Settlement aka to settle (colonize) the mind...hence establishing a penal colony to punish the mind.
There's a lot of holes in the theories, imo.
Theory aka theos (god) + ōrare (to speak)...speaking implies the articulation of Gods nature. To articulate implies summoning up partials (creation) within whole (creator) aka casting "lots" together in the attempt to make "whole/hole" by theorizing.
There are no holes in Gods holistic nature unless one ignores practical (perception) for theoretical (suggestion), which establishes a hole in one aka a mind empty of natural thought, yet filled with artificial apathy.
How does all these ideas come together and what are your overall thoughts?
Few utilize physical idols to sell mental ideals to tempt many into a consensus called idealism. Joining a consensus establishes few OVER-ALL many.
Why would whoever reset society decide to...
Consenting to a suggested -ism (socialism aka society) permits another to decide for one. Letting another decide for one contradicts ones free will of choice responding (RE) to being SET into natural balance.
Each being implies the RE-sponse within the natural SET-ting. Few suggest artificial resets to disable response among many.
to leave the buildings up and then dismantle the buildings later after the repopulation of the world had begun?
If nature cannot stop populating; then artificial repopulation has to work within the natural process of population. Right now the old world populace is being repopulated into a new world order under the disguise of "replacement migration"...simultaneously the old buildings are both being destroyed and rebuild like an hotel of old becoming a shelter of new.
The deception...old vs new represents an artificial conflict distracting from natural NOW. While being moved...one can only perceive "now"...not before or after. The moment one perceives implies the momentum of ongoing motion for each temporary matter within.
technology to destroy an advanced...
Techno (artifice) + logy (circular logic)...that's what destroys a being advanced within nature by tricking one to ignore natural for artificial.
If it was a mud flood then where isn't there more evidence of this?
Because evidence aka ex (out of) videre (to see) shared by suggestion and mentally held onto, prevents one from seeing that fluid (flood) dissolves solid (mud)...
If there was an apocalyptic event
Apocalyptic implies "to reveal" aka nature revealing being by moving life from inception towards death. The state of being represents the apocalypse...it's theorizing over one another's suggestions which artificially distorts natural revelation.
Satan was freed
a) God gives free will of choice...choosing to ignore God binds free will of choice to a chosen adversary.
b) God WAS before freedom came into being. Satan IS shaped by ones choice to ignore all that was (perceivable) for one another (suggested).
I have a hard time accepting
God neither requires acceptance ; nor denial...God (action) forces adaptation (reaction). God implies linear direction (action > reaction); satan implies circular misdirection (acceptance vs denial).
Only letting go of SIDE frees ones SIGHT. God doesn't give a side to hold onto; only the choice in-between needing to resist the wanted temptation of holding onto aka taking into possession aka becoming possessed.
we see today that we attribute
WE (plural) tempts ONE (singular) to tribute self to another aka self sacrifice.
guys like Elon Musk are living in meh ok houses
The switch from operative masonry (physical idols) to speculative masonry (mental ideals) corrupts one to mentally want more than physical offers.
You'd think a trillionaire would be able to build something grand to live in
Trillionaire implies the physical idol to sell the mental ideal of wealth...both representing idolatry used to corrupt the linear thought process of nature into a mental (logic) and physical (reason) loop around artifice.
I don't really understand what happened
Happenstance (come by chance) + understanding (to stand under) + don't (doing nothing) represent artificial distortions of reality...held within your mind.
doesn't seem to add up.
Only nature adds (inception) and subtracts (death) each divided being (life), while allowing multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) aka "be fruitful and multiply".
Adding up represents tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka artificially putting together what nature divides from one another. No matter how much one adds up...within all; one can never make whole again.
There does appear to be a missing link
Linking together (synthesis) tempts one to miss the natural process (analysis). Appearances can be deceiving if one permits another to deceive one. Permission implies linking consent and suggestion together.
free energy
En (within) ergos (work) implies being set free...
a) Thinking implies letting input pass through...wanting implies holding onto input, while ignoring the need to let go. Choosing want over need evokes emotions aka feelings, because continuing need moves want out of ones hold.
b) To be part of a people (plural) requires a person (singular) to join by free will of choice...the closer one holds the joined together; the less room for ones sight to express itself.
