deepstate comms.
The ignorance of the many to real communication (perceivable to perceiving) represents the deep state. Willingly consenting to suggested represents miscommunication.
- Deep (ignorance)...High (comprehension).
- State (condition) is either affixed (when ignoring) or ongoing (when comprehending).
- Ignorance represents repression; comprehension allows expression...it's a choice.
GRA'TEFUL, adjective [from Latin gratus; grace.] - "free, ready, quick, willing, prompt, from advancing"...
- "free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom.
- ready (inception) set (life) go (death).
- life being moved from inception towards death implies a quick existence.
- free "will" of choice.
- prompted (process of dying) to respond (living).
- advanced from inception towards death.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...
- "Amazing grace, How sweet the sound...That saved a wretch like me"
- "I once was lost, but now I am found...Was blind, but now I see".
actions speak louder than words
Consider if speaking words represents a reaction to sound...
information overload
Consenting to suggested information "loads" it within ones mind/memory, hence receiving a "download" from others.
knowledge is power
The power of knowledge (perceivable inspiration) represents velocity; being able to perceive knowledge represents the power to resist suggested information.
Resistance (life) exists within velocity (inception towards death)...
respond with actions
A contradiction in terms...response implies reaction aka RE (response to) ACTION (enacted upon). To respond implies being responsive to something that came before...action represents the origin of all reactions.
no one
Can one perceive "no one"? If not, why use suggested "no one" to describe a perceivable "someone"? But wait...SOME, adjective - "Noting a certain quantity of a thing"...how could "one" be of an uncertain quantity?
what's happening
HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance" + CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"...how could cause (inception towards death) be unknown to effect (life)?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6RJsM3f_5k (Jordan Maxwell : Understanding Words)
Look into "The Family International" and "David Berg" for a nice little rabbit-hole about separatism. Then there's also "The Family" under "Sarah Hamilton-Byrne" which ties into Julian Assanges' upbringing, but has allegedly nothing to do with the above group.
Science is merely another ism.In a way they are a religion themselves...
a) RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew)...adapting to perceivable represents the natural bond, consenting to suggested represents being bind anew.
b) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for every religion.
c) inception towards death represents the perceivable "way" for the perceiving life within, hence wanderer (living) being bound to way (process of dying).
....unless one is a "Scientist"
"-ist" represents ones consent to suggested "-ism".
needs funding to do research
a) foundation (perceivable) represents need for RE (respond to) SEARCH (finding something)...what one can find is self discernment about being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
b) suggested currency tempts those who consent to ignore perceivable current (inception towards death). Currency tempts one to follow; being within current forces one to resist...
Unless they belong to a University...
a) UNI (one) VERSE (short division of any composition) aka one temporary division (living) of ongoing composition (process of dying).
b) belong aka BEING (temporary) within LONG (ongoing).
Science doesn't even acknowledge
Knowledge is implied in SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.]...one needs to discern perceivable (science) for self, while resisting suggested (scientism).
matter of fact
Suggested MATTER (form) OF (out of) FACT (effect) tempts one to ignore that matter (life) represents the effect of immaterial cause (inception towards death).
A seed doesn't make a tree...motion makes a seed grow into a tree, hence flow (loss) generating form (growth).
science today is spoken
Suggested scientism is spoken in words, SCIENCE (Latin scio, to know) represents perceivable sound, hence KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Sound flows...words are formed within flow.
to speak in certainty
Speaking implies suggesting words towards consent by choice, while certainty represents "unquestionable; that which cannot be denied"...if it cannot be denied, then why does it require consent by choice for confirmation?
Nature doesn't speak in certainty, it represents a flowing solution, for each formed problem (answer/question by choice) within.
marketing their worth
Suggestion doesn't represent worth (value); only perceivable does. The marketed suggestion aims at getting consent by those representing evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
not sharing
SHARE, noun - "a part"...nature differentiates itself from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving). Nature shares itself with you...
