Ayh want to dismantle this group.
a) If one claims self as "me; myself or I/ayh"; then every other one is grouped into "you". Nature sets each one apart from one another...it's those within who tempt each other back together.
b) Want implies a division (want vs not want) which mantles ones discernment of need...ones self imposed cloak of willing ignorance.
c) Are chosen ONES a group or is there a singular implication hidden in plain sight?
anarchy
a) AN (without) ARKHOS (leader)....being implies within (life) lead (inception towards death).
b) If one resists the temptation to follow suggested leaders; then one would discern for self that one needs to resist being led by wanted temptations towards death.
identical to the first-identical in fact to all
The ones inside can be tricked to ignore that each "identical" thing exists at a "different" position. Resisting ignorance allows one to discern self within that which differentiates positions from one another.
The arrangement of...
Others can utilize suggestion to arrange information within ones consenting mind/ment/memory...perceivable inspiration implies an ongoing flow through each memory.
Memory isn't there for effect to "save" cause for later use; but to offer temporary effect (matter) a moment (momentum) to choose how to adapt to ongoing cause (motion).
Meanwhile...all suggested information is saved/stored/held onto by ones consent, while permitting those suggesting it to arrange; re-arrange and corrupt it at will.
One of the hexagon’s free sides
Oneself implies free (choice) within sides (balance)...ignoring this for a suggested hex'agon (six and an angle) tempts one to ignore ones sight aka ones angle of discernment as center within circumference aka as the compass rose aka in-between six sides (front/back + up/down + left/right)...these sides don't exist outside each ones perspective.
It is direction (inception towards death) which generates navigation (life)...any suggested navigation tempts ones misdirection aka missing perceivable direction.
crypto agnostic
a) Agnostic; noun - "one who professes that the existence of a First Cause and the essential nature of things are not and cannot be known"
How could an effect discern itself without cause offering perceivable knowledge to each effect within?
b) As for the cause of crypto (Greek kryptos; hidden)...ignorance hides discernment.
want...normies
What few suggest becomes the norm for what many reason (want vs not want) over. Few utilize suggestion (want) to tempt many to ignore perception (need) aka concealing that which nature reveals.
Maybe it's some kind of revelation of the method thing...
a) Revelation implies revealed (perception) through action (perceivable)...not through the suggestions by others.
b) METH'OD, noun (Latin methodus; Gr. with, and way) implies being within (life) way (inception towards death) aka the natural or regular disposition of separate things or parts within whole.
Few suggest methods of classification to tempt "many" together aka fictitious collectivism over natural apartheid. Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies a contract; a binding together; a religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) etc.
a) CIGARETTE aka ZIKKURAT/ZIGGURAT
b) É.TEMEN.AN.KI (temple of the foundation of heaven and earth) was a ziggurat dedicated to the Mesopotamian god Marduk in the ancient city of Babylon...a likely inspiration for the biblical story of the Tower of Babel.
TEMEN/MENTE...MENTHOL
Cathedrals probably do not have a religious purpose
Nature sets CATHode and anode apart from one another...religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) tempts partials together.
came with our realm
a) Being comes to be within REALity.
b) Real/realm/royal/rex/reg..."move in a straight line"
creation-in-ruin
Fall (inception towards death) transmuting rise (life)...others suggest creationism (out of nothing) as the inversion thereof.
permutations of a single
Aka from whole (oneness) into partials (ones)...all implies one within energy.
They want people to think
Wanting suggested tempts one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) against others...perceivable need inspires through implication (if/then).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt many to ignore perception.
Why would a city have a founder?
a) What if foundation (inception towards death) generates center/city (life)?
b) What if being implies center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable); while being tempted into circumference (suggestion)?
c) What if few erect centers to draw in and then cut many off circumference aka circumcision?
happen all
HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance as effect of unknown cause"...what if effects (life) can know cause (inception towards death) through discernment of self?
What if all implies known cause for each one within?
literally
What are words in their natural meaning (literal)...within a nature that doesn't shape words? How does nature shape a letter?
time
Aka part (life) of duration (inception towards death)...
I must admit though, it is more entertaining, very entertaining...
Aka ones consent to admit the suggestions by another to ENTER TAME MIND.
to transcend both sides
Being implies center (life) within sides (inception/death)...others tempt one off-center when choosing to hold onto a side.
both sides are profitable
Consenting (want or not want) to a suggestion by few puts many into a conflict of reason (want vs not want)...a conflict where both sides are profitable for the suggesting few. Why? Because both sides fighting are investing their resistance against one another.
If many spend resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) by selling themselves out to few; then...
Some people will sell...
...some more willingly buy into anything sold.
what will happen
HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance" + CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"...will implies effect within known cause...energy...what else could cause effects?
next
Few suggest progressivism (next) to tempt many to ignore being (life) within procession (inception towards death) NOW...being cannot exist before or after NOW.
Now can be ignored for a suggested next aka ANNEX', verb - "to unite at the end; to subjoin; to affix; to unite to something proceeding; to connect with".
In short: If one consents to suggested NEXT; while ignoring perceivable NOW; then that implies annexation.
week
a) Days/daze of the week/weak
b) If one yields (weak) to being overpowered by light (daze); then one seeks shadows/darkness. Perceivable inspiration implies light; ignoring it for suggested information implies darkness.
