a) HOW implies an adverb aka something added to a verb. Verb expresses action aka motion, which one ignores when adding to it. Why the ignorance? Because adding to motion burdens matter aka oneself.
Motion (inception towards death) offers everything to matter (life)...trying to add to motion implies matter taking from one another into (ideals) and onto (idols) self, hence the burden.
Try ask nature how. Nature doesn't answer by ad-verb...oneself represents the addition (ad) to natures motion (verb).
To prevent one from discerning this for self...others manipulate the words used to describe it like in this case VERB; noun - "word"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verb
How could a verb ever express motion if one holds onto words as definitions? Notice also that in this etymological dictionary...VERB (word) is defined as NOUN (name). That's a mindfuck right there.
how does one learn
Learn; verb - "to follow or find the track"...asking "how" implies following the track; discerning self within foundation implies finding the track.
Learning implies teaching self and vice verse.
how to perceive natures motion
One can only perceive what nature moves...it's holding onto what another suggests which manipulates ones perception.
For example...holding onto truth tempts one to ignore motion. Applying motion to truth changes it into a lie. That's why liars require one to believe it to be true.
tl;dr: Try to use implication (if/then) instead of reason (side vs side)...the former continues to move forwards; the latter tempts you to hold onto a side, while moving in circles.
If you ask "how to perceive natures motion"; then you confine the answer to either this or that (logic); which then turns into this vs that (reason) as soon as you choose a side by agreeing or disagreeing.
Now try implication...if nature moves; then "to perceive" implies nature moving perceivable towards a beings perception.
the union of Israeli and US military
It's hard to turn a trick if the whore is carrying her pimp around...
still too abstract
a) Still implies "motionless"...I described motion; you chose to view it as motionless. You are doing this willingly to yourself and so only your will can let go of the motionless view of motion.
b) Ab (away from) stract (to draw). Instead of drawing away from motion as I did when describing how motion works...you only view my description as drawn upon a motion you ignore.
For you the words "inception towards death" represent a script aka a written document (dock-your-mind). I try to describe the process which moves through the potential of life. It's this process which you need to abstract from (perceivable inspiration)...not my description thereof (suggested information).
for me to understand
- FOR implies forwards aka a process moving potential forwards.
- ME implies potential holding itself in possession, while ignoring process.
- TO implies towards aka a process moving potential (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
- UNDERSTAND implies potential choosing to stand-under another potential when consenting to a suggestion.
FOR + TO implies natural; ME + UNDERSTAND implies artificial...only if you choose to let go of self and the want to stand-under another will you discern being "forwarded towards".
it has a valid meaning
It doesn't. You choose to draw validity from meaning suggested to you. Meaning/mean/men (to think) implies either by natural impulse (perception) or artificial impulse (suggestion)...depending on your free will of choice.
Natural validity implies the force of nature moving through each being; artificial validity implies legal bondage to another being.
The bankers issuing currency become the source of validation for any price you buy and sell for...if you consent to the suggested currency.
You don't need validation from anyone...nature implies validation of being; being implies adaption to being validated by nature.
how do i use it
It (nature) uses you (being)...you adapt to being used by it OR be abused by others depending on your free will of choice.
in practice
Practice; verb - "to follow or employ a course of action"...if employee (life) follows course of action (inception towards death); then employee dies faster.
The opposite of practice implies alteration...that's what free will of choice does unless willingly ignored.
to escape
If TO implies "towards"; then life being moved from inception TOWARDS death doesn't allow escape from outcome. Inception sentences life towards point of death. Living implies a death sentence giving life sentience.
Few suggest escapism to confine the minds of consenting many within ignorance aka denial of being moved. Life after death tricks the mind to ignore living within process of dying. The issue...the living mind has to hold onto the trick, while the process of dying exponentially draws away the living power to hold onto unless life resists.
the artificial trap
Ignoring to be free traps one artificially. Whatever you hold onto mentally (ideal) or physically (idol) by free will of choice traps you artificially. Natures motion gives you free will of choice, while taking away any artificial traps you hold onto. The issue...how long will you choose to hold onto the artifice while ignoring natures motion?
what exactly is this natural path of inception life death?
a) The ACT (inception towards death) which EX-tracts reaction (life).