It has to burn
While temporary living within the ongoing process of dying...can't you feel the flowing heat dissolving your formed resistance? Try holding your breath until you can't ignore the burned offering (holocaust) anymore...
a) before the few can charge interest....the many are consenting to suggested prices for a nature that sets each one of them as "free" will of choice.
b) usury (interest) aka INTER (being within) ESSE (essence) implies as partial (perceiving evaluation) within whole (perceivable value)...the suggested values by others tempt one to both ignore perceivable value and devalue self.
c) no other life-form uses money to sustain self, the majority of mankind is labeled as living under "world wide poverty", hence not having access to money, yet not just sustaining self, but exponentially growing and replacing those who use money. Furthermore, the so called "rich" don't use money, since they already own everything the rest consents to believe costs money.
d) usury is being used by the few to stack exponentially increasing debt upon the ignorance of the many towards being evaluation within value aka reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying).
e) the highest value in existence (perceivable) represents evaluation (perceiving)....
why not with hold the welfare...
...because if "work will set you free", then welfare keeps you enslaved. Independence demands resisting to take; dependence tempts one to hold onto.
a) freemasonry ritual of consenting to a bitter offer while blindfolded, which represents consenting to suggested (fiction), while willingly ignoring perceivable (reality).
b) being within a chain of command implies consensual, hence experiencing the uncomfortable "rattling of the chains" whenever contemplating insubordination.
c) "Wo gehobelt wird da fallen Späne" aka "where planing is done, chips fall"...collateral damage.
Which they do with words...suggested HARMONY (Greek; a setting together) tempts one to ignore that nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (perceivable sound) into each partial (perceiving instrument).
Furthermore, there's a sleight of hand in there...HARM (to insult) ONY (one). Try using MELODY (succession of sound) instead.
Choice is grounded in perceivable balance (need/want), suggestion tempts choice to consent to imbalance (want vs not want), hence being lured to fight on dispersive; facile; contentious; open; intersecting; serious; difficult; hemmed-in or desperate ground..a battleground called "reasoning", which is being defined, redefined and contradicted at will by only those making the suggestions...not by those consenting to fight each other over it.
In short...the ART (artificial, hence in ignorance of natural) of WAR (to confuse; perplex) tempts one to ignore being of sound mind within natural (perceivable) through use of artificial confusion (suggestion).
a) the only weapon of choice represents ones free will of choice...everything else represents a tool of choice.
b) pornography represents a suggested temptation...ones consent to suggested pornography shapes the transaction into suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion. Therefore...free will of choice arms suggestion into a weapon used by others against self.
c) one gives the chosen ones the power of consent by consenting to their suggested choices. Consenting to suggested represents holstering ones own weapon (choice), while giving ammunition (consent) to others.
out of here...
...and into a ghetto? What if oneself represents apartheid within the wholeness of ones surrounding, hence struggling to sustain self apart, while being tempted by the suggestions of others to come together?
Healing the world by bringing together (tikkun olam)...sounds familiar?
A sleight of hand from the South Park running gag "Kenny's Death"... KEN, verb - (German kennen) - "to know, understand, take cognizance of"...
Notice the first one when the cattle (goyim) are running over KEN... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIcs9kw85GY Furthermore; notice that Kenny's voice is muffled...a sleight of hand for perception (sound) being muffled by suggestion (word).
a) GHETTO; noun (Yiddish; get) - "deed of separation". Occupation implies taking from; a deed implies given to.
b) meet the most infamous "ghetto" family... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3mw33aMM.jpg
- "People, don't you understand...The child needs a helping hand"
- "Or he'll grow to be an angry young man some day"
- "Take a look at you and me...Are we too blind to see?"
- "Do we simply turn our heads...And look the other way?"
- "In the ghetto..."
Do you ever initiate
a) Initiation (inception) and expulsion (death) of being (life)
b) ever (process of dying) generates momentarily (living).
new
Suggested "new" (want for more than what is) tempts one to ignore perceivable "néwos, now" (that which is needed for those perceiving it).
discussions
Reality represents the perceivable consensus, debating over anything suggested represents fiction in ignorance of reality.
