how many people are completely incapable of thinking
a) Suggested pluralism (people) tempts perceiving singular (person) to ignore self for others.
b) COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one, or by small numbers, for ascertaining the whole number of units in a collection"
Nature doesn't count; it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one), hence differentiating whole oneness into each partial one within. Others suggest collectivism (many people) to trick one to count others while ignoring self.
If one counts what another suggests; then that establishes an ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"...consenting to suggested implies crediting debt.
Feel the truth flowing through us
a) Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)
b) Holding onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...since it implies a flow-state.
c) Both truth and lie implies holding onto a suggested definition (definite; affixed), while ignoring being within motion aka constant change.
Choosing truth (want) vs lies (not want) ignores change (need)...the former implies the temptation to ignore latter.
a) Did you knew that the jew who coined schizophrenia (eugene bleuler) and the jew who was coined "father of psychoanalysis" (sigismund schlomo freud) conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry?
Could it be that gentiles psychoanalyzing each other as schizos; over a century after the aforementioned conspiracy, implies a successful conquering of the gentile mind?
b) Are you a person or a people? How does nature count? Can one form without flow? Can one hold onto inspiration? What if holding onto a truth; while within change, makes it a lie?
Can you answer any of these questions for yourself without psychoanalyzing others?
c) SCHIZO; noun (Greek skhizo) - "division; split; separate"...being one apart from one another implies a schism/schizo.
merely a conduit
Withing the merely (only) conduit (inception towards death) many channels (life) exist among one another...others suggest channels to distract from perceivable conduit.
a) Suggested pluralism (people) tempts perceiving singular (person) to ignore self for others.
b) COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one, or by small numbers, for ascertaining the whole number of units in a collection"
Nature doesn't count; it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one), hence differentiating whole oneness into each partial one within. Others suggest collectivism (many people) to trick one to count others while ignoring self.
If one counts what another suggests; then that establishes an ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"...consenting to suggested implies crediting debt.
a) Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)
b) Holding onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...since it implies a flow-state.
c) Both truth and lie implies holding onto a suggested definition (definite; affixed), while ignoring being within motion aka constant change.
Choosing truth (want) vs lies (not want) ignores change (need)...the former implies the temptation to ignore latter.
Are you schizophrenic?
I think it's a bot.
a) Did you knew that the jew who coined schizophrenia (eugene bleuler) and the jew who was coined "father of psychoanalysis" (sigismund schlomo freud) conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry?
Could it be that gentiles psychoanalyzing each other as schizos; over a century after the aforementioned conspiracy, implies a successful conquering of the gentile mind?
b) Are you a person or a people? How does nature count? Can one form without flow? Can one hold onto inspiration? What if holding onto a truth; while within change, makes it a lie?
Can you answer any of these questions for yourself without psychoanalyzing others?
c) SCHIZO; noun (Greek skhizo) - "division; split; separate"...being one apart from one another implies a schism/schizo.
Withing the merely (only) conduit (inception towards death) many channels (life) exist among one another...others suggest channels to distract from perceivable conduit.
You tangentially dissect my statements and answer questions with questions, that's all you had to say schizo!
To dissect another ones state of mind implies a split; division; separation...schism/schizo.