Yeah, controlled demolition. This video proves it. But, their timing was off. Somehow they "pulled it" later than the script called for. At least 20 minutes later, based on the BBC live TV report screwup.
Probably a combination of weapons, and definitely including nanothermite (aka super-thermite). Several people saw pools of "literally molten steel" at Ground Zero. They report as having seen molten steel in the bottoms of elevator shafts "three, four, and five weeks" after the attack.
According to ChatGPT, no race has any flaws besides for white people.
Some are this retarded, however "most of population is so heavily fluoridated"...
Same tribe: Every-berg, Single-stein, Time-owitz
Nope, two different people. You can fake a face, but not the auricle of a person's ear.
Which Fauci the 2014 Fauci or the 2021 one? note: the ears and noses don't match.
Jews just can't invent or make anything more or less of quality
Why invent when you can steal?
The protestant church is a gentile front
Sorry, I'm failing to see your point here. Jesus's mission was of spiritual liberation, not creating a new religion. The Church (Catholic or Protestant) hijacked Jesus's message. Church took this message of spiritual autonomy and reconstructed it as a message of spiritual submission. Jesus says "listen to my words", Church says "believe us of who Jesus is'.
Today's Church is completely in the hands of the jews, if this is what you're implying, then we're in agreement.
Jesus is not a real person but a mythical hero
I agree with you Jesus as presented to us is fake. So is our history and many other things. All fake, all made up. Read some of the manuscripts discovered at Nag Hammadi in 1945. Especially the Gospel of Thomas, you may find there is another Jesus they tried to hide from us. This Jesus gave us a message of spiritual autonomy, which is very dangerous to any system of power and control. Just don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Also Constantine is a crypto Jew
Yes, Constantine and many others. The Roman Catholic Church was established by crypto-Jews as a false "Christian" front for their Babylonian religion. Both Judaism and Catholicism are based upon Babylonian mysteries.
From the beginning, the true Christian church was in a spiritual struggle against Judaism. Judaism could not win in a head-to-head spiritual contest against Christianity. It was necessary for the Jews to throw their efforts behind undermining the Christian church by injecting it with a Judaic contagion. Their long-term strategy was to change the Christian church from the inside-out, to align more closely with their Judaic/Babylonian theosophy. And looking at the Christian Church today I would say the jews succeeded.
Where do you think Christianity came from and what makes you think that all of the developments that led to the Roman Empire
IMO, the Christianity you and I know today emerged from a brutal ideological war that lasted centuries. The Roman Church, which was not born from Jesus but from the Roman Empire using his name to maintain control, won the war. IMO, the church didn't learn from the Roman empire, the church was built as an institution to serve the empire. This was one of Paul's "innovations". Paul was focused on organization and structure. What is your view on this?
'What developments? IMO Bloodlines run and own the world, they always have, not the Roman Catholic Church. And the Bloodlines run the world through a collection of secret societies. These secret societies include the Freemasons, which are also called the Rosicrucians and the Knights Templars. They include Jewish organizations called the Sabbatean-Frankists, who are embedded in religious movements, including Chabad Lubavitch. And then you have the Jesuits (the Catholic Church, the Vatican).
Rome destroyed Judea
That's right, culminating in the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE. Led by Titus, Roman forces breached the city's defenses, destroyed the Second Temple, and systematically razed the capital, marking the end of Jewish political autonomy in the region. And jews will never forget or forgive that.
What "hell" you are talking about?
My exact same thought.
Your post seems a bit cryptic. Perhaps you can add some clarity, like why is 2016 significant (we all know Trump won that year the presidential election, so what...)? what event are you referring to in the 5th century AD?
Romans decided let a couple Jews take over their entire empire
Which jews?
Buried would be closer to reality
Indeed. The Mud Flood theory suggests that some of these structures survived a major catastrophe and were later excavated, modified, or simply partially buried beneath new cities.
freemasonic satanic/luciferian shabbos goyim traitor slaves who are working for the Synagogue of Satan
You're not wrong. The 9/11 operation was very ritualistic. Many examples, including numerology (911 is the emergency number in the US), Freemasonry (the WTC Twin Towers representing the Twin Pillars of Boaz and Joachim) and Vice President Dick Cheney (in-charge of the 9/11 op), a 33rd-degree Mason.