Nature gives sight by setting each being apart from one another; thereby making room for each being to see moving differences among each other. It's few who tempt many together to corrupt the sight of each within a joined consensus.
Most people's perception does not align with reality.
Because a) suggestion shapes a circle (logic) within ones mind if consented to, and b) perception implies singular analysis (person), which plural synthesis (people) inverts.
electricity from the air
What if each ones free will of choice represents the elect within natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)?
What if choice (matter) comes into being within balance (momentum) of motion, and what if from/fra - "forward" implies the whole process of internal division?
What if electric/elect (choice) + magnetic/magh (to be able) represents a mislabeling of the status quo of being aka towards (inception towards death) being (life) able to choose?
discovered
Dis (to divide) + cover (to conceal)...the former implies analysis; the latter synthesis. COVER contradicts DIS...there's an inversion afoot.
Ones perception within all perceivable implies DIS (to divide); ones consent to any suggestion of another implies COVER (to conceal).
element
Aka all (el) within (e) mind (ment)...an inversion of each ones mind within all. Only within all can each body have a mind...body/mind implying an internal division of all for each one in-between.
teleport
a) Tele (over a distance) port (recess of a large body of water where vessels can load and unload).
The vessel (life) represents the recess being moved over a distance (inception towards death) as solid within fluid. Loading implies the want to hold onto solid; unloading implies the need to let go of solid within fluid...each vessel comes into being in-between need/want aka as want (free will of choice) within need (balance).
b) One cannot teleport body without exchange of position...yet ex-change implies each one out of (ex) all (change) aka the status quo of being. It's the suggested word "exchange" and ones consent to it which represents mental teleportation. It's any suggested word which can be teleported by suggestion into the mind of a consenting body.
c) Any suggested words represents mental teleportation, while sound generating instrument (mind structured within) implies the tele of body enabling the port of mind aka inspiration moved over distance through a body enabling the import and export of information held within mind.
A being needs to adapt to TELE while resisting the wanted temptation to PORT.
fifth element Aether
There can be only one...natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). A singular analytical process. Fire represents a synthesis during the analytical process, while aether represents the division of all (nature) moving through each (native).
Tricks used to deceive a being from discerning this...
a) Suggesting words to establish all (el) within (e) mind (ment) aka to shape a mental consensus by synthesis distracting from the analytical process which divides body from mind.
b) Counting aka distracting ONE from discerning self by suggesting ONE to count others as two; three; four; five etc. Dis (to divide) cern (to perceive) implies analysis, while counting/count/co (together) implies a synthesis.
c) The word aether from aithēr (upper air) as opposed to aēr (lower air) tempts one to ignore being IN-BETWEEN aka as above/so below, hence air passing through one spiritually (spira; to breathe).
d) Being implies in-between Land; Air and Water, hence being able to balance as choice on land; being spiritually animated by inhaling and exhaling of air, and coming into being as solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) of water.
Being implies native medium within the natural process implying L(and) A(ir) W(ater), hence nature representing the law giver.
same man
Man implies division from woman...nothing can be the same during division. The origin of division implies motion, which implies the same animation for each diverse being within.
periodic table
a) Period aka peri (around) hodos (a way)...the latter implies the natural way; the former represents an artificial shape. Only within a line can a circle be shaped.
Being implies in-between anode and cathode aka ana hodos (up the way) and cata hodos (down the way) aka up (inception towards life) and down (life towards death) the way.
b) Table/tabula - "a flat surface" implies the way for each up-righteous wander being moved down it. Few suggest periodic (suggested circle) as the inversion of apparent (perceivable line).
Inversion aka within (in) turn (vers) implies the flipping of the table.
