Guardian (life) more suicidal and homicidal than time (inception towards death)...living in the process of dying yet managing to kill self and others quicker than nature.
how many people are completely incapable of thinking
a) Suggested pluralism (people) tempts perceiving singular (person) to ignore self for others.
b) COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one, or by small numbers, for ascertaining the whole number of units in a collection"
Nature doesn't count; it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one), hence differentiating whole oneness into each partial one within. Others suggest collectivism (many people) to trick one to count others while ignoring self.
If one counts what another suggests; then that establishes an ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"...consenting to suggested implies crediting debt.
Feel the truth flowing through us
a) Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)
b) Holding onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...since it implies a flow-state.
c) Both truth and lie implies holding onto a suggested definition (definite; affixed), while ignoring being within motion aka constant change.
Choosing truth (want) vs lies (not want) ignores change (need)...the former implies the temptation to ignore latter.
it's like the whole
Being implies different partial within same whole...others tempt one to ignore this for behaving alike.
under some spell
Consenting to stand-under/understand suggested spell-craft (letters into words) tempts one to ignore perceivable sound.
Nature doesn't shape letters...it offers each one the free will of choice to "let" others choose for one, when ignoring self.
only a few can see through...
...while many choose to only see what a few suggest them to watch.
yo dawg; why does my ass hurt?
RAP; verb (Latin rapio, rapidus, rapid) - "to seize by violence"...
rap
Aka rapture - "transport by violence (physical force; strength of action or motion) aka transport (life) by violence (inception towards death).
Another word for rapture..."exile" aka expressed departure/separation, hence whole separating into partials.
Because leaking; whistle-blowing; pirating; snitching etc. are controlled channels. How?
a) Perceivable towards perception implies original stream; while suggested towards perception implies channeling.
b) Accumulation of suggestible evidence tempts one to ignore Latin evidentia, from video - "to see". Hence, any evidence presented tempts others to ignore sight.
This is why jews can clean up the consequences of their choices over decades; centuries; millennia, while gentiles keep impotently showing each other "evidence". This is why denial works aka why "no" is stronger than "yes".
was given basic canned responses
Artifice implies suggested information as canned responses from others...natural implies perceivable inspiration as self. Holding onto former (information) implies canning it within ones mind/memory, while latter (inspiration) cannot be held onto...hence it being always freshly delivered for one to draw from.
Many are ignoring this; which enables few to utilize AI aka aggregation of information aka "egregore"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egregore
bankrupt
Bank implies "laid together"; rupture implies "broken apart"...
Being implies solids apart (life) within current solution (inception towards death)...others tempt solids together so that current/currency rips them apart.
In other words...being implies "rupture"; suggestions by others implies "bank", and ones consent to it implies "trust".
they have demonic magic that allows them to use hate, despair and anger as methods to keep themselves afloat.
The magic is suggestion; ones consent is that which allows/permits it, and reasoning about suggested implies the hate; despair and anger within self; aimed at all others who also consented.
As for afloat...rising (life) within loss (inception towards death) requires one to resist perceivable, while consenting to suggested drowns one quicker.
The few aren't struggling to stay afloat; they effortlessly watch the many struggle to drain each other as quick as possible by consenting to aka holding onto suggested information, which burdens their mind/memory until they cannot physically keep up with the mental demands anymore.
I am convinced that they are sustaining themselves with supernatural means
To convince implies "to persuade or satisfy the mind by evidence; to subdue the opposition of the mind to truth" aka you consenting to suggested information, while holding onto it.
That implies you holding onto fiction; which makes the natural reality you ignore seem super-duper-mega-with a cherry on top-special to you.
In short...focusing ones sight on fiction; makes all the ignored reality seem supernatural. Specters floating around the corner of ones eyes...
estimate
Aka esteem - "to hold in opinion" aka to hold suggested together, while ignoring to be perception apart from perceivable.
around
SouROUNDing is what one ignores, when focusing on suggested estimates. Focusing implies narrowing down ones sight...
compartmentalized
a) Notice COM (together) PART (apart)...a contradiction within ones MENT (mind/memory).
b) Nature sets whole (all perceivable) apart (each ones perception) from one another...others tempt each other together, which compartmentalized ones memory, because togetherness only exists within oneself holding onto a suggested state (togetherness), while ignoring perceivable (apartheid).
a) All perceivable "was" before one can suggest what "is".
b) To say implies to utter sound (perceivable) in words (suggested), which makes others SOOTH'SAYER, noun - "a foreteller; a prognosticator; one who undertakes to foretell future events without inspiration", and oneself ignorant of origin; source; omnipotence; whole; sole/soul; all...
c) -ist (atheist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (atheism). Willingly using THE implies one to be "A THE IST"...both believer (want) and unbeliever (not want) are consenting to the same suggestion from a different side, while ignoring perceivable.
