a) Noah/noach - "rest; cessation of motion"...an inversion of being which can only exist within (life) motion (inception towards death).
b) To be implies "one of a kind"...hence the inversion of two together.
c) Suggesting a floating vessel as a depository from a flood inverts being a submerged (inception towards death) vessel (life) exposed through flood aka form within flow.
d) Working towards the flood tempts one to ignore being the formed response within flood/flow.
e) The ark of deposition inverts the arc of rising (life) during fall (inception towards death).
f) Noah brings together aka abraham aka abh (father) of raham (multitude)...hence the covenant/convenire - "come together".
Nature sets each one within apart from one another.
g) Nature implies solution (inception towards death) for problems (life)...not salvation (to save).
h) Suggested "Olam Ha-Ba" (world to come) inverts perceivable Ba-Ha Olam (come to world), hence coming (inception towards death) towards being (life).
christ conspiracy
To christen implies to anoint aka each off-spring coming through the birth-channel, which implies a setting free of spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe).
Conspiracy implies breathing (spria) together (con)...hence contradicting christening.
roundly debunked
Roundly implies circular logic, hence keeping one within the same conflict of reason...verify vs debunk. Doing so represents the ouroboros eating itself.
zeitgeist
- Zeit/time/tidiz - "divide" + Geist/ghost/spirit/spiro - "to breathe"
A jew suggests time as a conflict between past (always loosing) and future (never reaching), which imbalances a gentile choice, while giving control of presence/present to a chosen one.
Suggested past tricks the gentile to hold onto memories; while suggested future tempts the gentile to seek outcomes, while ignoring to adapt (matter) to origin (motion) now (momentum)...matter holding onto anything makes it harder to sustain itself within motion, and matter trying to reach the end of motion destroys matter.
Letting go of time allows one to discern self as within spirit, hence being able to inhale (inception) and exhale (death) what goes through one (life).
Bonus: Holy (whole motion) Ghost (spirit of momentum) for each breathing body (matter) of Christ coming to be within.
what is there to "mock"
- WAS perceivable = origin
- IS suggested = mockery
To mock implies to imitate; simulate; resemble closely...mockery/mimicry.
jews hate the cross
- Vertical...implication (if/then)
- Horizontal...reason (versus)
Love vs hate implies a conflict of reason about a suggestion. Whichever side one chooses fixes one against the other, hence nailing one to the cross horizontally (life vs life), while ignoring to be moved vertically/velocity (inception towards death).
A jew suggests theism (the) and moralism (love or hate) to tempt gentiles to submit by consent to those suggesting, while fighting each other within a conflict of reason (love vs hate).
Notice that a jew sells gentiles both what they love and what they hate. Printing and distributing bibles worldwide...that ain't a Christian business.
What are they trying to get you to do.
Tempting ones consent.
What's their "agenda".
Collectivize reactions by others.
denomination
Action (ation) doesn't divide (de) by name (nomin)...action separates reactions from one another.
transistor
Aka transfer (inception towards death) + resistance (life)...
back and forth
Aka alternation (life) within motion (inception towards death)...
computation
That implies putting together (com-pute), which tempts one to ignore that transfer of resistance and alternation within motion implies a setting apart from one another.
Why did few suggest many to use computers?
pinball
Poking (pin) baal (ball) stokes the flames within...
b=6...don't just think letters to numbers, but also shapes in motion aka bending light.
Try asking your old jew friend about the origin of Hebrew letters; composed of consonances, through the core of an apple.
- ABCDEF
- 123456
"Don’t ascribe to malice what can be plainly explained by incompetence"
Ascribe/ascrive/attribute/credit/creed implies ones consent to a suggestion by another, which also implies a) coming together (competere) and b) the malice to contest another within a conflict of reason.
Anything ascribed to another tempts one to ignore being an attribute of nature.
in front of the curtain
Curtain implies ignorance...therefore ones free will of choice in front of the curtain; suggestions by another on stage, and perceivable behind the curtain.
Malice is being attributed by those in front of the curtain to those on stage and to one another.
DEI is a distraction
a) Equal (inception towards death) sets Diverse (life) free from one another...many consenting to few includes/encloses them within suggested aka collectivism.
b) WAS implies perceivable revelation; IS implies suggested distraction.
