Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

7
Disney, Pixar's, Inside Out 2 (2024).. "live in Riley's mind" is exactly like the nano tech the cabal has with whoever got the covid vaccine. They can watch what you see and hear, on their screens and speakers. Their AI monitors everybody simultaneously. It can hijack somebody too not just watch. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by newfunturistic 1 year ago by newfunturistic +9 / -2
9 comments share
9 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

To watch is to observe

a) Observe/observo - "to keep; hold". Perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...it's suggested (information) which tempts ones consent to keep holding onto it, while "serving" others.

b) Watch/wake (to arise) + weg (being lively) implies inception of ones life.

Furthermore...Weg (German way) implies being lively (life) within process of dying (inception towards death) aka ones way of life.

c) TO implies towards aka "inception towards death"; into which ones life comes to be.

To/towards implies WAS (perceivable)...not IS (suggested).

Few trick many to suggest to each other what IS, while ignoring what WAS perceivable before ones perception can discern being within.

To observe is not consent nor acceptance nor approval of what is being observed.

a) Notice that you choose to keep holding onto (ob-servo)...NOT + NOR (nothing or), which is based on ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing).

Where else could one get "nothing" from; than from the suggestion of another?

b) Holding onto (observe) implies ones choice of want (holding onto) over need (letting go). Since one cannot hold onto perceivable; holding onto suggested implies ones consent to conflicts of reason (acceptance vs denial + approval vs disapproval).

I can listen to what satan suggests but reject it, disagree with it, condemn it, and disapprove of it.

a) Nature doesn't brand anything...hence "satan" implying ones consent to suggested satanism.

b) Satan/s-t-n/adversary - "to turn" implies turning (suggested) from being (perception) directed (perceivable) aka ones choice to ignore origin (god) for turning towards outcome (satan).

To not subject oneself to the will of God

a) Will implies want (temptation), hence subjected to need (resistance).

b) Origin (god) doesn't require a free will of choice...each one within does, as to be able to respond to origin (need) or ignore it for outcome (want).

c) Being implies choice (matter) within balance (momentum) of god (motion).

the temptations of satan is to hide

a) Falling for temptation implies ignoring to resist.

b) Being implies rising (life) while falling (inception towards death).

c) Origin (all perceivable) reveals (ones perception)...outcome (suggested) hides origin from ones sight underneath ones "willing" ignorance.

d) God reveals (perceivable); Satan tempts one (perception) to hide among another (suggested).

That being said...others suggest the labels "God + Satan" and ones consent holds onto them.

openly offers in return for ones soul

a) Soul/sole aka whole (oneness) openly offering partials (ones) a free will of choice to be.

b) Return implies "responding to turn" aka ones free will of choice to turn against being (perception) directed (perceivable).

c) Few suggest many that return means "turning back", yet ones consent to any suggestion implies turning away from back (origin) towards front (outcome).

Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Elvis-presley-return-to-sender-lyrics

Postman (motion) - Sack (momentum) - Letter (matter)

  • "Address unknown...No such number...No such zone"
permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy