not in our name
Nature doesn't brand anything...consenting to suggested "jew" gives those suggesting the power to speak in the name of it. Show me a so called jew that comprehends the implication of IN NOMINE patris et filii et spiritus sancti...
a) the want to hold onto tempts others to want what one holds onto aka greed breeding envy.
b) only suggestion tempts consent, while perception demands adaptation. Only nature offers perceivable, whatever others are suggesting tempts one to ignore that.
Suggested Pepsi (want) vs Coke (not want) tempts one to ignore adapting to perceivable thirst (need). It doesn't matter who makes the suggestions; what they're suggesting or which side one chooses to consent to...only resisting suggested (want) for perceivable (need) sustains matter.
revoke all and any liability exemption laws for big pharma
Are consumers exempt from being liable for consenting to suggested ingredients and side-effects of pharmaceuticals offered to them?
Ask yourself what draws the snake-oil salesmen to come back after being chased out over and over again? Would killing the snake-oil few prevent the many from wanting snake-oil?
Bruce Y. Lee
Y Bruce Lee? Well...Y not? https://img.gvid.tv/i/3ufKLsYW.png
no one...near a lever of power
Every one represents the lever (raise) of power (potential) aka free will of choice. The few utilize the many as their lever of power by tempting the many to consent to the suggestions of the few, which shapes the few into the "chosen ones".
- KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" + OBEY, verb - "submit to the directions of"
a) perceiving (living) needs to resist perceivable (process of dying)...others tempt one to follow suggestions.
b) direction (inception towards death) generates reaction (life)...reaction implies response-ability aka free will of choice.
to know...is
To perceive (know) implies that which "was" perceivable, before one can shape suggestions about what it "is".
a) ignorance breeds insolence.
b) JAMES, from JACOB (Hebrew Ya'aqobh) - "a supplanter; one who trips up, overthrows, defeats, dispossesses" + TEMPLE (Latin tempus; tempora) - "fall of the head"...a Knights Templar.
This is no way for us to live -- its in our hands to stop it.
a) way (inception towards death) deletes content (life).
b) one (living) cannot stop all (process of dying)...only grow ones temporary resistance within ongoing change.
automatically
Manual (living) can only exists within auto (process of dying)...
force on readers
Reading implies consent to suggested words, while ignoring to resist the force of perceivable sound.
censured after purchase
a) PUR (put forth) CHASE (run after)...nature puts forth perceivable (inspiration); others tempt one to run after suggested (information).
b) CENSOR (Latin censere, value)...each one represents evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable). Ignoring this for suggested values by others gives those others the consent to define, redefine and contradict values, hence the suggesting few becoming the censors of the consenting many.
despite backlash
BACKLASH (reaction produced by an inconstant load)...perceivable inspiration represents constant input; suggested information represents inconstant load within the consenting ones mind/memory. Others defining; redefining and contradicting the suggested information loaded within ones mind/memory produces backlash.
Blaming others for backlash to ones own consent...aka TWIT; verb (to blame, reproach, taunt, upbraid) and TWIT; noun (foolish, stupid and ineffectual person).
Roald Dahl be like... https://img.gvid.tv/i/42pDzqDx.png
joel day
JOEL from Iudhael aka LUD (chief,lord) HAEL (generous) + DAY from DHEGH (to burn)...if anyone wants to burn, then Joel is where its at.
william hague
HAGUE (the count's hedge) aka reckoning together (count) + dodge, evade, avoid committing oneself (hedge) by means of free WILL I AM.
tony blair
"Ay, TONE...wasn't George Orwell's Pseudonym BLAIR ?"
a deep rabbit hole...baffles experts
Going deep "into" a rabbit hole contradicts EX (out of) PER (to try)...
similar but slightly different
Being able to perceive similarities (likeness) implies the perceivable to be different from one another. In other words...similar implies that one perceives this different one and this different one as similar.
the research I have done
What have you found that wasn't perceivable (hence available) beforehand? What can one search for that nature not already offers?
The universe is a simulation
How could UNI (one) be SIMUL (like; resembling) if uni implies oneness? What can one resemble? What can energy be like? What could energy simulate besides oneself?
uses itself to create
Creation implies out of nothing; "using itself" implies transmutation of something out of; into and in response to itself.
