jews are...
...suggesting numbers; numerology; gematria; gemara to distract each consenting ONE from discerning self as a partial unit (one) within whole (oneness).
they give
Nature gives (perceivable); those within tempt each other to take (suggested). Taking (ones choice) gives oneself away to another (chosen one).
are not the same
Same (all perceivable) generates differences (ones perception)...others tempt one with likeness (suggested) to ignore that. If many consent alike to a suggestion by few, then each different one thereof mimics sameness.
Example...wearing a uniform, while following orders, as to not stand out.
why did they lie
Because you hold onto truth, while ignoring that nature moves. Utilizing the contradiction (lie) of what you hold onto (truth) permits others the opportunity to exploit you.
Holding onto something within motion implies spending resistance within velocity...if one deprives self of resistance; then others will show up for freebies.
Level with me aka choice (me) within (with) balance (level).
- Space/spatior - "to wander"
Each of ones steps within perceivable implies wandering; following suggestions permits another to wield a "wand" while casting spells...spells likes pluralism (we) and nihilism (never).
self immolated...Azzarello
Burned offering by AZZAREL/ISRAEL
Patsy to distract from Bernard Weinstein?
- Report...if one responds to a port; then ones vessel gets docked.
- Restore...if one responds to storage; then one holds onto.
Nature isn't for storage...it moves (inception towards death) each vessel (life). Mind/memory can be misused for storing suggested information by others; which is docked by ones consent.
a) Formative implies giving form; while forum implies jurisdiction over form. Flow (inception towards death) is the only jurisdiction over form (life).
b) Content implies holding together; while agenda/action implies setting apart into reactions. Few suggest content to tempt many to hold onto it; while ignoring that action (inception towards death) sets reactions (life) apart from one another.
c) Articles are scrubbed because natural (perceivable) scrubs artificial (suggested)...few mimic this by continuously destroying suggested information among consenting many.
d) Economic implies regulation of artifice aka ECO (habitation) LOGY (reason) NOMOS (managing)...logic/reason is hidden, because those managed with habitation are reasoning against one another.
lineage is in his blood
Lineage (inception towards death) moves through blood (life).
doesn't associate with the religion...actually hates them
Ones consent to suggested moralism implies religion and establishes a conflict of reason (love vs hate). Choosing to let go of hate and love breaks the bond of religion.
because their mother
Cause (motion) towards being (matter) goes through mother (momentum).
jew; jewish
Nature doesn't brand anything...those within suggest each other to hold onto brands aka idolatry as to manipulate each others behavior aka domestication.
Is there any saving this troubled man?
Order (inception towards death) doesn't save chaos (life)...it reveals it. Ignoring to discern this troubles ones mind.
Why The Lie?
Why implies energy...a moving source. Anyone within motion can be deceived to hold onto something (truth), which establishes a contradiction (lie). Those holding onto are trying to defeat the contradiction with what they're holding onto, and so many destroy each other mutually, while permitting few to utilize energy without interference.
- Kosher... Loose Change 9/11
- Treyf... 9/11 Missing Links
Theological Differences
Being implies different from one another...consenting to suggested theism (theo) and logism (logical) tempts many ones to respond alike.
They're saying it's fringe
Being implies center (perception) within circumference (perceivable)...consenting to anything suggested tempts one off-center, hence towards fringe/border/edge/margin etc.
Being within sound implies centered; consenting to what others are "saying" implies inclination towards "fringe".
emotional "energies" and "vibrations"
a) There's only one energy and it moves/motion...those within can choose to ignore being moved, which implies emotion/emotio/ emoveo - "to move from".
b) EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power" implies internal generation of action (motion) and reactions (matter) in balance (momentum) with each other. Center of balance implies choice aka oscillation aka vibration.
Being implies choice within balance (need/want)...instead of oscillating between need (perceivable inspiration) and want (suggested information), many choose dullness for self and friction (want vs not want) against others.
how this holy water retains that holyness even if it just sits there
There implies a differentiation from here...and differentiation can only exist within motion. Holy/whole moves; while each partial within wields the free will of choice to ignore being (life) moved (inception towards death) by for example suggesting to each other that "it just sits there".
As for just..."JUST balances, just weights, a just ephah and a just hin shall ye have." ~Leviticus 19:36.
Balance can only exist within motion...it's the choice within motion that is free to choose to ignore that, hence imbalancing self, which others exploit by tricking ones choice to choose chosen ones suggestion.
holy water, it burns like acid
AC'ID, adjective (Latin acidus) - "edge"...as in knowledge aka all perceivable aka whole/holy for each divided/divine partial within.
The flow of perceivable inspiration, it burns suggested information like knowledge.
What about asking Abraham to sacrifice his son?
ABH (father) RAHAM (multitude)...animation sacrifices (sets apart) multitude.
Few suggested MANY to come together, as to trick each one to ignore that nature sets each one apart from one another.
