a) Why would adaption to inspiration ever be viewed as bothering?
b) What if drawing inspiration from to express self implies a relief instead of a bother?
c) Even implies balance; being bothered by implies ones choice to ignore balance.
I implied they were part of the whole
Which was being contradicted by "same...as whole" + "to a greater extent".
to answer a question I did not ask.
a) "to" aka towards aka perceivable solution is what inspires me to respond...not any suggested questions or answers.
b) Suggested "did not" tempts one to ignore being done by everything, hence existing within procession.
thread destroyer
What if your consent to suggested threads weaves you into them, while me pointing out contradictions opens up holes to make perceivable fabric harder to ignore?
Bonus: DES- (dis; de; apart; asunder) TROY (person of dissolute life) aka being apart (life) within solution (inception towards death).
Now if only such a person would comprehend the use of Trojan-horses; Trojan-condoms; Trojan-viruses or the Troy measuring system for precious metals...
As for tunnels...focusing on suggested gives one tunnel-vision.
Accuracy of title may be suspect
Putting a title onto something that moves cannot ever be accurate.
And what does that mean 'extremist'
-ist (extremist) implies consent to suggested -ism (extremism), hence an order follower.
Doesn't that imply that they serve the same goal as the whole, just to a greater extent?
Extremism cannot be whole; otherwise the distinction between extremist and extremism couldn't be made. Being implies medium (life) in-between extremes (inception/death).
a) Fiction (They Live) suggests one to put on the googles to see, while reality requires one to resist suggested "google"...
b) Sensitive event implies that which comes towards ones senses aka perceivable...not the suggestions by others.
c) Reasoning over suggested makes one insensible to perceivable.
d) Revision implies ones RE-sponse to VISIBLE...not to what others are showing; especially on a screen.
it grows mainstream
Mainstream (inception towards death) grows resistance (life)...resisting is on oneself, following others ignores that.
We have to climb over and be more!
One cannot be more than one...only grow oneself. Others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt singular (one) to hide under.
system vs surroundings
Imagine ones perception surrounded by perceivable...where's the "versus" conflict in that?
windmill as a self-contained system
Where does it stand on? What does it transform out of? Who build/maintains it? Can self be contained when perpetuation of self implies intercourse for off-spring through another?
free energy
If energy implies inherent/internal power, then what else but choice by power within to utilize it could be free?
takes inputs
Hold your breath...can you not take that input? If its forced through you, then what does choosing to take imply?
at every point
Point implies end of sentence; being implies life sentence...
all the way to the battery
What if all the way (inception towards death) generates resistance, while draining batteries? What happens if one batters resistance?
Substantially more power
What if substance (growth) cannot have more power than essence (loss)?
alternation
Like rise (need) and fall (want) of one's choice within a balance based system aka frequency of alternation within perpetual motion?
If you want...
...then you ignore need.
violates our current
What if current (inception towards death) violates being (life)? Dying sounds pretty harmful to living...
paradigm
Aka PARA (beside) DEIK (to show)...a sideshow (suggested information) within main act (perceivable inspiration).
tap into ether
What if "ether" generates a momentum within which matter is divided from one another and ether? What if taping implies among matter, while ignoring ether? What if ones consent permits others to tap ones mind/memory with suggested information? What if whatever suggested information one stores is being forced to leak out?
perpetual motion device
DEVICE, noun - "artificial contrivance"...perpetual motion implies natural. All suggested devices tempt one to ignore that. Only within momentum of perpetual motion can temporary matter device something.
there's a resistance issue
Ones consent to suggested devices (artifice) implies ones ignorance of being resistance (life) with momentum (inception towards death) of perpetual motion.
propaganda we are all fed
Propagation (inception towards death) generates resistance (life)...choosing to follow along suggested propaganda tempts one to ignore resisting.
Generation (ongoing loss) feeds re-generation (temporary growth)...consenting to suggested consumption tempts one to ignore that.
isn’t currently possible.