Misusing the word "exact" as a measure for accuracy or preciseness tempts ones mind to ignore the implied motion of ex (out) agere (to set in motion; drive forward)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/exact Without ignorance ones mind can discern self as coming out of motion.
b) A path implies "a narrow passageway or route across"...all of nature (cause) narrows itself down to each native (effect) being moved across aka a transference (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
What's artificial is mentally (ideal) or physically (idol) choosing to hold onto anything while ignoring motion. For example...nature moves sound; which one ignores when holding onto artificial words to describe anything within sound.
The articulation of words within natural sound represents spell-craft, and while natural sound transfers through each being; articulation tempts the sharing and carrying across of words held within memory...representing the self inflicted burden of sin/syn (together with, jointly; alike).
c) Motion (inception towards death) WAS perceivable before matter (life) can suggest what it IS...consenting to the latter tempts one to ignore the former.
Maybe all the religions are ass
a) All sets one free. Religion binds one to one another while ignoring all.
b) All moves through one. Holding onto religion establishes constipation within one.
c) Maybe implies may/magh (to be able) be (being; essence). All enables each one; few suggest "maybe" as an auxiliary of prediction to tempt many to ignore all.
Humanity has surrendered itself to essentially to what amounts to
Essential implies "essence within all" aka each ones state of being. Amounting implies essence (potential) shaped into a substance (possession)...self surrender.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Frank-harris-hold-on-to-the-vision-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcThFswcLB0
they are free
They (plural) are free (singular)...are you sure about that?
Seven Laws
There can be only one L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...S(plit)EVEN.
noah
An ark/arc puts those S(plit)EVEN into noah/noach (rest) aka the intermission of labor.
10 Commandments
1 (natural singularity) 0 (artificial denial)...one denies natural for artificial when com (together) mand (mandate) ment (mind).
Mandate refers to manually giving consent to any suggestion of another.
Intolerance writ large
a) Intolerance implies "unwillingness"...being implies given will. It's denial of ones choice for a chosen ones suggestion which establishes intolerance.
b) No matter how large or small one writes...the line within which one writes can never be fulfilled.
mosaic
Aka putting partials together to make whole...a game of puzzle.
origins are in place
Only within origin can there be placement.
the Babylonian experience
Aka the confusion of tongues from singularity (sound > instrument) into plurality (sound > word > instrument) establishing BA'BEL, noun - "confusion; disorder".
the jews adopted...a religion
If a gentile ADOPTS religion; then each jew ADAPTS without competition aka if ones choice re (to respond) ligo (to bind) then each chosen one remains free to choose.
with Yahweh as sole
a) WITH contradicts sole.
b) Yahweh implies a suggestible word among each divided being within the singularity of natural sound. It's consenting to the suggested word which represents pluralism.
c) Yahweh/havah - "was" aka singularity (cause) was before each single unit (effect) comes into being. Suggesting what Yahweh IS by shaping a label/libel tempts ones perception to deny what WAS perceivable.
erroneously accepted
Acceptance or denial of natural delineation (inception towards death) erodes being (life).
property rights
Right/reg (to move in a straight way) implies proper (forwards). Nature implies the property right each being needs to resist...a jew tempts gentiles to want property rights to hold onto.
Holding onto reduces resistance, hence moving anything held onto out of ones hold quicker, which in return permits each jew to freely use whatever gentiles are lacking in resistance to hold onto.
remove God from TV
Remove implies ones response to being moved by God. Responding to a vision told (tv) by another removes oneself from God.
I saw the light
Not while watching Television.
I was a fool to wander and a-stray...straight is the gate and narrow the way
Straight is the gate (inception towards death) and narrow (life) the way.
- Growing...inception > life
- Shrinking...life > death
A jew blows up an artificial circle (inflation vs deflation) to distract gentiles from natural delineation (inception > life > death)
The internet was once a fun place with many websites to visit daily and get new, fresh perspectives.
That's a gentiles mind on jewish inflation.
Help me find good content on the shrinking internet
That's a gentiles mind on jewish deflation.
I follow
If a gentile follows natural delineation (inception > life > death); then bye bye gentile.
If a gentile follows artificial circles (inflation vs deflation); then after the burst...the next bubble gets blown up.
the Star of David...it never existed
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3xeLvRgE.jpg
scriptures
Scripe; noun - "professional interpreter of the jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe
seal
Does nature engrave a seal (identifying mark) upon the living transfer from inception towards death?
summon demon
Summoning (to put together) contradicts de (to divide) mon (to provide)...
I want to meet u/free-will-of-choice in real life!