The flat earth (apparent) vs round earth (periodic) conflict continues the inversion (versus/verto; to turn)...no matter which side one chooses to hold onto. This versus conflict represents reason (turning against one another); which is based on logic (circular thinking within self).
that's word salad that only confuses
Con (together) fuse (to melt)...I take words apart (analysis) to dispel confusion (synthesis). It's the want to put understanding and words together which makes it look like word salad.
no offense
Nature offers all (perceivable) to each being (perception)...suggested offers tempt one to withhold perception.
what was written which was quite simple.
Sound implies simplicity; words represent complexity aka letter > word > meaning > exchange....
The word satan
God implies sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"...words represent the articulation of natural sound, which tempts each consenting being into adversary to one another.
Only within sound can an instrument (mind structured within) shape words...
satanists
-ist (satanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (satanism) aka the synthesis of consent (singular) into consensus (plural).
that's their job
Job implies a piece (effect) of work (cause) aka the internal division of singularity (energy) into each single unit (power).
All energy implies the cause for each empowered effect within. Using words to label that process represents a synthesis turning effect into affect.
nonsensical
Can one sense nothing (non)? If non implies the absence of; then how could there be any absence within God?
What if absence implies ones "abstaining sense" when denying perception for suggestion? And what if de-nial/nihilo implies "nothing"?
Luciferian is more accurate as satan
a) Luci (light) + ferre (to carry)...all light carries forth each ray within. The separation of light into ray implies spectrum (color). It's carrying any self imposed burden from one another which obstructs (satan aka s-t-n) one into ignoring light.
Satan represents the distortion of Gods light within self aka ones lack of self discernment when consenting to any suggestion by another.
b) More implies versus less aka two sides turning against one another into a conflict, which distorts accuracy. Accuracy requires analysis (setting apart); while synthesis (putting together) establishes inaccuracy.
is not a proper
Pro (forwards) per (by) implies coming into effect by forwarding cause or from the Christian perspective...pro (creator) > per (creation). Not aka nihilo (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable cause for suggested affect.
"is not" represents the satanic distortion of Gods proper way. God WAS before anyone within can suggest what IS NOT.
in the source texts
God implies source; being implies product within source...texts/teks - "to weave" implies products weaved together, while ignoring that source divides each product from one another, hence singularity.
nor is it singular
Only within singularity can a single unit choose to hold onto another, thereby establishing a "fictitious" plurality aka a distortion (satan) of singularity (God).
was changed from our adversaries to some...
God was change aka linear motion, before anyone within can choose to ad (towards) vert (to turn) one another.
Only within a line (God) can a circle (satan) be shaped...
corrupted seminaries
Semi (half) implies the division of creator into each creation aka a setting apart of whole (cause) into each partial (effect). It's ignoring this by joining a seminary which corrupts ones state of being apart from one another aka being christened (anointed).
They made many changes...
...based on ones willing ignorance of God (singularity). There can be only one flowing change (inception towards death) for each shape (life) formed within.
suggesting they don't believe
Belief implies ones consent to any suggestion; thereby affixing a distortion within ones mind, while ignoring that everything (cause) moves each thing (effect) apart from one another.
Suggestion represents articulation of temptation...consent represents the self imposed burden of sin/syn (togetherness) hence forming a consensus of many (commonwealth) under few (sovereign).
That's how distortion (satan) rules by shaping consensus (-ism) of consent (-ist), while God reveals free will of choice.
what they've written as that act
Only within a line (action) can one choose to write (reaction)...free will of choice implies reaction; NOT action.
Motion (action) > momentum (balance) > matter (choice)...only within the momentum of motion can matter react to being (life) enacted (inception towards death) upon.
according to the Bible
Fictitious accord (coming into agreement) implies ones consent to what another wrote into the bible. Real accord aka ad (forwards) cor (heart) implies the division of creation (effect) within creator (cause).
Reading a book tempts ones sight in-between covers, while reading the suggested spells crafted by another by the use of ABC aka Latin abecedary (abracadabra).
