If one is jewed, if it's possible, then some other one was jewing, or practicing Jewery.
- A jew: "Kill Yourself; Goy"
That implies a suggested temptation for ones consent. It has no power of its own until empowered by ones free will of choice. Rebranding this suggested temptation into for example https://img.gvid.tv/i/2kAnHEvi.jpg ...that's jewing.
manipulating the population as directed by their master
Here's the issue...ones free will of choice empowers the master and establishes the manipulation when consenting to a suggested temptation.
Furthermore...ones consent to follow permits another to suggest directions, while manipulating oneself to ignore being (life) directed (inception towards death)...a direction inspiring resistance from those living within.
jew as a religion or race
a) Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies ones consent to the suggestion of another.
b) Race/raddix/radius/ray implies ones growth within all, hence from center outwards like a seed within soil.
c) Consenting to a jewish suggestion implies religion; which tempts those consenting off-center and into circumference, while permitting those suggesting to erect self at center, which a jew uses to cut off gentiles from circumference aka circumcision.
That's for example how a central bank cuts off trustees within circumference into poverty and debt after tempting each one to give trust aka consent.
Another example...city implies center, which is where jew erects high-rise, while cutting off gentiles first into down-town, then through suburbia into outskirts.
it's like an action
Same action (inception towards death) generating different reactions (life)...a jew suggests gentiles to react alike; to equalize differences (equality through diversity) to mimic action (actor) by following direction (director).
or a strategy
Aka stratos - "multitude" aka stere (to spread) + agein (to lead)...that's few (jew) leading the spread of many (gentiles).
people hide behind the word Jew
Phonetic JEW/YOU...established by one claiming self as "me; myself or I", which within a balance based system, brands everyone else into a "YOU". That's how jewing works.
If ONE chooses to let go of "me; myself and I", then "you" will fall away from all other ONES including chosen ONES...that's how one reveals what's behind the curtain of ones own ignorance.
I choose to associate that word with
Before you make that association by slapping the word onto anything or anyone, your consent made the association with the one suggesting the word...that's the chosen one you don't see; while slapping more and more words onto others to help identify what you see.
Association implies joining together...having a choice implies being set apart within balance, hence FREE to choose at will. Association binds free.
jew is a behavior
Being cannot have (posses; hold onto; keep to self) while being (life) moved (inception towards death). As resistance within velocity...holding onto wastes resistance.
Few suggest behavior to many so that each one ignores to be FREE to choose at will. Nature makes it very clear what to choose (need) and what to resist (want)...yet temptation implies ignorance of resistance, and guess what? Ignorance is bliss.
Bliss/blithiz - "gentle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/bliss#etymonline_v_13608 There's the gentile and the jewing to hide it.
a system or method for management of those without a hord of esoteric knowledge
ESO (inner) implies suggested information held within ones consenting mind/memory. EXO (outer) implies perceivable inspiration (aka knowledge) moving through each ones perception.
The former tempts one to hord/store it within ones memory; which permits those suggesting it to establish systems and methods of manage (manually directing) ment (mind/memory)...the latter moves and cannot be held onto; an ongoing solution for each temporary problem within to draw from.
One doesn't need to store any information within ones mind/memory...ones consent misuses memory as storage for suggested information. Perceivable inspiration doesn't require ones consent (send together)...it sends one apart from one another, hence in-between moving differences as inspiration for one to sustain self.
Everything is inspiration...the more information one holds within, the less inspiration one draws from outside.
Example...if one doesn't know how to fish, one doesn't require a "how to fish" manual. Hunger inspires one to catch food. Getting hungry next to a river teaches one how to learn fishing.
Do you have a way to express a connection to/desire for/appreciation of the One, once words fail?
BEING...expressed by way; one enabled to connect; desire; appreciate with or without words.
The issue...one doesn't require the word "being" to be.
