a) HOMO (same) SEX (division) aka sex (life) within homo (inception towards death)
b) DIVORCE aka DIVERT - "turning from direction" aka subversion. Direction (inception towards death) turns into resistance (life)...others suggest one to follow, hence subverting ones position within direction.
c) ongoing (inception towards death) leads to temporary (life).
The many are ignoring this for reasoning against each other over who fucks whom where and why; while the few rebrand narratives (marriage vs divorce; homosexuality vs heterosexuality; culturalism vs multiculturalism; sodomy vs procreation; spouse vs stranger; morality vs degeneracy; make up vs break up; faggots vs bigots etc.
All suggested distractions from being perceiving eye (life) of perceivable storm (inception towards death), hence in need to sustain center by resisting temptation of surrounding.
now exploit
Perceivable now (reality) can be exploited with suggested before and after (fiction); yet only if oneself chooses to ignore perceivable for suggested first.
to get people to catch on to the reality...there seems to be an open checkbook to pay for this
a) the many willingly ignoring perceivable reality for suggested fiction...gives the few the power of mass consent to define reality through fiction.
b) CHECK, verb - "to stop; to restrain; to hinder; to curb"...ignorance keeps the many in check; the suggestions of the few for which the many ignore perceivable, "binds" aka spell-bounds them to the few, who in return become the accountants aka "bookies" (bookkeeper).
we are all being turned into metal saturated antennas
Signal (perceivable) towards antennas (perceiving)...anything suggested jams consenting antennas from comprehending perceivable signal.
It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words"
a) motion generates (inception) and destroys (life) those living within.
b) ongoing sound destroys temporary words held onto...
c) the construction of suggestible words represents ones veil of ignorance over perceivable sound.
4 levels to this particular
a) particular implies each ONE part of whole ONEness. Others suggest counting to tempt ONE from discerning to be.
b) by choosing to count to four one ignores level (balance) aka balancing as choice within the momentum of motion. Each ONE represents the center (choice) of surrounding (balance); hence adaptation representing re-calibration aka finding level. Oneself choosing to count others implies being tempted from center outwards, hence balancing self.
- Who cares?
That represents ones (1) ignorance of everything perceivable (1) for suggested nothing (0). Others exploit ones ignorance by using zero as the foundation for math; for counting, which when consented to, gives others the power of ones consent to shape ones foundation; level; balance. A zero-sum game...
intelligence gathering
Those who consent to stand under (understanding; intelligence) others are willing gathering under whatever is being suggested to them. The many are amassing themselves; while the few are suggesting collectivism and progressivism to keep them distracted from perceivable apartheid (being partial within whole) and need to resist (life) being progressed (inception towards death).
From a different perspective...the world wide web gathers whoever chooses to willingly log (locking oneself) into it. Suggestion ensnares ignorance.
fighting communism
Ones consent to any suggested -ism implies a) a many choosing to commune under a chosen few, and b) fighting each other within the conflict of reason over the meaning of the suggested -ism.
Reason represents the mental state of war the many are willingly choosing sides within with each one of their choices. The few suggest endless labels for both sides to keep distracting from the origin...reason aka logic aka logos aka words (suggested information) over sound (perceivable inspiration).
advanced students
Aka ones consent to stand under (as a student) suggested information by others (teachers), while following along suggested progressivism (advancing)...repression and self destruction.
the Party
Another sleigh of hand for those with eyes to see...a party is being suggested as a collective; a gathering, yet it perceptibly implies partial; apart from one another. Ones consent to the former; while ignoring the latter is based upon suggested THE-ism, hence ones willing submission to the authority of others, who shape suggestions in THE name of THE suggested.
a) psycho (animating spirit) represents natural; logic (word) represents artificial. Ones consent to the latter tempts one to ignore the former.
b) modern (existing now) tempts one to assume being able to exist outside now. Suggested ancient (distant in place) exists now within ones mind/memory as upheld memories.
c) within reality...perceivable represents value, while each ones perception thereof represents evaluation. Within fiction...artificial suggestions are utilized to hide perceivable value and devalue ones evaluation by suggesting artificial values for one to reason among others against.