The controlled demolition of Building 7 was not just a tactical maneuver but a symbolic act, mirroring the Masonic destruction of the Temple of Solomon (occult ritual of rebirth and renewal).
comment useful to our evolution
What evolution are you referring to? seems to me we are devolving, rather than evolving. Few of us are waking up, and even fewer realize what's really going on. Nevertheless I think that would be enough to brake the chains. No matter how many negative comments, and support from few normies for the scum we call "elites".
True Bill Gates didn't invent anything, he bought everything Microsoft used to license. However, Gates wealth is attributed to copyrights on software and market monopolies, rather than patents. Bill Gates Sr. was an attorney with a specific focus on corporate, technology, and dispute matters. He taught his son anything he needed to know for building a financial empire, without having to create anything.
The church has literally always been Jewish
That's because it's not a real "church", but an instrument to be used for imperial control. Bloodlines run and own the world, not the Church.
there was this family who was Jewish banking family who got one of their guys as Roman emperor
Maybe you're thinking of Giulio de’ Medici who would become Pope Clement VII. Giulio de’ Medici (1478-1534) would become Pope Clement VII, Alessandro de’ Medici (1535-1605) was Pope Leo XI and Giovanni de Medici, Pope Leo X (1513-1521).
The Medici family are a well known Black Nobility bloodline involved in the Vatican, banking, medical industry, secret societies, and Zionism. Medici involvement with the Vatican includes in addition to the popes also two queens of France: Catherine de’ Medici and Marie de’ Medici.
Some of the famous artists commissioned by the Medici family and paid to paint include: Sandro Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo Buonarroti, Raphael, Peter Paul Rubens, and many others.
there’s a conspiracy around it all being a Jewish takeover of Rome using religion and finance
Have you ever heard of the Black Nobility? 13 satanic bloodlines who control the world. Some people use the term "Khazarian Mafia", or their official name the "Khazars"... same thing. They are also known as the "Name Stealers", which imo is the best term.
Newton, Einstein and Darwin were Orsini and Farnese. Christopher Columbus was Colonna. The Rothschilds are at the top of this pyramid as Jesuit agents operating under a Kahzarian Jewish cover. The Rothschilds are Aldobrandini bloodline by marriage into this bloodline.
the church’s goal has always been to destroy paganism and get people to worship Yahweh so it’s literally always been Jewish
Yahweh worship can be traced back all the way to the ancient religion of Canaan. Yahweh was but one of many deities united under a figure known as El. Yahweh and Baal were merely two of El’s children.
How about GAYBALLAH?
Yeah, rooted in Kabbalah which is the primary term for this mystical tradition. Literally meaning "received tradition". But, Kabbalah is not a separate entity but an integral, esoteric component of Judaism. A blood cult masquerading as a religion.
Kabbalah is Witchcraft, is Masonry, is Judaism.
whoever wrote that in the Geneva Bible
The Geneva Bible, according to many scholars to be the most important English Bible, was translated by a group of English Protestant scholars who fled to Geneva to escape religious persecution under Queen Mary I. The project was led by William Whittingham, who served as the general editor and translated the New Testament.
Key contributors included:
- Anthony Gilby, who oversaw the translation of the Old Testament.
- Miles Coverdale, Thomas Sampson, Christopher Goodman, and William Cole.
- John Calvin and John Knox provided significant theological leadership and commentary, though their direct translation contributions are less defined than Whittingham's.
The translation was published in 1560 and was notable for being the first complete English Bible translated directly from Hebrew and Greek texts, featuring extensive marginal notes.
I just take it further and agree with Adam Green that when you put all the evidence together it makes more sense that he’s made up
Adam Green says Christianity is a deception and came from Judaism. I'm well aware of his views and beliefs. Like I said before imo Judaism is not a religion, it's blood cult masquerading as a religion. So, how could a religion be created by a cult? it's not possible, it has to be created by a system. Maybe the same people (bloodlines) are responsible for coming up with both Christianity/the religion, and Judaism/the cult... yes, absolutely. Otherwise, I agree with a lot of things Adam Green claims. I also disagree with him and also with Christopher Jon Bjerknes (I'm not sure if these two made up or are still enemies) when it comes to Jesus as revealed in the non-canonical gospels. This real Jesus is not Moshiach Ben Joseph as these two, and others believe. He simply does not fit this description according to traditional Jewish beliefs. Simon of Peraea (aka Simon son of Joseph), who led a revolt against Roman rule, would be a much better fit. So, I feel like they're throwing the baby out with the bathwater, so to speak.
