a) generator (perceivable) - re-generator (perceiving) - de-generator (suggested)...adaptation of perceiving partial to perceivable whole allows regeneration (growth) within generation (loss), while ignoring it for suggestions represents DE- (away from) generation.
b) the consenting choices of the many to the suggested choices of the few, shapes the few into the "chosen ones". The self inflicted inferiority of the many, when consenting to the suggestions of the few, represents the superiority complex of the few. The interconnection of mass consent represents the complex the chosen few are wielding against the many.
c) each one of the many who who wants to shirk response-ability (free will of choice) as "power of consent" onto the suggesting few, shapes the power the few can then wield over the many.
d) instead of suppressed sadism...the few openly express sadistic behavior, while suppressing the masochistic behavior of taking on the "power of consent" by the sado-masochistic many, who sadistically fight each other (reason) while masochistically shirking response-ability over self, through willing ignorance, onto others.
Consenting to suggested represents suicidal consent (masochistic) to genocidal suggestions (sadistic)...
e) MANIA; noun - "mental derangement characterized by excitement and delusion" represents ones excitement for suggested information, which shapes the delusion, when ignoring perceivable inspiration.
Sleight of hand...
"Lookin' for the fight of her life" (wanting to reason about suggested)
"In the real-time world no one sees her at all" (suggested fiction ignores perceivable reality)
"They all say she's crazy" (viewing perceivable reality through the lens of suggested fiction)
"She's a maniac..." (exited for suggested, in delusion about perceivable).
"She has danced into the danger zone...When the dancer (living) becomes the dance (process of dying)"
"It can cut you like a knife, if the gift (living) becomes the fire (dying)"
"On a wire (balance) between will (free will of choice) and what will be (consequences of choices).
a) Initiation (inception) and expulsion (death) of being (life)
b) ever (process of dying) generates momentarily (living).
new
Suggested "new" (want for more than what is) tempts one to ignore perceivable "néwos, now" (that which is needed for those perceiving it).
discussions
Reality represents the perceivable consensus, debating over anything suggested represents fiction in ignorance of reality.
Do you ever initiate new discussions with posts?
https://img.gvid.tv/i/c8x3cDvs.png (no suggested information (no posts); no judgements (no up or downvotes), just adaptation to perceivable inspiration). It's what keeps choice within balance.
The want of others for "new" things to discuss can never be satisfied. Either one chooses to resist want, or ones life ends while wanting even more from it.
do you just
JUSTICE (process of dying) INJUSTICE (living), hence living within the just process of dying aka within that which "just is".
reply with
As a reaction; choice can only reply. The issue is that others view comments as replies to their suggested choices, instead of as perceivable inspiration. I draw from what other write, not for them, but for the sustenance of self as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
definitions
Aka being DEAF to perceivable PHONECIANS (phonics; sound), based on ones consent to suggested words over perceivable sound aka idol-worship of the one giving consent and spell-craft of the one suggesting.
Words don't define the world surrounding you, others suggest words as labels slapped upon the world to trick you to ignore your surroundings.
semantics
Consider SEMANTIC (suggested words; symbols) as the temptation to ignore NONVERBAL (perceivable sound; symmetry)...
a) generator (perceivable) - re-generator (perceiving) - de-generator (suggested)...adaptation of perceiving partial to perceivable whole allows regeneration (growth) within generation (loss), while ignoring it for suggestions represents DE- (away from) generation.
b) the consenting choices of the many to the suggested choices of the few, shapes the few into the "chosen ones". The self inflicted inferiority of the many, when consenting to the suggestions of the few, represents the superiority complex of the few. The interconnection of mass consent represents the complex the chosen few are wielding against the many.
c) each one of the many who who wants to shirk response-ability (free will of choice) as "power of consent" onto the suggesting few, shapes the power the few can then wield over the many.
d) instead of suppressed sadism...the few openly express sadistic behavior, while suppressing the masochistic behavior of taking on the "power of consent" by the sado-masochistic many, who sadistically fight each other (reason) while masochistically shirking response-ability over self, through willing ignorance, onto others.
Consenting to suggested represents suicidal consent (masochistic) to genocidal suggestions (sadistic)...
e) MANIA; noun - "mental derangement characterized by excitement and delusion" represents ones excitement for suggested information, which shapes the delusion, when ignoring perceivable inspiration.
Sleight of hand...
"Lookin' for the fight of her life" (wanting to reason about suggested)
"In the real-time world no one sees her at all" (suggested fiction ignores perceivable reality)
"They all say she's crazy" (viewing perceivable reality through the lens of suggested fiction)
"She's a maniac..." (exited for suggested, in delusion about perceivable).
"She has danced into the danger zone...When the dancer (living) becomes the dance (process of dying)"
"It can cut you like a knife, if the gift (living) becomes the fire (dying)"
"On a wire (balance) between will (free will of choice) and what will be (consequences of choices).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=324it5DKoXU (((written Dennis Joseph Matkosky)))
Do you ever initiate new discussions with posts? Or do you just reply with definitions and semantics?
It's a bot, grasshopper.
a) Initiation (inception) and expulsion (death) of being (life)
b) ever (process of dying) generates momentarily (living).
Suggested "new" (want for more than what is) tempts one to ignore perceivable "néwos, now" (that which is needed for those perceiving it).
Reality represents the perceivable consensus, debating over anything suggested represents fiction in ignorance of reality.
https://img.gvid.tv/i/c8x3cDvs.png (no suggested information (no posts); no judgements (no up or downvotes), just adaptation to perceivable inspiration). It's what keeps choice within balance.
The want of others for "new" things to discuss can never be satisfied. Either one chooses to resist want, or ones life ends while wanting even more from it.
JUSTICE (process of dying) INJUSTICE (living), hence living within the just process of dying aka within that which "just is".
As a reaction; choice can only reply. The issue is that others view comments as replies to their suggested choices, instead of as perceivable inspiration. I draw from what other write, not for them, but for the sustenance of self as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
Aka being DEAF to perceivable PHONECIANS (phonics; sound), based on ones consent to suggested words over perceivable sound aka idol-worship of the one giving consent and spell-craft of the one suggesting.
Words don't define the world surrounding you, others suggest words as labels slapped upon the world to trick you to ignore your surroundings.
Consider SEMANTIC (suggested words; symbols) as the temptation to ignore NONVERBAL (perceivable sound; symmetry)...
tl; dr... does this count? https://img.gvid.tv/i/3Dkm1Xxz.png