By consent to suggested values one ignores being reacting center (evaluation) of enacting surrounding (value), which in return allows others to become the "central agency" one consents to stand under (understanding aka Latin intelligo; intelligence).
Isaiah...no tolerance for supremacist attitudes
ISAIAH (phonetic: yesh-ah-yaw) aka salvation of Yah (for israelites). I guess there ain't much salvation for the inferior...
delusion is a false belief
BELIE'F, noun - "a persuasion of the truth, assent of mind to the truth of a declaration, proposition or alleged fact, on the ground of evidence, distinct from personal knowledge"...
Ones willing belief or disbelief of suggested (information) deludes ones mind to ignore perceivable (inspiration). KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
not based in reality
Everything perceivable represents base for each perceiving ones mind within (base-ment)...ones consent to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality).
can't be reasoned with
Can vs can't represents reasoning over suggested, while ignoring perceivable, hence that which enables one to perceive...CAN, verb - "to be able".
To be able implies being (life) enabled by (inception towards death)...consenting to suggestions by others disables self within perceivable.
come across
Inception towards death (vertical progression) generates need/want balance (horizontal momentum) for each ones free will of choice within.
Ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestions by others; nails on to the cross (want vs not want), hence tempting one to be stuck reasoning against others over suggested, while ignoring to balance as choice within perceivable.
We've been bred to be.
Being implies singular one...others suggest plural we as the inversion.
Sleight of hand:"One (Always Hardcore) - 33 million views"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5pdgyOzJtE
One hard at core (life) - All way soft surrounding (inception towards death).
Baseline (process of dying) towards drop (living)...each life a NEO (new; newos; now) PHYTE (plant)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYvjg0l31oU
Edit: let's add the origin LOTION (Latin lotio, from lavo, to wash), hence BODY (life) within LOTION (inception towards death)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzu-xTIhTPE
have been bred to be cattle
a) NATURE, noun [Latin natura; born, produced]...ongoing velocity (inception towards death) gives birth to temporary resistance (life).
b) others tempt by suggestion to ignore perceivable, which establishes farmer (suggestion) and cattle (consent) aka few/many aka parasite/host aka accountant/debtor aka seller/buyer aka temptation/ignorance of resistance etc.
Systematic culling
Velocity (inception towards death) culls resistance (life)...even faster if one ignores to resist. Others suggest systems to follow as to industrialize the temptation for others to ignore resisting.
food (too many poisons to list)
ONEself as the ingredient choosing to mix suggested poison together, based on what one wants vs not wants (reasoning). That represents alchemy.
corruption of religion
RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents self inflicted corruption by submitting to the suggested choices of others, while shirking response-ability (free will of choice) within perceivable.
influence behind this is not human
a) HUMAN (Heb. form, species) implies formed within flow (animation; anima; animal), hence being IN (within) FLUENCE (fluid).
b) consenting to suggested "is not" (is nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything perceivable "was" before others can suggest what it "is" or "is not".
Lacking to discern B tempts one to ignore A. Self discernment implies grown by self...not gained by consenting to the suggested information by others.
poisoning of the mind
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the vector; ones ignorance of perceivable represents the host; the ones suggesting are shaped by ones consent into the parasites; and suggested information held willingly within ones mind/memory represents the poison.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/The-prodigy-poison-lyrics
- "I got the poison" (suggested information),
- "I got the remedy" (perceivable inspiration)
- "I got the pressure" (comprehension)
- " I got the pulsating (adaptation) rhythmical (proportion of sound) remedy (free will of choice)
record aka "response to cord"
a) CORD, noun - "a string composed of several strands twisted together".
b) insane (in-sanus aka within sound) person (per-sonos aka by sound) implies string/chord (inception towards death) surrounding instrument (life) at center.
c) many consenting to the suggestions of the few gives the few the power of mass consent to twist the many together; hence playing em like a fiddle.
d) In scripture, the cords of the wicked are the snares with which they catch the unwary. (Psalms 129:4)
e) aiming suggested information at ones mind consenting to record it represents "putting the needle to the record"; which in return shapes a conflict (aka war aka mars) of reason within the minds of the many.
