Everything (perceivable) implies knowledge for each thing (perception) within..."like" ignores difference of knowledge, and "they" ignores singularity of knowledge.
No sources no links no anything
All implies source; each one within an effect...links imply affection (suggested) to one another, while ignoring source (perceivable).
Nature doesn't link beings together...it sets each one apart from one another with free will of choice.
Like it must be true because I said so n stuff
Because implies "causing being"...an internal differentiation.
"like" implies differences put together.
"true" implies two different sides coming together in conflict (true vs false).
"said" implies the articulation of sound into words held onto aka a coming together of different letters.
"stuff" implies freely moving differences stuffed together, while restricting each others different expressions.
no sources
Suggested information cannot ever give the one consenting to it the source of it. It's ones consent to suggested which tricks ones perception to willingly ignore the source of all perceivable.
Also...there cannot be multiple sources; only one cause for any multiplication of effects within.
Multiple implies "many fold"...few utilize suggestion to fold consensus among many. Underneath how ever many folds there can be only ONEs consent to the suggested.
Another example...there's a manifold of religions, yet each ONE is based upon ONEs consent to the suggestion of another ONE.
To join together ignores being one apart from one another.
Or u can dispute them in uncensored debate instead of posting indirectly butthurt memes bout it.
I've got a link for you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o7LPaMqFP8
Everything (perceivable) implies knowledge for each thing (perception) within..."like" ignores difference of knowledge, and "they" ignores singularity of knowledge.
All implies source; each one within an effect...links imply affection (suggested) to one another, while ignoring source (perceivable).
Nature doesn't link beings together...it sets each one apart from one another with free will of choice.
Because implies "causing being"...an internal differentiation.
Suggested information cannot ever give the one consenting to it the source of it. It's ones consent to suggested which tricks ones perception to willingly ignore the source of all perceivable.
Also...there cannot be multiple sources; only one cause for any multiplication of effects within.
Multiple implies "many fold"...few utilize suggestion to fold consensus among many. Underneath how ever many folds there can be only ONEs consent to the suggested.
Another example...there's a manifold of religions, yet each ONE is based upon ONEs consent to the suggestion of another ONE.
To join together ignores being one apart from one another.
I like Pepe