If you read carefully the manuscripts found at Nag Hammadi you will see Jesus gave us a message of spiritual autonomy, which is very dangerous to any system of power. But, it's also dangerous to Jewish beliefs like repairing the world as well as the coming of the messianic age (Jew World Order). A slave with inner light does not fear death, a peasant with a sense of divine stature does not accept being owned by the system or someone else, and a whole nation moved by inner courage & character it’s not possible to control.
Paul it’s more that 1) he never met Jesus, his claims are based on visions
That's one of the problems, but there are others. For instance, according to most scholars the Gospels are generally considered to have been written after the Epistles, with the following approximate dates: Mark around 66 AD, Matthew 80–90 AD, Luke 100 AD, John 96 AD. In contrast, the Epistles to the Corinthians and Galatians are believed to have been written earlier, 1 Corinthians around 50 AD, Galatians around 50 AD. So, Paul wrote his letters, or if his letters were published or written down, before the Gospels, 20 to 50 years before Matthew, Mark, Luke or John. Why would the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, which claim to be the first person eyewitness accounts of the actions and sayings of Jesus, why on earth would they have been written down 20 to 50 years after the letters attributed to Paul were written down?
Ehrman believes Christianity was made up by the Romans and Carrier believes it was made up by the Jews
It's possible they're both correct. Paul (and Paul could represent a team of Romans and Jews) replaces Jesus' message and belief and hands interpretive power back to the system (authority, the Church or Rome). Paul shifts the center of experience and creates a new kind of structure. A structure that will grow much faster as a community than any individual autonomy. You could say Paul was the original architect of what today we call social media. Paul was very familiar with an ancient Greek art of using words not to seek truth but to construct reality. Paul takes Jesus’s message of spiritual autonomy and redirects/reconstructs it as a message of spiritual submission. Something that worked for both the Romans and the Jews.
Look at today's Jewish controlled Roman Catholic church, it's such a sad sh*tshow. For example, last year Pope Leo XIV blessed a giant ice cube in the name of fighting "climate change".
You should read Carrier’s book
I'm familiar with Richard Carrier and the fact he doubts the historical existence of Jesus as a person, using Bayesian reasoning to analyze the evidence. I haven't read his book, "On the Historicity of Jesus,", perhaps I will. I may agree with Carrier on many things, but I'll disagree with him regarding the existence of the historical Jesus. There is a lot of evidence and independent accounts of a human teacher which matches what today we would call Jesus in the 1st century AD. The 4 canonical gospels which made it in the NT are probably as Carrier puts it "forged", or fake, modified or made up. So, I agree with Carrier here as well, why only these 4 gospels, when we know there are so many more discovered at Nag Hammadi. 52 manuscripts found there in 1945. To me the New Testament canon seems in many ways like a reaction against Marcion's version. Irenaeus writing around 180 AD insisted there must be exactly four gospels. No more, no less. Interesting, because Marcion had only one gospel.
To me real Jesus is presented to us in the Gospel of Thomas. But, here Jesus's message is very different than what church teaches. He says "That which you have will save you if you bring it forth from yourselves.". Perhaps that's why this gospel was not included in the canonical Bible. Not because it contains teachings that contradict those in the canonical Gospels, as most scholars would argue. Heck there are plenty of contradictions among the 4 included gospels.
he goes through each Gospel and Paul’s letters
How about historical Paul? did Paul even exist? if he did exist, who was Paul and where did he come from (other than Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, modern-day Turkey)? We actually know very little about the early life of Paul, which itself is suspicious for someone so important.
Book of Enoch, it was just Jews writing biblical fan fiction
So were many other stories in the Bible... made up. But, that doesn't explain why this writing was removed from the Bible, and others weren't, does it? especially when it elaborates on Genesis 6:1 by providing a narrative about the "Watchers".
Bart Ehrman, eh, there’s a reason he won’t debate Carrier
What's the reason in your opinion? I'm aware in March this year Ehrman debated Jonathan Sheffield, whom he claims is backed up by Richard Carrier, Mark Goodacre and others.
No planes at Pentagon, NYC or Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Private video not handed over the FBI, and released later, proves it.