It was the camera behind Kirk. No, it was the magic bullet deflected off the vest that he is not wearing. No, it was Israel bcz he only vaguely said some thing while advocating zionism and Israel would benefit some how. Do you feel resolved yet? Nothing changes bcz they have you hooked. Solution: - Conspiracies

It was the camera behind Kirk. No, it was the magic bullet deflected off the vest that he is not wearing. No, it was Israel bcz he only vaguely said some thing while advocating zionism and Israel would benefit some how. Do you feel resolved yet? Nothing changes bcz they have you hooked. Solution: (www.youtube.com)

posted 340 days ago by pkvi_stannum 340 days ago by pkvi_stannum +5 / -0

10 comments

10 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (10)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point 340 days ago +1 / -0

What's this supposed to prove? He wasn't crushed by anything.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– BlueDrache 2 points 340 days ago +2 / -0

He's obliquely advocating for property damage.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– free-will-of-choice 1 point 340 days ago +1 / -0

a) What if suggested property distracts one from being temporary restored (life) during ongoing damage (inception towards death)?

b) Why was the definition of property/properte (nature, quality, distinctive character always present) changed into "possession; ownership"? https://www.etymonline.com/word/property

c) What if consenting to suggested advocation implies the transfer of ownership?

permalink parent save report block reply