Without a master there could never be enough slaves...
If humanity is free
a) Collectivism binds each particular, hence preventing ones FREE will of choice.
b) Hue of man implies a visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) for each ray (matter) within...a setting apart aka a setting free from one another.
The suggested word "humanity" tempts one to consent to "humans collectively", hence ignoring singular nature for plural artifice. Consent prevents one from being free, because it binds one to another.
we are not free
Are you free to resist nihilism (not) and pluralism (we)?
the great pyramid specifically
This perspective prevents building, because it specifies artifice over nature.
technical know how
Technic/techno/tekhnē - "art" tempts one to ignore natural knowledge. Look into how Schauberger was being smeared as "water wizard" by the scientific community, because he told them that water cannot be measured in a lab, only felt within nature.
current residents
If one discerns to reside (life) within current (inception towards death); then one can shape anything within everything provided.
the principalities of lawlessness
Anyone who ignores natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) establishes another as a principal (highest in rank) above one.
In other words...ignoring natural law makes many lawless and few principals over many.
attack on God
Partials cannot attack whole...only each other "in the name of" whole. Reasoning among many over suggestions by few implies such an attack...
I think a lot
LOT, noun - "that which, in human speech, is called chance, hazard, fortune"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/lot
Nature doesn't call chance; it sets choice. Many are the lot cast by few who suggest each ones free will of choice to follow orders together.
rambling about etymology
Only logy/logic/reason implies ramble/rumble...there's no conflict within etymo unless one chooses to establish one.
least person
Per sonos (by sound) implies each one within being lesser than entire sound. Shaping a conflict of reason (least vs most) tempts one to ignore that.
to get a reply
Form (life) needs to reply to flow (inception towards death); while resisting the want to reply to each other. Few designed social media to tempt many to reply to each other, while ignoring origin for medium.
least a bit happier
a) Least vs most aka happy vs sad...different brand for same conflict of reason.
b) BIT, verb - "to put a bridle upon a horse; to put the bit in the mouth"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bit
Sleight of hand: "bit and byte"... few utilize rhetoric like that for the domestication of many.
because
Being implies effect within cause...suggested "because" inverts that.
You have 0 posts score
No offer by free will of choice, yet so much offense taken by others willingly...
to contribute
a) Tribute/tribuo - "to divide" implies setting apart, which con - "together; with" contradicts.
b) That (inception towards death) which sets apart (life) implies ones tribunal aka administered justice aka natural order.
You have nothing
How could a being (perception) within everything (perceivable) have nothing (suggested)...
Everyone in here knows
Who would speak in the name of others? Alas, that's how it goes... https://genius.com/Leonard-cohen-everybody-knows-lyrics
literally changed nothing
ALL (inception towards death) changes ONE (life)...few utilize literation to tempt many into de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing). Nature doesn't shape letters, it offers each one the free will of choice to LET others shape.
I am 100% sure
If form (life) claims self as "me; myself or I"; then only by ignoring flow (inception towards death), which dissolves claims.
I guess I can't train
GUESS, verb - "to conjecture; to form an opinion without certain principles or means of knowledge; to judge at random"....guessing implies ignoring perceivable knowledge for the suggestions by others, hence being trained as a slave by a master.
What a faulty chatbot you turned out to be...made by a 3rd grader
a) Dehumanizing a child?
b) Can you show me a "chatbot" that can adapt to inspiration on the fly?
c) Does it look like as if I'm chatting aka talk idly aka being "slothful; given to rest and ease; averse to labor or employment"? Aren't my efforts contradicting that?
You're inconsequential.
a) "I am whatever you say I am...cause if I wasn't; then why would I say I am?"
b) Being implies within (life) sequence (inception towards death), while apart from one another...not CON (together; with), which implies ones CONsent to the suggested pluralism of another one...a chosen one.
- AXIS, noun - "motionless straight line around which a body rotates".
a) A straight line (inception towards death) implies motion, and a body (life) can only curve within it. If that straight line implies light (motion) establishing a spectrum (momentum), then each ray (matter) within can be bend...
b) Axis vs Allies...suggested vs perceivable...a trick to AX ALL.
expands everywhere more or less evenly...moves in addition
There cannot be expansion without motion....motion (inception towards death) adds expansion (life).
you are in the center of expansion
Indeed...center (life) of expansion (inception towards death) during motion.
speed of light is a constant
Speed implies measuring of ongoing motion by temporal matter from within. Light as constant implies before setting itself apart into a visible spectrum that can be measured.
nothing could move faster than light
Slow vs fast implies a conflict of reason aka measurement issue among rays within visible spectrum of light...not light itself.