One doesn't need to suggest anyone what is....one needs to adapt to all that was (perceivable) before one came to be (perception).
All was perceivable before one can suggest what it is, which tempts others to add to suggested...like doubling down on opinions.
enough is enough
If it's enough, then why double it?
they want...people had been kept falling for this
To keep implies wanting to hold onto vs not wanting to let go. This conflict is called reason and contradicts implication of being (life) within motion (inception towards death), hence needing to let go of wanted temptations.
Robspierre and Hitler
Aka wanting to follow leaders vs not wanting to be left behind the lead.
money is made from the advertisements
M-one-y/my one is made from turning (vert) minds (ments) towards (ad) outcome, hence away from origin and against one another.
controversies sell
Buying vs selling implies a conflict of reason aka ones mind turned (ver) against (contra) another.
to claim that advertisement doesn't want
An advertisement implies a suggestion aiming at the consent of those who claim a side aka wanting or not wanting suggested. Whichever side is chosen turns those consenting against one another, hence ad-vert + contro-ver.
mainstream
Coming to be implies as opposite within mainstream aka as resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)...the suggested mainstream tempts one to follow, while turning from ones position as resistance aka ad-vert.
over the target
Targeting implies towards an outcome, hence turning away from origin...God.
the land itself is what is spewing us out
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) spews/expels/drives out each one balancing on land; breathing air, and being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) of water.
In short...spewing (flow) generates land (form).
things like beastiality
a) Beast aka being astute/discerning.
b) Animal/anima/animation, hence being (life) animated (inception towards death).
c) To be implies different (life) during same (inception towards death)...few tempt many to respond "alike", which equalizes differences among them.
This also implies mixing human and animal. So long as many ignore to be different from one another, so long will few utilize mixing against them, by simply tempting together all differences.
the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up
Hence L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implying a flow state (inception towards death) for each form (life) within.
In other words...an off-spring (child) sprouts from the seed (man) within soil (woman), and withers back into origin (motion).
All the descriptions within scriptures suggested tempt one to hold onto the written/spoken word, while ignoring the flowing sound.
When you hear "land" you think matter. What you ignore is that you are balancing on land, which implies motion. Notice a child struggling to stand up and walk, and how easy it is for an adult to ignore that continuous struggle until getting older...
overcome
Coming implies to be within...over vs under tempts one to ignore that, while establishing imbalance to ones position.
Is there a conflict between "waters above and waters below" or are they in balance with one another?
What does life, while being moved from inception towards death, overcome? What can a problem (temporary form) within a solution (ongoing flow) overcome? Itself?
What if one doesn't need to overcome or understand others; but rise (life) during fall (inception towards death)?
I do not think God cares
Care implies "burden of mind"...God implies caretaker aka taking whatever burden those within choose to hold onto.
In other words...caring implies wanting to hold onto; care-taking implies needing to let go. If one cares; then one carries burdens of another within self, while ignoring that nature implies nurture; nourish aka the loss (inception towards death) which promotes growth (life).
two different
There can be only one. First commandment..."you shall have no other gods before me".
Differentiation implies from whole (oneness) into partials (ones)...two implies counting together that which the one and only "god" set apart from one another.
pervert nature
Latin pervertere implies "to overturn". Partials cannot overturn whole, but they can trick each other to turn against one another within conflicts of reason aka "circular" logic.
Nature implies implication (balance); perversion implies reason (imbalance).
which is a sin
Nature directs (inception towards death); those within react (life). Choosing to ignore direction by reacting against one another implies ones voluntary departure aka sin.
Sin/syn - "together; with" contradicts being "apart from one another"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/syn-#etymonline_v_24489
if you have Scripture that shows other wise, I will reconsider.
Ones consent to a suggested script contradicts SCRIPT/SKRIBH - "to separate" because consent joins together with suggested, hence con-sider (siding together).
using technology to manipulate biology
If bio (life) uses tekhnē (artifice); then it manipulates itself against one another within conflicts of reason (logy).