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPr1rwQkzWY
a) HAR'ASS, verb - "to fatigue to excess"...being alive (fatigue) implies being moved towards death (excess), hence life getting tired out.
b) MENT (Latin mentis) - "mind; memory" can be tired out (harassed) by reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested information upheld within mind/memory.
c) mind/memory exists within perceivable inspiration; hence struggling in-between the need to let go of perceivable and the want to hold onto suggested.
d) others utilize suggested information to HARAS (Hebrew הָרַס ; phonetic haw-ras) - "to throw down, break or tear down" it within the mind/memory of those consenting to hold onto it.
a) suggested OPERA (Italian opera; a work, labor, composition); from OP (to produce in abundance) represents the inversion of labor (life) within work (inception towards death) representing a division; a setting apart of wholeness; an expressed limitation of setting temporary growth into ongoing loss.
b) Gianni Schicchi; of which "O Mio Babbino Caro" represents the opening aria, is about a bunch of greedy parasites fighting over a will that left them out of what they want (fortunes), hence a transgression of free will of choice through the suggestions of others who deny it; who accuse it; who use every trick in the book to gain control over it, even after the ones wielding it passes away.
This represents another deception...a dead man's will distracting from the living mans free will of choice.
c) "vo’andare in Porta Rossa...a comperar l’anello!" (I want to go to Porta Rossa...to buy the ring!"
Port (harbor) Rossa (rose) represents a docked vessel (life); hence ignoring water (inception towards death), hence repressing rose; rise; expressed growth. This ties to Rosicrucian (rose-cross) aka being growth and loss (horizontal) within inception towards death (vertical).
Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka the ring; kike; ouroboros that binds aka choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) aka buy & sell mercantile contract.
Want (suggested) tempts one to ignore need (perceivable)...that's how free "will" of choice can be tricked by the suggested choices of others to consent to opera; to a composition; to suggested collectivism; to e pluribus unum (out of many; one) etc.
the secret covenant
a) COVENANT (mutual compact to do or not do something, a contract) represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; which was industrialized as RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew), hence utilized by a suggesting few to bind a consenting many.
Within reality...MU'TUAL, adjective [Latin mutuus, from muto, to change.]...mutual change (inception towards death) generates exclusives (life). Exclusives (temporary growth) need to resist mutual (ongoing loss)...
b) suggested THE-ism tempts one to submit willing to another by consent to a covenant; a contract; a binding; mercantile contract law; slavery etc.
c) ignoring reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested) gives those suggesting the power of ones consent to keep it a secret; hence Latin seco - "to cut off" access to it by withholding the drug (suggestion) from the junkie (consent).
we will keep...
a) will implies want to keep, which tempts one to ignore need to let go. Those within (life) motion (inception towards death) need to resist perceivable; not burdening self by holding onto suggested aka taking on exponentially increasing debt by others.
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore self for others. Being "part" of a collective implies each one part...aka oneself under the umbrella of suggested collectivism. That umbrella represents ones ignorance utilized by others aka the wool over ones eyes aka the curtain which hides the wizard aka darkness over light etc.
keeping minds weak
Keeping aka holding onto input (hard-drive) slows down mind/memory (ram)...adaptation to ongoing inspiration keeps memory fast; strong and resisting, yet inspiration implies fleeting, hence teaching one need to let go of wanted temptations.
Consenting to suggested "days of the week" represents a tool to evoke the "daze of the weak" within self aka a confused mind; weakening ones position as growth within loss.
use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways
a) knowledge implies perceivable; understanding represents suggested...ones consent to latter tempts one to ignore former.
b) suggested scientism through TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] tempts one to ignore natural science (Latin scio, to know aka perceivable inspiration).
c) SUB'TLE, adjective - "cunningly devised" aka DEVISED (given by will; bequeathed; contrived) CUNNING (artful deception aka suggested information deceiving one to ignore perceivable inspiration).
they will never see
Suggested "never" (nothing ever) represents the inversion of perceivable (everything within this moment)....willingly ignoring everything perceivable tempts one to view reality through the lens of suggested fiction (nothing).
