell-craft by few to shape consensus among many, hence United States.
A little simpler...condition implies condensing. US condenses ONE by preventing particular expression within a common construct.
b) Each ones perception within all perceivable implies "isolation"...others utilize suggestion to invert natural isolation with artificial attachment.
Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto...suggested information tempts ones mind to attach it.
c) Nature generating being implies ISOS (same) TOPOS (position) aka different position (life) within sameness (inception towards death) aka isolating reactions (effects) within action (cause) from one another.
- WE...speaking in the name of others.
- LOVE...declaring ones position (love) within a conflict (reason) against others (hate).
Bacon/bakkon - "back"...hence turning ones back when speaking in the name of others or declaring conflict.
nothing matters
Matter implies each thing; motion implies everything. Nothing implies matter ignoring motion for one another.
That's why nothing ELSE matters... https://genius.com/Metallica-nothing-else-matters-lyrics
its just what was, now it's what is
a) Everything WAS before each thing can come into being...suggesting each other what IS tempts one to ignore that.
b) Now implies the momentum of motion for each matter within aka the perceivable moment(um) of separation, which also represents the visible/audible spectrum of light/sound.
Who cares if it was cleared of wrong doing
Only nature does, which clears any right or wrong shaped within. Others suggest right vs wrong to tempt ones free will of choice to carry the burden of taking a side.
Agenda (nature) initiates (being)...captured entertainment tempts one to ignore that, because capturing implies holding onto something, while ignoring that everything moves.
That's why poesy is called the art of imitation.
Read Murasaki Shikibu 'The Tale of Genji" (one of history's first novels)... modifying or rephrasing a classic poem according to the current situation was expected behavior among the aristocracy.
It's the unwashed masses aka the peasant folk which ridicules itself with profane language.
a) To believe implies wanting or not wanting suggested...being alive implies perceivable need.
b) All separating into each one makes one alien/alius - "another", hence native (perception) within all (perceivable), while foreign (suggested) to one another.
c) Only within light (motion) can lightning (momentum) be shaped (matter)...
we create what you don't need
Aka we create (suggested) what you (perception) don't need (perceivable)...
inherited knowledge that gives me the edge
Perceivable gives one (choice) the edge (balance)...suggested tempts one to in-herent (stick within). Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) moves and cannot be held onto. What others call knowledge (suggested information) tempts ones consent to stick it within ones mind/memory.
worshiping false idols
Aka consenting to suggested ideals/idols.
these things won't matter when your time is done
Because motion (inception towards death) causes matter (life) to be.
to control the masses
TO (towards) implies nature moving beings apart from one another...few roll (trol) many (masses) together (con) with artificial ideals/idols.
Holding onto anything while being moved...instigates a rolling motion.
common people are loosing
Because only singular (potential) within singularity (procession) can grow...putting anything together during motion implies accelerated loss by friction. Common people call this friction "reason", while ignoring the implied mutual destruction.
I have the weapon of global TV
The weapon implies "free will of choice"...which one ignores when consenting to another telling-a-vision.
TV which gives us connection
Consenting to watch shapes consensus of many under few who show.
you would take back the power
By choosing to let go of what you took by consenting to any suggestion, which would release ones free will of choice from self imposed bondage to another.
terror
Aka fear of suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin.
finding your spiritual wholeness
Aka the foundation of your (matter) spiritual (momentum) wholeness (motion)...which one ignores when holding onto anything.
we rig the game and buy out both sides
a) Game implies gambling choice on chance, while ignoring origin for outcome.
Listen to this to overcome gambling addiction... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-crgQGdpZR0
b) Buying (to consent) and selling (to suggest) tempts the buyer to sell self out for the price of nothing.
c) Ignoring perceivable (need) by taking anything suggested establishes a conflict (want vs not want)...both sides of which are controlled by the ones making suggestions from outside.
Example...boxing implies loser vs loser, while the one losing less is declared winner from outside the ring. There ain't no growth is fighting each other...only loss.
william montague
William (i am free will of choice) Montague (sharp mountain) aka rising (choice) at the cutting edge (balance)
Starting at least at circumcision...
a) To care implies carrying within mind, thereby distorting change of mind by ignorance.
b) Space/spatior - "to wander"...by tempting others to wonder, one can explore space aka where ones mind wanders.
How about this... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wandering_Jew
I don't know either.
Plane (inception towards death) inertia (life)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/inert
To know (perception) implies inert within all known (perceivable).
Stop calling it a planet.
a) Stop ignores plane. Cessation of motion implies ones ignorance of being moved. The delay (cessare) isn't within nature, but within each being ignoring nature.
b) To call implies "summon, invoke; ask for, demand, order; give a name to, apply by way of designation" aka wanting more than all of nature generates as needed.
Before making a call...ask yourself can one C-ALL (see all) from within?
basic math
What's the base of math...zero or one? What does one measure...all or one another? What does addition add; subtraction subtract; division divide or multiplication multiply?