The key to comprehension represents "to" aka towards aka motion as the base to transmute temporary form (life) out of ongoing flow (inception towards death), yet once again transmuting comprehension out of perceivable implies "oneself" to choose growing it.
Our mind normally does...
a) pattern recognition implies the same pattern (perceivable) offered for imitation to each different mind recognizing it (perceiving) from within.
b) perceivable momentum (balance) represents shared memory, each perceiving choice represents individual memory. Suggested "our" (plural) tempts one to ignore self (partial within whole).
The ever changing moment (um) represents the moment each partial one can choose to adapt to the ongoing motion of the whole.
task to remember
a) one doesn't need to RE (respond to) MEM (memorized information), one needs memory to respond to needed input (flowing inspiration).
b) not "task towards", but towards (inception towards death) generating task (life).
c) nature doesn't need to be remembered by those within, those within need memory to sustain self temporarily within the ongoing offer of nature. Partial (perceiving) cannot handle whole (perceivable) without a moment to consider the implication (if/then) of reacting to an enacting system.
the whole universe will be perfected
a) being will (free will of choice) represents the imperfect partial within the always perfect whole.
b) UNI (one) VERSE (to turn) implies the inherent/internal turning of partial reaction (resistance) within whole action (velocity). Velocity generates momentum, within which resistance is formed. Resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) implies a turning, hence ones struggle to sustain self.
the name of the game
Consenting to a suggested name makes one the plaything for those suggesting it, who can then play a game within perceivable motion (sound) with all those consenting to ignore it for suggested names (words).
outside of the universe
Outside of oneness implies ones ignorance of being one part of whole oneness. Suggested THE-ism tempts one to ignore perceivable whole for a suggested author outside/above and beyond whole. Why? Because consenting to suggested implies ones willing submission under the suggestion of another one.
Self discernment as being "inside" allows further comprehension about "outside". Wanting out tempts one to ignore the need to adapt from within.
a comparison point to good
a) the point implies ones perspective in-between good vs evil, and choosing either side; while comparing it to the opposite, still implies the same position within a conflict (reason).
Meanwhile; outside of reasoning over suggested fiction...perceivable reality doesn't require to be compared to anything outside of perceivable reality, yet it tempts to be ignored for suggested fiction.
b) the few suggest COMPARE (together with) as the inversion of being apart from one another within whole, hence struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying). Together implies "towards getting", being implies one already got access to everything, while being moved towards losing access to it.
criminals
CRIME (Latin criminis, charge) - "load, burden; imposition"...life represents the load; burden, imposition (crime) within the process of dying (natural law). LAW (land; air; water) aka form implies formed out of, within and in response to flow. Therefore...law imposes crime, hence crime (living) representing a burden within law (process of dying).
weigh everything
Everything weighs (to move, stir) everyone within...
Why do I need to do anything...
Because everyone (living) is being done by everything (process of dying). One cannot "do" only RE (respond to) DO (being done by), hence representing a reaction (choice) within an enacting system (balance). Ones choice to ignore balance represents imbalance for choice.
I know I'll be repeating this for infinity?
a) suggested "i" represents the finite, one represents the infinite (partial ones within whole oneness). "Me; myself and I" represents ones claim over being, which tempts one to ignore the need to sustain oneself by resisting the want to claim what one cannot hold onto.
b) repetition aka RE (response to) PETO (being driven forwards) -ATION (through action) implies ones reaction to being driven forwards within an enacting system.
From the energy perspective...frequency (choice) of resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying).
c) Transmutation of partial (living) out of whole (process of dying) implies differentiation (reaction) within sameness (action). There will always be another "one", but never the same "I"...
do what you want
a) a suggested temptation to shirk response-ability (free will of choice) onto others, while ignoring that everyone shares the consequences of each ones choices.
b) want (free will of choice) is being done by need (balance)...only within balance can there be choice.
a) hunger represents need; appetite represents want. The more one wants to still ones appetites, the more one will be eaten alive by the appetite for more, hence starving resistance until mental and physical exhaustion.
