If you could create money out of thin air they are not money. You will need enormous efforts and tons of chutzpa to force the people to accept your "money", but that will not last forever. So, if you are obsessed with total control, you have to implement all your dreams before people wake up and hang you for your "money" fraud.
That is exactly what we witnessing right now. The question is who wil be faster - fraudsters or people.
To respond by commenting implies "reaction"...not action. Free will of choice can only react to a balance based system, not enact anything. The living can only react to the process of dying.
The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being perceiving reaction (life) within perceivable direction (inception towards death).
high and mighty
If one tries to understand suggested information, then one consents to "stand under" the ones suggesting it. What if it's not others "acting all high and mighty", but oneself consenting to be submissive when understanding?
Take for example ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice"...if each one of the many consents by free will of choice to the suggested choices by the few, then the few become the "selection, choice" (elite) aka the "chosen ones".
study life
Suggested STUDY, noun - "application of mind for the purpose of learning what is not before known" tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Everything (perceivable) is known by everyone (perceiving)...which in return allows everyone to grow comprehension about everything by adapting to it. How does perceivable (whole) communicate itself to perceiving (partial)? Self differentiation (whole into partial), which the differentiated perceives as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
imProve
What if suggested IMPROVE, verb - "to make productive" (aka progressivism) tempts one to ignore being produced by a perceivable origin aka NATURE, noun - "born, produced".
What if ignoring perceived cause for suggested effects...affects oneself?
Everything (process of dying) separates into everyone (living) aka from whole into partial.
ethical boundaries
a) ethic implies manner of choice...choice implies within the boundaries of perceivable balance (need/want) or within suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
b) if one is bound by ethical behavior, then why is one tempted by unethical behavior? Is temptation stronger than ones "ethical" bond?
I stopped by a McDonalds today cuz one of the kids wanted goyslop and I gave in.
I saw a hispanic family and an afghan family inside there. Each probably had 5-6 kids.
I don't think brown people use birth control at all. I even saw a one eyed broken down hispanic man who i figured must be childless. Even that ugly one eyed fool has two kids.
White people must be the only race on the planet that uses birth control. Did you know that Jews invented birth control pills?
Money is fake and that is important to understand. Just look at the relationship between printed money vs the value of the dollar vs price of gold and other precious metals and the stock market.
More important than that is we are a people who do not know who we are or what we are. How can we know anything till we nail that down. To answer these questions we need a good history which we have never had. We dont know where we came from, what and where we are, or where we are going.
Money you create is valued on exchange markets, thus more you print, more worthless it becomes very fast thus you can't buy shit and go bankrupt from hyperinflation.
but reeeeeeeeee the FED prints money like there is no tomorrow
But they didn't exactly go sway all that money around and just handed it out, more like complicatedly oiled the system where businesses and people basically received almost none of it thus not creating the inflation. Also look at shit inflating 10 - 300% so yeah.
Its all very complicated and will actually require few degrees to grasp, but also if such scheme was possible it would be quite complex.
Also what do you think the rich is literally doing ? Do you think people are joking around when the say the same rich, jews, whites, WEF owns all media, politicians and fucking everything that matters ? This shit is unfolding right before our eyes.
Wait? What?
I think it's time for a new post about the textbook monopoly and who owns McGraw Hill and Pearson and all these textbook companies.
I've tried researching it myself. They've tried very hard to hide who the real owners are.
If you could create money out of thin air they are not money. You will need enormous efforts and tons of chutzpa to force the people to accept your "money", but that will not last forever. So, if you are obsessed with total control, you have to implement all your dreams before people wake up and hang you for your "money" fraud.
That is exactly what we witnessing right now. The question is who wil be faster - fraudsters or people.
What about living? Why are your ethics based on death and shame?
maybe study life a bit before acting high and mighty
To respond by commenting implies "reaction"...not action. Free will of choice can only react to a balance based system, not enact anything. The living can only react to the process of dying.
The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being perceiving reaction (life) within perceivable direction (inception towards death).
If one tries to understand suggested information, then one consents to "stand under" the ones suggesting it. What if it's not others "acting all high and mighty", but oneself consenting to be submissive when understanding?
Take for example ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice"...if each one of the many consents by free will of choice to the suggested choices by the few, then the few become the "selection, choice" (elite) aka the "chosen ones".
Suggested STUDY, noun - "application of mind for the purpose of learning what is not before known" tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Everything (perceivable) is known by everyone (perceiving)...which in return allows everyone to grow comprehension about everything by adapting to it. How does perceivable (whole) communicate itself to perceiving (partial)? Self differentiation (whole into partial), which the differentiated perceives as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
What if suggested IMPROVE, verb - "to make productive" (aka progressivism) tempts one to ignore being produced by a perceivable origin aka NATURE, noun - "born, produced".
What if ignoring perceived cause for suggested effects...affects oneself?
LOL
Speak for yourself, pacifist
Everything (process of dying) separates into everyone (living) aka from whole into partial.
a) ethic implies manner of choice...choice implies within the boundaries of perceivable balance (need/want) or within suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
b) if one is bound by ethical behavior, then why is one tempted by unethical behavior? Is temptation stronger than ones "ethical" bond?
I stopped by a McDonalds today cuz one of the kids wanted goyslop and I gave in.
I saw a hispanic family and an afghan family inside there. Each probably had 5-6 kids.
I don't think brown people use birth control at all. I even saw a one eyed broken down hispanic man who i figured must be childless. Even that ugly one eyed fool has two kids.
White people must be the only race on the planet that uses birth control. Did you know that Jews invented birth control pills?
left out owning the parasites with the character of traitors called "law enforcement". cops are the front line that keeps peaceful change impossible.
Sounds more like the next reality show
You just described the ten planks of the Communist manfesto!
Money is fake and that is important to understand. Just look at the relationship between printed money vs the value of the dollar vs price of gold and other precious metals and the stock market.
More important than that is we are a people who do not know who we are or what we are. How can we know anything till we nail that down. To answer these questions we need a good history which we have never had. We dont know where we came from, what and where we are, or where we are going.
Money you create is valued on exchange markets, thus more you print, more worthless it becomes very fast thus you can't buy shit and go bankrupt from hyperinflation.
But they didn't exactly go sway all that money around and just handed it out, more like complicatedly oiled the system where businesses and people basically received almost none of it thus not creating the inflation. Also look at shit inflating 10 - 300% so yeah.
Its all very complicated and will actually require few degrees to grasp, but also if such scheme was possible it would be quite complex.
Also what do you think the rich is literally doing ? Do you think people are joking around when the say the same rich, jews, whites, WEF owns all media, politicians and fucking everything that matters ? This shit is unfolding right before our eyes.
Interesting. Kick off "The Age of Sorrow ". Survivors supplying the loosh.
a) is there perceivable value underneath suggested money?
b) what is used when responding to perceivable and what is used when suggesting or consenting to suggested?
Can humans survive (to live beyond any event) the process of dying?
What if that "off" (process of dying) keeps generating "on" (living)?
Is that really possible? https://pic8.co/sh/IOnd6j.jpg