They force you to link your PSN account to the game before playing
When you consider to dive into hell for a second time yet don't wanna be held accountable...
a) Identification/identical - "same".
b) Different marks (suggested words) to cover sameness (perceivable sound)...tick; tick; tick...BOMB, verb - "to sound".
the basic issue still persists
a) Base solution (inception towards death) issues ingredients (life)
b) Persistence aka PER (by forwards motion) SISTERE (come to stand, cause to stand still)...what if motion cannot stand still, since it inherent nature implies MOTION?
even worse
Even (balance) generates odds (choice)...odds ignoring even "makes it worse".
jewishness is either a religion, an ethnicity, or a nationality
a) All perceivable WAS before one within can suggest one another what it IS.
b) Being one within all implies nation aka NATIVE within ACTION. What is native within action? Each ones reaction.
c) If ones FREE will of choice chooses to Ignore perception for suggestion, then that implies religion/religio - "to bind anew".
d) Ethnic/ethnos - "nation; people" aka singular native within plural collective.
we look around
a) What does singular (one) among plural (we) see from ones surrounding?
b) Notice that moving around while looking/locking onto something implies circling a center...that's the opposite of being center (ones perception) within circumference (all perceivable).
einstein
Aka ein st ein aka ONE SAINT ONE.
No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it
a) Same solution (inception towards death) generates different problems (life) through internal transmutation.
b) Suggesting creationism (out of nothing) distracts from everything perceivable if consented to.
c) CON (together; with) SCIOUS/SCIRE/SCIO (to know) tempts one to ignore that knowledge implies all perceivable set apart into each ones perception.
One doesn't have a con-sciousness...one is being conned by another ones suggestion to ignore perception (knowledge; scio).
getting people just to ask that question
a) What if getting many on a quest (question) to seek answers from others is how a jew tempt gentiles with suggested progressivism to seek desired outcomes?
b) What if each person (singular) among people (plural) already got all sound, hence being per sonos (by sound)? What if trying to get from one another tempts one to ignore self discernment?
How does one get jewed? By buying into what a jew is selling aka by consenting to a chosen ones suggestion aka by establishing a master with ones submission aka by religio - " to bind anew".
Religion/rely - "to gather, assemble an army, followers, a host"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rely
there was not a SINGLE paper with which jews were CONNECTED....
How could there be a single within a connection? What connects a chosen ONE?
I still saw jewry as a religion
Latin religio - "to bind anew" aka to connect together aka to ignore singularity aka to ignore "thou shalt have no other gods before me".
genuinely national
Aka native (life) within generation (inception towards death)...set apart from one another.
I could get hold of, and looked up
What could matter (life) within motion (inception towards death) hold of or lock up? How could one look at without locking in ones sight?
nothing but jews
a) What about everything perceivable?
b) BUT aka butan/beutan aka BE (being) UTANA (from without)...an inversion of being (life) within (inception towards death).
Mein
Aka mine - "belonging to me; in my possession; held onto by me"...now consider the nature of a mercantile contract aka selling (to give) and buying (to take).
How is it that a mercantile few have everything when a consumerist many takes everything?
I take it back
Only flow (inception towards death) can take form (life) back...anything form takes back from one another implies a mercantile exchange aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion).
That wasn't a total fail at all.
All implies fall (inception towards death) for each ones rise (life) within...others suggest totalitarianism aka all together to distract each one within from being apart from one another.
Actually having 2 eyes
a) Being implies reaction (life) within action (inception towards death)...actually aka "as matter of fact" tempts reactive matter to hold onto active motion as "fact/faction". Doesn't work; yet it tricks to ignore being moved.
b) All (perceivable) seeing (ones perception) I (phonetic eye). One doesn't have two eyes; one wields each one apart from one another within motion, hence blink/blican/bhel - "to shine, flash, burn"...a temporary expression within the ongoing impression of light.
each representing 'sides' of perception of One
One implies response within presented (represent) aka perception within perceivable. Discerning self as choice implies being within balance...viewing balance as sides tempts one to ignore being at center, while inclining towards a side.
Are inception and death sides for the life in-between or does it imply different form within same flow? Branding something as a side contradicts perception (expression) within perceivable (impression)...which cannot be held onto.
Same with choice...one cannot hold onto choice; one needs to choose at every moment of being aka adaptation to being moved. Choice is about balancing aka shaping form within flow...not about holding onto any side/sight.