Current (inception towards death) generates potential (life)...consenting to suggested nihilism (isn't aka is nothing aka ex nihilo) tempts one to ignore that.
a turbine that spins a generator and produces electricity
Consider it being a regenerating device spinning a regenerating device, which transmutes more magnetic friction than drawing electric current...
Hook...to generators
What if generation (inception towards death) sets regeneration (life) free, while others tempt regeneration to hook itself to other regeneration in the name of suggested generators?
Consider the difference between cables used to bind connections, and a seed growing as above/so below through roots/branches...try to describe current going through seed which generates that growth?
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...What's the crocodile/reptile/repetition called in HOOK? Tick-Tock! It always catches up to HOOK, while chasing him. Those who cant see this represent "the boy who wouldn't grow up"...don't swallowing suggested clocks implies not getting hooked, which allows one to grow up.
He has stripped away the filmy varnish of our sentience to reveal the ancient triptych of cognition, emotion and motivation.
a) Suggested trinitarianism (triptych) tempts one to ignore that cogni-TION; emo-TION and motiva-TION imply different reactions to same action.
b) Consenting to suggested triptych doesn't strip away from sentience; it layers suggested upon ones perception.
synap...
...implies PANYS aka PENIS backwards.
politicians, celebrities, generals, lawyers
All known to live a double-life...why seek confirmation for their death, when they denied sharing life?
ban on drawn...
Prohibition on pencils?
a) Ones consent to suggested moralism (common rules of behavior) contradicts ones "free" will of choice. Few suggest moral-ism and common-ism to contradict and collectivize ones choice underneath chosen ones, while utilizing contradiction (immoral) and commoners (degenerates) against ones ignored free will of choice.
Only ones choice to resist suggested -isms gets one out of this control system...a system which devours those willingly participating.
b) The spell-craft underneath homosexual aka HOMO (same) SEX (seco; to divide aka difference) implies sameness (inception towards death) generating differences (life).
c) As for demoralization...ones consent to suggested morals establishes a conflict of reason (moral vs immoral). The longer one fights within, the more demoralized one feels. It doesn't matter if one holds onto moral or immoral; it's reasoning in-between aka friction which destroys both.
To resist immoral requires one to resist the temptation of wanting to hold onto moral, which implies ones response-ability (free will of choice) being utilized for resisting temptation, and resistance is fertile.
Letting go of morals doesn't imply "sodomy, here I come" it implies freeing oneself from a self inflicted boundary, hence willingly acknowledging response-ability. The more one does that; the more responsible one wields choice. Holding onto morals implies consenting to the suggested choices of others, hence binding ones choice to chosen ones...the same chosen ones suggesting immoral behavior.
your town's park
P'ARK, noun (Latin parcus, saving) - "a large piece of ground inclosed and privileged for wild beasts of chase, in England, by the king's grant or by prescription. To constitute a park three things are required; a royal grant or license; inclosure by pales, a wall or hedge; and beasts of chase, as deer, etc."
Few suggest enclosure of nature (parks) to distract many from being inclosed (life) within nature (inception towards death). Same trick with gardens and fences or nations and borders.
a) "new" (out of nothing) cannot exist within "now" (within everything)...unless one chooses to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
b) Being implies unit (one) within whole (oneness). Singular cannot perceive plural, but one can be deceived to ignore self for others...counting does the trick.
c) Sudden (happening without previous notice) tempts one to ignore that observation (perception) can only exist within observable (perceivable).
