Generalization (all perceivable) generates departmentalization (ones perception) by setting apart...generalizing or departmentalizing suggested information impairs digestion by holding together.
Trusting implies holding onto, which disturbs heart and head, both of which are adapting as matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).
How could one reason alone if reasoning implies against another?
What's the loyal/legal/law of nothing? What does nothing compete with? If others cannot see through ones eyes, then how is sharing ones vision not a distortion of another ones perspective?
Someone implies sum of one...how could the sum of one be anything other than ONE? What if ones choice can ignore this, which in return permits a chosen one to exploit ones ignorance and lack of self discernment?
Here (matter) can only exist now (momentum) within everything (motion). How could one choose nothing within everything?
Generalization (all perceivable) generates departmentalization (ones perception) by setting apart...generalizing or departmentalizing suggested information impairs digestion by holding together.
Trusting implies holding onto, which disturbs heart and head, both of which are adapting as matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).
How could one reason alone if reasoning implies against another?
What's the loyal/legal/law of nothing? What does nothing compete with? If others cannot see through ones eyes, then how is sharing ones vision not a distortion of another ones perspective?
Someone implies sum of one...how could the sum of one be anything other than ONE? What if ones choice can ignore this, which in return permits a chosen one to exploit ones ignorance and lack of self discernment?
Here (matter) can only exist now (momentum) within everything (motion). How could one choose nothing within everything?