I chose the name to show how each 'side' needs to come to the One
Choosing the name to show implies choosing a brand for suggestion aka tempting consent to hold onto a suggested brand from either of two sides within a conflict of reason...want vs not want aka agree vs disagree aka consent vs denial etc.
That whole line of thinking ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
Furthermore..."I chose" tempts one to ignore being choice for holding onto a side chosen before. Balance implies motion...holding onto a side implies imbalance of choice.
As for "to come to the one"....it's oneness coming towards being each one aka whole separating into partials.
without misleading
Nature leads (inception towards death) within (life)...others suggest "without" to tempt one to miss that.
Also; nature as leader doesn't generate followers, but resistance to being led towards death. Anything suggested tempts another to follow by consent.
You stress this by showing the 'ass' of each word that exists.
The issue is "showing" which tempts one to look forwards. Perceivable sound operates behind those who consent to suggested words. Consenting to a word tempts one sight to focus on a brand, hence establishing tunnel vision, while sound moves through one.
The stress of showing perceivable is felt by the one holding onto suggested as a friction...as not wanting to let go of what one wants to hold onto, while others are showing the need to let go.
You admit the One as non-dual, yet use dualism to duel with words.
a) You vs me + admit vs deny...that's the dual perspective of ones suggestion; establishing a conflict of reason aka a duel with words.
Free will of choice operates as want within need...not within conflicts....unless willingly chosen.
b) Non-dual implies nothing vs everything dual aka suggested nihilism (non) and dualism (dual) to distract one from everything perceivable.
One cannot perceive "non" nor "dual", yet "everything" and "one" is implied in the suggestion thereof. One cannot suggest non/not/nothing without implying everything, and one cannot suggest dual/duo/two without implying one.
Free will of choice binds itself when consenting to suggested nihilism (non) and dualism (dual).
a needed medicine to some poisons that exist.
Poison/poise- "counter-balance"...being implies choice within balance; others suggest choice to counter balance by choosing a side to hold onto. Ones consent then permits those suggesting to become accountants holding one accountable to ones choices.
COUNTER; noun - "table where a money lender does business; table or bench of a merchant or bank" aka to compute - "to count, sum up, reckon together".
What's the opposite of poison? Remedy/remederi aka ones response to heal/kailo/whole... https://www.etymonline.com/word/heal#etymonline_v_6245
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/The-prodigy-poison-lyrics
- "I got the poison, I got the remedy"
- "I got the pulsating rhythmical remedy"
- "I got the pressure, the pressure"
Who's singing that? MAXIM; noun - "an axiom, statement of a self-evident truth"
I'm curious.
Miao...
Do you have a way to express a connection to/desire for/appreciation of the One, once words fail?
a) A way (inception towards death) to express (life)...can't be had; sets connections apart; tempts resistance with desired temptation; moves value (perceivable) through evaluation (perception).
b) Words fail because one ignores to be a rising in-stru-ment during fall of sound.
c) Connection doesn't appreciate one...it tempts one to desire another.
There can be only one...one for all and all for one...alone aka all(in)one.
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svJvT6ruolA
Bonus edit: Which one of The Prodigy killed himself? KEITH FLINT aka keith/kith/gno - "to know" + flint/splei - "splice; split" aka splitting knowledge to start fires... https://genius.com/The-prodigy-firestarter-lyrics
Researchers are not inclined to study "nothing" as cause -- it is an intentional act of finding some thing.
a) Everything (perceivable) implies cause for each effect (perception) within.
b) Ignoring cause (perceivable) for another effect (suggested) implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing)...few suggest nihil-ism to tempt many to de-nial everything for nothing.
c) Responding to a search (research) implies ignoring everything already perceivable for searching for something suggested. Few suggest progressivism to tempt many to seek outcomes, while ignoring origin.
d) Intent (Latin intetus) implies stretching out within, hence as reaction (life) within action (inception towards death)....few suggest "intentional acts" to tempt many to ignore stretching reactions outwards.
Consenting to a suggesting implies submission of self to another, hence repression of self, instead of expression.