Do you ever initiate new discussions with posts?
https://img.gvid.tv/i/c8x3cDvs.png (no suggested information (no posts); no judgements (no up or downvotes), just adaptation to perceivable inspiration). It's what keeps choice within balance.
The want of others for "new" things to discuss can never be satisfied. Either one chooses to resist want, or ones life ends while wanting even more from it.
do you just
JUSTICE (process of dying) INJUSTICE (living), hence living within the just process of dying aka within that which "just is".
reply with
As a reaction; choice can only reply. The issue is that others view comments as replies to their suggested choices, instead of as perceivable inspiration. I draw from what other write, not for them, but for the sustenance of self as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
definitions
Aka being DEAF to perceivable PHONECIANS (phonics; sound), based on ones consent to suggested words over perceivable sound aka idol-worship of the one giving consent and spell-craft of the one suggesting.
Words don't define the world surrounding you, others suggest words as labels slapped upon the world to trick you to ignore your surroundings.
semantics
Consider SEMANTIC (suggested words; symbols) as the temptation to ignore NONVERBAL (perceivable sound; symmetry)...
tl; dr... does this count? https://img.gvid.tv/i/3Dkm1Xxz.png
a) generator (perceivable) - re-generator (perceiving) - de-generator (suggested)...adaptation of perceiving partial to perceivable whole allows regeneration (growth) within generation (loss), while ignoring it for suggestions represents DE- (away from) generation.
b) the consenting choices of the many to the suggested choices of the few, shapes the few into the "chosen ones". The self inflicted inferiority of the many, when consenting to the suggestions of the few, represents the superiority complex of the few. The interconnection of mass consent represents the complex the chosen few are wielding against the many.
c) each one of the many who who wants to shirk response-ability (free will of choice) as "power of consent" onto the suggesting few, shapes the power the few can then wield over the many.
d) instead of suppressed sadism...the few openly express sadistic behavior, while suppressing the masochistic behavior of taking on the "power of consent" by the sado-masochistic many, who sadistically fight each other (reason) while masochistically shirking response-ability over self, through willing ignorance, onto others.
Consenting to suggested represents suicidal consent (masochistic) to genocidal suggestions (sadistic)...
e) MANIA; noun - "mental derangement characterized by excitement and delusion" represents ones excitement for suggested information, which shapes the delusion, when ignoring perceivable inspiration.
Sleight of hand...
-
"Lookin' for the fight of her life" (wanting to reason about suggested)
-
"In the real-time world no one sees her at all" (suggested fiction ignores perceivable reality)
-
"They all say she's crazy" (viewing perceivable reality through the lens of suggested fiction)
-
"She's a maniac..." (exited for suggested, in delusion about perceivable).
-
"She has danced into the danger zone...When the dancer (living) becomes the dance (process of dying)"
-
"It can cut you like a knife, if the gift (living) becomes the fire (dying)"
-
"On a wire (balance) between will (free will of choice) and what will be (consequences of choices).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=324it5DKoXU (((written Dennis Joseph Matkosky)))
free will
Suggested free will tempts one to ignore perceivable free will of choice...if free, then dominated by, if will (want), then within need.
language model
Resonance/dissonance (balance) represents the mold (model) for the instrument of free will of choice within perceivable sound...articulating sound through suggested words tempts one to ignore that, while giving those suggesting the words the consent to mold definitions.
we know
Knowledge (perceivable) implies by each perceiving one, hence the communication of whole (perceivable) towards each partial (perceiving) within. Suggested "we" represents the inversion of perceivable "one". Every one comprehends perceivable differently, unless consenting to follow the same suggestions, hence order following.
know what sophistry is
a) knowledge implies that which was (perceivable), before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is".
b) a sophist represents one who consented to suggested sophism.
c) suggested sophistry (make impure by admixture) represents the inversion of being able to admix (perceiving choice) within pure (perceivable balance).