Ignorance implies a weakness dazing ones discernment.
more specifically
Aka more internal division among partials/specials.
april
From APO - "of, from, away from; separate, apart from, free from"; hence Sanskrit aparah "second" (Latin seco; to divide).
information warriors
Wanting vs not wanting suggested information, while ignoring the need within perceivable inspiration to resist want...it's ones free will of choice to enter war.
If you want to learn more...
...then war continues against that which you don't want.
all of history is a lie
- All is one in energy
- He-brew his-story to make jew/you fall for it
- A different word for lie is "truth"
the enemy
a) EN'EMY, noun (Latin inimicus) - "adversary" + AD'VERSE, adjective(Latin adversus, opposite; verto; to turn).
Turning implies "to cause to move in a circular course", while being implies within (life) a linear course (inception towards death).
b) Ones consent to suggested THE-ism turns one against others (circular reasoning), while ignoring cause of motion.
c) Discerning self within linear motion implies as wave-form aka WAVE, noun - "unevenness; inequality of surface"...VERSUS an enemy implies the same choice, no matter which enemy.
d) Sleight of hand:
- I'm gettin' bugged driving up and down the same old strip
- I gotta find a new place where the kids are hip
- My buddies and me are gettin' real well known
- Yeah, the bad guys know us and they leave us alone
- I get around (Get around round round, I get around)
Written from the perspective of few (jew) about many (gentiles).
Where the kids are hip? https://genius.com/Huey-lewis-and-the-news-hip-to-be-square-lyrics
a victim-superiority complex
a) Victim implies inferior, hence inferior vs superior aka both sides of the same conflict of reason.
b) Suggesting sides implies simple; consenting to either suggested side establishes a conflict among both, which implies complex.
A suggestion implies ONEs choice; consenting to suggested establishes a conflict of reason in-between TWO choices...simple (one) or complex (two).
c) If ones choice consents to chosen ones suggestion, then that implies inferiority of self permitting superiority of another.
Consent implies self-victimization.
There’s no creditor nor debtor
"no; nor" implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consent to it implies creed/credit given. Those suggesting the -ism become the debtor of those accrediting the suggested by consent.
do ya have a boner for usury
a) Erecting exponential growth sounds like trouble.
b) Bank & Trust implies suggestion & consent aka buy & sell...buying into it establishes debtor & creditor.
c) U'SURY, noun (Latin usura, utor, to use) - "taking interest"...nature uses; those within re-use what nature offers. Interest (inter-esse) implies within essence, which one cannot take without ignoring that origin moves.
man; he
Male (motion) through fe-male (momentum) for trans-form-ation (matter)...to be implies trans within fe of male.
That’s the question I asked
Each quests returns to where it started, hence coming to be (life) in (inception) and out (death) of origin.
your heart
Does one need to claim a heart as mine, and does a heart require others to suggest possession thereof as "yours"?
A heart beats in response to what? BEAT aka BE (being) AT (Hebrew; to come; direction towards)...and the beat goes on...
Does a heart pump blood?
Stillness contradicts knowledge. What if heart cannot stand still?
doesn't even know
Does nothing (doesn't) puts one at odds with knowledge aka everything perceivable.
what the heart does
a) What if pumping hearts/Hz/hurts? No pain; no gain...
b) Why is it called HEMO (blood) GLOBIN (round mass, sphere, ball/ba'al)?
c) What can you tell me about Iron deficiency anemia and... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumping_Iron
Breaking is implied in all nature is giving each one within...
- Free implies within dominance
- Will/want implies within need
- Of implies out of; hence within
- Choice implies within balance
Others suggest "free will" without "of choice". Why? To tempt ones choice to consent to the suggested offer "free will" by the choice of another, which makes it a liberty suggested, and ones consent puts one at liberty to another.
believe in cloning
Consenting to believe a suggestion by another "clones" it within self.
human clones
HUE (color) of man implies visible spectrum of light. There can be only one light and each one refraction within. Try to double light without refracting it further...
Is it possible?
It is possible to suggest one to consent to believe that cloning is possible. At moment of consent "believing in cloning" became a possibility.
What would be the purpose?
Suggesting the doubling of one tempts one to refract self within a conflict of reason against other ones.
any evidence that supports the theory?
Anyone consenting to suggested theorism becomes evidence of support.
anything that implies cloning is real
If Greek klōn; klados - "sprout; offshoot"; then sprout (life) derived by off-shoot (inception towards death).
Sun Tzu pointed out that all warfare is based on deception
Sun Tzu implies a suggested name upon a perceivable unit, and pointing out tempts one to ignore being sentence (life) within (inception towards death).
What if suggestion cannot dispel deceit; since suggestion (information) implies the spell within perception (inspiration)?
unaware that he is under attack
AWARE implies ones perception; UN (from root; -ne; not) implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting ones consent to de-nial perceivable.
In short...UN (suggestion) attacks AWARE (perception)...if one consents to it.
a) 'ARCHIVES, noun (Latin archivum) - "apartment in which records are kept"...that ment apart implies ones memory when consenting to a chosen ones suggested information, and consenting implies letting, hence the use of "letter".
b) SUD'DEN, adjective (Latin subitaneus) - "happening without previous notice"...perception can only come to be within perceivable, which is the previous notice one ignores when consenting to suggested.
c) One cannot "find" anything without ignoring that "foundation" had to exist before one came to be within it.
Reality doesn't hide; those within hide from reality when consenting to bury themselves with fiction.