Sleight of hand: "Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature"... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/madonna/humannature.html
d) Having choice implies being at center of balance...consenting to suggested choices inclines one towards another, which imbalances self.
of course it's a gene
Generation implies being (life) within course (inception towards death) aka in line. Few suggest "of course" and "online" to invert perceivable for consenting many.
key questions on everyone's mind
a) Momentum (all perceivable) generates each ones mind (ones perception) as temporal memory of matter within ongoing motion.
b) Questioning another "locks" one to suggested answers by others, while ignoring that all perceivable sets each ones perception free from one another.
Key aka "instrument for opening" tempts one to ignore being instrument (perception) within sound (perceivable) aka an opening (life) within a closed environment (inception towards death).
MIND telling us who PAYS
a) Payment...it's many who pay with their minds when consenting to suggestions by few.
b) Suggested pluralism (us) tempts perceiving singular (one) to sell self out to others.
c) TELL; verb from Proto-Germanic taljan - "mention in order"... implies mind paying for order.
Sleight of hand: "Pray Tell" aka a request for information aka ones consent (pray) to another ones suggestion (tell). In nature one pays for ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
different than us
Differentiation implies singular (one)...suggested pluralism (us) implies equalization.
AI doesn’t have desires or the ability to “want”
Using artifice (want) over natural (need) enables AI with DESIRE; noun - "to wish to obtain" hence waiting for an answer when asking a question.
Few utilize suggested artifice to tempt consenting many to disable themselves within natural, while expressing desire.
outside the box
a) Side implies within a box aka in-between left/right + front/back + up/down.
b) Few suggest outside as the inversion of inside, and the-ism to tempt many to stand under few through willing authorization.
it's own empire
EMPIRE, noun - "authority of an emperor; dominion"...asking AI implies giving dominion over answer to artifice, while ignoring to be free (choice) within dom (balance) of nature.
some billionaire who can afford
a) AFFORD; verb - "to put forth"...only flow (inception towards death) puts forth form (life), hence making being affordable aka enabling effort.
b) A jew calls it chutzpah to get away with something hidden in plain sight like BILL ON AIR...
No one believes or trusts you.
Trust implies self inflicted bondage to another, while denying free will of choice. Trust a jew and a gentile abortion will be delivered.
You destroyed good faith and made the truth impossible.
a) Faith implies holding onto, which in return establishes conflicts of reason such as good vs bad and truth vs lies. No matter which side one holds onto; one becomes stuck to the conflict itself.
b) Inception towards death implies destruction and formation of life...only during destruction can one build. Notice that to build one requires ingredients...it's destruction which separates ingredients from one another.
c) This (inception towards death) makes; this (life) remakes aka responds to being made.
You chose to remake your world with the ingredients "faith; good and truth", while ignoring balance, which implies the ingredients "distrust; bad and lies".
d) Impossible implies within possibility...others suggest "without" as the inversion thereof.
There is air around you like corpses, and the decay of rotten flesh
a) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) moves through one...holding onto anything establishes a "circular" conflict of reason within self, which is what tempts one to move "around", instead of being (life) moved linear (inception towards death).
Adapting to linear movement aka air moving through one implies SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, spiro, to breathe) - "air in motion"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/spirit
b) Being implies difference (life) during sameness (inception towards death)...few tempt many to react "alike" and consenting; believing; having faith implies alike behavior aka order following aka submission of self to another aka self imposed slavery.
c) DECA'Y, verb (French dechoir, from Latin decedo/decado) - "to fall"...only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life). One cannot ascend without decaying.
Notice a penis...no germination without shrinking.
complete
Few suggest filling (plete) together (com) as the inversion of depleting (inception towards death) apart (life).
תודה על ההשראה
"ready to drink" is just like "fast food"...the vendor has to dump it on predefined intervals. The wholesale through retail market is based on long term storage.
So this guy's (mike) a thorn in the cabal's side.
Nature transmutes from same into differences...few within tempt many to get MXD (mixed). Cabal/cabbala/qibbel - "to receive, admit, accept" implies each one of many consenting to be mixed with one another, when consenting to suggested collectivism...which in this case is hidden underneath consumerism.
As for Mike/michael/mikha-el - "who is like god"...that implies a difference suggesting others to behave alike in the name of sameness aka "equality through diversity".
news
Suggested N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) always lures core (ones perception) into periphery (all perceivable)...a destabilization of being.