Free will of choice implies want within need...any attempt to meet with another binds ones free will of choice.
genius
Genius; noun - "guardian deity or spirit which watches over each person from birth" from gene - "give birth, beget"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/genius
Only nature begets being. Viewing one another as GENIUS lets the GENIE out of the bottle aka ones essence (life) leaking the liquid nature (inception towards death) which carries one. Applying the label "genius" to another establishes friction like rubbing a lamp (vessel containing flammable liquid)...
- What's a vessel? Essence within all.
- What's flammable liquid? Liquid (inception towards death) enabling flame (life) aka the spark of life.
autistic
Autistic aka autism aka auto (self) ism (consensus)...joining a consensus contradicts self.
The jew who coined autism (eugen bleuler) conspired with the jewish father of psychoanalysis (sigismund schlomo freud) to conquer psychiatry... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
The trick...a gentile cannot be autistic without consenting to the jewish suggestion of autism, at which point self (auto) is being ignored for consensus (ism) which permits a jew to conquer the mind of gentiles.
fucker
The House of Fugger was originally called "Fucker"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family
Fuck/fugg from German Fuge, noun - "masonic joint" implies to knead; fashion; fit (ma) sound (sonic) by connecting (joint). Which represents the foundation for "banking trust"...where sound money is being fashioned into fiat currency by tempting trustees to join.
whose goal here is to raise
Only in-between coming in (inception) and going out (death) can one rise (life)...few suggest goals to tempt many to ignore the process.
linguistic awareness
A lingu-ist implies someone who consented to suggested lingu-ism...doing so binds ones tongue (lingu). Language prevents the free use of ones tongue by tricking one to articulate words within natural sound; thereby establishing a forked tongue. Those speaking in forked tongues become unaware of sound.
although misguidedly
Any guidance from another tempts one to miss being (life) moved (inception towards death). Why would a being require guidance during natural delineation? Once again...falling for guidance forks ones road of travel thereby establishing crossroads... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossroads_(folklore)
Or is a blue hair tranny activist with a shtick.
a) The last time I had colored hair was in the 80s.
b) Life being moved from inception towards death implies a TRANS-fer of essence
c) Only nature implies active, which activates each reactive being within, hence giving free will of choice. A jew suggests a consensus (activism) to trick the consent (activist) of each reacting gentile into bondage.
d) If you got a SHTICK; then you're free will of choice is STUCK. It's consenting to any suggestion which gets one stuck within an artificial consensus with others. A yid wields a shtick of authority aka god/gad - "stick to drive oxen"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad which the yid got by consensus of gentiles.
start an edomoligy sub
Start (inception) > finish (death) inspires resistance (life) which submission to logic contradicts.
which could be enjoyable and informative
a) A being has to resist the temptation of joy and misery as free will of choice from in-between.
b) Holding onto suggested information tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration. The issue...spirit moves through form, so holding onto form ignores spirit.
Being implies formed (matter) within the spirit (momentum) of action (motion)...holding onto information from another prevents one from discerning this for self by adapting to inspiration.
if you are an alive man or woman
Being implies the living transfer (matter) of male (motion) through female (momentum)...
The only enjoyment you can be garnering ftom posting here...is so fickle and small
a) About free-will-of-choice - Post Score (0) - Comment Score (15788)
Only nature posts (puts forwards); which is what I adapt to by taking apart com (together) ment (mind) aka collective consciousness aka hive-mind aka egregore.
b) By resisting joy (want) and misery (not want) ones mind opens up to need aka all of flowing nature for each one formed within.
What do you do for a living?
Only nature does which allows each being within to re-do. One cannot do "for a living" without ignoring nature forwarding each living being.
Are you married?
Not in wedlock. We did the ceremony privately for family and friends, but stayed fruitful ever since without public license.
Are you religious?
Re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...doing that binds free will of choice. On the flip-side...resisting bondage allows one to freely analyze any religious topics.
agnostic
Nostic/noēsis - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable. It's ones consent to any suggestion of another which makes one not (ag) knowing (nostic).
What do you enjoy other than dissecting language?
Watching connections (synthesis) fall apart while dissecting (analysis)...farmsteading would make me miserable if I couldn't dissect why everything keeps breaking down.
a) College aka col (together) legare (to choose)...there's no such thing as choosing together without ignoring ones free will of choice.
b) Re (to respond) com (together) ment (mind) implies a consensus among many shaped by suggestions of few.
even though it's "free".
Even (balance) sets odd (choice) free...any free college recommendations imbalances choice if consented to.
Eu (good) thanasia (death) implies a measurement taken of a punishment given...a contradiction. The trick is that consenting to suggested euthanasia gives another the legal sanction to mercy-kill one.