How could one see a moving system (change) if one holds onto affixed idols (truth and lies)...it's the falling apart of truths and exponential growth of lies which one will see.
soft metals
Another deception...phonetic METTLE (Latin animus, animosus) - "spirit; constitutional ardor" aka adaptation of form (life) to flow (inception towards death) aka breathing aka impression to compression to expression...respiration aka inhale/exhale represents the momentary relief within toil; work; energy; inherent/internal power. That's fucking hard to sustain life with...
aging accelerator
Inception towards death (ongoing loss) represents the aging accelerator for life (temporary growth) if ignored to resist, hence others suggesting progressivism aka following suggested orders instead of resisting perceivable "natural" order.
sedatives
Suggested SEDATED (settled) tempts one to ignore perceivable REFI'NED, (purified; separated from extraneous matter), hence being one separated among all other ones; pure; unmixed...unless ignored.
Sleight of hand from Tavistock... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm51ihfi1p4 (notice center of surrounding; notice s-table foundation when fast forwarded).
CABAL, noun - "number of persons untied in some close design"
- Number aka designated unit (unus; one) aka oneself.
- Person aka per sonos (by sound), hence being reacting instrument within the momentum (resonance/dissonance) of enacting sound
- United aka "free" will of choice...
- close design aka ...within the "dom"inance of balance (momentum of motion).
CHABAL (phonetic khaw-bal; hebrew חָבַל - "to bind, pledge"...being choice within balance represents bond within perceivable nature; consenting by choice to suggested choices of others represents a pledge to being bound anew aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew).
to win
a) being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) represents the highest value possible...evaluation.
b) current value (ongoing process of dying) generates species of goods (living) within itself.
c) what if mankind wants everything they already got without something they don't want in it?
"Now I ain't sayin' it's a clot; nigga"...but Pfizer loves messin' with the house niggas"
They're almost all in on it
a) each one (life) exist within all (inception towards death).
b) ignoring the above for suggested "it" allows a few to collectivize a many within "it"...without them realizing their ignorance.
holdouts to support
a) growth (life) is held within loss (inception towards death); hence busy supporting itself through resistance.
b) consider if want tempts one to hold onto; while need demands one to let go?
c) what if support (inception towards death) generates derivatives (life)? If derivatives are trying to support each other through suggested information, then they ignore foundation of support....perceivable inspiration.
Wanting to hold onto suggested information tempts one to ignore the need to adapt and let go of perceivable inspiration.
Allow yourself to question...MUSE, noun [Latin musa.] - "deep thought; close attention or contemplation which abstracts the minds from passing scenes, absence of mind"...now exchange passing scenes (perceivable inspiration) with suggested information from others within ones surrounding.
The suggested muse tries to mimic perceivable inspiration, hence tempting one to ignore ongoing (need to let go) for temporary (want to hold onto).
overall list (of scores) is depressing af.
Ones consent to suggested SCORE, noun - "debt, account of debt; reason" implies burdening self, while submitting to those suggesting it...that represents self repression, which tempts an emotion of feeling depressed.
Solution...choosing to resist suggested grows ones resistance, hence growing ones expression.
a) complying (want) vs not complying (not want) to suggested represents consent given to those suggesting it.
b) COMPLY , verb - "to carry into effect; to complete"...one represents a partial within whole; hence effect (life) carried within cause (inception towards death)...complying with the suggestions by others tempts one to ignore that.
c) consenting to suggested ESG (Environmental, Social, & Governance) allows others to shape what surrounds (environ) ones mind (ment); it tempts one to ignore being individual; not social, and it gives others control (govern) over ones mind (ment) through the suggested.
You have many options...
OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, opto, to wish or desire.] - "the power of choosing"...aka ones free will of choice. Suggested many (plural) tempts perceiving one (singular) to ignore self for others.
need to demand OPEN HARDWARE now.
a) perceivable implies open to each perceiving one within...suggested implies at will of disclosure by those suggesting it.
b) hardware (life) can only exist within software (inception towards death)...others can tempt one to ignore this for a suggested inversion (software within hardware).