The natural alphabet aka alpha (beginning) + beta (second) implies generation of being (be-ginning) by division (second/seco - "to divide").
once you take
Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life)...if a being takes; then a being also gives.
take too much
Nature gives and takes all (perceivable) through each one (perception) within...the conflict between taking too much vs too little of given is based on a MISTAKE aka if one takes; then one misses given.
build up a tolerance
Only during destruction (inception towards death) can one build (life)...few suggest tolerance to tempt many into accepting a toll (tax paid, duty imposed, fee).
If for example one tolerates the monetary system to build up wealth; then one accepts a usurious toll aka exponentially growing loss.
The trick underneath tolerance is to distract from resistance...tolerance tempts one to bear up and carry along, while resistance inspires one to resist the temptation to bear up and carry along.
From the Christian perspective...only liberation can free one from the burden of sin. Others suggest tolerance to tempt one to take on a self imposed burden of sin.
it stops to be as effective
Cessation of motion (stop) implies temporary effect (life) ignoring ongoing cause (inception towards death). To tempt ignorance among many...few are plastering the world with stop signs.
Affection stops effect from discerning that cause moves each effect apart from one another. How does a being become affected? By consenting to any suggestion of another, which implies taking on the burden of sin/syn - "together with, jointly; alike"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/syn-
If one stops a car at a stop sign, then the taxes; insurances, ones life and all of nature continues to move nonetheless as does gas consumption...the real traffic implies the transference of living essence from inception towards death; not the fake traffic from point A to point B; littered with stop signs.
tl;dr: Neither to supply of youth; not the aging process can be stopped. It's the adulteration in-between which can be tricked to tolerate ignorance.
making you look younger
If that works then why does Madonna look like this.... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4ED3W3PQ.jpg
torturing children for production
If tortured children supply the product for youth, then how much does physically torturing or mentally consenting to physical torture of children increases aging?
Asked Him to Consider Assisted Suicide
a) Nature assists stance of being...artificial assistance hinders a beings assisted stance within nature.
b) Inclining from ones naturally assisted stance towards artificial assistance implies suicide, while joining a consensus with others (healthcare) implies genocide.
c) Care/caru - "sorrow, anxiety, grief, burdens of mind" isn't health/hælþ - "wholeness"...
- Elvis aka El (god) vis (visage/videre - "to see")
- Aaron aka Aharon/harun (exalted one)
- Presley aka preost (priest)
A Kohen (priest) flowing out (exalted one) from God to see, while tempting gentiles to "Return to Sender" because "address unknown"...
hides the forever
Nature EVER FORwarding being cannot be hidden unless a being chooses to hide from it within the mental state of inversion.
"Though so profound a double-dealer, I was in no sense a hypocrite. Both sides of me were in dead earnest; I was no more myself when I laid aside restraint and plunged in shame, than when I labored, in the eye of day, at the furtherance of knowledge or the relief of sorrow and suffering."
~Robert Louis Stevenson, "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," 1886
Dr. Jekyll (judica ël) and Mr. Hyde (to hide) aka "hiding from Gods justice"...ones consent to any suggestion of another represents the double-deal aka entering into a dual contract; thereby hiding from the singular expansion of ones perception (effect) within all perceivable (cause). That's how few gained more energy than many can ever produce.
forever battery
a) Battery; noun - "the unlawful beating of another"...consenting to any suggestion implies taking a beating from another while ignoring natural law. Only ignorance can beat ones free will of choice.
b) Battery as an electric cell fueled by the discharge of electricity implies the incarceration (cell) of choice (elect) by establishing a retreat (consent to suggested) within charge (perceivable generating perception).
If a being consents to any suggestion from another being; then a beings perception retreats from the natural charge of perceivable aka nature using motion to spiritually (momentum) animate essence (matter).
c) The protege of Edison was named WILL-I-AM MASON...
d) Thomas/toma (twin) Alva/al (to grow; nourish) Edison (son of edict)...an edict implies a "proclamation having the force of law" cause only within the force of natural law can an artificial claim be shaped.
Claiming (consent) from another (suggestion) implies a two-fold deal aka a twin engine for the nourishing growth of a chosen one and ones loss deprived choice.
a replacement of the French
France/frank - "free"...only free will of choice can replace itself mentally by consenting to a suggestion by another.
