Putting a title onto something that moves cannot ever be accurate.
And what does that mean 'extremist'
-ist (extremist) implies consent to suggested -ism (extremism), hence an order follower.
Doesn't that imply that they serve the same goal as the whole, just to a greater extent?
Extremism cannot be whole; otherwise the distinction between extremist and extremism couldn't be made. Being implies medium (life) in-between extremes (inception/death).
Which was being contradicted by "same...as whole" + "to a greater extent".
to answer a question I did not ask.
a) "to" aka towards aka perceivable solution is what inspires me to respond...not any suggested questions or answers.
b) Suggested "did not" tempts one to ignore being done by everything, hence existing within procession.
thread destroyer
What if your consent to suggested threads weaves you into them, while me pointing out contradictions opens up holes to make perceivable fabric harder to ignore?
Bonus: DES- (dis; de; apart; asunder) TROY (person of dissolute life) aka being apart (life) within solution (inception towards death).
Now if only such a person would comprehend the use of Trojan-horses; Trojan-condoms; Trojan-viruses or the Troy measuring system for precious metals...
As for tunnels...focusing on suggested gives one tunnel-vision.
Putting a title onto something that moves cannot ever be accurate.
-ist (extremist) implies consent to suggested -ism (extremism), hence an order follower.
Extremism cannot be whole; otherwise the distinction between extremist and extremism couldn't be made. Being implies medium (life) in-between extremes (inception/death).
Intentional misinterpretation, in order to answer a question I did no ask.
I implied they were part of the whole, not the whole. But you already know that don't you? Thread Destroyer.
It’s a bot. Ignore him.
I point out that his intent is to destroy threads, and then I down vote him to the bottom. One can not just 'ignore' such a destructive presence.
To an extent I agree with you but it just feeds him. Every reply to him will encourage him to reply more thus making the thread unusable.
Until he’s banned it’s better to ignore him because now this post is unreadable thanks to him having spammed it in reply to your replies to him.
Which was being contradicted by "same...as whole" + "to a greater extent".
a) "to" aka towards aka perceivable solution is what inspires me to respond...not any suggested questions or answers.
b) Suggested "did not" tempts one to ignore being done by everything, hence existing within procession.
What if your consent to suggested threads weaves you into them, while me pointing out contradictions opens up holes to make perceivable fabric harder to ignore?
Bonus: DES- (dis; de; apart; asunder) TROY (person of dissolute life) aka being apart (life) within solution (inception towards death).
Now if only such a person would comprehend the use of Trojan-horses; Trojan-condoms; Trojan-viruses or the Troy measuring system for precious metals...
As for tunnels...focusing on suggested gives one tunnel-vision.
Why do you even bother?
a) Why would adaption to inspiration ever be viewed as bothering?
b) What if drawing inspiration from to express self implies a relief instead of a bother?
c) Even implies balance; being bothered by implies ones choice to ignore balance.
Not real. Artificial intelligence. Freewillofchoice user.
Not you.