Why the legal sanction? To shape mercy (reward) into market (trade; deal) aka tricking the natural reward (ones free will of choice) to sell itself out to another while becoming a trader/traitor to oneself.
astroturfing
a) Star within sky (astro) + surface of earth (turf) aka as above/so below.
b) Look into the history of Monsanto's "astroturf" aka the synthetic "grassroots"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AstroTurf
c) As for the spontaneous upwelling of public opinion aka astroturfing... a public isn't spontaneous but premeditated by few shaping many into a public through opinions.
Perception implies primary; suggestion implies optional...option + opinion require ones free will of choice to OPT into it; thereby permitting another to premeditate any spontaneous upwelling within ones mind from outside, which represents the animation of an anthropomorphic being aka a golem/goyim.
Why is it called astroturfing (as above/so below)? Because that's what free will of choice ignores when holding onto any opinion.
We're Being
We isn't a being..."we" implies a suggested pluralism to trick one to ignore being a perceiving singular unit.
held hostage
The age (vital force) which hosts gives each being FREE will of choice. Holding onto implies a secondary force by ones free will of choice...detrimental to ones vital being.
technology bubble
Techno (artifice) logy (logic) implies the bubble of circular thinking when holding onto artificial information. Natures ongoing vital force pops any such bubble.
truthstream media
Media implies middle of stream, because only within a stream (inception towards death) can a medium (being) come into being. Truth implies medium ignoring stream by inclining towards a side...also labeled "banking trust".
Nature implies all knowledge; each being implies alternating choice...any messaging systems among beings tempts one to ignore alternating.
- Message/mittere - "to release"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/message
- System aka sys (together) stem (to stand)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/system
Standing together (system) contradicts release (message).
No amount of systems build or messages shared can get many out of slavery to few...only each ones self discernment can.
sorcery and today’s technology
Sorcery implies using (being) the source (nature)...techno (artifice) logy (logic) implies drawing an artificial circle to distract user from source.
you might not be the same.
Same source (nature); different user (being)...it's using technology which makes users alike by equalizing differences.
ancient and modern information
In-form-ation implies "formed within action"...ancient > modern implies nature enacting motion upon being, which one ignores when holding onto whatever another formed within action (information).
AI synthesized
Nature dividing being implies analysis...being consenting to suggested AI implies synthesis. Few utilize AI to stir the synthetic cauldron of consensus among many.
spellcasting could be going on
Nature generating being implies sound generating in-stru-ment (mind structured within)...few suggest words (spell-craft) to cast many into a consensus.
Rob’s conclusion...was that AI knows
Knowledge doesn't con (together) clude (to shut)...it opens up to each part within. Few suggest AI to tempt many together into a closed environment, within which one ignores knowledge altogether.
plastic nature
Nature implies motion (inception towards death) dividing matter (life)...plastic implies the molding of a mass of matter. Few utilize suggested information to amass many into a consensus, which is being molded by the information held within from outside.
This process represents the animation (suggestion) of an anthropomorphic (consent) being aka a golem/goyim...
it’s able to use
Only nature uses; which enables being to re-use. Enabling artifice by using AI permits those who suggest artifice to abuse one.
- Some of them want to use you
- Some of them want to get used by you
- Some of them want to abuse you
- Some of them want to be abused
- Sweet dreams are made of this
- Who am I to disagree?
the key to unlocking...
...implies discerning self as being given FREE will of choice, which one locks away when binding self by consent to any suggestion of another.
the secrets of the universe
- Uni (one)
- Verse/verto (to turn)
- Secret/seco (to divide)
Singularity (cause) divides (effect); it doesn't turn into a plurality...unless ignored.
What are some alternatives?
A sum (some) prevents each particular from alternating.
In order to get more data
The natural order offers all (cause) to each one (effect)...few tempt many to give artificial orders to get more out of AI. The data/dare - "to give" refers to users giving themselves up to artifice, while ignoring nature.