Eat anything you like and soon you won't like it anymore. On the other hand...starve yourself until you can't ignore hunger anymore and whatever you then eat will blow your fucking mind.
b) one represents the temporary want within the ongoing need, and needs to resist want to grow ones resistance aka to sustain oneself longer.
Try need (perceivable) over want (suggested); implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false etc.) and inspiration over information...the more you do, the less will you be tempted to seek from others.
Nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) at any moment (momentum)...one just needs to choose it over what others are distracting one with.
Love (want) vs hate (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to constant change.
Hold your breath and reason (want vs not want) about breathing...does it matter or will the need to adapt be forced upon you? Another example....Cola (want) vs Pepsi (not want) or Pepsi (want) vs Cola (not want)? Both tempt one to ignore perceivable need (thirst).
eternal being.
Eternal implies without beginning or end of existence, while being implies the center of eternal (process of dying)....internal (living).
Flow, free will, guidance.
a) flow (velocity) to momentum (balance) to form (resistance)...form within the balance of flow implies free will of choice.
b) guidance implies directing with intent; flow only flows forward...its the existence of form within, which makes flow (inception towards death) the director of formed (life) reactions (choice).
Nothing more.
Ignoring everything perceivable for the suggestions of others represents a) the want for more than everything offers and b) nothing aka ones ignorance of everything.
Non-atheism is the true path.
a) only one path (inception towards death) for everyone within (life).
b) every suggested -ism implies a temptation for one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
c) true implies versus false...a conflict of reason caused by ones consent to the suggestions of other, while ignoring perceivable.
something can't come from nothing or we are all part of an eternal being
a) suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything), hence as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)...transmutation of ingredient out of base alchemy.
In other words...nature sets itself apart from whole (ongoing loss) into each partial (temporary growth).
b) ones consent to anything suggested by others puts others above one, hence corrupting ones perception of the world through the suggested lens of authority above self.
Ignoring self (being) corrupts ones comprehension about and self discernment within eternal origin as reaction within action, both in balance with each other representing EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Or reason is detrimental and therefore any reasoning is detrimental and therefore any moral justification is detrimental
a) reason (want vs not want, true vs false; belief vs disbelief; yes vs no; good vs evil, right vs left; white vs black; pepsi vs coke; us vs them; poor vs rich, vanilla vs chocolate etc.) represents the inversion of perceivable implication (if/then).
b) free will of choice exists at the center of dom-inanting balance (aka free-dom), hence in-between need (perceivable inspiration) and want (suggested information)...one needs (living) to resist want (dying); want represents the temptation to ignore need.
c) suggestion (information) represents the inversion of perception (inspiration) and consenting to suggested, while ignoring perceivable, gives those suggesting the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning at will.
The few utilize suggestion to divide the many against each other within the conflicts of reason, which the few control from both sides. Division (reason) by suggestion (-ism).
d) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance).
Why aren't we...
...because suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore self, hence each one of the many consenting to be dependent to the suggestions of the few.
The natural order (inception towards death) demands resistance from those living within, while the parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to follow suggest orders. One cannot follow orders while being the resistance within the natural order without contradicting ones existence....flow doesn't stop; form can be tempted to ignore being within flow.
independent
Aka IN (living within) DEPENDENCE (dependent to the process of dying)...
addicted to hedonism
Wanting (suggested -ism) tempts one to want more...nothing will ever satisfy want, only need fulfills being, and need require ones struggle to resist want.
communities are fighting for my residency?
Momentum exists at the center of motion; choice exists at the center of balance, growth exists at the center of loss etc. Each one represents the center of ones surrounding, other ones represent moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
The sustenance of self implies ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying)....others tempt one the inversion thereof....suggested togetherness aka e pluribus unum (out of many one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations, european union; uniformity or equality (same) through diversity (difference).
The many seek community, because the few suggest communism... meanwhile in reality...all represents one in energy aka "one for all and all for one" or "there can be only one" or alone aka ALL(in)ONE. The differentiation of whole into partial implies from oneness (perceivable) into each one (perceiving).
How is it completely contrary to that?
Because suggestion (nothing) represents the inversion of perception (everything) and therefore consenting to suggested contradicts perceivable.
require me to read a book, written by men
The few suggest words to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound. This represents spell-craft. For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in-sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound).
Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound), while those who consent to suggested word based definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
Nature doesn't label anything...it moves everyone (form) within the momentum of everything (flow).
potential limited
Limit potential (temporary growth) within unlimited potentiality (ongoing loss).
online misogyny
Hey Jonathan...Tits or GTFO!
a) temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) implies limited growth within unlimited loss....based on free will of choice.
b) if one chooses to grow, then one can never reach ones potential...comprehending this takes the pressure of wanting to reach outcomes, hence balancing ones growth.
Edit: this one's funny...suggesting the limits of growth as DENNIS (Latin Dionysius; god of wine and revelry) on a MEADOW (grassy pasture).
toxic injections; poison; lethal; maiming...
Carefully worded to protect the "vaccine" agenda, hence setting up the usual "bad actor"- scapegoat approach.
a) nature represents the whole (process of dying) decomposing into each partial (living).
b) the few suggest composition aka e pluribus unum (out of many one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations; european union, uniformity or equality (same) through diversity (difference) etc. as the inversion of reality.
c) ones consent to suggested composition (togetherness) tempts one to ignore ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
d) consenting to suggested implies both true (verity) or false (fallacy), while ignoring constant change. Motion doesn't communicate true or false information, it represents inspiration for adaptation by those within.
I don't understand...accountable for the actions of the extremist few
a) each one of the many consenting to "stand under" (understand) the suggestions of the few, gives the few aka the "chosen ones" the power of consent stand over the ignorant many.
b) the few suggest the many to count, ones consent makes one accountable...your consent to the suggestions of the few represents your credit (creed, belief, faith) accounted as debt (debitum; contracted) to them, hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, better known as RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
c) an extrem-ist represents one who consented to suggested extrem-ism, hence giving those suggesting the consent to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the definition of extremism and thereby control over all consenting extremists.
Meanwhile in reality....suggested EXTREME (outermost) tempts one to ignore being partial (living) within whole (process of dying), hence innermost. The center of motion (inception towards death) represents momentum (life). Momentum represents balance within motion and the center of balance represents each ones free will of choice.
There are bad eggs
Whose feeding the chickens? Are those birds domesticated (hence fed) or free (hence adapting to hunger)?
our civilization
To teach a child to respond to words is called "civilized", do it to a dog and it's called "domesticated"...how many civilizations have to collapse until the many comprehend being domesticated by the few?
To broadly label
Nature doesn't communicate labels...the parasitic few suggest labels (words) to tempt the consenting many to ignore perceivable (sound). This represents spell-craft, hence yet another tool of domestication.
Example: suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus " (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within and by sound.
Regardless if someone is Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Chinese, atheist, or human...
Each one "was" perceivable before other ones can suggest definitions for what one "is"....consenting to suggested (fiction) disregards perceivable (reality).
the actions of
Partial (living) within whole (process of dying) can only react to being enacted upon, hence representing free will of choice. The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to distract the consenting many from being reactors (life) within direction (inception towards death).
information to be lost
The few utilize suggested (information) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable (inspiration)...upholding information within memory shapes memory loss, while memory needs to be used for adaptation to always available inspiration.
Sound inspires, words tempt one to ignore that, hence enchantment (subduing mind with spells).
to be this incessant and reach for angles on EVERYTHING
a) to be implies occasional (living) within incessant (process of dying), hence the need to adapt as temporary to ongoing.
b) to be implies partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) aka growth at the center of loss aka one thing within everything.
c) having free will of choice represents difference (need or want) within the same line (inception towards death), hence having an angle while passing through aka the "guardian angel".
Pretending to be the CARICATURE, noun - "a figure or description in which beauties are concealed and blemishes exaggerated, but still bearing a resemblance to the object" diminishes ridicule as a weapon against you.
Take "offense represents the best defense" and add outrageously offensive behavior to the mix until the opposition is too perplexed to defend itself.
controlled by elites
ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice"...who selected the few by free will of choice? Who made the choice to select "elite" as a description for others?
Does a bird require the suggested label "bird" to be perceivable? Does perceivable require suggested labels?