world of chaos
Temporary chaos (life) within ongoing order (inception towards death).
invest
IN (within) VESTIO (clothed by) aka within (living) clothed by (process of dying), and since everyone dies...."the emperor (commander; director) has no clothes" aka naked (process of dying) towards clothed (living).
gambling
ALL (living) IN (process of dying)..."rien ne va plus" (nothing goes), since everything already works.
The few suggest currency (flow controlled by them) and money (m-one-y aka my one, an ownership claim of another) as the inversion of perceivable current (inception towards death) and the perceiving one within (life).
Neither can the perceivable current be controlled; nor the ones within be claimed without ignoring the perceivable current, and ones ignorance (of perceivable for suggested) is where the suggested mark of the suggesting beast bears fruit.
no better...most....truth...left vs right
Nothing vs everything - better vs worse - most vs least - truth vs lie - left vs right....all represent a different branding of the same conflict of reason, caused by ones consent to want or not want suggested information, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Over a million subscribers; a two weeks old vid with 5.8 million views; conspiracies in entertainment format...definitely fishy.
Buy low (iPad); sell high (attention)...
never is now
Everything (perceivable) represents "now" for everyone (perceiving) within...unless ignored for suggested "never" (nothing everything); a deliberate contradiction in terms.
No matter how much one believes in suggested "never"...one still exists within the "now" of perceivable everything.
I can't resist the feeling that what I see is not a human.
Ones choice to resist (need) temptation (want or not want) would grow ones resistance (living) within all temptation (process of dying).
It's never about what others are, but what oneself shapes out of it. Ones blame shapes the strength of others, hence giving them the power to defend themselves from persecution.
Listening to them makes things much worse.
Consenting to suggested (word), while ignoring perceivable (sound) represents ones "dissonance" with the perceivable world, hence making things much worse.
same place
Temporary differences (living) within ongoing sameness (process of dying)
repeat itself
a) transmutation of temporary form (life) out of ongoing flow (inception towards death) implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death)...and so on.
b) REPE'AT, verb [Latin repeto; re and peto, to drive towards) aka RE (life responding to) PETO (being driven forwards from inception towards death).
Humans keep fucking it up and destroying ourselves?
Living within the process of dying implies temporary growth within ongoing loss...which implies ones free will of choice to resist (need) or to be tempted (want) by the process of dying.
One cannot "fuck up" the natural order, only ignore to sustain self while being destroyed by it. Conscious existence as growth within loss represents an opportunity, while free will of choice represents ones response-ability while experiencing that opportunity.
look more and more
Because the many are forced to ignore less and less by the consequences of their ignorance.
People only believe.... literally TOLD...will be
Consenting to believe the suggestions told by others about what will be; puts ones mind into the state of WAR, noun (Greek, to perplex, embroil, disturb). The consequences of a mind in a state of war will reflect in ones surrounding, which those making the suggestions; narrate/direct/shape + define/redefine/contradict with more suggestions.
The suggested novus ordo seclorum (secular) can only exist inside the perceivable natural order (regular), and only oneself represents the free will of choice to regulate in-between regular (perceivable need) and secular (suggested want).
thoughts on the Nephilim
NEPHILIM (fallen angels) aka FALL, verb (Latin fallo, to fail, to deceive)...hence deceptive angles.
AN'GLE, noun (Latin angulus, a corner.) - "the point where two lines meet"....the lines represent the process of dying (inception towards death) and living (choice within balance), and the point represents ones "point of view".
These lines meet at the "cross" road, and consenting to the suggestions of others nails one to the cross.
their offspring
The consequences of ones choices at the cross-road, when ignoring perceivable for suggested.
Parable/myth/metaphor/etc
a) PAR'ABLE, noun (Latin parabola; Gr. to throw forward or against)....aka the perceiving (living) being thrown forwards by the perceivable (process of dying) or the choice of the perceiving to ignore perceivable for suggested, hence reasoning "against" others about the suggested.
b) MYTH; noun (Latin mythus) - "speech, thought, word, discourse, conversation; story, saga, tale, myth, anything delivered by word of mouth" aka suggested information (fiction) over perceivable inspiration (reality).
c) MET'APHOR, noun (metapherein) - "to transfer, carry over; change, alter" aka ones choice to "transfer; carry over; change; alter" perceivable inspiration into suggested information.