Those suggesting don't give a f... about from which sides others consent to; only that each one willingly consents to ignore perceivable for suggested.
d) "no to" implies nothing towards, which tempts one to ignore that everything moves each one living within from inception TOWARDS death. Nothing isn't a stance against anything; but ones ignorance of everything.
Once again...suggested nihil-ism tempting one to de-nial all perceivable, while entrapping self within a conflict of reason (no vs yes) against others.
Would a believer say "no" to god?
a) EX (expression outwards) STEN (stance within)....only within (inception towards death) can one express outwards (life).
b) -ist (existentialist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (existentialism)...which isn't an expression outwards; but a suppression of self inwards.
Do you pursue an id or the ego?
a) Within motion...seeking; following; pursuing implies falling for the temptation to ignore resisting. In other words...pursuing implies towards outcomes; being implies within origin.
Whenever I see something worth pursuing; I know schlomo is standing behind me with a fishing-rod, dangling it in-front of me. My consent to such a suggestion represents the hook.
b) ID aka identification aka identic (same) action (tion) tempts one to ignore being the different reaction (life) within same action (inception towards death).
c) Ego implies ones mind filled with the suggested information by others; hence tempting self to indulge inwards instead of expressing outwards.
He-brew his-story to tempt ones mind to be misused as a store for information; instead of a relinquishment for perceivable inspiration moving through.
Do you just be?
Being implies odd (choice) within just/even (balance), which offers being the opportunity to discern self...or ignore it for the suggestions by others which confuse self with concern about others.
Do you give yourself a new name?
a) All is given (perceivable) to each receiving one (perception)...changing the channel to suggestion doesn't change that; it corrupts oneself.
b) Suggested new (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable now (within everything).
One cannot be before (inception) or after (death)...only now (life). Also...new, néwos, now (it's not even hidden deep).
c) Name/noun/nombre/number implies designation of unit (Latin unitas; unus; one)...others suggest one to count others, which in return tempts one to ignore self for others.
Just. Wow.
I feel this whenever I adapt to inspiration. Like...I have no idea what I'm going to write until I write it.
how do you eat?
Permit hunger to inspire me with signs of consumption within my surrounding.
Strangers are approaching
Familiarize myself with departure; thereby teaching myself, while learning about farsight.
They seem angry, and confused.
Choose to resist semblance; which teaches me to learn about my differences...which turn out to be my strengths.
What do you do?
Learned through hunger that my surrounding does me; which implies that my choice permits me to re-do myself at will.
Your move.
Choose to resist being (life) moved (inception towards death)...thereby live longer.
Everything else still there? Then I am within; surrounded by, and the effect thereof. As a subordinate part within whole I am a MEM-BER, hence bearing memory.
To "believe" distracts from "be live"...
reflect light
REFLECT', verb (Latin reflecto; re and flecto, to bend) aka light (inception towards death) bending (life). The RE in reflect implies oneself as the reacting inflection; curvature; strain; that which is directed to a point within the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion).
Which is what creationism is based upon...
How about this? Can you "create" anything without using everything already in existence? Any example for creation out of nothing over transmutation within everything?
How could god create something without ignoring to be everything? If "almighty" could grow/add to self/create new, then that contradicts "almighty"...
What if HE isn't a creator; but SHE (momentum) implies the Split of HE (motion) into trans-formed matter? Hence from everything (whole) into each thing (partial)?
a) First implies all perceivable; second implies ones perception; third implies suggestions by another. Without perception a suggestion couldn't be made; and without perceivable ones perception would have no input.
If you say God equals perceivable; then ones perception needs to adapt to perceivable "God"...not to suggested "God". The difference...suggested is put together; perceivable is being set apart.
b) The suggestion of God as creator contradicts God as all; whole; omnipotence; everything; sole; one and only; origin; cause etc.
Creationism implies adding to; which implies God lacking...
a) Thule aka soul/sole/whole; hence ultima thule - "borders of knowledge".
b) Thule Gesellschaft aka Gemeinschaft (community) + Gesellschaft (society) aka suggested communism and socialism...within the borders of perceivable/knowledge.
a) AC'CIDENT, noun [Latin accidens, falling) - "a coming or falling; an event that takes place without one's foresight or expectation"...coming to be aka inception implies without ones expectation.
Also; only while falling (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
b) CREATE, verb - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist". Others suggest creationism (out of nothing) as the inversion of transmutation (within everything).
Nothing aka suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to consent to de-nial everything perceivable for suggested nothingness.
c) One cannot believe in "God" without first consenting to those who shape suggestions in the name of (in nomine) padre et fili et spiritu sancti.
Whatever one believes is secondary to those suggesting one what to believe, which those suggesting rub into ones eyes with the first commandment aka Exodus 20:3 - "You shall have no other gods before me".
The trick...suggestion by others (words) is secondary to perception as self (sound).
Where did you got the word "God" from? Who suggested you to use words?
