a) among all the us vs them killings, why are there crocuses "springing" up once again?
b) what if suggested OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.] tempts one to ignore needed response-ability?
to be completely unanswered
a) does being imply "complete" or partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?
b) what if suggested questions seeking suggested answers tempts one to ignore perceivable solution?
c) to be implies "towards being", while being (life) implies within towards (inception towards death)...can you discern the difference?
just a reception on...entrance.
What among all perceivable (whole) did the perceiving one (partial) not receive on entrance (inception)? What's missing within what's already available?
who is behind
a) does BE (being) imply HIND (backward; pertaining to the part which follows) or does being (living) imply resisting being progressed (process of dying)?
b) what if questioning "who is be..." implies lacking self discernment about "being"? Why would a being put "who" before "be"? Who could be more important than being oneself?
Sleight of hand: WHO runs the world? The WHO! Another sleight of hand: Horton hears a WHO, from HORTON (Latin hortatio, from hortor, to exhort) - "giving advice; to encourage; to embolden, to cheer).
stopped humanity progress
Can life being moved from inception towards death be stopped? How can any suggested progressivism be considered over perceptibly being processed?
What is the real source
All that "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is"...
The more we know, the more question arise
a) knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); questions and answers represent suggested (information).
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being problem (living) within solution (process of dying)...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.
evil is stronger than good
a) is the ongoing process of dying stronger that those temporary living within? Can any partial be stronger than the whole?
b) is living good or evil? Is dying good or evil? Can life exist without being moved from inception towards death? Is living without inception/death good or evil? Is dying without living good or evil?
the jews will always win
a) ALWAYS (without variation) represents the inversion of being the variant (life) within the way (inception towards death), hence "ONESWAY".
Sleight of hand: "One way or another I'm gonna get ya"
b) YOUS (phonetic jews) will always win, because each growing ME (life) exists within loss (inception towards death)...one dies; another lives.
c) WIN (to gain) implies being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception toward death)...
d) it took your free "will" of choice to suggest what "will" happen to the jews...
Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil
A ripe apple hanging in a tree; a hungry child needing it; a greedy child wanting it...is the tree good or evil?
we're aware
a) how can one be watchful (aware) if there's always more to watch?
b) how could a plural (we) be watchful for each singular (one) within?
to choose one or the other...
...or to be one representing free will of choice among all others?
{their} goal is
a) why do the many keep reasoning about goals, while the few keep taking down goalposts after goalposts within the ongoing game?
b) what if perceivable "was" before any suggestion can be shaped about what it "is"?
influence
IN (life) FLUENT (inception towards death)...how could life be "outfluent"?
lead us
Only followers can be led, while each life implies resisting while being processed from inception towards death.
to choose...en masse
"chosen ones" implies each one with choice. Groups don't choose, each individual chose to consent to a suggested group, which allows the suggesting individual to keep suggesting in the name of the group, hence becoming the suggesting leader for the consenting followers.
goal should be to do the opposite
a) being (life) implies being done in-between opposites (inception/death), hence representing the opportunity to RE (respond to) DO (being done by) self.
b) origin (inception) drives being (life) towards goal (death), hence the want to reach goals tempting one to ignore the need to sustain self.
the bottom of all the rabbit holes?
a) RAPID (speedy in progression) WHOLE (entire)
b) whole represents the foundation (bottom) for each partial (top) within.
what comes after this?
a) what comes after this moment(um)? What was there before this moment(um)?
b) THIS, definitive adjective...does adjective (to throw) define (limit) aka does adjective (inception towards death) define (life)?
the jews
What started the jewish behavior of exploiting others? What represents the origin of exploitation? What represents the foundation (bottom) for the so called jews to rise to the top?
give/take
What if given (inception) and taken (death) implies being (life)? What could life give/take from this process?
Horrible scenarios suggested by others or perceiving freshly generated crocuses with the kids...free will of choice.
Slow (living) within fast (process of dying) aka want (appetite) within need (hunger)...
One sees (perceivable) before other ones can tell-a-vision (suggestion) about what one sees...
it was the wrong choice
a) choosing to follow suggested orders implies ignoring one to represent free will of choice.
b) reasoning (right vs wrong) about suggested choices, after already ignoring ones own free will of choice, represents justification of ignorance.
a) Bullshit represents "fertile"; reasoning about suggested represents "infertile"...
b) suggested "flu" tempts one to ignore perceivable FLU'ID, adjective [Latin fluidus, from fluo, to flow.], hence being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
c) LAB, noun "a great talker; a blabber" + ORATORY (Latin oratio, to utter)
d) as for LEAK (hole within vessel)...consent to suggested represents the "hole in one" exploited by the suggestions of other ones.
Will comes from a combination of needs
a) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of CHOICE (implies within balance).
b) ongoing -ATION (action) allows temporary to COMBINE (reaction) by setting apart from whole (action) into partial (reaction).
c) ones struggle represents apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying), while others tempt with together aka with combinations of ingredients within base (alchemy).
we create
a) create any new thought without shaping out of preexisting input...partial cannot create without transmuting out of whole. Others can tempt perceiving partial with suggested creationism to ignore perceivable whole.
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts the perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore oneself. Mass consent to a suggested plural (we the people) doesn't cancel each individual one within, it just shows mass ignorance, which gives the few "chosen ones" the power to control each one of the consenting many through the suggested plural "we".
