a) Initiation (inception) and expulsion (death) of being (life)
b) ever (process of dying) generates momentarily (living).
new
Suggested "new" (want for more than what is) tempts one to ignore perceivable "néwos, now" (that which is needed for those perceiving it).
discussions
Reality represents the perceivable consensus, debating over anything suggested represents fiction in ignorance of reality.
Do you ever initiate new discussions with posts?
https://img.gvid.tv/i/c8x3cDvs.png (no suggested information (no posts); no judgements (no up or downvotes), just adaptation to perceivable inspiration). It's what keeps choice within balance.
The want of others for "new" things to discuss can never be satisfied. Either one chooses to resist want, or ones life ends while wanting even more from it.
do you just
JUSTICE (process of dying) INJUSTICE (living), hence living within the just process of dying aka within that which "just is".
reply with
As a reaction; choice can only reply. The issue is that others view comments as replies to their suggested choices, instead of as perceivable inspiration. I draw from what other write, not for them, but for the sustenance of self as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
definitions
Aka being DEAF to perceivable PHONECIANS (phonics; sound), based on ones consent to suggested words over perceivable sound aka idol-worship of the one giving consent and spell-craft of the one suggesting.
Words don't define the world surrounding you, others suggest words as labels slapped upon the world to trick you to ignore your surroundings.
semantics
Consider SEMANTIC (suggested words; symbols) as the temptation to ignore NONVERBAL (perceivable sound; symmetry)...
a) Initiation (inception) and expulsion (death) of being (life)
b) ever (process of dying) generates momentarily (living).
Suggested "new" (want for more than what is) tempts one to ignore perceivable "néwos, now" (that which is needed for those perceiving it).
Reality represents the perceivable consensus, debating over anything suggested represents fiction in ignorance of reality.
https://img.gvid.tv/i/c8x3cDvs.png (no suggested information (no posts); no judgements (no up or downvotes), just adaptation to perceivable inspiration). It's what keeps choice within balance.
The want of others for "new" things to discuss can never be satisfied. Either one chooses to resist want, or ones life ends while wanting even more from it.
JUSTICE (process of dying) INJUSTICE (living), hence living within the just process of dying aka within that which "just is".
As a reaction; choice can only reply. The issue is that others view comments as replies to their suggested choices, instead of as perceivable inspiration. I draw from what other write, not for them, but for the sustenance of self as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
Aka being DEAF to perceivable PHONECIANS (phonics; sound), based on ones consent to suggested words over perceivable sound aka idol-worship of the one giving consent and spell-craft of the one suggesting.
Words don't define the world surrounding you, others suggest words as labels slapped upon the world to trick you to ignore your surroundings.
Consider SEMANTIC (suggested words; symbols) as the temptation to ignore NONVERBAL (perceivable sound; symmetry)...
tl; dr... does this count? https://img.gvid.tv/i/3Dkm1Xxz.png