French population
If the opposite of population implies "choice; elect; elite".... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/population.html then one cannot be free (France) while taking part within a population.
voters believe France is witnessing
To vote a representative by free will of choice prevents one from witnessing...so does holding onto any belief.
replacement by...non-european
European aka phonetic U AR A PEON aka you are a peon (serve; slave)...if one permits another to replace ones mind with suggested information; then one becomes a slave to another within perceivable inspiration.
In short...flooding the third world into the first world makes many peons to few.
He's a pro-war jew
War implies pro vs contra aka two sides of gentiles turning against one another. A chosen one suggests both sides to tempt ones choice off-center and thereby into imbalance aka conflict.
If Shapiro is pro-war; then where's the other side? Hidden in plain sight...shapiro/shapir - "lovely" aka make love; not war.
A jew always operates from both sides because nature implies balance...gentiles ignore nature by choosing artificial sides which imbalances choice.
Everything “popular” is a jewish...
Everything (cause) generating each thing (effect) implies privatization. A jew suggests populism to tempt gentiles into a common-consensus aka artificially making public what nature makes private.
judge ordered
Natural order judges being, hence "judge not (artificially) lest ye be judged (naturally)".
The issue here...entering a court (formal assembly held by a sovereign) by free will of choice implies ones misjudgment of natural law for artificial law. Sovereignty of another requires willing subordination by self.
custody battle
- Custody; noun - "a keeping, a guarding, safe-keeping, protection, defense" from root custos/(s)keu - "to cover, conceal"
A being cannot keep anything in custody within the process of nature. Taking anything into possession conceals a beings potential.
The so called judge revealed this by exposing the child held in custody to injection from outside and through the will of the custodians.
Without entering an artificial court and joining an artificial battle over artificial custody because an artificial bond broke...it wouldn't be so easy for outside forces to penetrate children.
nice name (god)
a) Consider Aristotle's descriptions "unmoving mover" + "prime mover"...what if motion itself cannot move its status? What if motion was primary to any matter, while continuing to move through any matter coming into being within motion?
b) Name/nombre/number - "the designation of a unit" from Latin unitas/unus - "one".
What if sharing names tempts one another to ignore singularity?
c) Have a Dune quote: "'A process cannot be understood by stopping it. Understanding must move with the flow of the process, must join it and flow with it"...what if attaching names to anything tempts one to mentally attach measurements, while ignoring the process dividing each thing from one another?
Who is really in control? thoughts
Artificial control confines thought within reality. Control aka con (together) trol (to roll) implies circular thinking aka logic, which prevents ones mind from thinking straight.
the same people with a different mask
People implies plural; being implies singular...viewing another being as part of a people masks a beings perception (singularity) under suggestion (plurality).
In reality...each being within the same nature is being differentiated from one another.
aliens
Alien/alius - "another"...the same nature differentiates each being from one ANOTHER. Each being represents a native within nature...surrounded by aliens.
The military made a deal
Militancy (fighting, engaged in warfare) implies a beings consent to a side within a suggested conflict. It's consenting to any suggestion which represents the deal of selling self out to another.
Few suggest sides to tempt many into conflicts against one another. Logic represents the circular confinement of thought before choosing a side; while reason represents the circular conflict against others after choosing a side.
Example...the arrows next to any comment tempts one first into logic (upvote OR downvote); than into reason (upvote VS downvote). That's how simple it is to establish a military within a digital battleground.
change and save us
a) Change (process) cannot be (potential) saved (possession)...without sacrificing potential in the process.
b) Change divides..."us" represents a unification tempting one to ignore dividing change.
the same way the evil elites tell us about everything they do before they do it
Aka revelation of method aka sleight of hand. The trick...there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. Nature can only reveal being. It's ignoring perceivable nature for whatever artifice another suggests, which makes the trick work.
The end justifies the means
Beginning towards end implies the just way for each odd wanderer within...it's holding onto meaning (measurements) which tempts one to ignore that.