If you and me agree to be "we", then you will still be you and me will still be me, yet "we" can now be used by anyone to manipulate both of "us", hence WE the people or US (united states).
to achieve goals
a) If life is being moved from inception towards death, then does the outcome of life represent the wanted goal for living or does life need to resist the origin, which moves it from inception towards death?
b) why do you think freemasonry utilizes the soccer ritual in-between "goals"?
c) GOAL, noun - "the point set to bound a race, and to which they run; the mark" aka being bound to suggested progressivism, chasing whatever others tempt one to gain, while being "marked" by the beast for extinction.
disciplined
The disciple (living) needs to resist the master (process of dying)...not follow others, hence consenting to be domesticated by suggested rules.
a) consider a seed...it can unfold (evolve) into a tree by its own efforts, yet simultaneously it's being moved from inception towards death, hence corrupted through motion.
b) EVOLVO (unfolding reaction) within -TION (folded action) aka living (unfolding growth) within the process of dying (folding loss).
c) suggested UN (negation) tempts one to consent to ignore CONSCIOUS (awareness), hence ones willing choice to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) representing "unconscious" behavior. One (partial within whole) is always conscious, but has the free will of choice to ignore that.
d) suggested "cannot" aka CAN (being able) NOTHING (negation of everything) represents the inversion of being able (reaction) within everything (action).
e) free will of choice represents reaction within the enacting dominance of balance, hence IN (within) VOLUNTAS (will).
a) a sleight of hand...neo (new) implies there's old nazi...ashke-nazi. The many ignore implication (if/then) for reasoning (agreement vs disagreement) about whatever the few are suggesting them.
b) German abbreviates as follows...ALDI aka ALbrecht DIskont or VOKUHILA aka VOrne KUrz HInten LAng, hence NAtional SOzialist (NASO).
c) suggested head of the ashke-nazi? Rothschild aka BAUER (German for farmer).
optics?
The few utilize suggested information to distract the optics of the consenting many from perceivable inspiration, hence "those with eyes to see" and those "blinded by the light...cut loose like a deuce another runner in the night".
a) Problem (living) - Reaction (free will of choice) - Solution (process of dying)
What most lack to comprehend...enacting solution represents both origin (inception) and outcome (dying) for the reacting problems (life) within.
b) the few suggest Problem (suggestion) - Reaction (consent) - Solution (towards outcome aka death).
c) look at the sinus curvature, then replace 2020 with "inception", 2030 with "death" and all the others suggestions with "life". Self discernment about being alive would then allow one to choose to grow within loss, while being moved from inception towards death.
All suggestions represent distractions tempting one to ignore that, and each suggestion only works if one consents to it by either wanting or not wanting it.
distinct identities
- DISTINCT, adjective - "different"...
- IDEN'TITY, noun - "sameness"
a) the belief in stop (cessation of motion) is what suggested druidism sets into consenting minds/memories.
b) if perceiving (life) can discern perceivable (inception towards death), then that implies constant change. Suggested "stop" tempts one to stop questioning self discernment...
Making a point after suggesting "nothing" implies...
mutually exclusive...contradict each other.
a) CONTRA (against) DICERE (to speak) -TION (through action)...speaking represents different reactions within the same enacting sound. Every word represents inclusive within sound, while every choice to speak represents exclusive to one another.
b) MU'TUAL, adjective [Latin mutuus, from muto, to change.]...life being moved from inception towards death implies being within constant change aka exclusive partial (living) within inclusive whole (process of dying).
three...religions at the same time?
Every RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. If each one of the many chooses to consent to the suggestions of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice".
my religion
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...that bond implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one, hence binding oneself to the will of others by willing consent...the claim "my" tempts one to ignore that.
created is separate and distinct
Separated distinction aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies perceivable transmutation (out of everything)...not suggested creationism (out of nothing).
One (partial) can only be within all (whole) and all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power".
a) A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.]...everyone else represents another for oneself.
b) HOST, noun [Latin hostis, a stranger.]...once again, everyone represents a stranger to one another.
c) obsession (wanting suggested) comes before possession (holding onto suggested).
if...can vs cannot be, then...
a) using implication (if/then) upon reason (can vs cannot) tempts one to ignore that what's being reasoned about was suggested by another. Meanwhile, implication implies perceivable aka if inception, then death for life within.
b) to be implies life being moved from inception towards death...can vs cannot reasoning over suggested tempts one to ignore that.
c) to be implies being able (can) to adapt to everything perceivable...suggested cannot (can nothing) represents the inversion thereof.
Sleight of hand: "can" of worms...don't open it unless you want to bait.
a) life being moved from inception towards death represents a "RITE" of passage.
b) suggested ultimate (terminating) tempts one to ignore being the sustenance (living) within termination (process of dying).
c) abstract (process of dying) generating genuine (living)...whole abridged into partials.
vulnerable to manipulation
a) suggested bad-jacket (not want) vs good-jacket (want) tempts one to ignore perceivable sheltering (need).
b) MANIPULUS (by hand) -ATION (through action)... suggestion represents by hand, while perceivable implies through action. Perceivable cannot be manipulated, yet those perceiving it can be manipulated with the suggestions by others.
snitch
Suggested information tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration...those falling for the former can be utilized as INFORMER on others.
Treat People Like Animals
AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.] implies each animated person...suggested people (mass of persons) tempts one to ignore that.
They Are All Corrupt
CORRUPT, verb - "to break, separate or dissolve"...living within the process of dying implies one to be broken (partial within whole); separated (one from one another) and dissolved (temporary growth within ongoing loss).
life changing books
Life implies change (inception towards death)...suggested books tempt one to ignore that.
sam lyman
Aka Samuel Lyman aka SHEM (name) EL (god) aka man lying in the name of god...well, business as usual.
Hard to see "over" when standing "under"...
WAIT, verb -"to stop or to continue"...does that represent an option for life, while being moved from inception towards death?
Surrounding of center...