A crime against God
a) Partials within whole can only be against one another...never against whole.
b) Crime/crimen/krei - "to distinguish" implies natural law setting itself apart into each crime within.
important
Nature gives out whole (balance) for free (choice)...few within tempt many to ignore that with import (consent) and export (suggestion) for the fee of selling self out.
before all is lost
All implies loss (inception towards death) forwarding being (life)....few suggest before as the inversion of forward being; what all is as the inversion of what all was before one came to be within, and lost as that which cannot be found to distract one from discerning self as being growth within the foundation of loss.
Psycho/psyche implies animating power. Synagogue aka syn (together) agein (put in motion) tempts one to ignore that animating power (inception towards death) sets each off-spring within (life) apart from one another.
Ones consent to any suggestion tempts one to claim/take into possession/take ownership of, while ignoring that perceivable cannot be held onto, since it's an animating power.
Possession (consent) diminishes potential (choice) by shirking response-ability onto another...onto a chosen one. Ignoring ones choice by consenting to a chosen ones suggestion turns one against every other one within a conflict of reason.
Turning while being (life) directed (inception towards death) implies "one who opposes, obstructs, or reacts as an adversary" aka satan.
It's implied...otherwise one couldn't be alive.
Experts all agree
a) Being able to agree and test out (ex peritus) implies as one within all.
b) Expert vs amateur and agree vs disagree implies conflicts of reason, shaped by ones consent to a suggestion (scientism + definitionism) by another.
utopia
Suggested ou (not) topos (place) aka nowhere tempts one to ignore being within all aka placed somewhere within everywhere.
is possible, and it's desirable
What if desire (wanting outcome) diminishes potential (needing origin)?
all people are equal
That implies equalizing (inception towards death) each different (life) person.
equal, free
Equal (whole) differentiates (partials) by setting each one apart from one another, hence setting free (choice) within dominance (balance).
How does whole (motion) differentiate (matter)? Balance (momentum)...
brothers
Who suggested the Brotherhood of Man?
white light
White implies "pure light"; black implies "absence of light"...neither of which one can perceive from within the visible spectrum of light. Why? Because each ray (matter) within spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) is different from one another, hence neither pure, nor able to exist with the absence of light.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Def-leppard-white-lightning-lyrics
- You (life) got both ends (inception/death) burning like a moth to a flame
- You're (choice) going off the rails (balance) like a runaway train
- It's a no win situation (because outcome implies origin), there's no way out (while being within way)
Bible/biblio/book/boken/bocian - "to grant or assign by charter; to record"...ones consent grants or assigns by charter of ones will to record within ones mind/memory the suggested information by another.
Consent permits others to inscribe information; definition; truth; matter of fact etc. into one...digging into that doesn't help one to clear ones mind.
There are plenty
There can be only one...
old
Nothing new aka choosing suggested "new" over perceivable "now" implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing).
a number which binds
Aka ONE binding self to another when consenting to suggestions.
Time would appear to traverse faster and faster
Appearances can be deceiving...velocity (inception towards death) remains steady; while resistance (life) fluctuates.
There would not be one...
There can be only one...unless ONE ignores self by counting others.
black cube kikes
a) Being implies in-between left/right + front/back + up/down aka within a cube.
b) Ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested implies an absence of light (black), hence one lacking self discernment within pure light (white).
c) Consenting to suggested tempts one into a conflict of reason aka circular logic, hence permitting a kike/kikel - "circle" to encircle the square of ones cube in darkness.
Sleight of hand....al-Ka'ba al-Musharrafa aka Kaaba or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratur_des_Kreises
devil...divine
Divine/devil/divide/deviate/david as in affidavit aka AD (oath) FIDES (faith) DAVID (division)
mistaking
Taking (suggested information) implies missing (perceivable inspiration)...the former establishes a division (conflict of reason) by ones oath (will) of faith (consent) to another.
don't believe everything you hear
a) One hears perceivable; others whisper suggested.
b) E'AR, noun (Latin auris, auricula; audio) from root au - "to perceive".
c) Ones consent to suggested splits perceivable (audio/ear)...
Where is ones choice situated before choosing among both sides suggested by talking heads?
Certain/certus/fixed...what if a solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) cannot be fixed?
Even (balance) generates odds (choice)...odds trusting each other implies uneven.