How does alchemy work if each being represents an ingredient within base nature? Could math-a-magic be used in alchemy to invert analysis into synthesis?
we are not orbiting anything
a) Orbit/orbis - "wheel"...what if revolving information within ones memory aka circular thinking (logic) implies "a circle of life; a wheel of fortune; a leap of faith; a band of hope...on the path unwinding"?
What's the first line of "circle of life"? "From the day we arrive on the planet"...coincidence, right?
"And it seems to me you lived your life like a candle (life) in the wind (inception towards death)...never knowing (perception) who to cling to (suggestion)"
b) Let's try another angle..."in anatomy, the cavity in which the eye is situated, is called orbit". So what about orbit/arbitre - "eyewitness"?
Does one witness with ones eyes what others suggest one to consent to? What if consenting to any suggestion establishes arbitration...how is that for an orbit?
Powering the Prison
Within nature...prison/prism implies a trilateral column aka three sides (inception/life/death) within one column.
An artificial prison is based on imprisonment aka ones mind holding onto information, while ignoring the trilateral transmission of inspiration moving through ones mind aka from one side, through ones side/sight, to the other side, hence through a data processing center.
The issue with data/dare/do - "to give"...only nature gives; each being within needs to resist the wanted temptation to take.
Nature gives potential; potential resists possession...or gets possessed.
history lesson
Lesson/lessen...burdening self with his-story lessens ones growth.
In nature "lesson" implies less (to diminish) son (sound) aka the extenuation of sin...holding onto history lessons burdens self with sin.
we are in a complain
It's ones (singular) consent to we (plural) which establishes the com (together) plain. ONE doesn't have anything to COMplain...it requires others to complain to; with and about.
Notice furthermore that the opposite of a plaintiff is a defended...if one com-plains (synthesis), then one cannot de-fend (analysis).
they suffer no consequences
They + con implies plural...a chosen one implies singular. Sequence/sequi/sekw - "to follow" implies gentiles following each jew. A jew doesn't follow...israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies resisting the natural order aka resisting the temptation to follow.
Few suggest that "actions have consequences"...in reality...actions have re-actions aka an internal process of separation.
Being implies in disarray...not in sequence.
Every thing peasants have done in every
a) Peasants implies the synthesis of each singular thing into a plural "peasantry", which ignores everything (nature) separating into each thing (being).
It ain't every in every...it's each (partial) in every (whole). A singularity.
b) A being cannot do...only nature does; which allows each being within to re-do self. Redo implies ones response to being done within all.
inevitably a trap
Inevitable/evitare "to avoid"...nature cannot be avoided; only ignored, which represents the void within self aka entrapment...within (en) contrivance for catching unawares (trap) of mind (ment).
Ignorance corrupts awareness.
surrendered power
Nature (balance) empowers being (choice)...choosing to consent to the suggestions of one another surrenders power aka ones choice selecting a chosen one aka slave selecting master.
There cannot be a surrogate for ones free will of choice...only surrender.
Here's the sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Frank-harris-hold-on-to-the-vision-lyrics (no retreat; no surrender)
points of view being expressed
Being implies sentenced from inception towards point of death, hence being sentient, and being given sentience. A point ends expression.
allowed to offer criticism
Only all offers each one being...which one needs to resist to grow. Critic/krei - "to sieve; discriminate; distinguish" implies the separation of all into each one, hence "everyone's a critic".
Ones consent to suggested critic-ism implies a synthesis (putting together) corrupting analysis (setting apart).
communist party
Notice com (together) uni (one apart from one another) + party (collectivization of particles).
Being implies part (partial) within uni (whole)...it's ones consent to suggested commun-ism, which makes one a commun-ist, hence a part within a party that ignores being a part within whole.
choose to not participate
a) Not implies ones choice to consent to suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) aka ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
Not denies everything (whole) giving each thing (partial) a free will of choice to respond.
b) Choosing to join the choices suggested by another inverts participation...joining together contradicts being apart from one another.
Joining any religion sacrifices natural particularity for artificial commonality.
you can choose
YOU originates from ones choice to take possession of self as "me; myself or I", which shapes everyone else into a YOU (phonetic you).
The origin of YOU (jew) implies I AM (je suis; jesus)...
YOU sacrifices ones choice to a chosen one.
a) Only within motion (sound) can a narrative (words) be promoted.
b) Work implies energy (internal/inherent power) aka motion promoting matter aka expressing power within impressing power.
c) In your example...not only are the articles artificial, but also the dates aka the taking of measurements during a process. Reading the articles year after year ignores work...it represses expressive power.
d) Suggested repetition mimics perceivable instance aka ones stance within motion. Each moment one responds to repetitive suggestions, one ignores ones stance as matter within momentum of motion.
e) Consenting to a suggestion implies a "wage" aka a payment for services rendered. Making a wager implies gambling aka giving up choice by taking a chance...doing that inverts how nature works.
f) All works; which spreads each one within from one another...wanting vs not wanting to work isn't optional, but essential (life) ignoring necessity (inception towards death) of origin.