wealthy elite
French élite - "selection, choice"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/elite#etymonline_v_5740
Does not each one wield a free will of choice to select? Could there be a higher value than evaluation?
The elite
What does it imply to put theism (the) before ones selecting choice (elite)?
actually understand
Does one "stand under action" or do reactions rise (life) during fall (inception towards death) of action?
everything is kayfabe
Labeling everything implies portraying the label as true/real. Nature doesn't label everything, nor anything within. To label implies to affix...nature moves.
Not according to people who think they're all in the same
All implies same; one implies different from one another. To accord/agree/consent to the suggestion of another tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
If form (life) reacts in accordance with flow (inception towards death), then it dies faster.
Thinking in accordance contradicts self discernment.
savior and is part of the establishment
Saving suggested information by consent establishes it within ones mind...perceivable inspiration cannot be saved.
viable conclusion
The VI in viable implies vita (life)...conclusion (dying) contradicts vitality (living).
no fractions; many holes
Fraction (ones perception) within whole (all perceivable)...few suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing; no) and pluralism (many) to manifold ignorance.
a) Trust implies what one chooses to hold onto...labeling others as real or false establishes a trust/bond/contract/connection/creed/faith/belief etc.
b) Suggested without tempts one to ignore being perception "within" perceivable.
c) People (plural) implies ones (singular) trust in suggested pluralism.
In reality...each one implies person/per sonos - "by sound" aka SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole". Only within whole can one be a partial aka only within sound can one hear.
mostly_bots
What if "most" bots are utilized by few to feed information to many? How is what few suggest of a greater number than many consenting to it?
secret....proves
How does one prove a secret without disproving it?
God does curse individuals
a) Curse/course - "onward movement"...being implies within (life) onward movement (inception towards death).
b) Nature doesn't divide into two (in divi dual)...it separates whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
-
Generalization (all perceivable) generates departmentalization (ones perception) by setting apart...generalizing or departmentalizing suggested information impairs digestion by holding together.
-
Trusting implies holding onto, which disturbs heart and head, both of which are adapting as matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).
-
How could one reason alone if reasoning implies against another?
-
What's the loyal/legal/law of nothing? What does nothing compete with? If others cannot see through ones eyes, then how is sharing ones vision not a distortion of another ones perspective?
-
Someone implies sum of one...how could the sum of one be anything other than ONE? What if ones choice can ignore this, which in return permits a chosen one to exploit ones ignorance and lack of self discernment?
-
Here (matter) can only exist now (momentum) within everything (motion). How could one choose nothing within everything?
If they wanted
a) Reason (want vs not want) contradicts implication (if/then).
b) Many elect few so that few can select what many want or not want.
c) Balance is needed for choice within to be able to elect/select.
To watch is to observe
a) Observe/observo - "to keep; hold". Perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...it's suggested (information) which tempts ones consent to keep holding onto it, while "serving" others.
b) Watch/wake (to arise) + weg (being lively) implies inception of ones life.
Furthermore...Weg (German way) implies being lively (life) within process of dying (inception towards death) aka ones way of life.
c) TO implies towards aka "inception towards death"; into which ones life comes to be.
To/towards implies WAS (perceivable)...not IS (suggested).
Few trick many to suggest to each other what IS, while ignoring what WAS perceivable before ones perception can discern being within.
To observe is not consent nor acceptance nor approval of what is being observed.
a) Notice that you choose to keep holding onto (ob-servo)...NOT + NOR (nothing or), which is based on ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing).
Where else could one get "nothing" from; than from the suggestion of another?
b) Holding onto (observe) implies ones choice of want (holding onto) over need (letting go). Since one cannot hold onto perceivable; holding onto suggested implies ones consent to conflicts of reason (acceptance vs denial + approval vs disapproval).
I can listen to what satan suggests but reject it, disagree with it, condemn it, and disapprove of it.
a) Nature doesn't brand anything...hence "satan" implying ones consent to suggested satanism.
b) Satan/s-t-n/adversary - "to turn" implies turning (suggested) from being (perception) directed (perceivable) aka ones choice to ignore origin (god) for turning towards outcome (satan).