It doesn't matter where the news(noose) comes from...it always tempts one to put ones neck outwards.
influence
To be implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...others utilize influence to diminish ones form. Influencers lure followers forwards.... https://forward.com/
still watching...like before
Forward being (in motion) cannot be still (not moving)...keeping watch tempts one to ignore that everything moves.
it's all fragmented
Frag/frago - "to separate" + ment/mentis - "mind"...all (motion) separates (momentum) minds (matter).
nobody in the real public would be tuning into any of that shit.
TUNE, noun (Latin tonus) - "sound"...ones within all cannot "tune out". Reality cannot be tuned out by those within...only ignored/denied, and ignorance among many implies host environment for parasitic few.
a) SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole"...hence affecting each partial effect within.
b) Good vs bad implies dissonance within sound, hence effects fighting each other, while ignoring to be affected by sound.
c) To say implies putting words together; to being implies as instrument set apart within sound.
d) HEART, noun (Latin cor, cordis, and allied to Eng.core, or named from motion, pulsation) aka motion (inception towards death) driving pulsation (life)....hence BE (being) AT (direction towards).
In short...being implies core (perception) within periphery (perceivable) of sound.
Because awe/aue - "fear; terror; apprehension" implies towards outcome, which has to be advertised (suggestion) to those who ignore origin (perception). Without some advertisement how would one know what to be afraid of?
Also...some/sem - "one together with" inverts one apart from one another.
Well (will) coming (inception towards death) to be (life) back from origin.
- Curse/cursus/course (onward movement) from root kers - "to run"
Being implies resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)...running with onward movement curses one, hence few putting the spell of progressivism upon many to curse them out.
- Descendant/descendre - "to come down"
Being implies temporary rise (life) during ongoing fall (inception towards death) hence coming to be up from down under (underground; nether-realm etc.)
I think they like this godlikeproductions cause these guys are religious, eh. lol. That razzes them. lol.
God (same) produces differences...others suggest likeness, and ones consent to a suggestion implies binding self anew aka Latin religio - "to bind anew", hence binding ones free will of choice set free by "God".
The issue...The word "GOD" was suggested by others and ones consent to hold onto it contradicts sameness (all perceivable) differentiating (ones perception) through motion aka movement (moving mind).
In short...produced beings behaving alike contradicts god setting each one apart from one another.
it transmits what your damn brain thinks
Consenting to suggested information permits another to define; redefine and contradict what ones damn brain thinks.
phone transmits
Phonic transmutes aka all perceivable sound transmuting into each instrumental ones perception.
real deal
DEAL, verb - "to divide; to part; to separate; hence, to divide in portions; to distribute"....reality deals from all (perceivable) into ones (perception).
Buying into a suggested deal...sells one out to another.
AI that runs everything deals with everybody simultaneously
If many ignore nature (perceivable) for artifice (suggested); then many respond simultaneously instead of as separated units.
like a cube
Left/right + up/down + front/back...ones perception within all perceivable.
who knows
Consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable (knowledge).
Apparently, entities get confused?
Entity implies being within, hence separated from whole, and differentiated from one another. Consenting to a suggested apparition tempts those set apart from one another to fuse together (con-fuse).
mirror
Origin (perceivable) + mirror (suggested)...ignoring former for latter implies seeing through the looking glass.
Sleight of hand: "mirror; mirror (repeated suggestion) on the wall (ignorance) who is the fairest one (perception) of all (perceivable)?"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWflyssB9i8
- EX'ORCISE, verb - "to adjure, to bind by oath"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/exorcise
Ones consent to a suggestion binds one by oath to another, while adjuring self with a burden...that's how exorcism works.
supplication
Solicitation of suggestion tempts supplication of consent. It's why a few merchants rule many consumers.
possess
Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; taking possession of suggested information gets one possessed by it aka whatever one holds onto; drags one down with it.
a) To prepare implies towards outcome; reset aka response to setting implies in response to origin.
b) Preparation (inception towards death) generates adaptation (life).
Sleight of hand: "It shall be given to them for whom it is prepared." ~Matthew 20:23.