The opposite of notice implies obliviousness aka ignorance...which is what others are exploiting when utilizing suggestion as sudden notice within an already perceivable world.
d) Rare (uncommon; not frequent) is being suggested to tempt one to consent to common-ism, which in return collectivizes ones choice under chosen ones. Choice within a balance based system implies frequency aka a thing often repeated at short intervals, hence one choosing each moment (um) how to adapt to being within motion.
e) Type (to mark something) implies idolatry aka typecasting solids within a fluid system, which in return tempts one to hold onto solid while ignoring fluid.
f) As for blood...aorta (to raise, growth) + blood (fluid loss). How does one regenerate blood? Transmutation of fluid (inception towards death) to solid (life). Others tempt one to fill vessels, which tempts one to ignore being vessel within current.
How would you teach others to discern between bartering for outcome and bartering as balancing within a moving origin? If you barter for outcome (to get stuff) you'll establish the happy merchants of temptation aka the chosen few with the most effective sales-pitches accumulating all the products.
What many ignore is that bartering apples for oranges implies that apples and oranges already exist, so one doesn't need to barter for outcome, but in response to a moving origin aka living apples and oranges within the process of dying, hence getting spoiled within momentum.
How do you show others apples and oranges without them not being tempted to want them, while ignoring the need of hunger and thirst? If they want apples and oranges from others, then those others are being permitted to set the prices...which makes the merchant happy.
a new system
a) Same system; different branding. It can only be solid within fluid. Many holding onto solid crumbles; while everything flows through few.
b) System (assemblage of things into a regular whole) tempts one to ignore that whole (inception towards death) disassembles into things (life); while reassembling them back into whole.
Slowly and insidiously poisoning the population
What about poise (a regulating power; that which balances)? Was the population ignorant before poison was suggested to them? What if ignoring poise poisons self, which others then exploit with suggesting more poisonous intake?
Insidious (to lay in wait) implies entrapment. What if ignorance implies a mind entrapped, and what if easy prey tempts predators to lay in wait?
From a different angle...needle-jews utilize terrorism (Latin terreo, to frighten) aka suggested fear towards outcomes as the sales-pitch for ones willing intake of poison. Now reread OP...fear of losing a job sold the needle; but being afraid of dying from sickness isn't on the table yet. Why? Because it wasn't sold by others.
How would you deal with a majority ignoring death, which simultaneously consents to almost any suggestion to harm life?
Busying oneself growing life from inception onward implies "born to be alive"...ignoring this for suggested outcomes keeps one busy dyin'.
- "Propaganda, all is phony." aka all is phonics/sound, which implies each one within being propagated.
- "them that defend what they cannot see" aka defending suggested, while ignoring/being blind to perceivable.
- "While preachers preach of evil fates...Teachers teach that knowledge waits" aka suggested outcomes tempting one to stall ones perception within flow of perceivable knowledge.
- "Advertising signs that con you...Meantime life outside goes on all around you" aka suggested words tempting one to ignore perceivable sound.
- "You follow, find yourself at war" aka following suggested tempts one into conflicts of reason.
a) Gentiles follow directions suggested by jews. All suggested movements imply as directed by jews. Gentiles lack to comprehend what moves mind, hence running in circles instead aka reasoning (circular logic).
b) Pro this or anti that...either side implies ones consent to a suggested direction by another. The flags; slogans; speakers; participants; or sizes of any suggested movements are interchangeable and irrelevant to the suggesting few...a mere tool of distraction for the following many.
c) Whenever flags are suggested; consider...FLAG; noun (Latin flacceo) - "flaccid". Few erect poles to trick many to remain flaccid.
https://cdn.britannica.com/46/93846-050-EDA09DD6/Washington-Monument-Washington-DC.jpg ...erection at center; flags/flaccid in circumference. Monument aka MONU (to admonish) MENT (mind/memory)...
- vet
Vetting implies within the control system already in place. Before that has to be the suggestion of a system tempting others to consent to the system, which in return permits control of consentee with suggested.
Suggestion implies control system of others for each consenting one.
What if...hear me out...wait for it...ASS-ASS implies self negation?
why will you die?
Only within process of dying can ones will to live exist...
the death of the wicked
Wicked implies departed ( https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/wicked ) ...being alive implies being a part within whole process of dying, hence rising, while falling away.