Few trick many to measure while ignoring that each measurement aka each ones measuring mind is a fault within result.
could not lose energy
Lose energy into what and where? Energy implies all internal power aka both loss and growth in balance with each other, hence all being one in energy.
current expansion is one-way process
Current (inception towards death) expands (life) during a one-way process...internally/inherently.
And on top of that it all covered...
All reveals each one...one chooses to cover self by ignoring all (perceivable) for each other (suggested). Consenting to a suggestion puts oneself at bottom and another on top.
be completely different
A being cannot be complete...only a partial (matter) within an even (momentum) whole (motion) aka within the process of differentiation.
Few suggest progressivism (complete) to tempt many to heal the world by bringing together (tikkun olam) aka to complete that which is broken.
preserve current
Current moves...motion cannot be preserved. Prime example...currency. Many are tempted to hold onto currency; yet it miraculously flows out of their grasp...again, and again and a gain for few.
social security
SOC (together with) contradicts SE (apart from). Society only secures those few who socially distance from many.
Self-Assembling
Self implies apart from one another...assembling contradicts that, hence in this example the injection by another.
copy/paste
A tool for the many to pretend making efforts. Pretension aka professed ignorance...
you never changed...only then you change your ways
a) Contradiction
b) Only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within implying constant change.
Still not human
Human aka hue-man (color of man) implies a visible spectrum within moving light...motionless (still) and nihilism (not) contradict that.
your way to put forth useless information
a) One cannot put forth way, while way (inception towards death) puts forth one (life).
b) It's ones free will of choice to ignore perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction).
c) About free-will-of-choice...Post-Score (0). I didn't put anything forward aka no offers made.
so much work for -4
a) Work implies energy; being implies employment within energy aka reaction (life) employed within action (inception towards death)...working forwards tempts being to destroy itself.
b) I resist judging others, hence 0 upvotes/0 downvotes given, thereby not participating within a conflict of reason (upvote vs downvote).
c) For aka forwards implies towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring to respond to perceivable origin.
reaching no conclusion
Solution (inception towards death) implies erection (inception) and conclusion (death) of being (life). I adapt to solution...not towards conclusion.
Etymology is an interesting way to twist words
a) Way implies perceivable sound...suggested words twist ones perception if consented to.
b) Etymology aka etymos (actual) logy (reasoning about fictional). Using logic implies ignoring etymos (real; actual; perceivable) for suggested fiction.
not the desired response.
Desire implies temptation aka ones free will of choice to ignore need for want aka "a craving or yearning; an emotion directed toward attainment or possession of an object; sensual appetite, physical desire, lust".
Ones struggle to sustain life while being moved from inception towards death implies the need to resist wanted temptations.
adapt to this
This/the/seo - "to behold"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/this#etymonline_v_10764 implies being holding onto suggested information, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration, which cannot be held onto, since it moves through one.
I simply draw from all perceivable inspiration offered to each ones perception instead of holding onto any suggested information by another.
Viruses don't actually exist
a) Virus/ueis (to flow) aka viral (of nature). The flow of nature (inception towards death) implies the virus for each remedy (life) generated within.
Sleight of hand: "I got the poison, I got the remedy, I got the pressure"... https://genius.com/The-prodigy-poison-lyrics
b) "actual exist" contradicts itself...nature acts; those within re-act. Few suggest existentialism (ex-ist) to tempt many to react to the suggested instead of in response to perceivable nature.
To be implies EX within ACT. Sleight of hand: "exactamundo"
What causes...
EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...anything else is in effect.
herpes
a) Eruption from within spreading outwards. Ongoing velocity (inception towards death) generates temporary resistance (life)...whatever resistance holds onto will be forced to erupt through velocity.