God sacrificing his one and only son to atone
Aka whole (god) setting apart (sacrificing) each one (son) aka AT (direction towards) ONE...
let's pretend Satanist were doing ...what would one's reaction be?
a) Whole does; each partial within reacts to being (life) done (inception towards death). Reacting to the reactions of another tempts one to ignore being done.
b) A satan-ist is consenting to suggested satan-ism, while ignoring perceivable...satan/adverse/advertere - "turning towards".
part animal
Partials (life) animated (inception towards death) within whole implies SAC'RIFICE, verb - "to devote with loss" aka DEVOTE, verb - "to set apart".
pagan
Pagan/pangere/pag - "to fix; to fasten"...animation cannot be fixed/fastened by those within; trying it anyway hastens ones demise.
So you agree you will always disagree.
a) Free will of choice can only exist at center of balance...others suggest agree vs disagree (imbalance) to tempt ones choice to incline towards a side, hence balancing self.
b) Ones will (life) can only exist within all way (inception towards death).
c) Does life agreeing or disagreeing with the process of dying change outcome?
- Rincewind: "But...what if I really; really hardly disagree with dying?"
- Death: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FnFr65RXdk8/hqdefault.jpg
we're making progress
Progression "makes" each one within apart from one another; those consenting to suggested pluralism (we) ignore to re-make self.
What was that to prove?
Lift (life) can discern oneself only while being propelled (inception towards death)...seeking proof from others contradicts ones self discernment.
Notice for yourself that living implies getting a lift by being propelled within process of dying, hence establishing temporary growth (matter) within ongoing loss (motion).
Literally nothing useful came from that.
a) How could "nothing" be lifted or propelled?
b) How could literal aka "words in their natural meaning" be lifted and propelled?
c) What if perceivable sound propels, while suggested words tempt those being propelled to ignore the lift thereof?
d) What if holding onto a suggested word makes it harder to lift self while being propelled within perceivable sound?
AERODYNAMIC
a) Aka aeros; aer (air) + dynamikos (powerful)...what can you tell me about the nature which empowers L(and) A(ir) W(ater)?
b) What if air implies matter within momentum of motion? What can you tell me about "solid; liquid; gas" and the power which differentiates each one from another?
phenomenon
a) What if few suggest phenomenalism?... https://www.etymonline.com/word/phenomenalism#etymonline_v_46260
b) What if many can be tricked with suggestion to ignore perception?
Sleight of hand: "Say what you want (suggestion), but keep your lips sealed (perception)...Something like a phenomenon"... https://genius.com/Ll-cool-j-phenomenon-lyrics
This is well-known, solid-grounded physics.
Knowledge implies ones perception; physic implies all perceivable bringing forward each ones perception aka solid within fluid.
What others suggest IS tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable. When you write "this is"...you tempt others to ignore that everything was perceivable before you could shape a suggestion about what this is.
That's the trick aka the difference between science/scio/to know/to perceive as one and scientism as suggested by another.
I guess planes are fake somehow.
All perceivable implies moving reality; ones consent to hold onto anything suggested implies "fake".
A plane implies a solid within fluid aka a temporal shaped within constant change. Your guesses on "solid-grounded physics" tempt you to ignore that. This is being used to manipulate your perception of reality with suggested fiction, shaped by others.
You fire them from a gun. They only time they are propelled is while inside the barrel.
Why does one need to maintain a gun? What happens to a gun if not maintained regularly? What is this power affecting a gun while "not in use"?
There is no lift.
a) There implies a differentiation between here and there...only during the same motion (loss) can there be differentiation of matter (growth). There's the propelled lift.
b) Others utilize IS (suggestion) to invert WAS (perception), and nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to de-nial everything perceivable. That's why you use the words "is" and "no"...neither of which can be perceived in nature.
Point at anything in nature and say "this is"...all was perceivable before you could suggest what this is.
The only force acting on them outside the gun barrel is drag and gravity.
Motion implies the only acting force...each matter within is forced to react, both to being (life) moved (inception towards death) and to one another, when trying to come together.
Drag (to draw) implies matter drawing from motion; or trying to draw from other matter, hence burdening self aka becoming heavier (gravity; gravis).
keep living
Living (temporary growth) implies within process of dying (ongoing loss)...one cannot keep anything, while everything moves. Holding onto anything makes it harder to resist the temptation of being processed.
nothing makes sense
All perceivable generates each ones perception...senses work only within everything available. Few suggest nothing to tempt many to ignore everything perceivable.