ambivalent
AMBI (on both sides) represents suggested dualism, which tempts one to ignore perceivable oneness. Inception and death represent the same motion, only for life at the center does it represent both entrance and exit simultaneously. Life needs to discern oneness for self, while others tempt one with suggested dualism into a conflict (reason).
tl; dr...How could inception and death be at conflict with each other? What about left vs right? Whenever one chooses to step left, it implies coming from right and vice versa. One can only exist at the center...never on any side.
fist
Aka e pluribus unum...out of many (digits) one (fist).
a) horseshit represents fertilizer for all those who comprehend how to grow...
b) suppositions are based on reasoning (true vs false; belief vs disbelief)...implication (if/then) is based on adaptation to origin (perceivable).
Example.: pepsi vs coke represents a suggested supposition...thirst represents perceivable origin.
c) only within straight (inception towards death) can queer (life) learn and teach.
d) comedy (living) can only exists within drama (process of dying).
a) what if everyone (living) within everything (process of dying) cannot posit (put into place), but only reposit (response to being put into place)?
b) what if others suggest one to deposit (state of being placed in safe-keeping), while ignoring that living within the process of dying isn't safe at all?
c) why does a bank&trust require the trust of those who deposit?
d) how about using any topic you feel comfortable in to test if I'm full of shit when adapting to it? Am I lying about what I write about? Am I pushing any noticeable agendas? Do I suggest anyone to believe what I write about?
As this represents a conspiracy forum...how do I conspire against you? Whom do I conspire with? What do I gain from conspiring against you? Do you fell offended when I point out that CON, noun (negation) contradicts SPIRE (spiro; spirit; breathing aka adaptation), while CON, verb (together, with) implies SPIRE (adaptation)?
a bunch of shit
What if perceiving within perceivable represents differences within sameness, and what if others tempt one to ignore this for suggested like vs dislike?
Why does social media suggests like vs dislike (upvote vs downvote) tools for interaction? Why can I use free will of choice to be different, by resisting to consent to either like or dislike?
Thank you for the inspiration.
By sharing this story with others, are you saying that I am therefore consenting for this to happen?
a) consent implies ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable). Only suggestion tempts consents, while perception demands adaptation. You don't need to consent to what others are offering...you are being tempted to want or not want to.
b) AA suggests a SPONSOR, noun [Latin] - a surety; one who binds himself to answer for another and is responsible for his default". Why? To tempt one to ignore being the perceiving response-ability (free will of choice) within perceivable need.
c) contemplate the following...the outer jew suggests one to destroy self; the inner jew tempts one to consent. The more one ignores the inner jew, the stronger the outer jew becomes.
Am I promoting the suggested temptations (old) vs growing resistance by adapting to the fountain of youth?
Alcohol represents suggested want vs not want temptation...thirst represents perceivable need. Do you need suggested alcohol to quench perceivable thirst? You don't need others to answer this, you need to struggle with the temptation to seek suggested answers from others, which will a) never quench your thirst; b) always tempt you to want more from them, which c) empowers others to exploit your lack of resistance by suggesting you both what you want and not want.
The few operate vineyards, because they comprehend that the effort it takes to make wine keeps one from the temptation to drown oneself with it...contemplate that metaphor for being the resistance (living) within the temptation (process of dying).
Alcohol isn't the issue, lack of self discernment is...the more you choose want (alcohol), the less you comprehend about need (thirst). Look at how Islam utilizes fasting to teach the need of hunger within the want of appetite...the more one resists appetite, the stronger ones resistance within hunger becomes, and of course what could taste better than the first bite to still hunger?
All addictions represent wanting more (suggested) than need (perceivable) offers...which tempts one to ignore that perceivable offers everything, while suggestion represents nothing.
Sleight of hand... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
What do you think consenting to "retweet" a suggested "tweet" represents?
Look into dweedle-dum & dweedle-dee (Through the looking glass), afterwards compare it to the Bob Dylan version...