To respond by commenting implies "reaction"...not action. Free will of choice can only react to a balance based system, not enact anything. The living can only react to the process of dying.
The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being perceiving reaction (life) within perceivable direction (inception towards death).
high and mighty
If one tries to understand suggested information, then one consents to "stand under" the ones suggesting it. What if it's not others "acting all high and mighty", but oneself consenting to be submissive when understanding?
Take for example ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice"...if each one of the many consents by free will of choice to the suggested choices by the few, then the few become the "selection, choice" (elite) aka the "chosen ones".
study life
Suggested STUDY, noun - "application of mind for the purpose of learning what is not before known" tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Everything (perceivable) is known by everyone (perceiving)...which in return allows everyone to grow comprehension about everything by adapting to it. How does perceivable (whole) communicate itself to perceiving (partial)? Self differentiation (whole into partial), which the differentiated perceives as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
imProve
What if suggested IMPROVE, verb - "to make productive" (aka progressivism) tempts one to ignore being produced by a perceivable origin aka NATURE, noun - "born, produced".
What if ignoring perceived cause for suggested effects...affects oneself?
What about living? Why are your ethics based on death and shame?
maybe study life a bit before acting high and mighty
To respond by commenting implies "reaction"...not action. Free will of choice can only react to a balance based system, not enact anything. The living can only react to the process of dying.
The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being perceiving reaction (life) within perceivable direction (inception towards death).
If one tries to understand suggested information, then one consents to "stand under" the ones suggesting it. What if it's not others "acting all high and mighty", but oneself consenting to be submissive when understanding?
Take for example ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice"...if each one of the many consents by free will of choice to the suggested choices by the few, then the few become the "selection, choice" (elite) aka the "chosen ones".
Suggested STUDY, noun - "application of mind for the purpose of learning what is not before known" tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Everything (perceivable) is known by everyone (perceiving)...which in return allows everyone to grow comprehension about everything by adapting to it. How does perceivable (whole) communicate itself to perceiving (partial)? Self differentiation (whole into partial), which the differentiated perceives as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
What if suggested IMPROVE, verb - "to make productive" (aka progressivism) tempts one to ignore being produced by a perceivable origin aka NATURE, noun - "born, produced".
What if ignoring perceived cause for suggested effects...affects oneself?
LOL