"No rest for the wicked" implies wicked (life) to be within motion (inception towards death), hence no cessation of motion (rest) for em'.
we rot away because of them...How then can we live?
ROT, verb - "To lose the natural cohesion and organization of parts; to be decomposed and resolved into its origin by the natural process"
To lose (inception towards death) organization of parts (life)...what if being alive implies regeneration within decomposition?
Consider compost aka COM (together) POST (position; to place) and fertile (producing abundantly; bearing children)...why do I have to turn my compost- heaps and spread it apart when fertilizing?
architecture
a) Only within ongoing motion can there be temporary deviation...think electrical discharge (arc).
b) ARC (natural discharge) TEC (artificial fetter)...
modern
MODE, noun (Latin modus, metior) - The primary sense of mode is measure hence form. Measure is from extending, the extent, hence a limit, and hence the derivative sense of restraining... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/mode
What if "free" will of choice can be restrained by consenting to suggested choices? How did "chosen ones" manage to restrain the choice of many ones?
At what point does modern become ancient, and what if there's a perceivable line (life sentence) underneath suggested point (end of sentence)?
hideous
- OUS (having to do with)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/-ous#etymonline_v_32820
- HIDE (conceal)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hide#etymonline_v_9235
So what does suggested has to do with concealing ones perception?
Not a single candidate is going all the way
a) CANDID (free from undue bias)...voting a candidate implies a legal bond. In other words...using ones "free" will of choice to vote a chosen one establishes due bias.
b) Each one (life) goes all the way (inception towards death).
going all the way...to truth.
Can truth die? How does truth come to be? Does birth of lie imply death of truth or are they siblings; born apart from one another? Can truth and lie be twins in life?
I've seen this everywhere
...or are you focusing on what others are suggesting you they're doing?
wouldn't tell the media
What if few mediate information towards many to tempt each one to confine self to suggested fiction, while ignoring perceivable reality?
Imagine the worlds smallest bunker and compare it to yourself focusing on the screen in-front of your eyes...what restricts more?
What do you guys think?
Wherever you live there are bunkers. The "no trespassing" signs are only for those choosing to submit to a suggested marks of distinction by others.
Nature doesn't restrict...it sets free (will of choice). Being moved from inception towards death implies a loosen of life; not a strain/strict unless self inflicted. Consenting to what others are suggesting restraints one to it.
Try busting those bunkers...cause bustin' makes me feel good.
a) Evidence aka EX (out of whole) VIDERE (to see) aka what each one perceives...not what others are suggesting.
b) One perceives sound; others suggest words (Jesus; God) to distract with idols; brands; marks; spell-craft etc. Only oneself can resist the temptation of suggested (words) within perceivable (sound).
c) Word implies articulation of natural sound, and each suggested letter tempts one to LET another define it.
LET, verb (Latin elocare, to lease) - "to permit; to allow; to suffer; to give leave or power, to withhold restraint; not to prevent"...leasing to another; leashes self.
The "de" in degeneration implies separation, so what if generation (inception towards death) separates itself into regeneration (life), and what if the "re" in regeneration implies ones response to being generated?
What if others suggest a cessation of motion (stop) to distract one from choosing to regenerate? How does fighting another regenerates oneself?
Leviticus: ""Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is detestable" + "And if a man lie with mankind, as with womankind, both of them have committed a detestable act: They shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them"
Why bring up what others wanted in 2001 when Leviticus aka Levi is still going strong? What if detestability implies the ability of others to test one with for example suggested sentiments about sodomy?
Furthermore; consider this..."the Torah was created prior to the creation of the world, and was used as the blueprint for Creation" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah
Sounds crazy? What if ones consent to suggested creation-ism establishes a world/vault within ones mind/memory aka a confinement (confined mind)? What if Torah aka horah - "he taught, showed" implies the one suggesting?