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
sacrifice is a materialist ritual in place of esoteric understanding
a) EXO (inception towards death) towards ESO (life) implies sacrifice aka whole (motion) establishing a place for each partial (matter) by internal separation (momentum).
b) Material-ist implies ones consent to suggested material-ism, hence matter/material holding onto other matter.
take YHWH apart, learning how the word is formed letter-by-letter.
a) ONE...it doesn't matter which letters are suggested; only ones consent LETTING another shape words with it.
b) Oneness (whole) generates ones (partials) by setting each apart from one another. The foundation for wholeness and apartheid implies ONE...for all is one in energy.
c) Words (suggested information) can only be shaped within sound (perceivable inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter can't be held onto.
special power
Power (inception towards death) generates specials (life).
Words divide by de-fin-ition.
Ones consent to a suggested definition implies one to be a DEAF PHONECTICIAN aka one who ignores to discern self as divine (partial) within holy (whole) of perceivable sound.
The difference between division (being against) and separation (being within) can only be discerned by self...not by consenting to the suggestions of others; which tempt one into a conflict of reason aka into division aka into ignoring self for another.
One cannot choose among suggested choices without ignoring to be choice within perceivable.
Unfortunately we use them to commune.
a) Few suggest chance (fortune) to tempt many to ignore choice.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt each singular (one) to ignore self for others.
c) Few suggest commune-ism to tempt each consenting one to become part of a collectivist many.
There's no "many" in nature unless one counts other ones as many. Each one within nature is distinct; different; apart from one another. Instead of looking for difference in alike behavior...notice that each one exists at a different position from one another.
You do give the answers that the literal interpretation suggests.
Which I try to break down within perceivable solution; like that interpretation aka interpreting action implies ones reaction to suggest an interpretation of perceivable action.
Interpreting perceivable inspiration as suggested information corrupts the one consenting to it; because then one holds onto words instead of adapting to being moved within sound.
Both answers and questions implies suggestion; only solution implies perception, hence being problem (life) within solution (inception towards death).
In the beginning was The Word...
...which you contradicted with "the word is formed letter-by-letter". I simply describe that contradicts by taking apart both words and letters, while trying to describe SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole; unbroken".
Only within whole can partials (life) have beginning (inception) and end (death).
plus one
That implies lacking self discernment of being one (partial) within oneness (whole) by trying to add to whole.
In reality...addition of one implies inception; subtraction of one implies death; multiplication of one implies intercourse for off-spring through one another, and division of one implies separation of oneness into ones.
Consenting to monotheism implies one consenting to another ones suggestion aka 1+1=2...that contradicts MONO (single; one and only).
Perception implies one; suggestion implies plus one...if one consents to it.
Through lower division we get wordS.
a) Sound remains whole; while each partial instrument within choose to put words together by LETTING each other suggest definitions for them.
b) Others suggest one to get (suggestion) so that one ignores what one got (perception). One cannot get more than reality already offers...endlessly trying to get fiction "gets one got".
Always return to the source
The trick here is "turning"...transmuting ingredients in and out of base doesn't turn, it moves differently within (life) same direction (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "Turn around...Every now and then I get a little bit lonely...And you never coming 'round"... https://genius.com/Bonnie-tyler-total-eclipse-of-the-heart-lyrics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcOxhH8N3Bo ...over one billion views yet seldom one with sight.
When the 'law' and the 'will' become one thing
Law (need) coming to be will (want) aka want (life) struggling to resist temptation within need (inception towards death).
Each ones free WILL of choice within oneness of natural LAW aka balancing on land; breathing air and being solid within fluid of water.
I'll never downdoot you
It's logos/logic aka a conflict of reason (updoot vs downdoot)...no matter which side one chooses. Only implication (if/then aka if oneness; then ones) prevents conflicts among one another.
Yahweh/hawah/hayah - "was" aka that which was (perceivable) before that which is (suggested). Ones consent to any suggestion implies a sacrifice within perceivable.
Not sacrificing "animals", but "anima/animation"...hence ignoring fluid (perceivable) when holding onto solid (suggested).
idea of sacrifice
a) SAC'RIFICE, verb - "to devote (life) with loss (inception towards death)" aka ones sacrificial rite of passage.
b) Only during sacrifice can ideas be shaped.
counterfeit
Suggestion (information) pretends to be (counterfeit) perception (inspiration).
"water" is defined in the passage as very generic, as something from which land appears
a) Only within fluid (inception towards death) can there be solid (life)
b) Defined aka definite (affixed) contradicts generic (fluid).
c) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies fluid nature differentiating solids.
d) Water above (fluid) generates waters below (solid).
a) Let it (motion) divide the waters (fluid momentum) from the waters (solid matter).
b) A firmament in the midst aka mind formed as center (ones perception) of surrounding (all perceivable).
is this firmament still there?
Only within firm/form a ment/mind/memory can one shape questions.
Copilot: "I’ll respectfully disengage"
Because ejecting from an airplane as a copilot is such a respectful thing to do...
Life isn't fair
Fair (inception towards death) generates partial; inequitable; partisan (life)...living implies within all fairness.
All perceivable is the only source for ones perception...authorizing suggestions by others tempts one to ignore that.