You're bitch ass left this comment under the compilation of 3 informative sources, where there's a specific request for more information. Since your readying comprehension is so low, you may be suffering for side effects.
"The discovery of this new subtype and its subsequent addition to the GenBank database augments our understanding of the complexity and diversity of human blood types."
It's not a new blood type, its a new subtype.
Since you won't correct your mistake and others have to for you.
You deflect with "it's written about in multiple different ways"
Yet you don't fucking get it.
If the vaccines changes people blood subtypes then why haven't they found new ones for every type of blood?
Maybe it's the fact that the P blood type is rare and so finding different genes for p blood types is even rarer.
As you can see from the below compilation, it's written about in multiple different ways. If you can find a comparison to the ABO typing system that would be helpful.
a) "new" (out of nothing) cannot exist within "now" (within everything)...unless one chooses to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
b) Being implies unit (one) within whole (oneness). Singular cannot perceive plural, but one can be deceived to ignore self for others...counting does the trick.
c) Sudden (happening without previous notice) tempts one to ignore that observation (perception) can only exist within observable (perceivable).
The opposite of notice implies obliviousness aka ignorance...which is what others are exploiting when utilizing suggestion as sudden notice within an already perceivable world.
d) Rare (uncommon; not frequent) is being suggested to tempt one to consent to common-ism, which in return collectivizes ones choice under chosen ones. Choice within a balance based system implies frequency aka a thing often repeated at short intervals, hence one choosing each moment (um) how to adapt to being within motion.
e) Type (to mark something) implies idolatry aka typecasting solids within a fluid system, which in return tempts one to hold onto solid while ignoring fluid.
f) As for blood...aorta (to raise, growth) + blood (fluid loss). How does one regenerate blood? Transmutation of fluid (inception towards death) to solid (life). Others tempt one to fill vessels, which tempts one to ignore being vessel within current.
https://bnnbreaking.com/breaking-news/health/rare-p-blood-type-gene-sequence-discovered-in-china/
Another article.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/china-hospital-blood-type-genetic-sequence-b2475406.html
Edit :
More on P blood type. There's more than one way to type blood. We use the ABO +/- in the US. I can't find anything comparing these two type systems.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/blood-group-p-system
Wow, this is not cool.
In the land of organ harvesting, they may be safe.
YES! The Vaccine made a new blood type! You're not the slightest bit retarded!
You're bitch ass left this comment under the compilation of 3 informative sources, where there's a specific request for more information. Since your readying comprehension is so low, you may be suffering for side effects.
Maybe the problem is you're so stupid you don't know the difference between genes and blood types
Maybe you should leave the more difficult articles to people with more than a 5th grade mentality. I won't be responding to you again.
It's not a new blood type, its a new subtype.
Since you won't correct your mistake and others have to for you.
You deflect with "it's written about in multiple different ways"
Yet you don't fucking get it.
If the vaccines changes people blood subtypes then why haven't they found new ones for every type of blood?
Maybe it's the fact that the P blood type is rare and so finding different genes for p blood types is even rarer.
Your telling me the interbreeding of homo sapiens with other species like Neanderthals' and Denisovans would result in complex biological profiles.
And then you expect a one all vaccine that works for every different possible type.
Truly foolish.
P blood type has been known for ages. This is just a new gene sequence, not a new blood type.
As you can see from the below compilation, it's written about in multiple different ways. If you can find a comparison to the ABO typing system that would be helpful.
a) "new" (out of nothing) cannot exist within "now" (within everything)...unless one chooses to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
b) Being implies unit (one) within whole (oneness). Singular cannot perceive plural, but one can be deceived to ignore self for others...counting does the trick.
c) Sudden (happening without previous notice) tempts one to ignore that observation (perception) can only exist within observable (perceivable).
The opposite of notice implies obliviousness aka ignorance...which is what others are exploiting when utilizing suggestion as sudden notice within an already perceivable world.
d) Rare (uncommon; not frequent) is being suggested to tempt one to consent to common-ism, which in return collectivizes ones choice under chosen ones. Choice within a balance based system implies frequency aka a thing often repeated at short intervals, hence one choosing each moment (um) how to adapt to being within motion.
e) Type (to mark something) implies idolatry aka typecasting solids within a fluid system, which in return tempts one to hold onto solid while ignoring fluid.
f) As for blood...aorta (to raise, growth) + blood (fluid loss). How does one regenerate blood? Transmutation of fluid (inception towards death) to solid (life). Others tempt one to fill vessels, which tempts one to ignore being vessel within current.
a> gay
b> gay
c> gay
gay gay gay
d> gay
e> gay
f> gay
g> all the above was written by a faggot
You can easily spot the trolls because they'll reply to anyone even the obvious bots lol. It's sad really.
Oh no he criticized me so he's a troll!
He's right, and I'm a stupid faggot, but i'm going to latch onto anything to dimiss him because I hate facts and logic.