Nature doesn't offer affixed meaning, but each moving mind able to measure.
illusion of choice
Only within balance can there be choice...ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion tempts ones choice into imbalance.
Anything others offer one to choose from implies OPTIONAL...only natural balance giving each being choice implies PRIMARY.
Few shape optional illusions to trick many to ignore primary actuality.
But how else do you corral sheep or cows without sheep dogs and cattle prods?
God (phonetic gad)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad
The Most Evil Platform
Platform implies the plane (inception towards death) of form (life)...only within that platform can form choose a side within a conflict (most vs less or good vs evil), while submitting to a suggested authority (the-ism) of another.
reddit...platform
If you reddit (read it); then you read what another wrote into the plane of form. It's the shape of the written which distracts the reader from the flat/plat/plane of animating motion...only within which one can write and read.
reddit targeted
Target/zarge - "border, edge, frame"...being implies in-between border (choice within balance); edge (at the edge of known) and frame (from; forwarded). It's ignoring ones state of being (center) for another (circumference) which puts the target on ones back.
With a target on ones back...others can drive one towards the borderlands; use the edge of a sword to threaten one, and picture one out of frame.
harassment
Harass/harier - "to draw, drag"...suggestion draws the mind to give consent, while giving consent by free will of choice establishes an attachment for others to drag ones mind.
Few tempting many together establishes attachment...the foundation for harassment. If one attaches to love/truth, then one permits another to harass by hate/lie etc.
no one can explain this conversation
Because converse implies "turning together", which no ONE can explain without contradicting the other.
grown...rather than engineered.
Engine implies "within generation" aka growth within loss. Growth can be tricked with other growth to ignore loss...which represents social engineering.
almost like a recipe
All generates each one...few trick most of many to respond alike by joining together which represents recipe/recipere - "to take, hold, contain".
Artificially putting together what nature sets apart represents the alchemy of synthesis, which requires recipients to take and hold the synthesis together during the natural process of analysis.
we know that when you put in the flour, the eggs, and the milk...you'll get out the cake.
That's Cameron Bergstein suggesting tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka distracting gentiles from nature dividing the flour; the eggs, and the milk from one another for analysis, by suggesting the synthesis of "cake" which represents a tempting outcome.
"Let them eat cake" because "The cake is a lie"...
we know...nobody understands
Because understanding corrupts knowledge...one cannot be at the edge of known, while standing under another.
Anthropic
Aka entrophy; noun - "measure of the disorder of a system"...system represents fiction; disorder implies reality; and measure implies many holding onto suggestions, which permits few control over systems (synthesis) during disorder (analysis).
what we have right now are powerful systems which are fundamentally mysterious
Aka artificial systems making the natural foundation of mind (fundamental) a mystery for powerless gentiles, wasting their power holding onto suggestions, by each powerful jew.
The natural foundation of mind implies balance, which is why lessening the power of ones choice fills the power of a chosen one.
Berlin Kreuzberg
Text from 1997: https://matchlyric.com/die-zillertaler-turkenjager-kreuzberger-nachte + https://www.vidlii.com/watch?v=7Q2_hV-_3IA
- Ich gehe hier durch Kreuzberg in Berlin
- Und kann nur Zecken und Alibanden sehen
- Ich weiß nicht mehr wie lang ich das ertrag
- Weil ich weder Türken noch Autonome mag
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1sWbxVUbOQIQ ...Jake Shields talking with the son of Alex Jones about the lawfare angle behind the take down of InfoWars.
The boomer generation won't...the next generation has very little tolerance left.
Boomer vs zoomer represents the very same conflict designed by a jew to turn gentiles against each other. Versus represents a mental (logic) and physical (reason) hamster-wheel one cannot leave by choosing either side.
a) That ain't a German name.
b) Germaine B. aka "be german"...that ain't a coincidence.
Tawhid (to unite; to make one) implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together). Freeing Palestine would require a separation from Israeli occupation...not a tawhid. Furthermore...God (allahu) can only represent the greatest (akbar) if there's a lessening division into each being within.