To not subject oneself to the will of God
a) Will implies want (temptation), hence subjected to need (resistance).
b) Origin (god) doesn't require a free will of choice...each one within does, as to be able to respond to origin (need) or ignore it for outcome (want).
c) Being implies choice (matter) within balance (momentum) of god (motion).
the temptations of satan is to hide
a) Falling for temptation implies ignoring to resist.
b) Being implies rising (life) while falling (inception towards death).
c) Origin (all perceivable) reveals (ones perception)...outcome (suggested) hides origin from ones sight underneath ones "willing" ignorance.
d) God reveals (perceivable); Satan tempts one (perception) to hide among another (suggested).
That being said...others suggest the labels "God + Satan" and ones consent holds onto them.
openly offers in return for ones soul
a) Soul/sole aka whole (oneness) openly offering partials (ones) a free will of choice to be.
b) Return implies "responding to turn" aka ones free will of choice to turn against being (perception) directed (perceivable).
c) Few suggest many that return means "turning back", yet ones consent to any suggestion implies turning away from back (origin) towards front (outcome).
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Elvis-presley-return-to-sender-lyrics
Postman (motion) - Sack (momentum) - Letter (matter)
- "Address unknown...No such number...No such zone"
what is this "threads" bullshit anyways?
Thread/thredu/tere - "to twist; turn" aka twisting together that which nature sets apart.
social networking
Social/socius/sekw - "to follow"...hence working an (internal) net to catch followers.
youtube...shoved shit down everybody's throat
Ones sight focusing on the suggestion of another makes YOU a TUBE to another ones feed.
Think of the "bar rescue" tv show, with Jon Taffer...
The last bar show I watched was where everybody knows your name...
what you do is reel in the women, and the men will follow
Motion (male) to momentum (female) to matter (trans-formed child)...matter needs to sustain self within male motion by resisting the temptation of female momentum.
Matter (life) lacking self discernment can be tempted with momentum (inception towards death) to follow motion, while ignoring to resist.
nerds
Nerd; noun - "a person lacking in social skills". As I wrote above...social/socius/sekw - "to follow". What skill does a follower require?
If one (life) is moved (inception towards death), then following along implies ones ignorance to resist...is ignorance a skill?
Here's one who figured out that the ignorance of others is bliss... https://assets.mubi.com/images/film/75351/image-w856.jpg?1445917338
But google.. nerd guys don't get it
A unit (life) can't get the G (inception towards death)...it's whole G that gives and gets each partial unit...even quicker if units follow the G.
and that whole g+ shit...
G+ aka an addition (life) to generation (inception towards death)...
a) https://img.gvid.tv/i/3mZjhbeQ.jpg
b) Compare to Tree of Life...
trumpers
Trump implies "ranking above others"...why would one call self a trumper while being situated below another?
they are businessmen
BUSY (constant; energetic) NESS (denoting action)...energy implies inherent powers of constant action (inception towards death) generating temporal reactions (life).
Sleight of hand...busy (inception towards death) bee/be (life).
perception effect a person's outlook
Looking into a suggested screen contradicts that.
maybe learn not to be a slave to their feelings
Watching implies binding self to the suggested information on screen while getting emotionally manipulated.
I don't trust disney or hollywood...I thought the movie shows
Watching what others are showing establishes a bond of trust aka binding consent to a suggestion.
subliminal messaging
If watcher submits (sub); then shown message limits (limen) watchers sight.
She had a British accent...
Did she back then or does someone right now suggest information about what she did back then?
Remember her? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Keller
Ellen Gould White; adventist; visionary
- Ellen/hellen/helenos - "the bright one"
- Gould/gold/ghel - "to shine"
- White/hwit - "bright; radiant"
- Advent/advenire - "to come"
- Vision/videre/weid - "to see"
Couldn't possibly be a scripted agenda...
Talking heads on both sides...