TILE, noun [Latin tegula; tego, to cover]
GEN-TILE - a suggested cover for ongoing generation (process of dying)
REP-TILE - a suggested cover for temporary regeneration by repetition (living)
much more provable
How does any "proof" hold up within a mainstream narrative, that is being perpetuated through mass suggestion? The few who conspire are doing it by suggestion, while utilizing the consent of the many as a weapon of offense and defense....consent drives the mainstream forwards, while protecting those making the suggestions.
acting
To respond by commenting implies "reaction"...not action. Free will of choice can only react to a balance based system, not enact anything. The living can only react to the process of dying.
The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being perceiving reaction (life) within perceivable direction (inception towards death).
high and mighty
If one tries to understand suggested information, then one consents to "stand under" the ones suggesting it. What if it's not others "acting all high and mighty", but oneself consenting to be submissive when understanding?
Take for example ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice"...if each one of the many consents by free will of choice to the suggested choices by the few, then the few become the "selection, choice" (elite) aka the "chosen ones".
study life
Suggested STUDY, noun - "application of mind for the purpose of learning what is not before known" tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Everything (perceivable) is known by everyone (perceiving)...which in return allows everyone to grow comprehension about everything by adapting to it. How does perceivable (whole) communicate itself to perceiving (partial)? Self differentiation (whole into partial), which the differentiated perceives as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
imProve
What if suggested IMPROVE, verb - "to make productive" (aka progressivism) tempts one to ignore being produced by a perceivable origin aka NATURE, noun - "born, produced".
What if ignoring perceived cause for suggested effects...affects oneself?
a) https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=bianca + https://www.etymonline.com/word/censor#etymonline_v_8347
b) it represents ones free will of choice to adapt to perceivable (inspiration) or suggested (information). Oneself has to discern the perceivable sound underneath the suggested words...self discernment cannot be gained from others.
c) suggested RAN'DOM, noun - "course without direction" tempts one to ignore being (life) directed within the only course (inception towards death).
d) the few suggest TELE- (towards a distance aka progressivism) COM- (together with aka unionism) -ATION (through action) as the inversion of from center (choice), apart (as partial within whole) and by reaction (living) to enacting (process of dying).
e) instead of using suggested phones; I utilize perceivable PHON'ICS, noun [Greek sound.] - "the science of sounds; otherwise called acoustics"
BIANCA (bianco; white) CENSOR (censere; to appraise)...to appraise white by binding (in wedlock) to black.
Living within the process of dying implies CARE (living) within the source of HEALTH (process of dying), hence the struggle to sustain self takes care of ones health....unless ignored.
Suggested healthcare tempts one to ignore resisting, while the consequences of ignoring resistance are being covered by suggested pharmakia, hence using drugs for the treatment of mind.
Why DRUG, noun - "to dry"? Because a vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) dissolves if too dry.
You are to blame
Who consented to who others suggested one to blame?
kill and eat...kill and consume...never felt bad about eating
What about living? Why are your ethics based on death and shame?
what separates us
Everything (process of dying) separates into everyone (living) aka from whole into partial.
ethical boundaries
a) ethic implies manner of choice...choice implies within the boundaries of perceivable balance (need/want) or within suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
b) if one is bound by ethical behavior, then why is one tempted by unethical behavior? Is temptation stronger than ones "ethical" bond?
create money out of thin air
a) is there perceivable value underneath suggested money?
b) what is used when responding to perceivable and what is used when suggesting or consenting to suggested?
Everything needed for humans to survive
Can humans survive (to live beyond any event) the process of dying?
kill off
What if that "off" (process of dying) keeps generating "on" (living)?
to keep alive
Is that really possible? https://pic8.co/sh/IOnd6j.jpg
a) why prevent putrefaction by embalming, when dissolving (process of dying) continues to solidify (living)?
b) why is it that one assists putrefaction with compost heaps for more efficient yield, yet embalms ones kin?
continue to die
Living implies that.
humanity progresses
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] implies AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.]...animation implies progression.
lets all keep
What can the living keep within the progress of dying?
- PAPPA (father; supreme being) RAZZ (to deride; laugh, mock, ridicule, scorn in contempt)
If father (flow) to mother (momentum) to child (form), then capturing the moment (through photography) derides the father.
The few suggest the norm; the many consent to stand under (understand) the suggested norm. Consent of the many gives the few the capability to define; redefine and contradict the "norm" at will, while the many are stuck reasoning (right vs left; straight vs queer; love vs hate; beautiful vs ugly; jew vs gentile etc.) about it.
What if you willingly ignore what is (everything perceivable) for the suggested "nobody" (nothing body) by others?