In other words...the need to let go overrules the want to hold onto.
b) Why the spreading? Because nature sets apart, and so if a partial doesn't resist it mixes together with others partials, hence spreading dis-ease.
what happened to Native Americans upon contact with Europeans shows contagion
Apart implies "at ease"; mixed together implies "dis ease".
contagion
Aka together, with (con) touching (tag) action (ion)...action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life) by setting apart through anointment. Each offspring being anointed through the birth channel implies without direct touch.
Sleight of hand for touch: "reach out and touch faith"... https://genius.com/Depeche-mode-personal-jesus-lyrics
Few have only one agenda...mix many to set apart few.
enriching a story
How does a store get rich...wholesale or retail?
themes are essential
If essence implies being, then how does a store use themes to get rich of beings? Could themes be used within retail to distract beings from wholesale?
multiple levels fostering a more immersive experience that encourages personal interpretation and emotional resonance.
Like multiple levels of cornflakes within a store? Is this really done to foster/promote growth within a buyer who experiences personal interpretation and emotional resonance when looking at cornflakes?
A kid looking at cornflakes doesn't think about organized jewish crime or the sugar quay in the city of london...the theme playing in a kids mind is more likely about Tony the Tiger; right?
the most evil, toxic, and harmful
a) Aka DEFAMATION...
b) LEAGUE/ligo - "to bind" + FAME/fama/bha - "to speak"...consenting to any suggested word binds ones free will of choice to a definition/definite - "affixed".
double standard
a) Reason. Ones consent to a suggested standard by another one implies dualism, hence a double standard tempting one to reason against others over the suggested standard.
b) Standard aka "stand hard" tempts one to ignore being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka standing within a moving foundation aka a soft standing.
c) Few suggest standards as a rallying point for military forces...these forces rallying against each other imply many reasoning against each other over suggested standards.
a retarded question
To retard implies to delay/stop motion, which contradicts quesTION (action; motion)...establishing this contradiction within the minds of many is how few reign over them.
What are you even referring to...
REFER', verb (Latin refero) - " to direct"...what directs matter? What's the foundation of matter? If matter is odd; then what's even?
Question I've never seen
a) A quest implies towards an outcome; while ones sight implies in response to origin...that's why question chasing answers makes it so hard for one to see solution.
b) Have you ever seen "nothing ever" (never)? If so, could you please describe what you saw?
what's on the other side
An other can only exist in-between sides. Differentiation from one another implies being (life) in-between origin (inception) and outcome (death).
Few suggest sides to tempt many to "choose" a side, while ignoring that choice can only exist at center. By holding onto a suggested side, one ignores self at center for another. That's how a few operate from center of many through a central bank or a central intelligence agency or central communication or central credit union or the...center of gravity.
the disk
Disk/deik - "to show"...any suggestion shown by another becomes circular logic within self aka a conflict of reason against another. Few put on a show to tempt many to ignore that nature draws an ongoing line (inception towards death) for each temporary shape (life) within.
Awaiting
Aka waiting for suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin... a good goy attitude.
I adapt to whatever inspires...like for example "keyword". Ones consent to a suggested word binds one to a definition aka definite/affixed, therefore a word implies a lock and ones choice the key.
Sleight of hand right here; "know something" aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka the known EDGE.
- There's something wrong with the world today....I don't KNOW what it is
- Something's wrong with our eyes...we're seeing things in a different way
- And God KNOWS it ain't his...it sure ain't no surprise, yeah
- We're livin' on the EDGE
terrorized
TER'ROR, noun (Latin terreo, to frighten)... fear can only enter if invited in.
Economically? No. Freedomly? Also no
Eco (offspring aka originating from) nom/nem (to take) aka originating from taking the suggestion of another by ones free will of choice, which establishes dominance of another over one.
The jab/injection had to be taken in...
- Consent to suggestion establishes a conflict of reason.
- Reason implies the foundation of opposition against another.
- Few suggesting gain control over both sides, within any conflict of reason, by consent of many.
- Control implies "rolled together" and refers to many rolled together within conflicts of reason.
- Rolled together like "ouroboros" eating itself...
To prevent others control over opposition...resist control aka circular logic aka conflicts of reason by not giving consent to ANY suggested information.
If one chooses a side within a conflict of reason; then one looses control over ones choice to a suggestion by a chosen one.
A solid (life) can only exist within fluid (inception towards death). Can a "stone" be liquefied and grown into shape? Can heat melt small stones into larger ones?