Notice the flow of energy required as the foundation for suggested warez...
providing AI with
a) artificial (suggestion) implies being provided within a natural foundation (perception).
b) intelligence (Latin intelligo, to understand) implies ones consent to understand/stand-under suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
It's ones consent that allows others to provide power of consent to suggestions.
rights and insertion
a) RIGHT, adjective (Latin rectus, rego, straight.]...inception towards death implies straight for curving life within, hence one being able to grow (up) within loss (down). Notice also RITE (phonetic right), hence life representing ones rite of passage from inception towards death.
b) temporary center (life) of ongoing surrounding (inception towards death) implies being inserted as partial into whole.
What gender and sex is AI?
a) natural (perceivable) generates ones free will of choice to ignore it for artificial (suggested).
b) generation implies motion (male) to momentum (female) for trans-form (life with choice within balance).
c) nature produces SEX (Latin seco; to divide), hence the trans-formation of whole motion (male) through momentum (female) into distinct form aka fe(minine)male + wo(mb)man + s(plit)he.
d) trans-forming perceivable (female momentum within male motion) into suggested still implies trans within female of male...it's oneself who ignores this when consenting to suggested over perceivable.
From a different perspective...each trans-form contains both salt (male) and oil (female).
brainwashing
Ones mind/memory exits within a flow-state of perceivable inspiration. Choosing to ignore this for suggested information (held onto mentally) allows those suggesting to utilize the ignored flow-state to wash away the held onto form-state.
The one being "brainwashed" perceives this as loss of what one tries to hold onto like belief systems; -isms; truths; information etc. This represents a self imposed state of wanting to hold onto, while ignoring need to let go.
how will that intelligence become identified
You represent the will (free will of choice) that already consented to stand under (understand aka intelligence) suggested IDEN'TITY (sameness). You cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences...try it. Take any two things that you believe to be same and allow yourself to notice that you are able to discern each different one of them?
Suggested sameness represents artificial, while ones consent to ignore natural for it represents intelligence aka AI...
getting its foot in the door
Ones consent represents the door; while suggestions represents the foot of others.
usurped your natural...
Ones consent to want to hold onto suggested represents USURP (Latin usurpo) - "to seize and hold in possession". Consent seizes and hold suggested within ones mind/memory.
Meanwhile...the natural is being willingly ignored, which gives those suggesting artificial to opportunity to freely utilize everything offered without any noticeable resistance from the ignorant.
in 3 sentences or less
"Louie Louie you're gonna cry...Louie Louie you're gonna die"...if you're tweeting the 3 letters (J.E.W).
loot...with no fear of accountability
Those who consent to count, burden themselves with debt, while those who suggest others to count represent ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit".
Counting charges accountants; while discharging self. What's missing? Ones comprehension about the difference between perceivable current and suggested currency...the former needs to be resisted; while the latter tempts one to want to hold onto. Ignoring to resist current spends ones resistance on currency, hence charging accountants.
Edit: LOIS (to furrow; track; dig out) FRANK (free, liberal, generous) aka digging for generosity (within the pockets of others)...while looking like Dan Lauria in drag.
a) suggested words (both written and oral) contradict perceivable sound if consented to.
b) TORAH (instruction; imparting of knowledge; authoritative direction) implies perceivable inspiration...not suggested information.
Gemara contains those who fall for suggested information; while mishnah teaches those who adapt to perceivable inspiration how to deal with those within gemara (talmudic reasoning).
Only oneself can grow self discernment about being perceiving partial within perceivable whole, which requires ones free will of choice to resist suggestions by others.
If one consents to suggested words over perceivable sound, then one will be stuck reasoning over suggested, hence giving those suggesting the power of ones consent to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning at will.
If one resists reason (want vs not want; belief vs disbelief; truth vs lies; agree vs disagree etc.) for implication (if/then, hence in accordance with momentum/balance), then mishnah can help one to resist as center, while being surrounded by gemara followers and their temptations.
a) author (inception towards death) authorizes resistance (life)...others suggest progressivism, hence tempting one to follow orders; norms; rules of behavior etc. instead of being free will of choice resistance within natural order.
b) suggested equality (same) through diversity (difference) represents the inversion of being different (partial temporary growth) within sameness (whole ongoing loss). Parity suggests being equal...being one implies different from every other one, hence partial within whole.