RAP'TURE, noun [Latin raptus, rapio.] aka rapidity (life) within violence (inception towards death), which also implies a rupture/rapture from whole into partials.
pyramid
a) PYRA (fire) MID (middle)...hence being able to feel emotions in the middle (life) of motion (inception towards death).
b) PYRA also implies pyrde/pride...hence pride goes before a fall.
alters the way we see reality
Reality implies way (inception towards death) for alternating wanderers (life) within aka the whole SEA for each partial vessel enabled to SEE within. Being alternated also implies violent agitation (storm); hence being the eye/I of the storm.
cause suffering because suffering leads to all kinds of emotional outbursts like fear
a) Cause (inception towards death) inspires effects (life) to resist; other effects affect one to be afraid of suggested outcomes, when ignoring perceivable origin.
b) Only within relief (inception towards death) can there be suffering (life), hence SUFFER aka SUB (under) FERO/PYRO (fire)....burn motherfucker; burn, cause the roof is on fire.
Emotions are energy in motion
a) All is one in energy (internal/inherent power). Energy implies the external whole for each partial power within.
b) Emotion (Latin emoveo; to move from) implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death), hence "holding" onto suggested; while ignoring that perceivable moves.
all work together to increase suffering.
Nature sets itself apart from whole into partials, so that each one can handle all suffering. Others tempt partials together (e pluribus unum; out of many; one) to trick partials to take one more suffering through one another, which in return becomes unbearable for oneself.
As for work...that implies energy, hence all works for each ones employed mind within.
raise in words
Words tempt ones understanding, which curtails rising.
supposed invincibility
- IN (within) VINCO (to conquer)
- CONQUER, verb - "to subdue; to reduce, by physical force, till resistance is no longer made"
Aka being within (life) that which conquers (inception towards death). Each one is invincible; while others suggest "supposition" to tempt one to ignore resisting.
occult
Ignoring perceivable (inspiration) conceals ones discernment underneath suggested (information). Oculus implies ones eyes to see, and ones free will of choice cultivates what one sees.
how they continue
CONTINUE, verb (Latin, to hold) - "to remain in a state"...being doesn't remain; it struggles (inception towards death) to sustain (life) as temporary solid within ongoing fluid.
gradually inveigle their depraved behavior into society. MONARCH PROGRAMMING
a) Society implies the suggested seduction (inveigle) for one (singular) to join together (pluralism) with other ones (singular)...it's social-ism aka community-ism aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together).
Only if many lump together can few remain apart, because nature is busy ripping that lump apart aka using procession to overcome indigestion.
b) MONO (Greek monos - "single, alone") ARCH (curve supported by extremities)
Being implies one curve (life) supported in-between extremities (inception towards death). The latter implies linear loss; the former curved/wave-form growth.
c) The monarch programming aka MKUltra suggests the use of fear to set the mind apart, hence tricking one to isolate self from surrounding.
The deception...fear implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin, and being (perception) within origin (perceivable) implies being set apart. Others tempt one to hold onto suggested, while imagining fearful outcomes. This way ones memory is filled to the brim with suggested garbage by others; within which one tries to isolate self from others. That only suffocates self.
The solution...letting go of suggested information aka resisting suggested (want) within perceivable (need) to grow resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death).
Before being afraid of something suggested; one consents to trust the one suggesting it...that's the issue. Trust breeds fear. Why? Trust tempts one to hold onto something within a moving system, and when motion takes away whatever one holds onto, then one gets afraid of loosing it.
damsel
a) Damsel/dame/mother/matrix/uterus/womb
b) Being implies fetus (matter) within womb (momentum) of man (motion) aka the male through female trans-mutation of oneself.
c) Suggested "damsel in distress" aka womb (dame) apart (dis) together (stringere) tempts one to ignore being partial (life) within womb (inception towards death) of whole (motion).
movie
Aka a moving picture aka a captured moment...tempting one to ignore that momentum (inception towards death) cannot be held onto by those (life) within.
Watching a movie implies consenting to focus ones sight within all perceivable on a suggested screen. In-between suggested fiction and perceivable reality exists a wall of ignorance, and a mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks and ones willing consent as mortar to sustain this (wailing) wall of ignorance.
a) Did you knew that the jew who coined schizophrenia (eugene bleuler) and the jew who was coined "father of psychoanalysis" (sigismund schlomo freud) conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry?
Could it be that gentiles psychoanalyzing each other as schizos; over a century after the aforementioned conspiracy, implies a successful conquering of the gentile mind?
b) Are you a person or a people? How does nature count? Can one form without flow? Can one hold onto inspiration? What if holding onto a truth; while within change, makes it a lie?
Can you answer any of these questions for yourself without psychoanalyzing others?
c) SCHIZO; noun (Greek skhizo) - "division; split; separate"...being one apart from one another implies a schism/schizo.
Withing the merely (only) conduit (inception towards death) many channels (life) exist among one another...others suggest channels to distract from perceivable conduit.