I don't like...because it embeds itself
Like implies versus dislike...choosing either side embeds oneself into a conflict.
signal
Sign (to mark) al (all)...all (perceivable) moves each one (perception) within apart from one another; ones consent to any suggestion of another marks one.
forcing you to switch
Nature is forcing being to adapt by choice...few tempt many with artificial choices to switch sides.
the first change takes place in your mind
It's misusing mind by taking suggested information into memory which tempts one to ignore that first there was change aka perceivable inspiration.
something no one will ever be able to catch
EVERYTHING...no one will ever be able to catch from within.
right page; wrong note
- Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"
- Page/pag - "to fasten"
- Wrong/wer - "to turn"
- Note/nota - "to mark"
the end goal...is likely not profit
Profit implies "to set forth"...few utilize AI to shape artificial end goals as to distract many from being set forth within nature.
at this point
If nature moves, then "this" can only ever be a sentence aka the sentience of being.
a lot of these elites
Few cast many into a lot (consensus)...choosing to join a lot makes the one casting it elite (selected by choice).
they do not and they will not care.
Because caring implies carrying a self inflicted burden which few trick many into doing to themselves.
it's a religious mission
Mission implies nature sending forth free will of choice...religion implies choosing to bind self to another.
rule over
Only within rule/reg (to move in a straight line) can balance (over/under) bring choice into being.
A gentile choosing to bow down doesn't rise up any jew. Nobody else can overrule ones free will of choice, but free will of choice is so omnipotent that it can hold itself in submission to everyone else.
Hence the dilemma trying to describe without triggering the script within others. Nature doesn't describe anything to a being...yet it all works.
hated Marx
Both Bakunin and Marx where used as figureheads for -isms (consensus) to tempt gentiles into conflict against one another. Any conflict among the figureheads is about a) not being able to handle the power over gentiles or b) jew vs jew shenanigans about loot or c) political theater.
ally
There's only all (cause) for each one (effect) within...allying with one another (affection) tempts one to ignore all.
Ally/alligare - "to bind" implies bondage for ones free will of choice if joined... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ally
demon
Aka dai (to divide) mon (to provide)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/demon aka nature (cause) providing division of being (effect).
France/franc/frank - "free"...only a native can be free; a foreigner remains bound to somewhere else.
eugenic
Eu (to be) genic (give birth, beget)...nature generating being implies eugenic; being generated within nature implies dis (to divide) genic (give birth, beget).
The progress of generation cannot be hindered...a being can be tricked to hide (ignorance) from it.
intentional or unintentional eugenics
Neither. Eugenic implies delineation (inception towards death) of being (life); while intend implies the turning of one's attention from nature, which in return shapes an artificial conflict (intentional vs unintentional).
Is it on purpose, or a side effect?
Pur (forth) pose (to put) implies nature putting forth being (eugenic) and being put forth by the division of nature (disgenic).
Ignoring the above (cause > effect) establishes affection towards a side within a conflict.
Those who are detached
The status quo of coming into being implies detachment from one another. It's consenting to one another's suggestions which binds a detached beings free will of choice.
smart enough
En (within) nough (to reach) implies a beings free will of choice to reach from within outwards...its grasping which smarts; verb - "to cause pain, to suffer pain".
Nature implies the cause of pain and suffering (inception towards death) for each relieved being (life) within...trying to grasp what moves increases the pain and suffering of a relieved being.
lucky
Implies gambling aka ignoring choice given by choosing to take chance. Luck aka "good or bad fortune" implies both sides tempting choice to gamble on chance.
big food
Big vs small appetite tempts one to ignore that all hungers (inception towards death) for each food (life) within. Furthermore...versus/verto - "to turn" implies circular congestion during linear digestion.
By disassociate, I don't mean try to FIX, but wise enough NOT TO TAKE
Free will of choice can only be free while adapting to change given...choosing to take affixes ignorance within ones mind, which binds ones free will of choice.
Dis (to divide) associa (to follow) tion (action)...the divided (life) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow the enacting (inception towards death).
Natural association implies nature tempting being to ignore resisting. Artificial association implies being joining one another in their ignorance of resistance.
Notice as-SOCIA-tion...that's the parasite establishing socialism (socia) at the center of natural (tion) being (as).
you get the idea
If you get (by taking) the idea (idealism aka idolatry); then you weren't "wise enough not to take".
needs an ambulance
Ambulance/ambulare (to walk, go about) implies adaptation to motion...not matter being carried to affix injury. It's the process of dying which is needed for each life within to be able to walk and go about.
The artificial ambulance tempts one into a want vs not want conflict... https://img.gvid.tv/i/27Q7bPQm.jpg
What if the only unidentified flying (inception towards death) object (life) is located within a social identity? What if this artificial social identity can be destroyed to dis-locate natural objects from one another?
Re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...what if ones response to suggested socialism binds one into a society, while ignoring that FREE will of choice implies a dislocation from one another?
Heather O'Rourke (1975–1988)...