Seems to be the minimally sufficient criteria for an eternal being. Flow, free will, guidence. Nothing more.
Non-atheism is the true path. We're designed to ponder the ultimate reality so why are we giving up all our priceless free time to society?
Non-atheism: either something can't come from nothing or we are all part of an eternal being. Or reason is detrimental and therefore any reasoning is detrimental and therefore any moral justification is detrimental - that is, free for all / Hobbs state of nature.
Why aren't we building independent communities, like the amish? Are people that addicted to hedonism or are they that cowardly to try, or too ignorant to face reality?
Why am I not living in a world where independent communities are fighting for my residency? How is it completely contrary to that?
Why would an eternal being require me to read a book, written by men, over time, in order to "change my current present state into a more "pleasurable?" state? (Heaven).
If astrology has any basis then other solar systems with life have their own interpretations.
We're potential limited. Note the precise ordering of words. Matter could be 100% fabricated and you cannot refute that (https://medium.com/inserting-philosophy/george-berkeley-matter-doesnt-matter-6323f86485f7).
Would you even befriend a family member if you somehow forget they were blood related?
You can study for an IQ test.
I haven't met a person I morally agree with.
Gregory House - "friends allow you to not sit in a room by yourself". Sherlock Holmes reference.
I've had my life flash in front of my eyes. I witnessed my own life through the eyes of what I believe was a morally superior being. Felt like akashic record in real time. I've never been the same ever since.
I also thought I died once, for what felt like several hours. I communicated with a shadow man through telekenesis. I completely accepted that I had died.
I graduated high school with a 2.1 gpa. Skipped at least 1 year of school, was stoned the rest. I also broke a 50 year record in baseball. Eventually got a math degree.
I have only a few friends, which to me, means there are very few remaining moral people.
Why shouldn't a higher power punish us? And why shouldn't we just have fun until he does so?
Eternal implies without beginning or end of existence, while being implies the center of eternal (process of dying)....internal (living).
a) flow (velocity) to momentum (balance) to form (resistance)...form within the balance of flow implies free will of choice.
b) guidance implies directing with intent; flow only flows forward...its the existence of form within, which makes flow (inception towards death) the director of formed (life) reactions (choice).
Ignoring everything perceivable for the suggestions of others represents a) the want for more than everything offers and b) nothing aka ones ignorance of everything.
a) only one path (inception towards death) for everyone within (life).
b) every suggested -ism implies a temptation for one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
c) true implies versus false...a conflict of reason caused by ones consent to the suggestions of other, while ignoring perceivable.
a) suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything), hence as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)...transmutation of ingredient out of base alchemy.
In other words...nature sets itself apart from whole (ongoing loss) into each partial (temporary growth).
b) ones consent to anything suggested by others puts others above one, hence corrupting ones perception of the world through the suggested lens of authority above self.
Ignoring self (being) corrupts ones comprehension about and self discernment within eternal origin as reaction within action, both in balance with each other representing EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
a) reason (want vs not want, true vs false; belief vs disbelief; yes vs no; good vs evil, right vs left; white vs black; pepsi vs coke; us vs them; poor vs rich, vanilla vs chocolate etc.) represents the inversion of perceivable implication (if/then).
b) free will of choice exists at the center of dom-inanting balance (aka free-dom), hence in-between need (perceivable inspiration) and want (suggested information)...one needs (living) to resist want (dying); want represents the temptation to ignore need.
c) suggestion (information) represents the inversion of perception (inspiration) and consenting to suggested, while ignoring perceivable, gives those suggesting the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning at will.
The few utilize suggestion to divide the many against each other within the conflicts of reason, which the few control from both sides. Division (reason) by suggestion (-ism).
d) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance).
...because suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore self, hence each one of the many consenting to be dependent to the suggestions of the few.
The natural order (inception towards death) demands resistance from those living within, while the parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to follow suggest orders. One cannot follow orders while being the resistance within the natural order without contradicting ones existence....flow doesn't stop; form can be tempted to ignore being within flow.
Aka IN (living within) DEPENDENCE (dependent to the process of dying)...
Wanting (suggested -ism) tempts one to want more...nothing will ever satisfy want, only need fulfills being, and need require ones struggle to resist want.
Momentum exists at the center of motion; choice exists at the center of balance, growth exists at the center of loss etc. Each one represents the center of ones surrounding, other ones represent moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
The sustenance of self implies ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying)....others tempt one the inversion thereof....suggested togetherness aka e pluribus unum (out of many one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations, european union; uniformity or equality (same) through diversity (difference).
The many seek community, because the few suggest communism... meanwhile in reality...all represents one in energy aka "one for all and all for one" or "there can be only one" or alone aka ALL(in)ONE. The differentiation of whole into partial implies from oneness (perceivable) into each one (perceiving).
Because suggestion (nothing) represents the inversion of perception (everything) and therefore consenting to suggested contradicts perceivable.
The few suggest words to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound. This represents spell-craft. For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in-sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound).
Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound), while those who consent to suggested word based definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
Nature doesn't label anything...it moves everyone (form) within the momentum of everything (flow).
Limit potential (temporary growth) within unlimited potentiality (ongoing loss).