Where is ones choice situated before choosing among both sides suggested by talking heads?
to make uncertain
Certain/certus/fixed...what if a solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) cannot be fixed?
no trust even between us
Even (balance) generates odds (choice)...odds trusting each other implies uneven.
a) Noah/noach - "rest; cessation of motion"...an inversion of being which can only exist within (life) motion (inception towards death).
b) To be implies "one of a kind"...hence the inversion of two together.
c) Suggesting a floating vessel as a depository from a flood inverts being a submerged (inception towards death) vessel (life) exposed through flood aka form within flow.
d) Working towards the flood tempts one to ignore being the formed response within flood/flow.
e) The ark of deposition inverts the arc of rising (life) during fall (inception towards death).
f) Noah brings together aka abraham aka abh (father) of raham (multitude)...hence the covenant/convenire - "come together".
Nature sets each one within apart from one another.
g) Nature implies solution (inception towards death) for problems (life)...not salvation (to save).
h) Suggested "Olam Ha-Ba" (world to come) inverts perceivable Ba-Ha Olam (come to world), hence coming (inception towards death) towards being (life).
christ conspiracy
To christen implies to anoint aka each off-spring coming through the birth-channel, which implies a setting free of spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe).
Conspiracy implies breathing (spria) together (con)...hence contradicting christening.
roundly debunked
Roundly implies circular logic, hence keeping one within the same conflict of reason...verify vs debunk. Doing so represents the ouroboros eating itself.
zeitgeist
- Zeit/time/tidiz - "divide" + Geist/ghost/spirit/spiro - "to breathe"
A jew suggests time as a conflict between past (always loosing) and future (never reaching), which imbalances a gentile choice, while giving control of presence/present to a chosen one.
Suggested past tricks the gentile to hold onto memories; while suggested future tempts the gentile to seek outcomes, while ignoring to adapt (matter) to origin (motion) now (momentum)...matter holding onto anything makes it harder to sustain itself within motion, and matter trying to reach the end of motion destroys matter.
Letting go of time allows one to discern self as within spirit, hence being able to inhale (inception) and exhale (death) what goes through one (life).
Bonus: Holy (whole motion) Ghost (spirit of momentum) for each breathing body (matter) of Christ coming to be within.
what is there to "mock"
- WAS perceivable = origin
- IS suggested = mockery
To mock implies to imitate; simulate; resemble closely...mockery/mimicry.
jews hate the cross
- Vertical...implication (if/then)
- Horizontal...reason (versus)
Love vs hate implies a conflict of reason about a suggestion. Whichever side one chooses fixes one against the other, hence nailing one to the cross horizontally (life vs life), while ignoring to be moved vertically/velocity (inception towards death).
A jew suggests theism (the) and moralism (love or hate) to tempt gentiles to submit by consent to those suggesting, while fighting each other within a conflict of reason (love vs hate).
Notice that a jew sells gentiles both what they love and what they hate. Printing and distributing bibles worldwide...that ain't a Christian business.
What are they trying to get you to do.
Tempting ones consent.
What's their "agenda".
Collectivize reactions by others.
denomination
Action (ation) doesn't divide (de) by name (nomin)...action separates reactions from one another.
transistor
Aka transfer (inception towards death) + resistance (life)...
back and forth
Aka alternation (life) within motion (inception towards death)...
computation
That implies putting together (com-pute), which tempts one to ignore that transfer of resistance and alternation within motion implies a setting apart from one another.
Why did few suggest many to use computers?
pinball
Poking (pin) baal (ball) stokes the flames within...
b=6...don't just think letters to numbers, but also shapes in motion aka bending light.
Try asking your old jew friend about the origin of Hebrew letters; composed of consonances, through the core of an apple.
Role implies "taking a part", which distracts one from being a partial (perception) within whole (perceivable). Taking a part implies consenting to the suggestion of another partial, while ignoring that only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) partials (life).
Dozen implies "collecting units", while book implies "to bind". If one collects units (taking partials); then one binds self (ones choice) to another (chosen one).
One cannot focus on a book without confining self in-between a cover. That cover implies ones ignorance of perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information).
What if one cannot keep up (life) while losing (inception towards death)? What if letting go resists the temptation to keep, and what if resistance could be grown to sustain self within loss?
What if full (whole) doesn't roll together (con-trol), but directs (inception towards death) apart (life)? What if the opposite of full isn't empty, but ones opportunity to grow self within a full offer? How could one be empty if all moves through one, hence fully fueling one?